PTU-067 Out-patient assessment for liver transplantation: a single centre experience
IntroductionAssessment for orthotopic liver transplantation (LT) traditionally requires admission to hospital. In 2010, the liver unit at the University Hospital Birmingham (UHB) launched the first UK-based out-patient assessment programme (OPA). This study aims to describe our experience, with spec...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gut 2012-07, Vol.61 (Suppl 2), p.A211 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | Suppl 2 |
container_start_page | A211 |
container_title | Gut |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | Lim, T R Armstrong, M J Houlihan, D D Wong, K Cook, C Turner, A Perrin, M Cantrill, J Ashcroft, P Hughes, D Weijers, C Holt, A |
description | IntroductionAssessment for orthotopic liver transplantation (LT) traditionally requires admission to hospital. In 2010, the liver unit at the University Hospital Birmingham (UHB) launched the first UK-based out-patient assessment programme (OPA). This study aims to describe our experience, with specific focus on feasibility, efficacy, cost-effectiveness and patient satisfaction.MethodsPatients undergoing elective LT assessment were retrospectively analysed between June 2010 and April 2011. Data collected included patient demographics/clinical features, LT assessment parameters, duration to listing/LT and reasons for LT refusal. An extensive cost evaluation was performed on both in- and out-patient LT assessment, including clinical tests, staffing and hospital facilities utilised. Patient satisfaction questionnaires were collected prospectively from April 2011 to November 2011.Results179 patients underwent LT assessment. 87/94 successfully completed OPA, with seven converted to in-patient LT assessment (IPA) due to pre-existing co-morbidity including refractory ascites and hepatic encephalopathy. All patients referred for OPA were triaged 2 weeks prior to the assessment to ensure suitability. 92 patients successfully underwent IPA. 66/87 OPAs were subsequently listed for LT (median duration from OPA to listing 3 days [0–306], of which 37/66 received a cadaveric graft. The reasons for OPAs not listed include: too early for LT (50.0%), contraindication to LT (42.9%) and patient refusal (7.1%). 53/92 IPAs were listed, mean duration 4 days [1–39], of which 34/53 were transplanted. Reasons for IPAs not listed: contraindication to LT (48.2%), too early for LT (44.4%) and patient refusal (7.4%). A single IPA costs on average £14 441 as compared to £11 494 for an OPA. Overall satisfaction (mean score 9.6/10; 10=very satisfied, 1=very dissatisfied) and convenience (7.9/10) for patients undergoing OPA were high.ConclusionWe describe for first time that OPA is feasible, efficient and cost-effective. With increasing demand on hospital beds in the UK National Health Service, such a programme has the potential to reduce the burden on LT in-patient services.Abstract PTU-067 Table 1Patient demographics and clinical featuresOPA (n=87)IPA (n=92)Mean age (±SD)52.3 (±1.3)55.0 (±0.9)Male sex (%)58.654.3Aetiology Viral611 Alcohol621 HCC2612 Metabolic920 Autoimmune/biliary3013 Other1015UKELD median [range]51 [43–66]53 [43–67]Liver co-morbidities Encepaholopathy2340 Refractory asc |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302514c.67 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_istex</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2038747039</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2038747039</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1089-204dc98de344c3b6cf6968e7b42cf9e8a13821a3bf365121f1aa3b71faeaefff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMFOwzAMhiMEEmPwCqgS54w4aZOUGxpsIE0bh23XKO2SqaVrS9KicePCi_IktOrEybb0-bf1IXQLZALA-P2-bfKywJQAxYzQCMJ0wsUZGkHIJWZUynM0IgQEjkQYX6Ir73NCiJQxjND2bb3BhIvf759V2-BaN5kpm0B7b7w_9K2tXFBkn8YFjdOlrwtdNh1VlQ-BDnxW7gsTpB3oTGCOtXHdfmqu0YXVhTc3pzpGm9nzevqCF6v56_RxgRMgMu5-DndpLHeGhWHKEp5aHnNpRBLS1MZGamCSgmaJZTwCChZ0Nwiw2mhjrWVjdDfk1q76aI1vVF61ruxOKkqYFKEgLO4oPFCZb8xR1S47aPeltHtXXDARqeV2qubLGRfzJVVPHQ8DnxzyfxqI6nWrQbfqdauT7j7lD6pddak</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2038747039</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PTU-067 Out-patient assessment for liver transplantation: a single centre experience</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Lim, T R ; Armstrong, M J ; Houlihan, D D ; Wong, K ; Cook, C ; Turner, A ; Perrin, M ; Cantrill, J ; Ashcroft, P ; Hughes, D ; Weijers, C ; Holt, A</creator><creatorcontrib>Lim, T R ; Armstrong, M J ; Houlihan, D D ; Wong, K ; Cook, C ; Turner, A ; Perrin, M ; Cantrill, J ; Ashcroft, P ; Hughes, D ; Weijers, C ; Holt, A</creatorcontrib><description>IntroductionAssessment for orthotopic liver transplantation (LT) traditionally requires admission to hospital. In 2010, the liver unit at the University Hospital Birmingham (UHB) launched the first UK-based out-patient assessment programme (OPA). This study aims to describe our experience, with specific focus on feasibility, efficacy, cost-effectiveness and patient satisfaction.MethodsPatients undergoing elective LT assessment were retrospectively analysed between June 2010 and April 2011. Data collected included patient demographics/clinical features, LT assessment parameters, duration to listing/LT and reasons for LT refusal. An extensive cost evaluation was performed on both in- and out-patient LT assessment, including clinical tests, staffing and hospital facilities utilised. Patient satisfaction questionnaires were collected prospectively from April 2011 to November 2011.Results179 patients underwent LT assessment. 87/94 successfully completed OPA, with seven converted to in-patient LT assessment (IPA) due to pre-existing co-morbidity including refractory ascites and hepatic encephalopathy. All patients referred for OPA were triaged 2 weeks prior to the assessment to ensure suitability. 92 patients successfully underwent IPA. 66/87 OPAs were subsequently listed for LT (median duration from OPA to listing 3 days [0–306], of which 37/66 received a cadaveric graft. The reasons for OPAs not listed include: too early for LT (50.0%), contraindication to LT (42.9%) and patient refusal (7.1%). 53/92 IPAs were listed, mean duration 4 days [1–39], of which 34/53 were transplanted. Reasons for IPAs not listed: contraindication to LT (48.2%), too early for LT (44.4%) and patient refusal (7.4%). A single IPA costs on average £14 441 as compared to £11 494 for an OPA. Overall satisfaction (mean score 9.6/10; 10=very satisfied, 1=very dissatisfied) and convenience (7.9/10) for patients undergoing OPA were high.ConclusionWe describe for first time that OPA is feasible, efficient and cost-effective. With increasing demand on hospital beds in the UK National Health Service, such a programme has the potential to reduce the burden on LT in-patient services.Abstract PTU-067 Table 1Patient demographics and clinical featuresOPA (n=87)IPA (n=92)Mean age (±SD)52.3 (±1.3)55.0 (±0.9)Male sex (%)58.654.3Aetiology Viral611 Alcohol621 HCC2612 Metabolic920 Autoimmune/biliary3013 Other1015UKELD median [range]51 [43–66]53 [43–67]Liver co-morbidities Encepaholopathy2340 Refractory ascites07 Variceal bleeding148Other co-morbidities Hypertension103 Diabetes1110 Renal impairment14Competing interestsNone declared.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-5749</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-3288</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302514c.67</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology</publisher><subject>Ascites ; Cadavers ; Demography ; Diabetes mellitus ; Hepatic encephalopathy ; Liver ; Liver transplantation ; Liver transplants ; Morbidity ; Patient assessment ; Patient satisfaction</subject><ispartof>Gut, 2012-07, Vol.61 (Suppl 2), p.A211</ispartof><rights>2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><rights>Copyright: 2012 © 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://gut.bmj.com/content/61/Suppl_2/A211.1.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://gut.bmj.com/content/61/Suppl_2/A211.1.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,780,784,23571,27924,27925,77600,77631</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lim, T R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, M J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houlihan, D D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perrin, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cantrill, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashcroft, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weijers, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holt, A</creatorcontrib><title>PTU-067 Out-patient assessment for liver transplantation: a single centre experience</title><title>Gut</title><addtitle>Gut</addtitle><description>IntroductionAssessment for orthotopic liver transplantation (LT) traditionally requires admission to hospital. In 2010, the liver unit at the University Hospital Birmingham (UHB) launched the first UK-based out-patient assessment programme (OPA). This study aims to describe our experience, with specific focus on feasibility, efficacy, cost-effectiveness and patient satisfaction.MethodsPatients undergoing elective LT assessment were retrospectively analysed between June 2010 and April 2011. Data collected included patient demographics/clinical features, LT assessment parameters, duration to listing/LT and reasons for LT refusal. An extensive cost evaluation was performed on both in- and out-patient LT assessment, including clinical tests, staffing and hospital facilities utilised. Patient satisfaction questionnaires were collected prospectively from April 2011 to November 2011.Results179 patients underwent LT assessment. 87/94 successfully completed OPA, with seven converted to in-patient LT assessment (IPA) due to pre-existing co-morbidity including refractory ascites and hepatic encephalopathy. All patients referred for OPA were triaged 2 weeks prior to the assessment to ensure suitability. 92 patients successfully underwent IPA. 66/87 OPAs were subsequently listed for LT (median duration from OPA to listing 3 days [0–306], of which 37/66 received a cadaveric graft. The reasons for OPAs not listed include: too early for LT (50.0%), contraindication to LT (42.9%) and patient refusal (7.1%). 53/92 IPAs were listed, mean duration 4 days [1–39], of which 34/53 were transplanted. Reasons for IPAs not listed: contraindication to LT (48.2%), too early for LT (44.4%) and patient refusal (7.4%). A single IPA costs on average £14 441 as compared to £11 494 for an OPA. Overall satisfaction (mean score 9.6/10; 10=very satisfied, 1=very dissatisfied) and convenience (7.9/10) for patients undergoing OPA were high.ConclusionWe describe for first time that OPA is feasible, efficient and cost-effective. With increasing demand on hospital beds in the UK National Health Service, such a programme has the potential to reduce the burden on LT in-patient services.Abstract PTU-067 Table 1Patient demographics and clinical featuresOPA (n=87)IPA (n=92)Mean age (±SD)52.3 (±1.3)55.0 (±0.9)Male sex (%)58.654.3Aetiology Viral611 Alcohol621 HCC2612 Metabolic920 Autoimmune/biliary3013 Other1015UKELD median [range]51 [43–66]53 [43–67]Liver co-morbidities Encepaholopathy2340 Refractory ascites07 Variceal bleeding148Other co-morbidities Hypertension103 Diabetes1110 Renal impairment14Competing interestsNone declared.</description><subject>Ascites</subject><subject>Cadavers</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Diabetes mellitus</subject><subject>Hepatic encephalopathy</subject><subject>Liver</subject><subject>Liver transplantation</subject><subject>Liver transplants</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Patient assessment</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><issn>0017-5749</issn><issn>1468-3288</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kMFOwzAMhiMEEmPwCqgS54w4aZOUGxpsIE0bh23XKO2SqaVrS9KicePCi_IktOrEybb0-bf1IXQLZALA-P2-bfKywJQAxYzQCMJ0wsUZGkHIJWZUynM0IgQEjkQYX6Ir73NCiJQxjND2bb3BhIvf759V2-BaN5kpm0B7b7w_9K2tXFBkn8YFjdOlrwtdNh1VlQ-BDnxW7gsTpB3oTGCOtXHdfmqu0YXVhTc3pzpGm9nzevqCF6v56_RxgRMgMu5-DndpLHeGhWHKEp5aHnNpRBLS1MZGamCSgmaJZTwCChZ0Nwiw2mhjrWVjdDfk1q76aI1vVF61ruxOKkqYFKEgLO4oPFCZb8xR1S47aPeltHtXXDARqeV2qubLGRfzJVVPHQ8DnxzyfxqI6nWrQbfqdauT7j7lD6pddak</recordid><startdate>201207</startdate><enddate>201207</enddate><creator>Lim, T R</creator><creator>Armstrong, M J</creator><creator>Houlihan, D D</creator><creator>Wong, K</creator><creator>Cook, C</creator><creator>Turner, A</creator><creator>Perrin, M</creator><creator>Cantrill, J</creator><creator>Ashcroft, P</creator><creator>Hughes, D</creator><creator>Weijers, C</creator><creator>Holt, A</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201207</creationdate><title>PTU-067 Out-patient assessment for liver transplantation: a single centre experience</title><author>Lim, T R ; Armstrong, M J ; Houlihan, D D ; Wong, K ; Cook, C ; Turner, A ; Perrin, M ; Cantrill, J ; Ashcroft, P ; Hughes, D ; Weijers, C ; Holt, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1089-204dc98de344c3b6cf6968e7b42cf9e8a13821a3bf365121f1aa3b71faeaefff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Ascites</topic><topic>Cadavers</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Diabetes mellitus</topic><topic>Hepatic encephalopathy</topic><topic>Liver</topic><topic>Liver transplantation</topic><topic>Liver transplants</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Patient assessment</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lim, T R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, M J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houlihan, D D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perrin, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cantrill, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashcroft, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weijers, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holt, A</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Gut</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lim, T R</au><au>Armstrong, M J</au><au>Houlihan, D D</au><au>Wong, K</au><au>Cook, C</au><au>Turner, A</au><au>Perrin, M</au><au>Cantrill, J</au><au>Ashcroft, P</au><au>Hughes, D</au><au>Weijers, C</au><au>Holt, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PTU-067 Out-patient assessment for liver transplantation: a single centre experience</atitle><jtitle>Gut</jtitle><addtitle>Gut</addtitle><date>2012-07</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>Suppl 2</issue><spage>A211</spage><pages>A211-</pages><issn>0017-5749</issn><eissn>1468-3288</eissn><abstract>IntroductionAssessment for orthotopic liver transplantation (LT) traditionally requires admission to hospital. In 2010, the liver unit at the University Hospital Birmingham (UHB) launched the first UK-based out-patient assessment programme (OPA). This study aims to describe our experience, with specific focus on feasibility, efficacy, cost-effectiveness and patient satisfaction.MethodsPatients undergoing elective LT assessment were retrospectively analysed between June 2010 and April 2011. Data collected included patient demographics/clinical features, LT assessment parameters, duration to listing/LT and reasons for LT refusal. An extensive cost evaluation was performed on both in- and out-patient LT assessment, including clinical tests, staffing and hospital facilities utilised. Patient satisfaction questionnaires were collected prospectively from April 2011 to November 2011.Results179 patients underwent LT assessment. 87/94 successfully completed OPA, with seven converted to in-patient LT assessment (IPA) due to pre-existing co-morbidity including refractory ascites and hepatic encephalopathy. All patients referred for OPA were triaged 2 weeks prior to the assessment to ensure suitability. 92 patients successfully underwent IPA. 66/87 OPAs were subsequently listed for LT (median duration from OPA to listing 3 days [0–306], of which 37/66 received a cadaveric graft. The reasons for OPAs not listed include: too early for LT (50.0%), contraindication to LT (42.9%) and patient refusal (7.1%). 53/92 IPAs were listed, mean duration 4 days [1–39], of which 34/53 were transplanted. Reasons for IPAs not listed: contraindication to LT (48.2%), too early for LT (44.4%) and patient refusal (7.4%). A single IPA costs on average £14 441 as compared to £11 494 for an OPA. Overall satisfaction (mean score 9.6/10; 10=very satisfied, 1=very dissatisfied) and convenience (7.9/10) for patients undergoing OPA were high.ConclusionWe describe for first time that OPA is feasible, efficient and cost-effective. With increasing demand on hospital beds in the UK National Health Service, such a programme has the potential to reduce the burden on LT in-patient services.Abstract PTU-067 Table 1Patient demographics and clinical featuresOPA (n=87)IPA (n=92)Mean age (±SD)52.3 (±1.3)55.0 (±0.9)Male sex (%)58.654.3Aetiology Viral611 Alcohol621 HCC2612 Metabolic920 Autoimmune/biliary3013 Other1015UKELD median [range]51 [43–66]53 [43–67]Liver co-morbidities Encepaholopathy2340 Refractory ascites07 Variceal bleeding148Other co-morbidities Hypertension103 Diabetes1110 Renal impairment14Competing interestsNone declared.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology</pub><doi>10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302514c.67</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0017-5749 |
ispartof | Gut, 2012-07, Vol.61 (Suppl 2), p.A211 |
issn | 0017-5749 1468-3288 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2038747039 |
source | BMJ Journals - NESLi2; PubMed Central |
subjects | Ascites Cadavers Demography Diabetes mellitus Hepatic encephalopathy Liver Liver transplantation Liver transplants Morbidity Patient assessment Patient satisfaction |
title | PTU-067 Out-patient assessment for liver transplantation: a single centre experience |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T00%3A47%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_istex&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PTU-067%E2%80%85Out-patient%20assessment%20for%20liver%20transplantation:%20a%20single%20centre%20experience&rft.jtitle=Gut&rft.au=Lim,%20T%20R&rft.date=2012-07&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=Suppl%202&rft.spage=A211&rft.pages=A211-&rft.issn=0017-5749&rft.eissn=1468-3288&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302514c.67&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_istex%3E2038747039%3C/proquest_istex%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2038747039&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |