PWE-178 Feasibility, safety and efficacy of endoscopic resection of upper gastrointestinal submucosal lesions in a western setting

IntroductionSubmucosal lesions are a relatively common finding at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopic resection (ER) may be warranted in larger lesions, those causing symptoms or those with malignant potential. However submucosal origin makes these lesions difficult to resect by an endoscop...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gut 2012-07, Vol.61 (Suppl 2), p.A368
Hauptverfasser: Basford, P J, Mead, R J, Duku, M D, Longcroft-Wheaton, G R, Bhandari, P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue Suppl 2
container_start_page A368
container_title Gut
container_volume 61
creator Basford, P J
Mead, R J
Duku, M D
Longcroft-Wheaton, G R
Bhandari, P
description IntroductionSubmucosal lesions are a relatively common finding at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopic resection (ER) may be warranted in larger lesions, those causing symptoms or those with malignant potential. However submucosal origin makes these lesions difficult to resect by an endoscopic approach. Advances in resection techniques have made this feasible.MethodsPortsmouth Hospitals is a tertiary referral centre for advanced ER. All ER procedures between 2005 and 2011 were recorded in a prospective database. We analysed our database to identify all submucosal lesions removed by ER in the past 7 years. All procedures were carried out by a single skilled endoscopist. Demographic data, histology, procedure success, long-term outcome and complications were assessed.ResultsA total of 161 lesions were treated by UGI ER between 2005 and 2011. 14 of 161 were submucosal lesions. Nine of the 14 patients were female and the mean age was 54.3 years (range 34–69 years). Five lesions were located in the oesophagus, seven in the stomach and two in the duodenum. Histology revealed granular cell tumour (3), neuroendocrine tumour (5), inflammatory fibroid polyp (2), lipoma (2), gastrointestinal stromal tumour (1), Leiomyoma (1). All cases were successfully treated in a single ER session of which 6 cases were treated by conventional EMR, 9 by ESD techniques. The single complication was a microperforation during ESD of an oesophageal GIST which was endoscopically clipped. The patient was managed conservatively with intravenous antibiotics and was discharged after 3 days. There were no cases of significant bleeding and no patient required surgery. After a mean follow-up of 19.5 months all patients remain well and have no signs of recurrence.ConclusionThe caseload of UGI ER for submucosal lesions in low with an average of two cases per year in a large UK specialist centre. The majority of cases required ESD skills and therefore these cases should be treated in specialist centres with expertise in this technique. Outcomes and complication rates were acceptable in this small series and major surgery was avoided in these patients reducing costs and bed occupancy.Abstract PWE-178 Table 1OesophagusGranular cell tumour3GIST1Leiomyoma1GastricNeuroendocrine tumour4Lipoma1Inflammatory fibroid polyp2DuodenumNeuroendocrine tumour1Lipoma1Competing interestsNone declared.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302514d.178
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_istex</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2038751380</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2038751380</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1090-2e6abf0153e017cccdcf364f23f9fc0ed4fafb7ec3dd634c9ac0d3a881a1aaee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo90c9u1DAQBnALUYml5RmwxBWXsZ0_zhFWLSC1UFUFjtbEGa-8ZJNgJ4K99QAv2iepV1tx8sj6yfrGH2OvJZxLqat3m2XeDr1QIJXQoEpZdOeyNs_YShaVEVoZ85ytAGQtyrpoXrCXKW0BwJhGrtjfmx8XIvOH-3-XhCm0oQ_z_i1P6Gnecxw6Tt4Hh27PR89p6Mbkxik4HimRm8M4HO6XaaLIN5jmOIZhpjSHAXuelna3uDHlsaeUbeJh4Mh_Z0Bx4InmDDdn7MRjn-jV03nKvl1e3K0_iauvHz-v31-JVkIDQlGFrQdZasrbOOc653VVeKV94x1QV3j0bU1Od12lC9egg06jMRIlIpE-ZW-O705x_LXkDHY7LjEHTVaBNnUptYGsxFGFHPKPnWLYYdxbjD9tVeu6tF--r-26Uh_gtri219mro2932_9agj20Y4_t2EM79qkdm79bPwLJFoh0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2038751380</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PWE-178 Feasibility, safety and efficacy of endoscopic resection of upper gastrointestinal submucosal lesions in a western setting</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Basford, P J ; Mead, R J ; Duku, M D ; Longcroft-Wheaton, G R ; Bhandari, P</creator><creatorcontrib>Basford, P J ; Mead, R J ; Duku, M D ; Longcroft-Wheaton, G R ; Bhandari, P</creatorcontrib><description>IntroductionSubmucosal lesions are a relatively common finding at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopic resection (ER) may be warranted in larger lesions, those causing symptoms or those with malignant potential. However submucosal origin makes these lesions difficult to resect by an endoscopic approach. Advances in resection techniques have made this feasible.MethodsPortsmouth Hospitals is a tertiary referral centre for advanced ER. All ER procedures between 2005 and 2011 were recorded in a prospective database. We analysed our database to identify all submucosal lesions removed by ER in the past 7 years. All procedures were carried out by a single skilled endoscopist. Demographic data, histology, procedure success, long-term outcome and complications were assessed.ResultsA total of 161 lesions were treated by UGI ER between 2005 and 2011. 14 of 161 were submucosal lesions. Nine of the 14 patients were female and the mean age was 54.3 years (range 34–69 years). Five lesions were located in the oesophagus, seven in the stomach and two in the duodenum. Histology revealed granular cell tumour (3), neuroendocrine tumour (5), inflammatory fibroid polyp (2), lipoma (2), gastrointestinal stromal tumour (1), Leiomyoma (1). All cases were successfully treated in a single ER session of which 6 cases were treated by conventional EMR, 9 by ESD techniques. The single complication was a microperforation during ESD of an oesophageal GIST which was endoscopically clipped. The patient was managed conservatively with intravenous antibiotics and was discharged after 3 days. There were no cases of significant bleeding and no patient required surgery. After a mean follow-up of 19.5 months all patients remain well and have no signs of recurrence.ConclusionThe caseload of UGI ER for submucosal lesions in low with an average of two cases per year in a large UK specialist centre. The majority of cases required ESD skills and therefore these cases should be treated in specialist centres with expertise in this technique. Outcomes and complication rates were acceptable in this small series and major surgery was avoided in these patients reducing costs and bed occupancy.Abstract PWE-178 Table 1OesophagusGranular cell tumour3GIST1Leiomyoma1GastricNeuroendocrine tumour4Lipoma1Inflammatory fibroid polyp2DuodenumNeuroendocrine tumour1Lipoma1Competing interestsNone declared.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-5749</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-3288</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302514d.178</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology</publisher><subject>Antibiotics ; Duodenum ; Endoscopy ; Esophagus ; Fibroids ; Gastrointestinal cancer ; Histology ; Inflammation ; Intravenous administration ; Lipoma ; Neuroendocrine tumors ; Patients ; Stomach ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Gut, 2012-07, Vol.61 (Suppl 2), p.A368</ispartof><rights>2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><rights>Copyright: 2012 © 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://gut.bmj.com/content/61/Suppl_2/A368.3.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://gut.bmj.com/content/61/Suppl_2/A368.3.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,778,782,23558,27911,27912,77355,77386</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Basford, P J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mead, R J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duku, M D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Longcroft-Wheaton, G R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhandari, P</creatorcontrib><title>PWE-178 Feasibility, safety and efficacy of endoscopic resection of upper gastrointestinal submucosal lesions in a western setting</title><title>Gut</title><addtitle>Gut</addtitle><description>IntroductionSubmucosal lesions are a relatively common finding at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopic resection (ER) may be warranted in larger lesions, those causing symptoms or those with malignant potential. However submucosal origin makes these lesions difficult to resect by an endoscopic approach. Advances in resection techniques have made this feasible.MethodsPortsmouth Hospitals is a tertiary referral centre for advanced ER. All ER procedures between 2005 and 2011 were recorded in a prospective database. We analysed our database to identify all submucosal lesions removed by ER in the past 7 years. All procedures were carried out by a single skilled endoscopist. Demographic data, histology, procedure success, long-term outcome and complications were assessed.ResultsA total of 161 lesions were treated by UGI ER between 2005 and 2011. 14 of 161 were submucosal lesions. Nine of the 14 patients were female and the mean age was 54.3 years (range 34–69 years). Five lesions were located in the oesophagus, seven in the stomach and two in the duodenum. Histology revealed granular cell tumour (3), neuroendocrine tumour (5), inflammatory fibroid polyp (2), lipoma (2), gastrointestinal stromal tumour (1), Leiomyoma (1). All cases were successfully treated in a single ER session of which 6 cases were treated by conventional EMR, 9 by ESD techniques. The single complication was a microperforation during ESD of an oesophageal GIST which was endoscopically clipped. The patient was managed conservatively with intravenous antibiotics and was discharged after 3 days. There were no cases of significant bleeding and no patient required surgery. After a mean follow-up of 19.5 months all patients remain well and have no signs of recurrence.ConclusionThe caseload of UGI ER for submucosal lesions in low with an average of two cases per year in a large UK specialist centre. The majority of cases required ESD skills and therefore these cases should be treated in specialist centres with expertise in this technique. Outcomes and complication rates were acceptable in this small series and major surgery was avoided in these patients reducing costs and bed occupancy.Abstract PWE-178 Table 1OesophagusGranular cell tumour3GIST1Leiomyoma1GastricNeuroendocrine tumour4Lipoma1Inflammatory fibroid polyp2DuodenumNeuroendocrine tumour1Lipoma1Competing interestsNone declared.</description><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Duodenum</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Esophagus</subject><subject>Fibroids</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal cancer</subject><subject>Histology</subject><subject>Inflammation</subject><subject>Intravenous administration</subject><subject>Lipoma</subject><subject>Neuroendocrine tumors</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Stomach</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0017-5749</issn><issn>1468-3288</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNo90c9u1DAQBnALUYml5RmwxBWXsZ0_zhFWLSC1UFUFjtbEGa-8ZJNgJ4K99QAv2iepV1tx8sj6yfrGH2OvJZxLqat3m2XeDr1QIJXQoEpZdOeyNs_YShaVEVoZ85ytAGQtyrpoXrCXKW0BwJhGrtjfmx8XIvOH-3-XhCm0oQ_z_i1P6Gnecxw6Tt4Hh27PR89p6Mbkxik4HimRm8M4HO6XaaLIN5jmOIZhpjSHAXuelna3uDHlsaeUbeJh4Mh_Z0Bx4InmDDdn7MRjn-jV03nKvl1e3K0_iauvHz-v31-JVkIDQlGFrQdZasrbOOc653VVeKV94x1QV3j0bU1Od12lC9egg06jMRIlIpE-ZW-O705x_LXkDHY7LjEHTVaBNnUptYGsxFGFHPKPnWLYYdxbjD9tVeu6tF--r-26Uh_gtri219mro2932_9agj20Y4_t2EM79qkdm79bPwLJFoh0</recordid><startdate>201207</startdate><enddate>201207</enddate><creator>Basford, P J</creator><creator>Mead, R J</creator><creator>Duku, M D</creator><creator>Longcroft-Wheaton, G R</creator><creator>Bhandari, P</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201207</creationdate><title>PWE-178 Feasibility, safety and efficacy of endoscopic resection of upper gastrointestinal submucosal lesions in a western setting</title><author>Basford, P J ; Mead, R J ; Duku, M D ; Longcroft-Wheaton, G R ; Bhandari, P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1090-2e6abf0153e017cccdcf364f23f9fc0ed4fafb7ec3dd634c9ac0d3a881a1aaee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Duodenum</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Esophagus</topic><topic>Fibroids</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal cancer</topic><topic>Histology</topic><topic>Inflammation</topic><topic>Intravenous administration</topic><topic>Lipoma</topic><topic>Neuroendocrine tumors</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Stomach</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Basford, P J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mead, R J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duku, M D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Longcroft-Wheaton, G R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhandari, P</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Gut</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Basford, P J</au><au>Mead, R J</au><au>Duku, M D</au><au>Longcroft-Wheaton, G R</au><au>Bhandari, P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PWE-178 Feasibility, safety and efficacy of endoscopic resection of upper gastrointestinal submucosal lesions in a western setting</atitle><jtitle>Gut</jtitle><addtitle>Gut</addtitle><date>2012-07</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>Suppl 2</issue><spage>A368</spage><pages>A368-</pages><issn>0017-5749</issn><eissn>1468-3288</eissn><abstract>IntroductionSubmucosal lesions are a relatively common finding at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopic resection (ER) may be warranted in larger lesions, those causing symptoms or those with malignant potential. However submucosal origin makes these lesions difficult to resect by an endoscopic approach. Advances in resection techniques have made this feasible.MethodsPortsmouth Hospitals is a tertiary referral centre for advanced ER. All ER procedures between 2005 and 2011 were recorded in a prospective database. We analysed our database to identify all submucosal lesions removed by ER in the past 7 years. All procedures were carried out by a single skilled endoscopist. Demographic data, histology, procedure success, long-term outcome and complications were assessed.ResultsA total of 161 lesions were treated by UGI ER between 2005 and 2011. 14 of 161 were submucosal lesions. Nine of the 14 patients were female and the mean age was 54.3 years (range 34–69 years). Five lesions were located in the oesophagus, seven in the stomach and two in the duodenum. Histology revealed granular cell tumour (3), neuroendocrine tumour (5), inflammatory fibroid polyp (2), lipoma (2), gastrointestinal stromal tumour (1), Leiomyoma (1). All cases were successfully treated in a single ER session of which 6 cases were treated by conventional EMR, 9 by ESD techniques. The single complication was a microperforation during ESD of an oesophageal GIST which was endoscopically clipped. The patient was managed conservatively with intravenous antibiotics and was discharged after 3 days. There were no cases of significant bleeding and no patient required surgery. After a mean follow-up of 19.5 months all patients remain well and have no signs of recurrence.ConclusionThe caseload of UGI ER for submucosal lesions in low with an average of two cases per year in a large UK specialist centre. The majority of cases required ESD skills and therefore these cases should be treated in specialist centres with expertise in this technique. Outcomes and complication rates were acceptable in this small series and major surgery was avoided in these patients reducing costs and bed occupancy.Abstract PWE-178 Table 1OesophagusGranular cell tumour3GIST1Leiomyoma1GastricNeuroendocrine tumour4Lipoma1Inflammatory fibroid polyp2DuodenumNeuroendocrine tumour1Lipoma1Competing interestsNone declared.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology</pub><doi>10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302514d.178</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0017-5749
ispartof Gut, 2012-07, Vol.61 (Suppl 2), p.A368
issn 0017-5749
1468-3288
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2038751380
source BMJ Journals - NESLi2; PubMed Central
subjects Antibiotics
Duodenum
Endoscopy
Esophagus
Fibroids
Gastrointestinal cancer
Histology
Inflammation
Intravenous administration
Lipoma
Neuroendocrine tumors
Patients
Stomach
Surgery
title PWE-178 Feasibility, safety and efficacy of endoscopic resection of upper gastrointestinal submucosal lesions in a western setting
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T05%3A13%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_istex&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PWE-178%E2%80%85Feasibility,%20safety%20and%20efficacy%20of%20endoscopic%20resection%20of%20upper%20gastrointestinal%20submucosal%20lesions%20in%20a%20western%20setting&rft.jtitle=Gut&rft.au=Basford,%20P%20J&rft.date=2012-07&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=Suppl%202&rft.spage=A368&rft.pages=A368-&rft.issn=0017-5749&rft.eissn=1468-3288&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302514d.178&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_istex%3E2038751380%3C/proquest_istex%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2038751380&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true