Visitation Orders, Family Courts, and Fragile Families

Despite proposals to make parenting time a part of all new child support orders, limited research has examined why some unmarried are more likely than others to establish legal visitation agreements. This mixed‐methods study draws on qualitative data collected from unmarried mothers and fathers livi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of marriage and family 2018-06, Vol.80 (3), p.653-670
Hauptverfasser: Waller, Maureen R., Dwyer Emory, Allison
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 670
container_issue 3
container_start_page 653
container_title Journal of marriage and family
container_volume 80
creator Waller, Maureen R.
Dwyer Emory, Allison
description Despite proposals to make parenting time a part of all new child support orders, limited research has examined why some unmarried are more likely than others to establish legal visitation agreements. This mixed‐methods study draws on qualitative data collected from unmarried mothers and fathers living in New York (N = 70) to develop hypotheses about the contexts in which parents set up visitation orders, which are then tested in a large sample of unmarried parents living apart (N = 1,392). Both qualitative and quantitative findings show that disengagement, cooperation, and conflict in the coparenting relationship postseparation influence unmarried parents' decisions about whether to establish a legal visitation agreement. The qualitative data further illustrate how parents' distrust of the court system, preference for informal agreements, and uncertainty about the custody of nonmarital children inform their decisions. The article concludes by considering approaches for helping low‐conflict coparents set up visitation agreements outside of family court.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jomf.12480
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2039803154</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2039803154</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3670-f72930d5154cf58963556fe26340287c322cff77db611bf3161464c449a2c0b13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqWw4QsisUOkzNiOnSxRRXioqBtgazmOjRy1TbFTof59XcKauxmN5szrEnKNMMOk-65fuxlSXsIJmaDkmDPJ5CmZAFCaU86Lc3IRYwdJtIIJEZ8--kEPvt9ky9DaEO-yWq_9ap_N-10YUqo3bVYH_eVXdix5Gy_JmdOraK_-4pR81I_v8-d8sXx6mT8scsOEhNxJWjFoCyy4cUVZCVYUwlkqGAdaSsMoNc5J2TYCsXEMBXLBDeeVpgYaZFNyM87dhv57Z-OgunTVJq1UFFhVAkujE3U7Uib0MQbr1Db4tQ57haCOvqijL-rXlwTjCP-kh_b_kOp1-VaPPQfPnmIx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2039803154</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Visitation Orders, Family Courts, and Fragile Families</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Education Source</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Waller, Maureen R. ; Dwyer Emory, Allison</creator><creatorcontrib>Waller, Maureen R. ; Dwyer Emory, Allison</creatorcontrib><description>Despite proposals to make parenting time a part of all new child support orders, limited research has examined why some unmarried are more likely than others to establish legal visitation agreements. This mixed‐methods study draws on qualitative data collected from unmarried mothers and fathers living in New York (N = 70) to develop hypotheses about the contexts in which parents set up visitation orders, which are then tested in a large sample of unmarried parents living apart (N = 1,392). Both qualitative and quantitative findings show that disengagement, cooperation, and conflict in the coparenting relationship postseparation influence unmarried parents' decisions about whether to establish a legal visitation agreement. The qualitative data further illustrate how parents' distrust of the court system, preference for informal agreements, and uncertainty about the custody of nonmarital children inform their decisions. The article concludes by considering approaches for helping low‐conflict coparents set up visitation agreements outside of family court.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2445</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-3737</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jomf.12480</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Agreements ; Child custody ; Child Rearing ; Child support ; Childrearing practices ; Children ; Conflict ; Cooperation ; Coparenting ; Couples ; Courts ; Disengagement ; Divorce ; Family law ; Family Violence ; fatherhood ; Fathers ; Focus Groups ; fragile families ; Interviews ; Legal Problems ; Marriage ; mixed methodology ; Mixed Methods Research ; Mothers ; Parent participation ; Parents &amp; parenting ; Uncertainty ; Visitation ; Visiting rights</subject><ispartof>Journal of marriage and family, 2018-06, Vol.80 (3), p.653-670</ispartof><rights>2018 National Council on Family Relations</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Jun 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3670-f72930d5154cf58963556fe26340287c322cff77db611bf3161464c449a2c0b13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3670-f72930d5154cf58963556fe26340287c322cff77db611bf3161464c449a2c0b13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjomf.12480$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjomf.12480$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27321,27901,27902,33751,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Waller, Maureen R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dwyer Emory, Allison</creatorcontrib><title>Visitation Orders, Family Courts, and Fragile Families</title><title>Journal of marriage and family</title><description>Despite proposals to make parenting time a part of all new child support orders, limited research has examined why some unmarried are more likely than others to establish legal visitation agreements. This mixed‐methods study draws on qualitative data collected from unmarried mothers and fathers living in New York (N = 70) to develop hypotheses about the contexts in which parents set up visitation orders, which are then tested in a large sample of unmarried parents living apart (N = 1,392). Both qualitative and quantitative findings show that disengagement, cooperation, and conflict in the coparenting relationship postseparation influence unmarried parents' decisions about whether to establish a legal visitation agreement. The qualitative data further illustrate how parents' distrust of the court system, preference for informal agreements, and uncertainty about the custody of nonmarital children inform their decisions. The article concludes by considering approaches for helping low‐conflict coparents set up visitation agreements outside of family court.</description><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Child custody</subject><subject>Child Rearing</subject><subject>Child support</subject><subject>Childrearing practices</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Conflict</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Coparenting</subject><subject>Couples</subject><subject>Courts</subject><subject>Disengagement</subject><subject>Divorce</subject><subject>Family law</subject><subject>Family Violence</subject><subject>fatherhood</subject><subject>Fathers</subject><subject>Focus Groups</subject><subject>fragile families</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Legal Problems</subject><subject>Marriage</subject><subject>mixed methodology</subject><subject>Mixed Methods Research</subject><subject>Mothers</subject><subject>Parent participation</subject><subject>Parents &amp; parenting</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Visitation</subject><subject>Visiting rights</subject><issn>0022-2445</issn><issn>1741-3737</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>88H</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2N</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqWw4QsisUOkzNiOnSxRRXioqBtgazmOjRy1TbFTof59XcKauxmN5szrEnKNMMOk-65fuxlSXsIJmaDkmDPJ5CmZAFCaU86Lc3IRYwdJtIIJEZ8--kEPvt9ky9DaEO-yWq_9ap_N-10YUqo3bVYH_eVXdix5Gy_JmdOraK_-4pR81I_v8-d8sXx6mT8scsOEhNxJWjFoCyy4cUVZCVYUwlkqGAdaSsMoNc5J2TYCsXEMBXLBDeeVpgYaZFNyM87dhv57Z-OgunTVJq1UFFhVAkujE3U7Uib0MQbr1Db4tQ57haCOvqijL-rXlwTjCP-kh_b_kOp1-VaPPQfPnmIx</recordid><startdate>201806</startdate><enddate>201806</enddate><creator>Waller, Maureen R.</creator><creator>Dwyer Emory, Allison</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88H</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201806</creationdate><title>Visitation Orders, Family Courts, and Fragile Families</title><author>Waller, Maureen R. ; Dwyer Emory, Allison</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3670-f72930d5154cf58963556fe26340287c322cff77db611bf3161464c449a2c0b13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Child custody</topic><topic>Child Rearing</topic><topic>Child support</topic><topic>Childrearing practices</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Conflict</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Coparenting</topic><topic>Couples</topic><topic>Courts</topic><topic>Disengagement</topic><topic>Divorce</topic><topic>Family law</topic><topic>Family Violence</topic><topic>fatherhood</topic><topic>Fathers</topic><topic>Focus Groups</topic><topic>fragile families</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Legal Problems</topic><topic>Marriage</topic><topic>mixed methodology</topic><topic>Mixed Methods Research</topic><topic>Mothers</topic><topic>Parent participation</topic><topic>Parents &amp; parenting</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Visitation</topic><topic>Visiting rights</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Waller, Maureen R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dwyer Emory, Allison</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Religion Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Religion Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of marriage and family</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Waller, Maureen R.</au><au>Dwyer Emory, Allison</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Visitation Orders, Family Courts, and Fragile Families</atitle><jtitle>Journal of marriage and family</jtitle><date>2018-06</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>653</spage><epage>670</epage><pages>653-670</pages><issn>0022-2445</issn><eissn>1741-3737</eissn><abstract>Despite proposals to make parenting time a part of all new child support orders, limited research has examined why some unmarried are more likely than others to establish legal visitation agreements. This mixed‐methods study draws on qualitative data collected from unmarried mothers and fathers living in New York (N = 70) to develop hypotheses about the contexts in which parents set up visitation orders, which are then tested in a large sample of unmarried parents living apart (N = 1,392). Both qualitative and quantitative findings show that disengagement, cooperation, and conflict in the coparenting relationship postseparation influence unmarried parents' decisions about whether to establish a legal visitation agreement. The qualitative data further illustrate how parents' distrust of the court system, preference for informal agreements, and uncertainty about the custody of nonmarital children inform their decisions. The article concludes by considering approaches for helping low‐conflict coparents set up visitation agreements outside of family court.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/jomf.12480</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-2445
ispartof Journal of marriage and family, 2018-06, Vol.80 (3), p.653-670
issn 0022-2445
1741-3737
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2039803154
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Education Source; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Agreements
Child custody
Child Rearing
Child support
Childrearing practices
Children
Conflict
Cooperation
Coparenting
Couples
Courts
Disengagement
Divorce
Family law
Family Violence
fatherhood
Fathers
Focus Groups
fragile families
Interviews
Legal Problems
Marriage
mixed methodology
Mixed Methods Research
Mothers
Parent participation
Parents & parenting
Uncertainty
Visitation
Visiting rights
title Visitation Orders, Family Courts, and Fragile Families
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T20%3A45%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Visitation%20Orders,%20Family%20Courts,%20and%20Fragile%20Families&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20marriage%20and%20family&rft.au=Waller,%20Maureen%20R.&rft.date=2018-06&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=653&rft.epage=670&rft.pages=653-670&rft.issn=0022-2445&rft.eissn=1741-3737&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jomf.12480&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2039803154%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2039803154&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true