PWE-178 Feasibility, safety and efficacy of endoscopic resection of upper gastrointestinal submucosal lesions in a western setting
IntroductionSubmucosal lesions are a relatively common finding at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopic resection (ER) may be warranted in larger lesions, those causing symptoms or those with malignant potential. However submucosal origin makes these lesions difficult to resect by an endoscop...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gut 2012-07, Vol.61 (Suppl 2), p.A368 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | Suppl 2 |
container_start_page | A368 |
container_title | Gut |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | Basford, P J Mead, R J Duku, M D Longcroft-Wheaton, G R Bhandari, P |
description | IntroductionSubmucosal lesions are a relatively common finding at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopic resection (ER) may be warranted in larger lesions, those causing symptoms or those with malignant potential. However submucosal origin makes these lesions difficult to resect by an endoscopic approach. Advances in resection techniques have made this feasible.MethodsPortsmouth Hospitals is a tertiary referral centre for advanced ER. All ER procedures between 2005 and 2011 were recorded in a prospective database. We analysed our database to identify all submucosal lesions removed by ER in the past 7 years. All procedures were carried out by a single skilled endoscopist. Demographic data, histology, procedure success, long-term outcome and complications were assessed.ResultsA total of 161 lesions were treated by UGI ER between 2005 and 2011. 14 of 161 were submucosal lesions. Nine of the 14 patients were female and the mean age was 54.3 years (range 34–69 years). Five lesions were located in the oesophagus, seven in the stomach and two in the duodenum. Histology revealed granular cell tumour (3), neuroendocrine tumour (5), inflammatory fibroid polyp (2), lipoma (2), gastrointestinal stromal tumour (1), Leiomyoma (1). All cases were successfully treated in a single ER session of which 6 cases were treated by conventional EMR, 9 by ESD techniques. The single complication was a microperforation during ESD of an oesophageal GIST which was endoscopically clipped. The patient was managed conservatively with intravenous antibiotics and was discharged after 3 days. There were no cases of significant bleeding and no patient required surgery. After a mean follow-up of 19.5 months all patients remain well and have no signs of recurrence.ConclusionThe caseload of UGI ER for submucosal lesions in low with an average of two cases per year in a large UK specialist centre. The majority of cases required ESD skills and therefore these cases should be treated in specialist centres with expertise in this technique. Outcomes and complication rates were acceptable in this small series and major surgery was avoided in these patients reducing costs and bed occupancy.Abstract PWE-178 Table 1OesophagusGranular cell tumour3GIST1Leiomyoma1GastricNeuroendocrine tumour4Lipoma1Inflammatory fibroid polyp2DuodenumNeuroendocrine tumour1Lipoma1Competing interestsNone declared. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302514d.178 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_istex</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2038751380</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2038751380</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1090-2e6abf0153e017cccdcf364f23f9fc0ed4fafb7ec3dd634c9ac0d3a881a1aaee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo90c9u1DAQBnALUYml5RmwxBWXsZ0_zhFWLSC1UFUFjtbEGa-8ZJNgJ4K99QAv2iepV1tx8sj6yfrGH2OvJZxLqat3m2XeDr1QIJXQoEpZdOeyNs_YShaVEVoZ85ytAGQtyrpoXrCXKW0BwJhGrtjfmx8XIvOH-3-XhCm0oQ_z_i1P6Gnecxw6Tt4Hh27PR89p6Mbkxik4HimRm8M4HO6XaaLIN5jmOIZhpjSHAXuelna3uDHlsaeUbeJh4Mh_Z0Bx4InmDDdn7MRjn-jV03nKvl1e3K0_iauvHz-v31-JVkIDQlGFrQdZasrbOOc653VVeKV94x1QV3j0bU1Od12lC9egg06jMRIlIpE-ZW-O705x_LXkDHY7LjEHTVaBNnUptYGsxFGFHPKPnWLYYdxbjD9tVeu6tF--r-26Uh_gtri219mro2932_9agj20Y4_t2EM79qkdm79bPwLJFoh0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2038751380</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PWE-178 Feasibility, safety and efficacy of endoscopic resection of upper gastrointestinal submucosal lesions in a western setting</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Basford, P J ; Mead, R J ; Duku, M D ; Longcroft-Wheaton, G R ; Bhandari, P</creator><creatorcontrib>Basford, P J ; Mead, R J ; Duku, M D ; Longcroft-Wheaton, G R ; Bhandari, P</creatorcontrib><description>IntroductionSubmucosal lesions are a relatively common finding at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopic resection (ER) may be warranted in larger lesions, those causing symptoms or those with malignant potential. However submucosal origin makes these lesions difficult to resect by an endoscopic approach. Advances in resection techniques have made this feasible.MethodsPortsmouth Hospitals is a tertiary referral centre for advanced ER. All ER procedures between 2005 and 2011 were recorded in a prospective database. We analysed our database to identify all submucosal lesions removed by ER in the past 7 years. All procedures were carried out by a single skilled endoscopist. Demographic data, histology, procedure success, long-term outcome and complications were assessed.ResultsA total of 161 lesions were treated by UGI ER between 2005 and 2011. 14 of 161 were submucosal lesions. Nine of the 14 patients were female and the mean age was 54.3 years (range 34–69 years). Five lesions were located in the oesophagus, seven in the stomach and two in the duodenum. Histology revealed granular cell tumour (3), neuroendocrine tumour (5), inflammatory fibroid polyp (2), lipoma (2), gastrointestinal stromal tumour (1), Leiomyoma (1). All cases were successfully treated in a single ER session of which 6 cases were treated by conventional EMR, 9 by ESD techniques. The single complication was a microperforation during ESD of an oesophageal GIST which was endoscopically clipped. The patient was managed conservatively with intravenous antibiotics and was discharged after 3 days. There were no cases of significant bleeding and no patient required surgery. After a mean follow-up of 19.5 months all patients remain well and have no signs of recurrence.ConclusionThe caseload of UGI ER for submucosal lesions in low with an average of two cases per year in a large UK specialist centre. The majority of cases required ESD skills and therefore these cases should be treated in specialist centres with expertise in this technique. Outcomes and complication rates were acceptable in this small series and major surgery was avoided in these patients reducing costs and bed occupancy.Abstract PWE-178 Table 1OesophagusGranular cell tumour3GIST1Leiomyoma1GastricNeuroendocrine tumour4Lipoma1Inflammatory fibroid polyp2DuodenumNeuroendocrine tumour1Lipoma1Competing interestsNone declared.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-5749</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-3288</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302514d.178</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology</publisher><subject>Antibiotics ; Duodenum ; Endoscopy ; Esophagus ; Fibroids ; Gastrointestinal cancer ; Histology ; Inflammation ; Intravenous administration ; Lipoma ; Neuroendocrine tumors ; Patients ; Stomach ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Gut, 2012-07, Vol.61 (Suppl 2), p.A368</ispartof><rights>2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><rights>Copyright: 2012 © 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://gut.bmj.com/content/61/Suppl_2/A368.3.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://gut.bmj.com/content/61/Suppl_2/A368.3.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,778,782,23558,27911,27912,77355,77386</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Basford, P J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mead, R J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duku, M D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Longcroft-Wheaton, G R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhandari, P</creatorcontrib><title>PWE-178 Feasibility, safety and efficacy of endoscopic resection of upper gastrointestinal submucosal lesions in a western setting</title><title>Gut</title><addtitle>Gut</addtitle><description>IntroductionSubmucosal lesions are a relatively common finding at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopic resection (ER) may be warranted in larger lesions, those causing symptoms or those with malignant potential. However submucosal origin makes these lesions difficult to resect by an endoscopic approach. Advances in resection techniques have made this feasible.MethodsPortsmouth Hospitals is a tertiary referral centre for advanced ER. All ER procedures between 2005 and 2011 were recorded in a prospective database. We analysed our database to identify all submucosal lesions removed by ER in the past 7 years. All procedures were carried out by a single skilled endoscopist. Demographic data, histology, procedure success, long-term outcome and complications were assessed.ResultsA total of 161 lesions were treated by UGI ER between 2005 and 2011. 14 of 161 were submucosal lesions. Nine of the 14 patients were female and the mean age was 54.3 years (range 34–69 years). Five lesions were located in the oesophagus, seven in the stomach and two in the duodenum. Histology revealed granular cell tumour (3), neuroendocrine tumour (5), inflammatory fibroid polyp (2), lipoma (2), gastrointestinal stromal tumour (1), Leiomyoma (1). All cases were successfully treated in a single ER session of which 6 cases were treated by conventional EMR, 9 by ESD techniques. The single complication was a microperforation during ESD of an oesophageal GIST which was endoscopically clipped. The patient was managed conservatively with intravenous antibiotics and was discharged after 3 days. There were no cases of significant bleeding and no patient required surgery. After a mean follow-up of 19.5 months all patients remain well and have no signs of recurrence.ConclusionThe caseload of UGI ER for submucosal lesions in low with an average of two cases per year in a large UK specialist centre. The majority of cases required ESD skills and therefore these cases should be treated in specialist centres with expertise in this technique. Outcomes and complication rates were acceptable in this small series and major surgery was avoided in these patients reducing costs and bed occupancy.Abstract PWE-178 Table 1OesophagusGranular cell tumour3GIST1Leiomyoma1GastricNeuroendocrine tumour4Lipoma1Inflammatory fibroid polyp2DuodenumNeuroendocrine tumour1Lipoma1Competing interestsNone declared.</description><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Duodenum</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Esophagus</subject><subject>Fibroids</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal cancer</subject><subject>Histology</subject><subject>Inflammation</subject><subject>Intravenous administration</subject><subject>Lipoma</subject><subject>Neuroendocrine tumors</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Stomach</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0017-5749</issn><issn>1468-3288</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNo90c9u1DAQBnALUYml5RmwxBWXsZ0_zhFWLSC1UFUFjtbEGa-8ZJNgJ4K99QAv2iepV1tx8sj6yfrGH2OvJZxLqat3m2XeDr1QIJXQoEpZdOeyNs_YShaVEVoZ85ytAGQtyrpoXrCXKW0BwJhGrtjfmx8XIvOH-3-XhCm0oQ_z_i1P6Gnecxw6Tt4Hh27PR89p6Mbkxik4HimRm8M4HO6XaaLIN5jmOIZhpjSHAXuelna3uDHlsaeUbeJh4Mh_Z0Bx4InmDDdn7MRjn-jV03nKvl1e3K0_iauvHz-v31-JVkIDQlGFrQdZasrbOOc653VVeKV94x1QV3j0bU1Od12lC9egg06jMRIlIpE-ZW-O705x_LXkDHY7LjEHTVaBNnUptYGsxFGFHPKPnWLYYdxbjD9tVeu6tF--r-26Uh_gtri219mro2932_9agj20Y4_t2EM79qkdm79bPwLJFoh0</recordid><startdate>201207</startdate><enddate>201207</enddate><creator>Basford, P J</creator><creator>Mead, R J</creator><creator>Duku, M D</creator><creator>Longcroft-Wheaton, G R</creator><creator>Bhandari, P</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201207</creationdate><title>PWE-178 Feasibility, safety and efficacy of endoscopic resection of upper gastrointestinal submucosal lesions in a western setting</title><author>Basford, P J ; Mead, R J ; Duku, M D ; Longcroft-Wheaton, G R ; Bhandari, P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1090-2e6abf0153e017cccdcf364f23f9fc0ed4fafb7ec3dd634c9ac0d3a881a1aaee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Duodenum</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Esophagus</topic><topic>Fibroids</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal cancer</topic><topic>Histology</topic><topic>Inflammation</topic><topic>Intravenous administration</topic><topic>Lipoma</topic><topic>Neuroendocrine tumors</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Stomach</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Basford, P J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mead, R J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duku, M D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Longcroft-Wheaton, G R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhandari, P</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Gut</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Basford, P J</au><au>Mead, R J</au><au>Duku, M D</au><au>Longcroft-Wheaton, G R</au><au>Bhandari, P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PWE-178 Feasibility, safety and efficacy of endoscopic resection of upper gastrointestinal submucosal lesions in a western setting</atitle><jtitle>Gut</jtitle><addtitle>Gut</addtitle><date>2012-07</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>Suppl 2</issue><spage>A368</spage><pages>A368-</pages><issn>0017-5749</issn><eissn>1468-3288</eissn><abstract>IntroductionSubmucosal lesions are a relatively common finding at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopic resection (ER) may be warranted in larger lesions, those causing symptoms or those with malignant potential. However submucosal origin makes these lesions difficult to resect by an endoscopic approach. Advances in resection techniques have made this feasible.MethodsPortsmouth Hospitals is a tertiary referral centre for advanced ER. All ER procedures between 2005 and 2011 were recorded in a prospective database. We analysed our database to identify all submucosal lesions removed by ER in the past 7 years. All procedures were carried out by a single skilled endoscopist. Demographic data, histology, procedure success, long-term outcome and complications were assessed.ResultsA total of 161 lesions were treated by UGI ER between 2005 and 2011. 14 of 161 were submucosal lesions. Nine of the 14 patients were female and the mean age was 54.3 years (range 34–69 years). Five lesions were located in the oesophagus, seven in the stomach and two in the duodenum. Histology revealed granular cell tumour (3), neuroendocrine tumour (5), inflammatory fibroid polyp (2), lipoma (2), gastrointestinal stromal tumour (1), Leiomyoma (1). All cases were successfully treated in a single ER session of which 6 cases were treated by conventional EMR, 9 by ESD techniques. The single complication was a microperforation during ESD of an oesophageal GIST which was endoscopically clipped. The patient was managed conservatively with intravenous antibiotics and was discharged after 3 days. There were no cases of significant bleeding and no patient required surgery. After a mean follow-up of 19.5 months all patients remain well and have no signs of recurrence.ConclusionThe caseload of UGI ER for submucosal lesions in low with an average of two cases per year in a large UK specialist centre. The majority of cases required ESD skills and therefore these cases should be treated in specialist centres with expertise in this technique. Outcomes and complication rates were acceptable in this small series and major surgery was avoided in these patients reducing costs and bed occupancy.Abstract PWE-178 Table 1OesophagusGranular cell tumour3GIST1Leiomyoma1GastricNeuroendocrine tumour4Lipoma1Inflammatory fibroid polyp2DuodenumNeuroendocrine tumour1Lipoma1Competing interestsNone declared.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology</pub><doi>10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302514d.178</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0017-5749 |
ispartof | Gut, 2012-07, Vol.61 (Suppl 2), p.A368 |
issn | 0017-5749 1468-3288 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2038751380 |
source | BMJ Journals - NESLi2; PubMed Central |
subjects | Antibiotics Duodenum Endoscopy Esophagus Fibroids Gastrointestinal cancer Histology Inflammation Intravenous administration Lipoma Neuroendocrine tumors Patients Stomach Surgery |
title | PWE-178 Feasibility, safety and efficacy of endoscopic resection of upper gastrointestinal submucosal lesions in a western setting |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T05%3A13%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_istex&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PWE-178%E2%80%85Feasibility,%20safety%20and%20efficacy%20of%20endoscopic%20resection%20of%20upper%20gastrointestinal%20submucosal%20lesions%20in%20a%20western%20setting&rft.jtitle=Gut&rft.au=Basford,%20P%20J&rft.date=2012-07&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=Suppl%202&rft.spage=A368&rft.pages=A368-&rft.issn=0017-5749&rft.eissn=1468-3288&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302514d.178&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_istex%3E2038751380%3C/proquest_istex%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2038751380&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |