PMO-107 Role of ERCP in the management of acute gallstone pancreatitis—a review of current practice
IntroductionCholecystectomy is the preferred definitive treatment to prevent further episodes of gallstone pancreatitis, if patients have clear bile ducts and are suitable for surgery. Endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) is utilised to either clear the biliary tree of gallstones p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gut 2012-07, Vol.61 (Suppl 2), p.A116-A116 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | A116 |
---|---|
container_issue | Suppl 2 |
container_start_page | A116 |
container_title | Gut |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | Johnstone, M Marriott, P Royle, J Hepburn, E Torrance, A Richardson, C Patel, A Bartlett, D Pinkney, T |
description | IntroductionCholecystectomy is the preferred definitive treatment to prevent further episodes of gallstone pancreatitis, if patients have clear bile ducts and are suitable for surgery. Endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) is utilised to either clear the biliary tree of gallstones prior to operation or as definitive treatment in those deemed unsuitable for surgery. We aimed to determine how ERCP is being utilised, its effect on recurrent pancreatitis and readmission rates.MethodsA multi-centre retrospective review was performed of patients presenting with their first episode of gallstone pancreatitis between 2006 and 2008. All patients with confirmed biochemical diagnosis of pancreatitis plus a radiological diagnosis of gallstones were included. Data were collected on demographics, ERCP, operative management and readmissions. Groups were compared using χ2 and medians using Mann–Whitney U.Results523 patients were identified (36% male, median age 63) in seven acute hospital trusts. 166 (32%) underwent ERCP with 20 (13%) having a failed procedure. 127 (77%) underwent sphincterotomy with the common bile duct being clear in 80% (133). 28 (17%) were performed within 72 h of admission and 105 (63%) were performed during the index admission. There was no effect on the timing of ERCP in the likelihood of the procedure failing to be completed (median time 10 vs 10.5 days). 364 patients underwent cholecystectomy with 29% undergoing ERCP prior to surgery. ERCP was performed as the definitive procedure in 58 patients; median age 80 years compared to 58 years in those undergoing cholecystectomy (p two patients died following successful ERCPs; one 87 year old of Clostridium difficile colitis and one 81 year old of pancreatitis. There was one episode of post ERCP pancreatitis, and one bleed that resolved spontaneously. An additional 5 patients developed a second episode of pancreatitis subsequent to their ERCP. Sphincterotomy had not been performed in three of these cases (p=0.08). ERCP with the index admission was the only significant factor to reduce recurrent pancreatitis rates (OR 0.092 (0.013–0.673); p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302514b.107 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2038742154</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2038742154</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b2067-41aeaf6fa2b156ec20d6a2ca388ccb790a13eab920b939c40c0322ec4fdcabf13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1O3EAQhVsRSAwDZ8AS6ybVP3bbSzICQjQBNErYtspNeeKJxx662wnZsckNckJOEltGrFnV4n1fPekxdiLgTAiVfVz3cdM2XIKQXIFMhS7PBJgPbCZ0lnMl83yPzQCE4anRxQE7DGEDAHleiBlb33295QP-8vx31TWUdFVysVrcJXWbxB-UbLHFNW2pjWOCro-UrLFpQuxaSnbYOk8Y61iHl-d_mHj6VdPvEXW996O18-hi7eiI7VfYBDp-vXP2_fLi2-IzX95eXS_Ol7yUkBmuBRJWWYWyFGlGTsJDhtKhynPnSlMACkVYFhLKQhVOgwMlJTldPTgsK6Hm7HT6u_PdY08h2k3X-3aotBJUbrQUqR4oM1HOdyF4quzO11v0f6wAO65qp1XtuKp9XXXIzGDyyaxDpKc3Df1PmxllUntzv7A3y9WX5Sed2ZGXE19uN-8u-Q-mj43z</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2038742154</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PMO-107 Role of ERCP in the management of acute gallstone pancreatitis—a review of current practice</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Johnstone, M ; Marriott, P ; Royle, J ; Hepburn, E ; Torrance, A ; Richardson, C ; Patel, A ; Bartlett, D ; Pinkney, T</creator><creatorcontrib>Johnstone, M ; Marriott, P ; Royle, J ; Hepburn, E ; Torrance, A ; Richardson, C ; Patel, A ; Bartlett, D ; Pinkney, T</creatorcontrib><description>IntroductionCholecystectomy is the preferred definitive treatment to prevent further episodes of gallstone pancreatitis, if patients have clear bile ducts and are suitable for surgery. Endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) is utilised to either clear the biliary tree of gallstones prior to operation or as definitive treatment in those deemed unsuitable for surgery. We aimed to determine how ERCP is being utilised, its effect on recurrent pancreatitis and readmission rates.MethodsA multi-centre retrospective review was performed of patients presenting with their first episode of gallstone pancreatitis between 2006 and 2008. All patients with confirmed biochemical diagnosis of pancreatitis plus a radiological diagnosis of gallstones were included. Data were collected on demographics, ERCP, operative management and readmissions. Groups were compared using χ2 and medians using Mann–Whitney U.Results523 patients were identified (36% male, median age 63) in seven acute hospital trusts. 166 (32%) underwent ERCP with 20 (13%) having a failed procedure. 127 (77%) underwent sphincterotomy with the common bile duct being clear in 80% (133). 28 (17%) were performed within 72 h of admission and 105 (63%) were performed during the index admission. There was no effect on the timing of ERCP in the likelihood of the procedure failing to be completed (median time 10 vs 10.5 days). 364 patients underwent cholecystectomy with 29% undergoing ERCP prior to surgery. ERCP was performed as the definitive procedure in 58 patients; median age 80 years compared to 58 years in those undergoing cholecystectomy (p two patients died following successful ERCPs; one 87 year old of Clostridium difficile colitis and one 81 year old of pancreatitis. There was one episode of post ERCP pancreatitis, and one bleed that resolved spontaneously. An additional 5 patients developed a second episode of pancreatitis subsequent to their ERCP. Sphincterotomy had not been performed in three of these cases (p=0.08). ERCP with the index admission was the only significant factor to reduce recurrent pancreatitis rates (OR 0.092 (0.013–0.673); p<0.01) however it failed to reduce the risk of readmission (OR 0.704 (0.39–1.26); P=0.24), which was only achieved by cholecystectomy within the index admission (OR 0.06 (0.01–0.4700); p<0.01).ConclusionERCP is currently being used as definitive treatment for gallstone pancreatitis in selected elderly patients. In our series ERCP had an acceptable rate of morbidity associated with the procedure, and was shown to significantly reduce the rate of recurrent pancreatitis. However, overall readmission rates were not improved by ERCP, with this only being achieved by cholecystectomy during the index admission.Competing interestsNone declared.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-5749</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-3288</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302514b.107</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology</publisher><subject>Bile ducts ; Calculi ; Cholecystectomy ; Colitis ; Demography ; Diagnosis ; Gallstones ; Geriatrics ; Morbidity ; Pancreatitis ; Pancreatography ; Patients ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Gut, 2012-07, Vol.61 (Suppl 2), p.A116-A116</ispartof><rights>2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><rights>Copyright: 2012 © 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://gut.bmj.com/content/61/Suppl_2/A116.2.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://gut.bmj.com/content/61/Suppl_2/A116.2.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,780,784,3196,23571,27924,27925,77600,77631</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johnstone, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marriott, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Royle, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hepburn, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torrance, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartlett, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinkney, T</creatorcontrib><title>PMO-107 Role of ERCP in the management of acute gallstone pancreatitis—a review of current practice</title><title>Gut</title><addtitle>Gut</addtitle><description>IntroductionCholecystectomy is the preferred definitive treatment to prevent further episodes of gallstone pancreatitis, if patients have clear bile ducts and are suitable for surgery. Endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) is utilised to either clear the biliary tree of gallstones prior to operation or as definitive treatment in those deemed unsuitable for surgery. We aimed to determine how ERCP is being utilised, its effect on recurrent pancreatitis and readmission rates.MethodsA multi-centre retrospective review was performed of patients presenting with their first episode of gallstone pancreatitis between 2006 and 2008. All patients with confirmed biochemical diagnosis of pancreatitis plus a radiological diagnosis of gallstones were included. Data were collected on demographics, ERCP, operative management and readmissions. Groups were compared using χ2 and medians using Mann–Whitney U.Results523 patients were identified (36% male, median age 63) in seven acute hospital trusts. 166 (32%) underwent ERCP with 20 (13%) having a failed procedure. 127 (77%) underwent sphincterotomy with the common bile duct being clear in 80% (133). 28 (17%) were performed within 72 h of admission and 105 (63%) were performed during the index admission. There was no effect on the timing of ERCP in the likelihood of the procedure failing to be completed (median time 10 vs 10.5 days). 364 patients underwent cholecystectomy with 29% undergoing ERCP prior to surgery. ERCP was performed as the definitive procedure in 58 patients; median age 80 years compared to 58 years in those undergoing cholecystectomy (p two patients died following successful ERCPs; one 87 year old of Clostridium difficile colitis and one 81 year old of pancreatitis. There was one episode of post ERCP pancreatitis, and one bleed that resolved spontaneously. An additional 5 patients developed a second episode of pancreatitis subsequent to their ERCP. Sphincterotomy had not been performed in three of these cases (p=0.08). ERCP with the index admission was the only significant factor to reduce recurrent pancreatitis rates (OR 0.092 (0.013–0.673); p<0.01) however it failed to reduce the risk of readmission (OR 0.704 (0.39–1.26); P=0.24), which was only achieved by cholecystectomy within the index admission (OR 0.06 (0.01–0.4700); p<0.01).ConclusionERCP is currently being used as definitive treatment for gallstone pancreatitis in selected elderly patients. In our series ERCP had an acceptable rate of morbidity associated with the procedure, and was shown to significantly reduce the rate of recurrent pancreatitis. However, overall readmission rates were not improved by ERCP, with this only being achieved by cholecystectomy during the index admission.Competing interestsNone declared.</description><subject>Bile ducts</subject><subject>Calculi</subject><subject>Cholecystectomy</subject><subject>Colitis</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Gallstones</subject><subject>Geriatrics</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Pancreatitis</subject><subject>Pancreatography</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0017-5749</issn><issn>1468-3288</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1O3EAQhVsRSAwDZ8AS6ybVP3bbSzICQjQBNErYtspNeeKJxx662wnZsckNckJOEltGrFnV4n1fPekxdiLgTAiVfVz3cdM2XIKQXIFMhS7PBJgPbCZ0lnMl83yPzQCE4anRxQE7DGEDAHleiBlb33295QP-8vx31TWUdFVysVrcJXWbxB-UbLHFNW2pjWOCro-UrLFpQuxaSnbYOk8Y61iHl-d_mHj6VdPvEXW996O18-hi7eiI7VfYBDp-vXP2_fLi2-IzX95eXS_Ol7yUkBmuBRJWWYWyFGlGTsJDhtKhynPnSlMACkVYFhLKQhVOgwMlJTldPTgsK6Hm7HT6u_PdY08h2k3X-3aotBJUbrQUqR4oM1HOdyF4quzO11v0f6wAO65qp1XtuKp9XXXIzGDyyaxDpKc3Df1PmxllUntzv7A3y9WX5Sed2ZGXE19uN-8u-Q-mj43z</recordid><startdate>201207</startdate><enddate>201207</enddate><creator>Johnstone, M</creator><creator>Marriott, P</creator><creator>Royle, J</creator><creator>Hepburn, E</creator><creator>Torrance, A</creator><creator>Richardson, C</creator><creator>Patel, A</creator><creator>Bartlett, D</creator><creator>Pinkney, T</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201207</creationdate><title>PMO-107 Role of ERCP in the management of acute gallstone pancreatitis—a review of current practice</title><author>Johnstone, M ; Marriott, P ; Royle, J ; Hepburn, E ; Torrance, A ; Richardson, C ; Patel, A ; Bartlett, D ; Pinkney, T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b2067-41aeaf6fa2b156ec20d6a2ca388ccb790a13eab920b939c40c0322ec4fdcabf13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Bile ducts</topic><topic>Calculi</topic><topic>Cholecystectomy</topic><topic>Colitis</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Gallstones</topic><topic>Geriatrics</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Pancreatitis</topic><topic>Pancreatography</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johnstone, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marriott, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Royle, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hepburn, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torrance, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartlett, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinkney, T</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Gut</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johnstone, M</au><au>Marriott, P</au><au>Royle, J</au><au>Hepburn, E</au><au>Torrance, A</au><au>Richardson, C</au><au>Patel, A</au><au>Bartlett, D</au><au>Pinkney, T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PMO-107 Role of ERCP in the management of acute gallstone pancreatitis—a review of current practice</atitle><jtitle>Gut</jtitle><addtitle>Gut</addtitle><date>2012-07</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>Suppl 2</issue><spage>A116</spage><epage>A116</epage><pages>A116-A116</pages><issn>0017-5749</issn><eissn>1468-3288</eissn><abstract>IntroductionCholecystectomy is the preferred definitive treatment to prevent further episodes of gallstone pancreatitis, if patients have clear bile ducts and are suitable for surgery. Endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) is utilised to either clear the biliary tree of gallstones prior to operation or as definitive treatment in those deemed unsuitable for surgery. We aimed to determine how ERCP is being utilised, its effect on recurrent pancreatitis and readmission rates.MethodsA multi-centre retrospective review was performed of patients presenting with their first episode of gallstone pancreatitis between 2006 and 2008. All patients with confirmed biochemical diagnosis of pancreatitis plus a radiological diagnosis of gallstones were included. Data were collected on demographics, ERCP, operative management and readmissions. Groups were compared using χ2 and medians using Mann–Whitney U.Results523 patients were identified (36% male, median age 63) in seven acute hospital trusts. 166 (32%) underwent ERCP with 20 (13%) having a failed procedure. 127 (77%) underwent sphincterotomy with the common bile duct being clear in 80% (133). 28 (17%) were performed within 72 h of admission and 105 (63%) were performed during the index admission. There was no effect on the timing of ERCP in the likelihood of the procedure failing to be completed (median time 10 vs 10.5 days). 364 patients underwent cholecystectomy with 29% undergoing ERCP prior to surgery. ERCP was performed as the definitive procedure in 58 patients; median age 80 years compared to 58 years in those undergoing cholecystectomy (p two patients died following successful ERCPs; one 87 year old of Clostridium difficile colitis and one 81 year old of pancreatitis. There was one episode of post ERCP pancreatitis, and one bleed that resolved spontaneously. An additional 5 patients developed a second episode of pancreatitis subsequent to their ERCP. Sphincterotomy had not been performed in three of these cases (p=0.08). ERCP with the index admission was the only significant factor to reduce recurrent pancreatitis rates (OR 0.092 (0.013–0.673); p<0.01) however it failed to reduce the risk of readmission (OR 0.704 (0.39–1.26); P=0.24), which was only achieved by cholecystectomy within the index admission (OR 0.06 (0.01–0.4700); p<0.01).ConclusionERCP is currently being used as definitive treatment for gallstone pancreatitis in selected elderly patients. In our series ERCP had an acceptable rate of morbidity associated with the procedure, and was shown to significantly reduce the rate of recurrent pancreatitis. However, overall readmission rates were not improved by ERCP, with this only being achieved by cholecystectomy during the index admission.Competing interestsNone declared.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology</pub><doi>10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302514b.107</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0017-5749 |
ispartof | Gut, 2012-07, Vol.61 (Suppl 2), p.A116-A116 |
issn | 0017-5749 1468-3288 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2038742154 |
source | BMJ Journals - NESLi2; PubMed Central |
subjects | Bile ducts Calculi Cholecystectomy Colitis Demography Diagnosis Gallstones Geriatrics Morbidity Pancreatitis Pancreatography Patients Surgery |
title | PMO-107 Role of ERCP in the management of acute gallstone pancreatitis—a review of current practice |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T09%3A38%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PMO-107%E2%80%85Role%20of%20ERCP%20in%20the%20management%20of%20acute%20gallstone%20pancreatitis%E2%80%94a%20review%20of%20current%20practice&rft.jtitle=Gut&rft.au=Johnstone,%20M&rft.date=2012-07&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=Suppl%202&rft.spage=A116&rft.epage=A116&rft.pages=A116-A116&rft.issn=0017-5749&rft.eissn=1468-3288&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302514b.107&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2038742154%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2038742154&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |