Targeting cardiovascular inflammation for imaging: Comparison of the uptake of multiple tracers in leukocyte subpopulations
Objectives: Localized inflammation in myocardium and vasculature has emerged as a therapeutic and imaging target for cardiovascular disease. A range of different radiotracers have been evaluated for assessment of inflammatory cell infiltration, but the precise cell populations responsible for the in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978) 2017-05, Vol.58, p.302 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 302 |
container_title | The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978) |
container_volume | 58 |
creator | Thackeray, James Ross, Tobias Ludwig Bankstahl, Jens Wester, Hans Bengel, Frank |
description | Objectives: Localized inflammation in myocardium and vasculature has emerged as a therapeutic and imaging target for cardiovascular disease. A range of different radiotracers have been evaluated for assessment of inflammatory cell infiltration, but the precise cell populations responsible for the in vivo signal remain elusive. We aimed to characterize the cellular binding profiles of five candidate inflammation radiotracers. Methods: Radiotracers evaluated were: 18F-deoxyglucose (FDG), labeled amino acids 18F-fluoroethyltyrosine (FET) and 11C-methionine (MET), mitochondrial translocator protein (TSPO)-targeted 18F-GE180, and leukocyte-expressed chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4) targeted 68Ga-pentixafor. All tracers were previously shown to be useful for imaging of myocardial inflammation in preclinical and/or clinical models. Uptake assays were performed in THP-1 derived macrophages with classical polarization, and in peripheral blood leukocyte subpopulations purified by magnetic immunoseparation. Results: All tracers demonstrated specific uptake by polarized macrophages. FDG uptake was consistently higher than for other tracers, with intermediate uptake of GE180, and comparatively low accumulation of MET, FET, and pentixafor, reflecting slower transport rates of amino acids and lower expression of CXCR4, respectively. Most tracers showed higher accumulation in proinflammatory M1 macrophages over M2. FDG uptake was 20-fold higher in M1 compared to M2 (p |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2039865853</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2039865853</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_20398658533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjEFKBDEQRYM4YOt4hwLXDWmbxOh2UDzA7IeyrW4zk3TFVCKIlzcDHsDV5___eBeqG8xoemPtw6Xq9GCH3hhtrtS1yFFrbZ1znfrZY16o-HWBCfO75y-UqQbM4Nc5YIxYPK8wcxsiLo17gh3HhNlL23mG8kFQU8ETnVusofgUCErGibI0DQSqJ56-C4HUt8Sp6c9S2arNjEHo9i9v1N3L83732qfMn5WkHI5c89quw70eH501zozj_6hfpghR5Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2039865853</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Targeting cardiovascular inflammation for imaging: Comparison of the uptake of multiple tracers in leukocyte subpopulations</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Thackeray, James ; Ross, Tobias Ludwig ; Bankstahl, Jens ; Wester, Hans ; Bengel, Frank</creator><creatorcontrib>Thackeray, James ; Ross, Tobias Ludwig ; Bankstahl, Jens ; Wester, Hans ; Bengel, Frank</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: Localized inflammation in myocardium and vasculature has emerged as a therapeutic and imaging target for cardiovascular disease. A range of different radiotracers have been evaluated for assessment of inflammatory cell infiltration, but the precise cell populations responsible for the in vivo signal remain elusive. We aimed to characterize the cellular binding profiles of five candidate inflammation radiotracers. Methods: Radiotracers evaluated were: 18F-deoxyglucose (FDG), labeled amino acids 18F-fluoroethyltyrosine (FET) and 11C-methionine (MET), mitochondrial translocator protein (TSPO)-targeted 18F-GE180, and leukocyte-expressed chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4) targeted 68Ga-pentixafor. All tracers were previously shown to be useful for imaging of myocardial inflammation in preclinical and/or clinical models. Uptake assays were performed in THP-1 derived macrophages with classical polarization, and in peripheral blood leukocyte subpopulations purified by magnetic immunoseparation. Results: All tracers demonstrated specific uptake by polarized macrophages. FDG uptake was consistently higher than for other tracers, with intermediate uptake of GE180, and comparatively low accumulation of MET, FET, and pentixafor, reflecting slower transport rates of amino acids and lower expression of CXCR4, respectively. Most tracers showed higher accumulation in proinflammatory M1 macrophages over M2. FDG uptake was 20-fold higher in M1 compared to M2 (p<0.001), FET was 13-fold higher (p<0.001), MET was 10-fold higher (p=0.03), and GE180 was 7-fold higher (p<0.001). By contrast, pentixafor showed comparable accumulation in M1 and M2 polarized macrophages, suggesting similar expression of CXCR4 in these cells (p=NS). In peripheral blood leukocytes, CD177-positive neutrophils tended to have the highest uptake of FDG, MET, and FET, reflecting high metabolic activity. By contrast, T- and B-lymphocytes showed relatively low uptake of metabolic tracers. Both GE180 and pentixafor displayed greater selectivity for CD11b-positive monocytes over other subtypes, supporting higher selectivity of TSPO and CXCR4 molecular targets (Fig). Conclusion: Inflammation-targeted tracers show subtle differences with regard to the identified leukocyte subpopulations. Whereas metabolic markers are characterized by high accumulation in neutrophils, more specific molecular markers TSPO and CXCR4 target different subsets of leukocytes. These differences in tracer uptake parameters should be considered when interpreting inflammation imaging data.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-5505</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-5667</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Society of Nuclear Medicine</publisher><subject>Accumulation ; Amino acids ; Binding sites ; Cardiovascular disease ; Cardiovascular diseases ; CD11b antigen ; Chemical compounds ; CXCR4 protein ; Deoxyglucose ; Imaging ; Infiltration ; Inflammation ; Leukocytes ; Leukocytes (neutrophilic) ; Lymphocytes ; Lymphocytes B ; Lymphocytes T ; Macrophages ; Markers ; Medical imaging ; Methionine ; Mitochondria ; Monocytes ; Myocardium ; Peripheral blood ; Proteins ; Radioactive tracers ; Selectivity ; Subpopulations ; Target recognition</subject><ispartof>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978), 2017-05, Vol.58, p.302</ispartof><rights>Copyright Society of Nuclear Medicine May 1, 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thackeray, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, Tobias Ludwig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bankstahl, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wester, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bengel, Frank</creatorcontrib><title>Targeting cardiovascular inflammation for imaging: Comparison of the uptake of multiple tracers in leukocyte subpopulations</title><title>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)</title><description>Objectives: Localized inflammation in myocardium and vasculature has emerged as a therapeutic and imaging target for cardiovascular disease. A range of different radiotracers have been evaluated for assessment of inflammatory cell infiltration, but the precise cell populations responsible for the in vivo signal remain elusive. We aimed to characterize the cellular binding profiles of five candidate inflammation radiotracers. Methods: Radiotracers evaluated were: 18F-deoxyglucose (FDG), labeled amino acids 18F-fluoroethyltyrosine (FET) and 11C-methionine (MET), mitochondrial translocator protein (TSPO)-targeted 18F-GE180, and leukocyte-expressed chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4) targeted 68Ga-pentixafor. All tracers were previously shown to be useful for imaging of myocardial inflammation in preclinical and/or clinical models. Uptake assays were performed in THP-1 derived macrophages with classical polarization, and in peripheral blood leukocyte subpopulations purified by magnetic immunoseparation. Results: All tracers demonstrated specific uptake by polarized macrophages. FDG uptake was consistently higher than for other tracers, with intermediate uptake of GE180, and comparatively low accumulation of MET, FET, and pentixafor, reflecting slower transport rates of amino acids and lower expression of CXCR4, respectively. Most tracers showed higher accumulation in proinflammatory M1 macrophages over M2. FDG uptake was 20-fold higher in M1 compared to M2 (p<0.001), FET was 13-fold higher (p<0.001), MET was 10-fold higher (p=0.03), and GE180 was 7-fold higher (p<0.001). By contrast, pentixafor showed comparable accumulation in M1 and M2 polarized macrophages, suggesting similar expression of CXCR4 in these cells (p=NS). In peripheral blood leukocytes, CD177-positive neutrophils tended to have the highest uptake of FDG, MET, and FET, reflecting high metabolic activity. By contrast, T- and B-lymphocytes showed relatively low uptake of metabolic tracers. Both GE180 and pentixafor displayed greater selectivity for CD11b-positive monocytes over other subtypes, supporting higher selectivity of TSPO and CXCR4 molecular targets (Fig). Conclusion: Inflammation-targeted tracers show subtle differences with regard to the identified leukocyte subpopulations. Whereas metabolic markers are characterized by high accumulation in neutrophils, more specific molecular markers TSPO and CXCR4 target different subsets of leukocytes. These differences in tracer uptake parameters should be considered when interpreting inflammation imaging data.</description><subject>Accumulation</subject><subject>Amino acids</subject><subject>Binding sites</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Cardiovascular diseases</subject><subject>CD11b antigen</subject><subject>Chemical compounds</subject><subject>CXCR4 protein</subject><subject>Deoxyglucose</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Infiltration</subject><subject>Inflammation</subject><subject>Leukocytes</subject><subject>Leukocytes (neutrophilic)</subject><subject>Lymphocytes</subject><subject>Lymphocytes B</subject><subject>Lymphocytes T</subject><subject>Macrophages</subject><subject>Markers</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Methionine</subject><subject>Mitochondria</subject><subject>Monocytes</subject><subject>Myocardium</subject><subject>Peripheral blood</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Radioactive tracers</subject><subject>Selectivity</subject><subject>Subpopulations</subject><subject>Target recognition</subject><issn>0161-5505</issn><issn>1535-5667</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNjEFKBDEQRYM4YOt4hwLXDWmbxOh2UDzA7IeyrW4zk3TFVCKIlzcDHsDV5___eBeqG8xoemPtw6Xq9GCH3hhtrtS1yFFrbZ1znfrZY16o-HWBCfO75y-UqQbM4Nc5YIxYPK8wcxsiLo17gh3HhNlL23mG8kFQU8ETnVusofgUCErGibI0DQSqJ56-C4HUt8Sp6c9S2arNjEHo9i9v1N3L83732qfMn5WkHI5c89quw70eH501zozj_6hfpghR5Q</recordid><startdate>20170501</startdate><enddate>20170501</enddate><creator>Thackeray, James</creator><creator>Ross, Tobias Ludwig</creator><creator>Bankstahl, Jens</creator><creator>Wester, Hans</creator><creator>Bengel, Frank</creator><general>Society of Nuclear Medicine</general><scope>4T-</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170501</creationdate><title>Targeting cardiovascular inflammation for imaging: Comparison of the uptake of multiple tracers in leukocyte subpopulations</title><author>Thackeray, James ; Ross, Tobias Ludwig ; Bankstahl, Jens ; Wester, Hans ; Bengel, Frank</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20398658533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Accumulation</topic><topic>Amino acids</topic><topic>Binding sites</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Cardiovascular diseases</topic><topic>CD11b antigen</topic><topic>Chemical compounds</topic><topic>CXCR4 protein</topic><topic>Deoxyglucose</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Infiltration</topic><topic>Inflammation</topic><topic>Leukocytes</topic><topic>Leukocytes (neutrophilic)</topic><topic>Lymphocytes</topic><topic>Lymphocytes B</topic><topic>Lymphocytes T</topic><topic>Macrophages</topic><topic>Markers</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Methionine</topic><topic>Mitochondria</topic><topic>Monocytes</topic><topic>Myocardium</topic><topic>Peripheral blood</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Radioactive tracers</topic><topic>Selectivity</topic><topic>Subpopulations</topic><topic>Target recognition</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thackeray, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, Tobias Ludwig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bankstahl, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wester, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bengel, Frank</creatorcontrib><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thackeray, James</au><au>Ross, Tobias Ludwig</au><au>Bankstahl, Jens</au><au>Wester, Hans</au><au>Bengel, Frank</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Targeting cardiovascular inflammation for imaging: Comparison of the uptake of multiple tracers in leukocyte subpopulations</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)</jtitle><date>2017-05-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>58</volume><spage>302</spage><pages>302-</pages><issn>0161-5505</issn><eissn>1535-5667</eissn><abstract>Objectives: Localized inflammation in myocardium and vasculature has emerged as a therapeutic and imaging target for cardiovascular disease. A range of different radiotracers have been evaluated for assessment of inflammatory cell infiltration, but the precise cell populations responsible for the in vivo signal remain elusive. We aimed to characterize the cellular binding profiles of five candidate inflammation radiotracers. Methods: Radiotracers evaluated were: 18F-deoxyglucose (FDG), labeled amino acids 18F-fluoroethyltyrosine (FET) and 11C-methionine (MET), mitochondrial translocator protein (TSPO)-targeted 18F-GE180, and leukocyte-expressed chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4) targeted 68Ga-pentixafor. All tracers were previously shown to be useful for imaging of myocardial inflammation in preclinical and/or clinical models. Uptake assays were performed in THP-1 derived macrophages with classical polarization, and in peripheral blood leukocyte subpopulations purified by magnetic immunoseparation. Results: All tracers demonstrated specific uptake by polarized macrophages. FDG uptake was consistently higher than for other tracers, with intermediate uptake of GE180, and comparatively low accumulation of MET, FET, and pentixafor, reflecting slower transport rates of amino acids and lower expression of CXCR4, respectively. Most tracers showed higher accumulation in proinflammatory M1 macrophages over M2. FDG uptake was 20-fold higher in M1 compared to M2 (p<0.001), FET was 13-fold higher (p<0.001), MET was 10-fold higher (p=0.03), and GE180 was 7-fold higher (p<0.001). By contrast, pentixafor showed comparable accumulation in M1 and M2 polarized macrophages, suggesting similar expression of CXCR4 in these cells (p=NS). In peripheral blood leukocytes, CD177-positive neutrophils tended to have the highest uptake of FDG, MET, and FET, reflecting high metabolic activity. By contrast, T- and B-lymphocytes showed relatively low uptake of metabolic tracers. Both GE180 and pentixafor displayed greater selectivity for CD11b-positive monocytes over other subtypes, supporting higher selectivity of TSPO and CXCR4 molecular targets (Fig). Conclusion: Inflammation-targeted tracers show subtle differences with regard to the identified leukocyte subpopulations. Whereas metabolic markers are characterized by high accumulation in neutrophils, more specific molecular markers TSPO and CXCR4 target different subsets of leukocytes. These differences in tracer uptake parameters should be considered when interpreting inflammation imaging data.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Society of Nuclear Medicine</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0161-5505 |
ispartof | The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978), 2017-05, Vol.58, p.302 |
issn | 0161-5505 1535-5667 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2039865853 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Accumulation Amino acids Binding sites Cardiovascular disease Cardiovascular diseases CD11b antigen Chemical compounds CXCR4 protein Deoxyglucose Imaging Infiltration Inflammation Leukocytes Leukocytes (neutrophilic) Lymphocytes Lymphocytes B Lymphocytes T Macrophages Markers Medical imaging Methionine Mitochondria Monocytes Myocardium Peripheral blood Proteins Radioactive tracers Selectivity Subpopulations Target recognition |
title | Targeting cardiovascular inflammation for imaging: Comparison of the uptake of multiple tracers in leukocyte subpopulations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T08%3A25%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Targeting%20cardiovascular%20inflammation%20for%20imaging:%20Comparison%20of%20the%20uptake%20of%20multiple%20tracers%20in%20leukocyte%20subpopulations&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20nuclear%20medicine%20(1978)&rft.au=Thackeray,%20James&rft.date=2017-05-01&rft.volume=58&rft.spage=302&rft.pages=302-&rft.issn=0161-5505&rft.eissn=1535-5667&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2039865853%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2039865853&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |