Why integrated health networks have failed / Commentaries / Reply
Over the last two decades, hospitals, physicians, and nursing homes have rushed to merge or partner with one another, cheered on by consultants, academics, and experts who claimed that such networking was imperative for these organizations to survive in an increasingly competitive environment. In th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Frontiers of health services management 2001-07, Vol.17 (4), p.3 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 3 |
container_title | Frontiers of health services management |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Friedman, Leonard Goes, Jim Coddington, Dean C Linenkugel, Nancy |
description | Over the last two decades, hospitals, physicians, and nursing homes have rushed to merge or partner with one another, cheered on by consultants, academics, and experts who claimed that such networking was imperative for these organizations to survive in an increasingly competitive environment. In the 1990s, however, reports of the major difficulties encountered by the merged entities began to dampen the industry's enthusiasm for integration, causing some to even question the value of the integration "revolution." This article will review the primary rationale behind integration and will assess its success to date. Based on field reports and the available evidence, a study concludes that IHNS have not delivered on their promise. While each network should be considered in its unique market and contextual situation, the enormous financial, human, and clinical resources devoted to integration have not borne much fruit. Evidence of quantifiable, sustained financial or clinical value is scant. A number of commentaries about the study are also presented. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_203888616</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>73769017</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2038886163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNiksKwjAUAIMoWD93CO6LSfpJXEpRXIvQZQn4alrTpCap0tvbhQdwNQwzMxSxlGcx4wc-RxHhqYgFzfgSrbxvCaEsyViEjqUacWMCPJwMcMcKpA4KGwgf654eK_kGXMtGT22PC9t1YIJ0DfhJr9DrcYMWtdQetj-u0e58uhWXuHf2NYAPVWsHZ6ZUMZIIIXKaJ39NX9R4OdQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>203888616</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why integrated health networks have failed / Commentaries / Reply</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Friedman, Leonard ; Goes, Jim ; Coddington, Dean C ; Linenkugel, Nancy</creator><creatorcontrib>Friedman, Leonard ; Goes, Jim ; Coddington, Dean C ; Linenkugel, Nancy</creatorcontrib><description>Over the last two decades, hospitals, physicians, and nursing homes have rushed to merge or partner with one another, cheered on by consultants, academics, and experts who claimed that such networking was imperative for these organizations to survive in an increasingly competitive environment. In the 1990s, however, reports of the major difficulties encountered by the merged entities began to dampen the industry's enthusiasm for integration, causing some to even question the value of the integration "revolution." This article will review the primary rationale behind integration and will assess its success to date. Based on field reports and the available evidence, a study concludes that IHNS have not delivered on their promise. While each network should be considered in its unique market and contextual situation, the enormous financial, human, and clinical resources devoted to integration have not borne much fruit. Evidence of quantifiable, sustained financial or clinical value is scant. A number of commentaries about the study are also presented.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0748-8157</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2475-2797</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies</publisher><subject>Corporate reorganization ; Cost shifting ; Health care expenditures ; Health care industry ; Health care networks ; Health care policy ; Health insurance ; Health maintenance organizations ; Health services ; HMOs ; Horizontal integration ; Hospitals ; Indigent care ; Industrywide conditions ; Integrated delivery systems ; Medicare ; Nursing homes ; Physician practice management ; Quality management ; Studies ; Total quality</subject><ispartof>Frontiers of health services management, 2001-07, Vol.17 (4), p.3</ispartof><rights>Copyright Health Administration Press Summer 2001</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Friedman, Leonard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goes, Jim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coddington, Dean C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linenkugel, Nancy</creatorcontrib><title>Why integrated health networks have failed / Commentaries / Reply</title><title>Frontiers of health services management</title><description>Over the last two decades, hospitals, physicians, and nursing homes have rushed to merge or partner with one another, cheered on by consultants, academics, and experts who claimed that such networking was imperative for these organizations to survive in an increasingly competitive environment. In the 1990s, however, reports of the major difficulties encountered by the merged entities began to dampen the industry's enthusiasm for integration, causing some to even question the value of the integration "revolution." This article will review the primary rationale behind integration and will assess its success to date. Based on field reports and the available evidence, a study concludes that IHNS have not delivered on their promise. While each network should be considered in its unique market and contextual situation, the enormous financial, human, and clinical resources devoted to integration have not borne much fruit. Evidence of quantifiable, sustained financial or clinical value is scant. A number of commentaries about the study are also presented.</description><subject>Corporate reorganization</subject><subject>Cost shifting</subject><subject>Health care expenditures</subject><subject>Health care industry</subject><subject>Health care networks</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Health insurance</subject><subject>Health maintenance organizations</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>HMOs</subject><subject>Horizontal integration</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Indigent care</subject><subject>Industrywide conditions</subject><subject>Integrated delivery systems</subject><subject>Medicare</subject><subject>Nursing homes</subject><subject>Physician practice management</subject><subject>Quality management</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Total quality</subject><issn>0748-8157</issn><issn>2475-2797</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNiksKwjAUAIMoWD93CO6LSfpJXEpRXIvQZQn4alrTpCap0tvbhQdwNQwzMxSxlGcx4wc-RxHhqYgFzfgSrbxvCaEsyViEjqUacWMCPJwMcMcKpA4KGwgf654eK_kGXMtGT22PC9t1YIJ0DfhJr9DrcYMWtdQetj-u0e58uhWXuHf2NYAPVWsHZ6ZUMZIIIXKaJ39NX9R4OdQ</recordid><startdate>20010701</startdate><enddate>20010701</enddate><creator>Friedman, Leonard</creator><creator>Goes, Jim</creator><creator>Coddington, Dean C</creator><creator>Linenkugel, Nancy</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4S-</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010701</creationdate><title>Why integrated health networks have failed / Commentaries / Reply</title><author>Friedman, Leonard ; Goes, Jim ; Coddington, Dean C ; Linenkugel, Nancy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2038886163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Corporate reorganization</topic><topic>Cost shifting</topic><topic>Health care expenditures</topic><topic>Health care industry</topic><topic>Health care networks</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Health insurance</topic><topic>Health maintenance organizations</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>HMOs</topic><topic>Horizontal integration</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Indigent care</topic><topic>Industrywide conditions</topic><topic>Integrated delivery systems</topic><topic>Medicare</topic><topic>Nursing homes</topic><topic>Physician practice management</topic><topic>Quality management</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Total quality</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Friedman, Leonard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goes, Jim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coddington, Dean C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linenkugel, Nancy</creatorcontrib><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>BPIR.com Limited</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Frontiers of health services management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Friedman, Leonard</au><au>Goes, Jim</au><au>Coddington, Dean C</au><au>Linenkugel, Nancy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why integrated health networks have failed / Commentaries / Reply</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers of health services management</jtitle><date>2001-07-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>3</spage><pages>3-</pages><issn>0748-8157</issn><eissn>2475-2797</eissn><abstract>Over the last two decades, hospitals, physicians, and nursing homes have rushed to merge or partner with one another, cheered on by consultants, academics, and experts who claimed that such networking was imperative for these organizations to survive in an increasingly competitive environment. In the 1990s, however, reports of the major difficulties encountered by the merged entities began to dampen the industry's enthusiasm for integration, causing some to even question the value of the integration "revolution." This article will review the primary rationale behind integration and will assess its success to date. Based on field reports and the available evidence, a study concludes that IHNS have not delivered on their promise. While each network should be considered in its unique market and contextual situation, the enormous financial, human, and clinical resources devoted to integration have not borne much fruit. Evidence of quantifiable, sustained financial or clinical value is scant. A number of commentaries about the study are also presented.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0748-8157 |
ispartof | Frontiers of health services management, 2001-07, Vol.17 (4), p.3 |
issn | 0748-8157 2475-2797 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_203888616 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Corporate reorganization Cost shifting Health care expenditures Health care industry Health care networks Health care policy Health insurance Health maintenance organizations Health services HMOs Horizontal integration Hospitals Indigent care Industrywide conditions Integrated delivery systems Medicare Nursing homes Physician practice management Quality management Studies Total quality |
title | Why integrated health networks have failed / Commentaries / Reply |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T20%3A01%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20integrated%20health%20networks%20have%20failed%20/%20Commentaries%20/%20Reply&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20of%20health%20services%20management&rft.au=Friedman,%20Leonard&rft.date=2001-07-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=3&rft.pages=3-&rft.issn=0748-8157&rft.eissn=2475-2797&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E73769017%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=203888616&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |