Optimization of a genomic breeding program for a moderately sized dairy cattle population

Although it is now standard practice to genotype thousands of female calves, genotyping of bull calves is still limited to progeny of elite cows. In addition to genotyping costs, increasing the pool of candidate sires requires purchase, isolation and identification of calves until selection decision...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of animal science 2016-09, Vol.94, p.120-120
Hauptverfasser: Weller, J I, Reiner-Benaim, A, Ezra, E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 120
container_issue
container_start_page 120
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 94
creator Weller, J I
Reiner-Benaim, A
Ezra, E
description Although it is now standard practice to genotype thousands of female calves, genotyping of bull calves is still limited to progeny of elite cows. In addition to genotyping costs, increasing the pool of candidate sires requires purchase, isolation and identification of calves until selection decisions are made. We economically optimized via simulation a genomic breeding program for a population of ~120,000 milk-recorded cows, corresponding to the Israeli Holstein population. All 30,000 heifers and 60,000 older cows of parities 2-4 were potential bull dams. Animals were assumed to have genetic evaluations for a trait with heritability of 0.25 derived by an animal model evaluation of the population. A pseudo phenotype was generated, consisting of the animal's genetic value plus a residual with variance set to obtain the assumed reliability for each group of animals. Genetic values of founder heifers were simulated by sampling from a normal distribution with a mean of zero, and a variance of unity. Genetic values of older cows were generated with the same variance, but with means decreasing by 0.2 for each additional parity, to reflect the assumed genetic gain per year. Reliabilities increased with cow age. Forty founder sires were simulated in a similar manner assuming reliabilities of 0.9, and a mean genetic value of zero. From 4 to 20 bulls and from 200 to 27,000 cows with the highest pseudo phenotypes were selected as candidate bull parents. For all progeny of the founder animals, genetic values were simulated as the mean of the parental values plus a Mendelian sampling effect with a variance of 0.5. A probability of 0.3 for a healthy bull calf per mating, and a genomic reliability of 0.43 were assumed. The 40 bull calves with the highest genomic evaluations were selected for general service for 1 yr. Cost included genotyping of candidate bulls and their dames, purchase of the calves from the farmers and identification. Costs of raising culled calves were recovered by resale for beef. Annual costs dependent on the number of candidate bulls were estimated as: $10,650 + $300·candidate bulls. Annual profit per cow per genetic SD was $106. Economic optimum with a discount rate of 5% and a profit horizon of 15 yr was obtained with 1650 to 1850 candidate bulls. Annual response to selection ranged from 0.4 to 0.35 genetic SD for 4 to 20 bull sires.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2038230417</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2038230417</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_20382304173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjLsKwjAUQIMoWB__cMG5kIfVOovi5uLiVGJzW1LaJCbp0H69RfwApzOcw5mRhGU8SwU7iDlJKOUszXPGl2QVQkMp49kpS8jz7qLu9CijtgZsBRJqNLbTJbw8otKmBudt7WUHlfWT7qxCLyO2AwQ9ogIltR-glDG2CM66vv3ONmRRyTbg9sc12V0vj_MtnXbvHkMsGtt7M6mCU5FzQffsKP6rPjBORAU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2038230417</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimization of a genomic breeding program for a moderately sized dairy cattle population</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Weller, J I ; Reiner-Benaim, A ; Ezra, E</creator><creatorcontrib>Weller, J I ; Reiner-Benaim, A ; Ezra, E</creatorcontrib><description>Although it is now standard practice to genotype thousands of female calves, genotyping of bull calves is still limited to progeny of elite cows. In addition to genotyping costs, increasing the pool of candidate sires requires purchase, isolation and identification of calves until selection decisions are made. We economically optimized via simulation a genomic breeding program for a population of ~120,000 milk-recorded cows, corresponding to the Israeli Holstein population. All 30,000 heifers and 60,000 older cows of parities 2-4 were potential bull dams. Animals were assumed to have genetic evaluations for a trait with heritability of 0.25 derived by an animal model evaluation of the population. A pseudo phenotype was generated, consisting of the animal's genetic value plus a residual with variance set to obtain the assumed reliability for each group of animals. Genetic values of founder heifers were simulated by sampling from a normal distribution with a mean of zero, and a variance of unity. Genetic values of older cows were generated with the same variance, but with means decreasing by 0.2 for each additional parity, to reflect the assumed genetic gain per year. Reliabilities increased with cow age. Forty founder sires were simulated in a similar manner assuming reliabilities of 0.9, and a mean genetic value of zero. From 4 to 20 bulls and from 200 to 27,000 cows with the highest pseudo phenotypes were selected as candidate bull parents. For all progeny of the founder animals, genetic values were simulated as the mean of the parental values plus a Mendelian sampling effect with a variance of 0.5. A probability of 0.3 for a healthy bull calf per mating, and a genomic reliability of 0.43 were assumed. The 40 bull calves with the highest genomic evaluations were selected for general service for 1 yr. Cost included genotyping of candidate bulls and their dames, purchase of the calves from the farmers and identification. Costs of raising culled calves were recovered by resale for beef. Annual costs dependent on the number of candidate bulls were estimated as: $10,650 + $300·candidate bulls. Annual profit per cow per genetic SD was $106. Economic optimum with a discount rate of 5% and a profit horizon of 15 yr was obtained with 1650 to 1850 candidate bulls. Annual response to selection ranged from 0.4 to 0.35 genetic SD for 4 to 20 bull sires.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Agricultural economics ; Animal populations ; Animals ; Breeding ; Calves ; Cattle ; Computer simulation ; Costs ; Cow's milk ; Dairy cattle ; Economic conditions ; Genotype &amp; phenotype ; Genotyping ; Heredity ; Heritability ; Livestock breeding ; Normal distribution ; Offspring ; Optimization ; Parents ; Phenotypes ; Progeny ; Reliability ; Sampling ; Statistical analysis ; Variance</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2016-09, Vol.94, p.120-120</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press, UK Sep 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weller, J I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiner-Benaim, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ezra, E</creatorcontrib><title>Optimization of a genomic breeding program for a moderately sized dairy cattle population</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>Although it is now standard practice to genotype thousands of female calves, genotyping of bull calves is still limited to progeny of elite cows. In addition to genotyping costs, increasing the pool of candidate sires requires purchase, isolation and identification of calves until selection decisions are made. We economically optimized via simulation a genomic breeding program for a population of ~120,000 milk-recorded cows, corresponding to the Israeli Holstein population. All 30,000 heifers and 60,000 older cows of parities 2-4 were potential bull dams. Animals were assumed to have genetic evaluations for a trait with heritability of 0.25 derived by an animal model evaluation of the population. A pseudo phenotype was generated, consisting of the animal's genetic value plus a residual with variance set to obtain the assumed reliability for each group of animals. Genetic values of founder heifers were simulated by sampling from a normal distribution with a mean of zero, and a variance of unity. Genetic values of older cows were generated with the same variance, but with means decreasing by 0.2 for each additional parity, to reflect the assumed genetic gain per year. Reliabilities increased with cow age. Forty founder sires were simulated in a similar manner assuming reliabilities of 0.9, and a mean genetic value of zero. From 4 to 20 bulls and from 200 to 27,000 cows with the highest pseudo phenotypes were selected as candidate bull parents. For all progeny of the founder animals, genetic values were simulated as the mean of the parental values plus a Mendelian sampling effect with a variance of 0.5. A probability of 0.3 for a healthy bull calf per mating, and a genomic reliability of 0.43 were assumed. The 40 bull calves with the highest genomic evaluations were selected for general service for 1 yr. Cost included genotyping of candidate bulls and their dames, purchase of the calves from the farmers and identification. Costs of raising culled calves were recovered by resale for beef. Annual costs dependent on the number of candidate bulls were estimated as: $10,650 + $300·candidate bulls. Annual profit per cow per genetic SD was $106. Economic optimum with a discount rate of 5% and a profit horizon of 15 yr was obtained with 1650 to 1850 candidate bulls. Annual response to selection ranged from 0.4 to 0.35 genetic SD for 4 to 20 bull sires.</description><subject>Agricultural economics</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Calves</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Cow's milk</subject><subject>Dairy cattle</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Genotype &amp; phenotype</subject><subject>Genotyping</subject><subject>Heredity</subject><subject>Heritability</subject><subject>Livestock breeding</subject><subject>Normal distribution</subject><subject>Offspring</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>Phenotypes</subject><subject>Progeny</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Variance</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjLsKwjAUQIMoWB__cMG5kIfVOovi5uLiVGJzW1LaJCbp0H69RfwApzOcw5mRhGU8SwU7iDlJKOUszXPGl2QVQkMp49kpS8jz7qLu9CijtgZsBRJqNLbTJbw8otKmBudt7WUHlfWT7qxCLyO2AwQ9ogIltR-glDG2CM66vv3ONmRRyTbg9sc12V0vj_MtnXbvHkMsGtt7M6mCU5FzQffsKP6rPjBORAU</recordid><startdate>20160901</startdate><enddate>20160901</enddate><creator>Weller, J I</creator><creator>Reiner-Benaim, A</creator><creator>Ezra, E</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160901</creationdate><title>Optimization of a genomic breeding program for a moderately sized dairy cattle population</title><author>Weller, J I ; Reiner-Benaim, A ; Ezra, E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20382304173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Agricultural economics</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Calves</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Cow's milk</topic><topic>Dairy cattle</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Genotype &amp; phenotype</topic><topic>Genotyping</topic><topic>Heredity</topic><topic>Heritability</topic><topic>Livestock breeding</topic><topic>Normal distribution</topic><topic>Offspring</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>Phenotypes</topic><topic>Progeny</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Variance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weller, J I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiner-Benaim, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ezra, E</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weller, J I</au><au>Reiner-Benaim, A</au><au>Ezra, E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimization of a genomic breeding program for a moderately sized dairy cattle population</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2016-09-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>94</volume><spage>120</spage><epage>120</epage><pages>120-120</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>Although it is now standard practice to genotype thousands of female calves, genotyping of bull calves is still limited to progeny of elite cows. In addition to genotyping costs, increasing the pool of candidate sires requires purchase, isolation and identification of calves until selection decisions are made. We economically optimized via simulation a genomic breeding program for a population of ~120,000 milk-recorded cows, corresponding to the Israeli Holstein population. All 30,000 heifers and 60,000 older cows of parities 2-4 were potential bull dams. Animals were assumed to have genetic evaluations for a trait with heritability of 0.25 derived by an animal model evaluation of the population. A pseudo phenotype was generated, consisting of the animal's genetic value plus a residual with variance set to obtain the assumed reliability for each group of animals. Genetic values of founder heifers were simulated by sampling from a normal distribution with a mean of zero, and a variance of unity. Genetic values of older cows were generated with the same variance, but with means decreasing by 0.2 for each additional parity, to reflect the assumed genetic gain per year. Reliabilities increased with cow age. Forty founder sires were simulated in a similar manner assuming reliabilities of 0.9, and a mean genetic value of zero. From 4 to 20 bulls and from 200 to 27,000 cows with the highest pseudo phenotypes were selected as candidate bull parents. For all progeny of the founder animals, genetic values were simulated as the mean of the parental values plus a Mendelian sampling effect with a variance of 0.5. A probability of 0.3 for a healthy bull calf per mating, and a genomic reliability of 0.43 were assumed. The 40 bull calves with the highest genomic evaluations were selected for general service for 1 yr. Cost included genotyping of candidate bulls and their dames, purchase of the calves from the farmers and identification. Costs of raising culled calves were recovered by resale for beef. Annual costs dependent on the number of candidate bulls were estimated as: $10,650 + $300·candidate bulls. Annual profit per cow per genetic SD was $106. Economic optimum with a discount rate of 5% and a profit horizon of 15 yr was obtained with 1650 to 1850 candidate bulls. Annual response to selection ranged from 0.4 to 0.35 genetic SD for 4 to 20 bull sires.</abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8812
ispartof Journal of animal science, 2016-09, Vol.94, p.120-120
issn 0021-8812
1525-3163
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2038230417
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Agricultural economics
Animal populations
Animals
Breeding
Calves
Cattle
Computer simulation
Costs
Cow's milk
Dairy cattle
Economic conditions
Genotype & phenotype
Genotyping
Heredity
Heritability
Livestock breeding
Normal distribution
Offspring
Optimization
Parents
Phenotypes
Progeny
Reliability
Sampling
Statistical analysis
Variance
title Optimization of a genomic breeding program for a moderately sized dairy cattle population
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T13%3A28%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimization%20of%20a%20genomic%20breeding%20program%20for%20a%20moderately%20sized%20dairy%20cattle%20population&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Weller,%20J%20I&rft.date=2016-09-01&rft.volume=94&rft.spage=120&rft.epage=120&rft.pages=120-120&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2038230417%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2038230417&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true