PTH-060 Evaluation Of An Established Community Gastroenterology Clinic With Comparison To Secondary Care
Introduction Community based specialist clinics improve patient experience and access to healthcare whilst improving GP-Specialist communication.1 Commissioning dictates that future management of chronic gastro-intestinal conditions needs to involve integrated care. We reviewed the outcomes of an es...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gut 2014-06, Vol.63 (Suppl 1), p.A235-A235 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | A235 |
---|---|
container_issue | Suppl 1 |
container_start_page | A235 |
container_title | Gut |
container_volume | 63 |
creator | Ahmad, OF Dawood, R Oesterling, C Rusk, D Akbar, A |
description | Introduction Community based specialist clinics improve patient experience and access to healthcare whilst improving GP-Specialist communication.1 Commissioning dictates that future management of chronic gastro-intestinal conditions needs to involve integrated care. We reviewed the outcomes of an established gastroenterology community clinic run for 3 years by two General Practitioners with a specialist interest in gastroenterology (GPwSIs) and a consultant gastroenterologist from the local hospital. Methods A weekly gastroenterology community clinic in primary care was established to service 35 local General Practices. Data was collected from January-September 2013 using referral letters and an electronic database and compared to the local hospital general gastroenterology clinics. Results Of 490 patients referred 284 (58%) were triaged to community, 188 (38%) referred onwards to secondary care and 18 (4%) were returned to the referring GP. 37% of appointments were conducted by the consultant. The proportion of patients that did not attend was lower in the community (10%) than secondary care (22%). 86% were discharged back to their referring GP; 16% after the 1st appointment and 84% after one further follow up appointment. Others were directly referred to relevant secondary care. 80% had further investigations (39% Gastroscopy, 24% Colonoscopy, 22% CT scan, 12% Ultrasound abdomen, 9% flexible sigmoidoscopy, 1% Oesophageal manometry) all performed in the local hospital. Median wait time from referral to 1st clinic appointment was 28 days in the community (56 days in the local hospital). Intra-clinic wait time in community was an average of 3 min (38 min in secondary care). A community patient satisfaction survey (N=102) revealed that 88% would definitely recommend the clinic to a friend, with high levels of satisfaction. A secondary care satisfaction survey (N=214) showed that although overall satisfaction was similar, there was relative dissatisfaction of waiting times, waiting area and communication. Conclusion This novel gastroenterology community clinic delivers high quality care closer to patients. It is associated with shorter refe, UKrral waiting times, high discharge rates and excellent patient satisfaction scores. Additional benefits include enhancement of primary/secondary care links, mentoring and teaching of GPwSIs, continuity of care and direct access to onward referral to secondary care for further management across specialties. Further follo |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307263.506 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2038763638</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2038763638</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b2186-852f7ace0babe912989f85da097d68d284e526feab54d4631a61f3b2e1f3ce43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkN9KwzAUh4MoOKevIAGvo_nTpunlGHMTBhMseBnSNt1S2mQmrbA7b3xRn8SM-gDenHPz_X7n8AFwT_AjIYw_7cehtR2imCSI4Yxy9phifgFmJOECMSrEJZhhTDKUZkl-DW5CaDHGQuRkBtrXYoMwxz9f36tP1Y1qMM7CXQMXFq7CoMrOhIOu4dL1_WjNcIJrFQbvtB20d53bn-CyM9ZU8N0MhzN2VN6E2FE4-KYrZ2vlI6O8vgVXjeqCvvvbc1A8r4rlBm1365flYotKSgRHIqVNpiqNS1XqnNBc5I1Ia4XzrOaipiLRKeWNVmWa1AlnRHHSsJLqOCudsDl4mGqP3n2MOgyydaO38aKkmImMM85EpPhEVd6F4HUjj9708VVJsDxrlZNWedYqJ60yao1BMgXLvv1v5hcHpn2P</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2038763638</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PTH-060 Evaluation Of An Established Community Gastroenterology Clinic With Comparison To Secondary Care</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ahmad, OF ; Dawood, R ; Oesterling, C ; Rusk, D ; Akbar, A</creator><creatorcontrib>Ahmad, OF ; Dawood, R ; Oesterling, C ; Rusk, D ; Akbar, A</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Community based specialist clinics improve patient experience and access to healthcare whilst improving GP-Specialist communication.1 Commissioning dictates that future management of chronic gastro-intestinal conditions needs to involve integrated care. We reviewed the outcomes of an established gastroenterology community clinic run for 3 years by two General Practitioners with a specialist interest in gastroenterology (GPwSIs) and a consultant gastroenterologist from the local hospital. Methods A weekly gastroenterology community clinic in primary care was established to service 35 local General Practices. Data was collected from January-September 2013 using referral letters and an electronic database and compared to the local hospital general gastroenterology clinics. Results Of 490 patients referred 284 (58%) were triaged to community, 188 (38%) referred onwards to secondary care and 18 (4%) were returned to the referring GP. 37% of appointments were conducted by the consultant. The proportion of patients that did not attend was lower in the community (10%) than secondary care (22%). 86% were discharged back to their referring GP; 16% after the 1st appointment and 84% after one further follow up appointment. Others were directly referred to relevant secondary care. 80% had further investigations (39% Gastroscopy, 24% Colonoscopy, 22% CT scan, 12% Ultrasound abdomen, 9% flexible sigmoidoscopy, 1% Oesophageal manometry) all performed in the local hospital. Median wait time from referral to 1st clinic appointment was 28 days in the community (56 days in the local hospital). Intra-clinic wait time in community was an average of 3 min (38 min in secondary care). A community patient satisfaction survey (N=102) revealed that 88% would definitely recommend the clinic to a friend, with high levels of satisfaction. A secondary care satisfaction survey (N=214) showed that although overall satisfaction was similar, there was relative dissatisfaction of waiting times, waiting area and communication. Conclusion This novel gastroenterology community clinic delivers high quality care closer to patients. It is associated with shorter refe, UKrral waiting times, high discharge rates and excellent patient satisfaction scores. Additional benefits include enhancement of primary/secondary care links, mentoring and teaching of GPwSIs, continuity of care and direct access to onward referral to secondary care for further management across specialties. Further follow up is necessary to evaluate the effect on local healthcare delivery. Reference 1 Powell J. Systematic review of outreach clinics in primary care in the UK. J Health Serv Res Policy 2002:7:177–83 Disclosure of Interest None Declared.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-5749</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-3288</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307263.506</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Clinics ; Colon ; Computed tomography ; Esophagus ; Gastroenterology ; Gastroscopy ; Intestine ; Parathyroid hormone ; Patient satisfaction ; Primary care ; Sigmoidoscopy ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>Gut, 2014-06, Vol.63 (Suppl 1), p.A235-A235</ispartof><rights>2014, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>Copyright: 2014 © 2014, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b2186-852f7ace0babe912989f85da097d68d284e526feab54d4631a61f3b2e1f3ce43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://gut.bmj.com/content/63/Suppl_1/A235.1.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://gut.bmj.com/content/63/Suppl_1/A235.1.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,776,780,3183,23550,27901,27902,77342,77373</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ahmad, OF</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawood, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oesterling, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rusk, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akbar, A</creatorcontrib><title>PTH-060 Evaluation Of An Established Community Gastroenterology Clinic With Comparison To Secondary Care</title><title>Gut</title><description>Introduction Community based specialist clinics improve patient experience and access to healthcare whilst improving GP-Specialist communication.1 Commissioning dictates that future management of chronic gastro-intestinal conditions needs to involve integrated care. We reviewed the outcomes of an established gastroenterology community clinic run for 3 years by two General Practitioners with a specialist interest in gastroenterology (GPwSIs) and a consultant gastroenterologist from the local hospital. Methods A weekly gastroenterology community clinic in primary care was established to service 35 local General Practices. Data was collected from January-September 2013 using referral letters and an electronic database and compared to the local hospital general gastroenterology clinics. Results Of 490 patients referred 284 (58%) were triaged to community, 188 (38%) referred onwards to secondary care and 18 (4%) were returned to the referring GP. 37% of appointments were conducted by the consultant. The proportion of patients that did not attend was lower in the community (10%) than secondary care (22%). 86% were discharged back to their referring GP; 16% after the 1st appointment and 84% after one further follow up appointment. Others were directly referred to relevant secondary care. 80% had further investigations (39% Gastroscopy, 24% Colonoscopy, 22% CT scan, 12% Ultrasound abdomen, 9% flexible sigmoidoscopy, 1% Oesophageal manometry) all performed in the local hospital. Median wait time from referral to 1st clinic appointment was 28 days in the community (56 days in the local hospital). Intra-clinic wait time in community was an average of 3 min (38 min in secondary care). A community patient satisfaction survey (N=102) revealed that 88% would definitely recommend the clinic to a friend, with high levels of satisfaction. A secondary care satisfaction survey (N=214) showed that although overall satisfaction was similar, there was relative dissatisfaction of waiting times, waiting area and communication. Conclusion This novel gastroenterology community clinic delivers high quality care closer to patients. It is associated with shorter refe, UKrral waiting times, high discharge rates and excellent patient satisfaction scores. Additional benefits include enhancement of primary/secondary care links, mentoring and teaching of GPwSIs, continuity of care and direct access to onward referral to secondary care for further management across specialties. Further follow up is necessary to evaluate the effect on local healthcare delivery. Reference 1 Powell J. Systematic review of outreach clinics in primary care in the UK. J Health Serv Res Policy 2002:7:177–83 Disclosure of Interest None Declared.</description><subject>Clinics</subject><subject>Colon</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Esophagus</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gastroscopy</subject><subject>Intestine</subject><subject>Parathyroid hormone</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Sigmoidoscopy</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>0017-5749</issn><issn>1468-3288</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkN9KwzAUh4MoOKevIAGvo_nTpunlGHMTBhMseBnSNt1S2mQmrbA7b3xRn8SM-gDenHPz_X7n8AFwT_AjIYw_7cehtR2imCSI4Yxy9phifgFmJOECMSrEJZhhTDKUZkl-DW5CaDHGQuRkBtrXYoMwxz9f36tP1Y1qMM7CXQMXFq7CoMrOhIOu4dL1_WjNcIJrFQbvtB20d53bn-CyM9ZU8N0MhzN2VN6E2FE4-KYrZ2vlI6O8vgVXjeqCvvvbc1A8r4rlBm1365flYotKSgRHIqVNpiqNS1XqnNBc5I1Ia4XzrOaipiLRKeWNVmWa1AlnRHHSsJLqOCudsDl4mGqP3n2MOgyydaO38aKkmImMM85EpPhEVd6F4HUjj9708VVJsDxrlZNWedYqJ60yao1BMgXLvv1v5hcHpn2P</recordid><startdate>201406</startdate><enddate>201406</enddate><creator>Ahmad, OF</creator><creator>Dawood, R</creator><creator>Oesterling, C</creator><creator>Rusk, D</creator><creator>Akbar, A</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201406</creationdate><title>PTH-060 Evaluation Of An Established Community Gastroenterology Clinic With Comparison To Secondary Care</title><author>Ahmad, OF ; Dawood, R ; Oesterling, C ; Rusk, D ; Akbar, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b2186-852f7ace0babe912989f85da097d68d284e526feab54d4631a61f3b2e1f3ce43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Clinics</topic><topic>Colon</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Esophagus</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gastroscopy</topic><topic>Intestine</topic><topic>Parathyroid hormone</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Sigmoidoscopy</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ahmad, OF</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawood, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oesterling, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rusk, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akbar, A</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Gut</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ahmad, OF</au><au>Dawood, R</au><au>Oesterling, C</au><au>Rusk, D</au><au>Akbar, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PTH-060 Evaluation Of An Established Community Gastroenterology Clinic With Comparison To Secondary Care</atitle><jtitle>Gut</jtitle><date>2014-06</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>A235</spage><epage>A235</epage><pages>A235-A235</pages><issn>0017-5749</issn><eissn>1468-3288</eissn><abstract>Introduction Community based specialist clinics improve patient experience and access to healthcare whilst improving GP-Specialist communication.1 Commissioning dictates that future management of chronic gastro-intestinal conditions needs to involve integrated care. We reviewed the outcomes of an established gastroenterology community clinic run for 3 years by two General Practitioners with a specialist interest in gastroenterology (GPwSIs) and a consultant gastroenterologist from the local hospital. Methods A weekly gastroenterology community clinic in primary care was established to service 35 local General Practices. Data was collected from January-September 2013 using referral letters and an electronic database and compared to the local hospital general gastroenterology clinics. Results Of 490 patients referred 284 (58%) were triaged to community, 188 (38%) referred onwards to secondary care and 18 (4%) were returned to the referring GP. 37% of appointments were conducted by the consultant. The proportion of patients that did not attend was lower in the community (10%) than secondary care (22%). 86% were discharged back to their referring GP; 16% after the 1st appointment and 84% after one further follow up appointment. Others were directly referred to relevant secondary care. 80% had further investigations (39% Gastroscopy, 24% Colonoscopy, 22% CT scan, 12% Ultrasound abdomen, 9% flexible sigmoidoscopy, 1% Oesophageal manometry) all performed in the local hospital. Median wait time from referral to 1st clinic appointment was 28 days in the community (56 days in the local hospital). Intra-clinic wait time in community was an average of 3 min (38 min in secondary care). A community patient satisfaction survey (N=102) revealed that 88% would definitely recommend the clinic to a friend, with high levels of satisfaction. A secondary care satisfaction survey (N=214) showed that although overall satisfaction was similar, there was relative dissatisfaction of waiting times, waiting area and communication. Conclusion This novel gastroenterology community clinic delivers high quality care closer to patients. It is associated with shorter refe, UKrral waiting times, high discharge rates and excellent patient satisfaction scores. Additional benefits include enhancement of primary/secondary care links, mentoring and teaching of GPwSIs, continuity of care and direct access to onward referral to secondary care for further management across specialties. Further follow up is necessary to evaluate the effect on local healthcare delivery. Reference 1 Powell J. Systematic review of outreach clinics in primary care in the UK. J Health Serv Res Policy 2002:7:177–83 Disclosure of Interest None Declared.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><doi>10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307263.506</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0017-5749 |
ispartof | Gut, 2014-06, Vol.63 (Suppl 1), p.A235-A235 |
issn | 0017-5749 1468-3288 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2038763638 |
source | BMJ Journals - NESLi2; PubMed Central |
subjects | Clinics Colon Computed tomography Esophagus Gastroenterology Gastroscopy Intestine Parathyroid hormone Patient satisfaction Primary care Sigmoidoscopy Ultrasound |
title | PTH-060 Evaluation Of An Established Community Gastroenterology Clinic With Comparison To Secondary Care |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T12%3A28%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PTH-060%E2%80%85Evaluation%20Of%20An%20Established%20Community%20Gastroenterology%20Clinic%20With%20Comparison%20To%20Secondary%20Care&rft.jtitle=Gut&rft.au=Ahmad,%20OF&rft.date=2014-06&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=A235&rft.epage=A235&rft.pages=A235-A235&rft.issn=0017-5749&rft.eissn=1468-3288&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307263.506&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2038763638%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2038763638&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |