Literacy Conversations Between Adults and Children at Child Care: Descriptive Observations and Hypotheses

This study examines the nature of literacy-related, teacher-child talk in the daily routines of child care. The researchers focused on the incidence, features, and patterns of talk on a typical morning at three child care centers. With regard to the incidence of talk, observations indicated that the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of research in childhood education 2002-03, Vol.16 (2), p.212-231
Hauptverfasser: Rosemary, Catherine A., Roskos, Kathleen A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 231
container_issue 2
container_start_page 212
container_title Journal of research in childhood education
container_volume 16
creator Rosemary, Catherine A.
Roskos, Kathleen A.
description This study examines the nature of literacy-related, teacher-child talk in the daily routines of child care. The researchers focused on the incidence, features, and patterns of talk on a typical morning at three child care centers. With regard to the incidence of talk, observations indicated that the adults talked about reading and writing to a modest degree, compared to the total amount of talk with children. When adults did talk about reading and writing, it typically involved few children in brief exchanges that primarily gave information about print, or that met practical needs of daily routines. The incidence of the adults' literacy talk, aside from book talk, was primarily intermittent and spontaneous. Analysis of the discourse features of the teachers' literacy talk showed a similar pattern for all three teachers, namely one of getting/giving information and checking for understanding. Overall, the patterns reflected the natural teaching tendencies of telling, asking, and checking, features that are characteristic of transmissive teaching practices. The patterns found do not ignore literacy, but do not promote it either. These findings support the argument for improving and enriching the professional education literacy curriculum as the surest route for enriching and bettering the literacy environment for children at child care.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/02568540209594986
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_203888520</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A86875103</galeid><ericid>EJ654381</ericid><sourcerecordid>A86875103</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c555t-92b6b3c2faee4f3090539122ae64d7fdfbe0401a79f3997dc9fdf60d328cc95f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNksFuEzEQhi0EEiHwAEgcVpwQ6oK9Xu_aqJd0KWlRRA4UcbQc7zh1tVkH20mbt8fRVkhRU1H7MNbM9_-2xoPQW4I_EczxZ1ywirMSF1gwUQpePUOjgjCcF1VJnqPRvp4ngL5Er0K4wWmRsh4hO7MRvNK7rHH9FnxQ0bo-ZGcQbwH6bNJuuhgy1bdZc2271qecisM5a5SHL9lXCNrbdbRbyOaLAH5777EXXezWLl5DgPAavTCqC_DmPo7Rr2_nV81FPptPL5vJLNeMsZiLYlEtqC6MAigNxQIzKkhRKKjKtjatWQAuMVG1MFSIutUi5Src0oJrLZihY_R-8F1792cDIcobt_F9ulIWmHLOWQpjdDJAS9WBtL1xMTVhCX3qRed6MDalJ7ziNSOYJjw_gqfdwsrqY_yHAz4hEe7iUm1CkJc_fzwZPZseoB8fRydXv5sn-_Lp7AA9OYZq13WwBJl-p5kf4GTAtXcheDBy7e1K-Z0kWO6HUT4YxqR5N2jAW_2PP_9epYnkJJXrobxvrV-pW-e7Vka165w3XvXahoemMt7FpDz9r5I-_q6_p7n8Rg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>203888520</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Literacy Conversations Between Adults and Children at Child Care: Descriptive Observations and Hypotheses</title><source>Education Source</source><creator>Rosemary, Catherine A. ; Roskos, Kathleen A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rosemary, Catherine A. ; Roskos, Kathleen A.</creatorcontrib><description>This study examines the nature of literacy-related, teacher-child talk in the daily routines of child care. The researchers focused on the incidence, features, and patterns of talk on a typical morning at three child care centers. With regard to the incidence of talk, observations indicated that the adults talked about reading and writing to a modest degree, compared to the total amount of talk with children. When adults did talk about reading and writing, it typically involved few children in brief exchanges that primarily gave information about print, or that met practical needs of daily routines. The incidence of the adults' literacy talk, aside from book talk, was primarily intermittent and spontaneous. Analysis of the discourse features of the teachers' literacy talk showed a similar pattern for all three teachers, namely one of getting/giving information and checking for understanding. Overall, the patterns reflected the natural teaching tendencies of telling, asking, and checking, features that are characteristic of transmissive teaching practices. The patterns found do not ignore literacy, but do not promote it either. These findings support the argument for improving and enriching the professional education literacy curriculum as the surest route for enriching and bettering the literacy environment for children at child care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0256-8543</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2150-2641</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/02568540209594986</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Olney: Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Adult Child Relationship ; Adult-child relations ; Caregiver Child Relationship ; Caregiver Speech ; Case studies ; Child Care ; Child Care Centers ; Child Caregivers ; Children &amp; youth ; Children and adults ; Comparative Analysis ; Daily Routines ; Discourse Analysis ; Emergent Literacy ; Interpersonal communication ; Language Acquisition ; Language Patterns ; Learning Processes ; Literacy ; Professional Education ; Social aspects ; Teacher-student relations ; Teacher-student relationships ; Teachers ; Teaching Methods ; United States ; Young Children</subject><ispartof>Journal of research in childhood education, 2002-03, Vol.16 (2), p.212-231</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2002</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2002 Association for Childhood Education International</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2002 Association for Childhood Education International</rights><rights>Copyright Association for Childhood Education International Spring 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c555t-92b6b3c2faee4f3090539122ae64d7fdfbe0401a79f3997dc9fdf60d328cc95f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c555t-92b6b3c2faee4f3090539122ae64d7fdfbe0401a79f3997dc9fdf60d328cc95f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ654381$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rosemary, Catherine A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roskos, Kathleen A.</creatorcontrib><title>Literacy Conversations Between Adults and Children at Child Care: Descriptive Observations and Hypotheses</title><title>Journal of research in childhood education</title><addtitle>Journal of Research in Childhood Education</addtitle><description>This study examines the nature of literacy-related, teacher-child talk in the daily routines of child care. The researchers focused on the incidence, features, and patterns of talk on a typical morning at three child care centers. With regard to the incidence of talk, observations indicated that the adults talked about reading and writing to a modest degree, compared to the total amount of talk with children. When adults did talk about reading and writing, it typically involved few children in brief exchanges that primarily gave information about print, or that met practical needs of daily routines. The incidence of the adults' literacy talk, aside from book talk, was primarily intermittent and spontaneous. Analysis of the discourse features of the teachers' literacy talk showed a similar pattern for all three teachers, namely one of getting/giving information and checking for understanding. Overall, the patterns reflected the natural teaching tendencies of telling, asking, and checking, features that are characteristic of transmissive teaching practices. The patterns found do not ignore literacy, but do not promote it either. These findings support the argument for improving and enriching the professional education literacy curriculum as the surest route for enriching and bettering the literacy environment for children at child care.</description><subject>Adult Child Relationship</subject><subject>Adult-child relations</subject><subject>Caregiver Child Relationship</subject><subject>Caregiver Speech</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Child Care</subject><subject>Child Care Centers</subject><subject>Child Caregivers</subject><subject>Children &amp; youth</subject><subject>Children and adults</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Daily Routines</subject><subject>Discourse Analysis</subject><subject>Emergent Literacy</subject><subject>Interpersonal communication</subject><subject>Language Acquisition</subject><subject>Language Patterns</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Literacy</subject><subject>Professional Education</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Teacher-student relations</subject><subject>Teacher-student relationships</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Young Children</subject><issn>0256-8543</issn><issn>2150-2641</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNksFuEzEQhi0EEiHwAEgcVpwQ6oK9Xu_aqJd0KWlRRA4UcbQc7zh1tVkH20mbt8fRVkhRU1H7MNbM9_-2xoPQW4I_EczxZ1ywirMSF1gwUQpePUOjgjCcF1VJnqPRvp4ngL5Er0K4wWmRsh4hO7MRvNK7rHH9FnxQ0bo-ZGcQbwH6bNJuuhgy1bdZc2271qecisM5a5SHL9lXCNrbdbRbyOaLAH5777EXXezWLl5DgPAavTCqC_DmPo7Rr2_nV81FPptPL5vJLNeMsZiLYlEtqC6MAigNxQIzKkhRKKjKtjatWQAuMVG1MFSIutUi5Src0oJrLZihY_R-8F1792cDIcobt_F9ulIWmHLOWQpjdDJAS9WBtL1xMTVhCX3qRed6MDalJ7ziNSOYJjw_gqfdwsrqY_yHAz4hEe7iUm1CkJc_fzwZPZseoB8fRydXv5sn-_Lp7AA9OYZq13WwBJl-p5kf4GTAtXcheDBy7e1K-Z0kWO6HUT4YxqR5N2jAW_2PP_9epYnkJJXrobxvrV-pW-e7Vka165w3XvXahoemMt7FpDz9r5I-_q6_p7n8Rg</recordid><startdate>20020322</startdate><enddate>20020322</enddate><creator>Rosemary, Catherine A.</creator><creator>Roskos, Kathleen A.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><general>Association for Childhood Education International</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Inc</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>ATWCN</scope><scope>IBG</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020322</creationdate><title>Literacy Conversations Between Adults and Children at Child Care: Descriptive Observations and Hypotheses</title><author>Rosemary, Catherine A. ; Roskos, Kathleen A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c555t-92b6b3c2faee4f3090539122ae64d7fdfbe0401a79f3997dc9fdf60d328cc95f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adult Child Relationship</topic><topic>Adult-child relations</topic><topic>Caregiver Child Relationship</topic><topic>Caregiver Speech</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Child Care</topic><topic>Child Care Centers</topic><topic>Child Caregivers</topic><topic>Children &amp; youth</topic><topic>Children and adults</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Daily Routines</topic><topic>Discourse Analysis</topic><topic>Emergent Literacy</topic><topic>Interpersonal communication</topic><topic>Language Acquisition</topic><topic>Language Patterns</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Literacy</topic><topic>Professional Education</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Teacher-student relations</topic><topic>Teacher-student relationships</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Young Children</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rosemary, Catherine A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roskos, Kathleen A.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Middle School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Biography</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Education Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of research in childhood education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rosemary, Catherine A.</au><au>Roskos, Kathleen A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ654381</ericid><atitle>Literacy Conversations Between Adults and Children at Child Care: Descriptive Observations and Hypotheses</atitle><jtitle>Journal of research in childhood education</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of Research in Childhood Education</addtitle><date>2002-03-22</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>212</spage><epage>231</epage><pages>212-231</pages><issn>0256-8543</issn><eissn>2150-2641</eissn><abstract>This study examines the nature of literacy-related, teacher-child talk in the daily routines of child care. The researchers focused on the incidence, features, and patterns of talk on a typical morning at three child care centers. With regard to the incidence of talk, observations indicated that the adults talked about reading and writing to a modest degree, compared to the total amount of talk with children. When adults did talk about reading and writing, it typically involved few children in brief exchanges that primarily gave information about print, or that met practical needs of daily routines. The incidence of the adults' literacy talk, aside from book talk, was primarily intermittent and spontaneous. Analysis of the discourse features of the teachers' literacy talk showed a similar pattern for all three teachers, namely one of getting/giving information and checking for understanding. Overall, the patterns reflected the natural teaching tendencies of telling, asking, and checking, features that are characteristic of transmissive teaching practices. The patterns found do not ignore literacy, but do not promote it either. These findings support the argument for improving and enriching the professional education literacy curriculum as the surest route for enriching and bettering the literacy environment for children at child care.</abstract><cop>Olney</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/02568540209594986</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0256-8543
ispartof Journal of research in childhood education, 2002-03, Vol.16 (2), p.212-231
issn 0256-8543
2150-2641
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_203888520
source Education Source
subjects Adult Child Relationship
Adult-child relations
Caregiver Child Relationship
Caregiver Speech
Case studies
Child Care
Child Care Centers
Child Caregivers
Children & youth
Children and adults
Comparative Analysis
Daily Routines
Discourse Analysis
Emergent Literacy
Interpersonal communication
Language Acquisition
Language Patterns
Learning Processes
Literacy
Professional Education
Social aspects
Teacher-student relations
Teacher-student relationships
Teachers
Teaching Methods
United States
Young Children
title Literacy Conversations Between Adults and Children at Child Care: Descriptive Observations and Hypotheses
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T23%3A26%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Literacy%20Conversations%20Between%20Adults%20and%20Children%20at%20Child%20Care:%20Descriptive%20Observations%20and%20Hypotheses&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20research%20in%20childhood%20education&rft.au=Rosemary,%20Catherine%20A.&rft.date=2002-03-22&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=212&rft.epage=231&rft.pages=212-231&rft.issn=0256-8543&rft.eissn=2150-2641&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/02568540209594986&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA86875103%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=203888520&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A86875103&rft_ericid=EJ654381&rfr_iscdi=true