Guardians of the Status Quo: Stopping the Diffusion of Popular Challenges to Authoritarian Rule
How do authoritarian leaders insulate their regimes from the contagion effects generated by cross-national waves of popular protest? This article compares the strategies of leaders in four authoritarian regimes--Azerbaijan, China, Russia, and Saudi Arabia--and their responses to the color revolution...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Demokratizatsiya (Washington, D.C.) D.C.), 2018-03, Vol.26 (2), p.251-283 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 283 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 251 |
container_title | Demokratizatsiya (Washington, D.C.) |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Koesel, Karrie J |
description | How do authoritarian leaders insulate their regimes from the contagion effects generated by cross-national waves of popular protest? This article compares the strategies of leaders in four authoritarian regimes--Azerbaijan, China, Russia, and Saudi Arabia--and their responses to the color revolutions and the Arab uprisings. This comparison reveals that these countries have developed an elaborate and similar toolkit to defend the authoritarian status quo and that vigilant autocrats take preemptive measures even when popular uprisings erupt in geographically distant regions or within very different political systems. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2036982245</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A538725327</galeid><sourcerecordid>A538725327</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g248t-5013f0609ae638e81987008be2cd2caefcda5d776ee3e074500685049e2ddbf33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkV1LwzAUhosoOKf_IeB1Jc1XU-_G1CkIfkzBu5K1J11Gl9Qm-f9mKg5h5OIccp685w3vUTYpKoZzJjA9Tj0uWS4kE6fZmfcbjLEgkk2yehHV2BplPXIahTWgZVAhevQS3XXq3TAY230PbozW0Rtnd-SzG2KvRjRfq74H24FHwaFZDGs3mqDGpIheYw_n2YlWvYeL3zrN3u9u3-b3-ePT4mE-e8w7wmTIOS6oxgJXCgSVIItKlhjLFZCmJY0C3bSKt2UpACikr_DkX3LMKiBtu9KUTrPLH91hdJ8RfKg3Lo42rawJpqKShDC-pzrVQ22sdmFUzdb4pp5xKkvCKSkTlR-gOrAwqt5Z0CZd_-OvDvDptLA1zcEH7M_sBpqwjR72fkVFCoHr5S6-XXqFJCku_kG_AAOujDo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2036982245</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Guardians of the Status Quo: Stopping the Diffusion of Popular Challenges to Authoritarian Rule</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><creator>Koesel, Karrie J</creator><creatorcontrib>Koesel, Karrie J</creatorcontrib><description>How do authoritarian leaders insulate their regimes from the contagion effects generated by cross-national waves of popular protest? This article compares the strategies of leaders in four authoritarian regimes--Azerbaijan, China, Russia, and Saudi Arabia--and their responses to the color revolutions and the Arab uprisings. This comparison reveals that these countries have developed an elaborate and similar toolkit to defend the authoritarian status quo and that vigilant autocrats take preemptive measures even when popular uprisings erupt in geographically distant regions or within very different political systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1074-6846</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1940-4603</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Institute for European, Russian, and Eurasian Studies, The George Washington University</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Authoritarianism ; Autocracy ; Democracy ; Demonstrations & protests ; Dictators ; Forecasts and trends ; Influence ; Political systems ; Politics ; Power ; Public opinion surveys ; Rebellions ; Revolutions ; State-society relations</subject><ispartof>Demokratizatsiya (Washington, D.C.), 2018-03, Vol.26 (2), p.251-283</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 George Washington University</rights><rights>Copyright Kirkpatrick Jordon Foundation Spring 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12845</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Koesel, Karrie J</creatorcontrib><title>Guardians of the Status Quo: Stopping the Diffusion of Popular Challenges to Authoritarian Rule</title><title>Demokratizatsiya (Washington, D.C.)</title><description>How do authoritarian leaders insulate their regimes from the contagion effects generated by cross-national waves of popular protest? This article compares the strategies of leaders in four authoritarian regimes--Azerbaijan, China, Russia, and Saudi Arabia--and their responses to the color revolutions and the Arab uprisings. This comparison reveals that these countries have developed an elaborate and similar toolkit to defend the authoritarian status quo and that vigilant autocrats take preemptive measures even when popular uprisings erupt in geographically distant regions or within very different political systems.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Authoritarianism</subject><subject>Autocracy</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Demonstrations & protests</subject><subject>Dictators</subject><subject>Forecasts and trends</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Political systems</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Public opinion surveys</subject><subject>Rebellions</subject><subject>Revolutions</subject><subject>State-society relations</subject><issn>1074-6846</issn><issn>1940-4603</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>QXPDG</sourceid><recordid>eNptkV1LwzAUhosoOKf_IeB1Jc1XU-_G1CkIfkzBu5K1J11Gl9Qm-f9mKg5h5OIccp685w3vUTYpKoZzJjA9Tj0uWS4kE6fZmfcbjLEgkk2yehHV2BplPXIahTWgZVAhevQS3XXq3TAY230PbozW0Rtnd-SzG2KvRjRfq74H24FHwaFZDGs3mqDGpIheYw_n2YlWvYeL3zrN3u9u3-b3-ePT4mE-e8w7wmTIOS6oxgJXCgSVIItKlhjLFZCmJY0C3bSKt2UpACikr_DkX3LMKiBtu9KUTrPLH91hdJ8RfKg3Lo42rawJpqKShDC-pzrVQ22sdmFUzdb4pp5xKkvCKSkTlR-gOrAwqt5Z0CZd_-OvDvDptLA1zcEH7M_sBpqwjR72fkVFCoHr5S6-XXqFJCku_kG_AAOujDo</recordid><startdate>20180322</startdate><enddate>20180322</enddate><creator>Koesel, Karrie J</creator><general>Institute for European, Russian, and Eurasian Studies, The George Washington University</general><general>George Washington University</general><general>Kirkpatrick Jordon Foundation</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>884</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M0I</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180322</creationdate><title>Guardians of the Status Quo: Stopping the Diffusion of Popular Challenges to Authoritarian Rule</title><author>Koesel, Karrie J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g248t-5013f0609ae638e81987008be2cd2caefcda5d776ee3e074500685049e2ddbf33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Authoritarianism</topic><topic>Autocracy</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Demonstrations & protests</topic><topic>Dictators</topic><topic>Forecasts and trends</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Political systems</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Public opinion surveys</topic><topic>Rebellions</topic><topic>Revolutions</topic><topic>State-society relations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koesel, Karrie J</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Alt-PressWatch (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Alt-PressWatch</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Demokratizatsiya (Washington, D.C.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koesel, Karrie J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Guardians of the Status Quo: Stopping the Diffusion of Popular Challenges to Authoritarian Rule</atitle><jtitle>Demokratizatsiya (Washington, D.C.)</jtitle><date>2018-03-22</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>251</spage><epage>283</epage><pages>251-283</pages><issn>1074-6846</issn><eissn>1940-4603</eissn><abstract>How do authoritarian leaders insulate their regimes from the contagion effects generated by cross-national waves of popular protest? This article compares the strategies of leaders in four authoritarian regimes--Azerbaijan, China, Russia, and Saudi Arabia--and their responses to the color revolutions and the Arab uprisings. This comparison reveals that these countries have developed an elaborate and similar toolkit to defend the authoritarian status quo and that vigilant autocrats take preemptive measures even when popular uprisings erupt in geographically distant regions or within very different political systems.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Institute for European, Russian, and Eurasian Studies, The George Washington University</pub><tpages>33</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1074-6846 |
ispartof | Demokratizatsiya (Washington, D.C.), 2018-03, Vol.26 (2), p.251-283 |
issn | 1074-6846 1940-4603 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2036982245 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Political Science Complete |
subjects | Analysis Authoritarianism Autocracy Democracy Demonstrations & protests Dictators Forecasts and trends Influence Political systems Politics Power Public opinion surveys Rebellions Revolutions State-society relations |
title | Guardians of the Status Quo: Stopping the Diffusion of Popular Challenges to Authoritarian Rule |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T20%3A17%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Guardians%20of%20the%20Status%20Quo:%20Stopping%20the%20Diffusion%20of%20Popular%20Challenges%20to%20Authoritarian%20Rule&rft.jtitle=Demokratizatsiya%20(Washington,%20D.C.)&rft.au=Koesel,%20Karrie%20J&rft.date=2018-03-22&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=251&rft.epage=283&rft.pages=251-283&rft.issn=1074-6846&rft.eissn=1940-4603&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA538725327%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2036982245&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A538725327&rfr_iscdi=true |