State accountability for violations of intellectual property rights: How to "fix" Florida prepaid (and how not to)
In 2 companion cases decided during the October 1998 Term, the Supreme Court raised significant barriers to federal intellectual property suits against state governments. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. College Savings Bank held that the constitutional doctrine of state sove...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Texas law review 2001-04, Vol.79 (5), p.1037 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1037 |
container_title | Texas law review |
container_volume | 79 |
creator | Berman, Mitchell N Reese, R Anthony Young, Ernest A |
description | In 2 companion cases decided during the October 1998 Term, the Supreme Court raised significant barriers to federal intellectual property suits against state governments. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. College Savings Bank held that the constitutional doctrine of state sovereign immunity blocked Congress's effort to subject states to liability for patent infringement under the Patent and Plant Variety Protection Remedy Clarification Act. The other case, College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board, similarly held that Congress could not subject states to damages liability for false advertising under the Lanham Act. While neither of these cases dealt with the copyright laws implicated by our hypothetical, the 5th Circuit has already relied on Florida Prepaid and College Savings Bank to also bar copyright suits against state entities. These developments have sparked efforts in Congress to amend the federal intellectual property laws to ensure that state governments will remain accountable for violations of federal rights. In this Article, it is considered what form such legislation ought to take in order to withstand future constitutional challenge. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_203679435</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72672578</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p180t-156f2906fdfca9e43d740df9fa0f78442d3290f3f17f482e0bd3012f4778394a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotzktLxDAUBeAgCo6j_yF0pYvCzaNN404GxxEGXKjgbsg0uU6G0NQ09fHvDejqLs7HOfeELJiWvO4a9XZKFgASaikZOycX03QEgEbpZkHSczbZUdP3cR6y2fvg8w_FmOinj8FkH4eJRqR-yC4E1-fZBDqmOLpUXPLvhzzd0k38ojnSCv13RdchJm9NUW403tJrM1h6KGKIuaibS3KGJkzu6v8uyev6_mW1qbdPD4-ru209sg5yzZoWuYYWLfZGOymskmBRowFUnZTcihKjQKZQdtzB3gpgHKVSndDSiCWp_nrLux-zm_LuGOc0lMkdB9EqLUUjfgG9zVfX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>203679435</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>State accountability for violations of intellectual property rights: How to "fix" Florida prepaid (and how not to)</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Berman, Mitchell N ; Reese, R Anthony ; Young, Ernest A</creator><creatorcontrib>Berman, Mitchell N ; Reese, R Anthony ; Young, Ernest A</creatorcontrib><description>In 2 companion cases decided during the October 1998 Term, the Supreme Court raised significant barriers to federal intellectual property suits against state governments. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. College Savings Bank held that the constitutional doctrine of state sovereign immunity blocked Congress's effort to subject states to liability for patent infringement under the Patent and Plant Variety Protection Remedy Clarification Act. The other case, College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board, similarly held that Congress could not subject states to damages liability for false advertising under the Lanham Act. While neither of these cases dealt with the copyright laws implicated by our hypothetical, the 5th Circuit has already relied on Florida Prepaid and College Savings Bank to also bar copyright suits against state entities. These developments have sparked efforts in Congress to amend the federal intellectual property laws to ensure that state governments will remain accountable for violations of federal rights. In this Article, it is considered what form such legislation ought to take in order to withstand future constitutional challenge.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0040-4411</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1942-857X</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TXLRA2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Austin: University of Texas, Austin, School of Law Publications, Inc</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Bills ; Compliance ; Copyright ; Federal court decisions ; Federal state relations ; Higher education ; Immunity from prosecution ; Infringement ; Intellectual property ; Law ; Prepaid services ; Privileges & immunities ; Proposals ; Savings banks ; State government ; Supreme Court decisions ; Violations ; Waivers</subject><ispartof>Texas law review, 2001-04, Vol.79 (5), p.1037</ispartof><rights>Copyright University of Texas, Austin, School of Law Publications, Inc. Apr 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Berman, Mitchell N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reese, R Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Ernest A</creatorcontrib><title>State accountability for violations of intellectual property rights: How to "fix" Florida prepaid (and how not to)</title><title>Texas law review</title><description>In 2 companion cases decided during the October 1998 Term, the Supreme Court raised significant barriers to federal intellectual property suits against state governments. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. College Savings Bank held that the constitutional doctrine of state sovereign immunity blocked Congress's effort to subject states to liability for patent infringement under the Patent and Plant Variety Protection Remedy Clarification Act. The other case, College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board, similarly held that Congress could not subject states to damages liability for false advertising under the Lanham Act. While neither of these cases dealt with the copyright laws implicated by our hypothetical, the 5th Circuit has already relied on Florida Prepaid and College Savings Bank to also bar copyright suits against state entities. These developments have sparked efforts in Congress to amend the federal intellectual property laws to ensure that state governments will remain accountable for violations of federal rights. In this Article, it is considered what form such legislation ought to take in order to withstand future constitutional challenge.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Bills</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Copyright</subject><subject>Federal court decisions</subject><subject>Federal state relations</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Immunity from prosecution</subject><subject>Infringement</subject><subject>Intellectual property</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Prepaid services</subject><subject>Privileges & immunities</subject><subject>Proposals</subject><subject>Savings banks</subject><subject>State government</subject><subject>Supreme Court decisions</subject><subject>Violations</subject><subject>Waivers</subject><issn>0040-4411</issn><issn>1942-857X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNotzktLxDAUBeAgCo6j_yF0pYvCzaNN404GxxEGXKjgbsg0uU6G0NQ09fHvDejqLs7HOfeELJiWvO4a9XZKFgASaikZOycX03QEgEbpZkHSczbZUdP3cR6y2fvg8w_FmOinj8FkH4eJRqR-yC4E1-fZBDqmOLpUXPLvhzzd0k38ojnSCv13RdchJm9NUW403tJrM1h6KGKIuaibS3KGJkzu6v8uyev6_mW1qbdPD4-ru209sg5yzZoWuYYWLfZGOymskmBRowFUnZTcihKjQKZQdtzB3gpgHKVSndDSiCWp_nrLux-zm_LuGOc0lMkdB9EqLUUjfgG9zVfX</recordid><startdate>20010401</startdate><enddate>20010401</enddate><creator>Berman, Mitchell N</creator><creator>Reese, R Anthony</creator><creator>Young, Ernest A</creator><general>University of Texas, Austin, School of Law Publications, Inc</general><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010401</creationdate><title>State accountability for violations of intellectual property rights: How to "fix" Florida prepaid (and how not to)</title><author>Berman, Mitchell N ; Reese, R Anthony ; Young, Ernest A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p180t-156f2906fdfca9e43d740df9fa0f78442d3290f3f17f482e0bd3012f4778394a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Bills</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Copyright</topic><topic>Federal court decisions</topic><topic>Federal state relations</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Immunity from prosecution</topic><topic>Infringement</topic><topic>Intellectual property</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Prepaid services</topic><topic>Privileges & immunities</topic><topic>Proposals</topic><topic>Savings banks</topic><topic>State government</topic><topic>Supreme Court decisions</topic><topic>Violations</topic><topic>Waivers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Berman, Mitchell N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reese, R Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Ernest A</creatorcontrib><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Texas law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Berman, Mitchell N</au><au>Reese, R Anthony</au><au>Young, Ernest A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>State accountability for violations of intellectual property rights: How to "fix" Florida prepaid (and how not to)</atitle><jtitle>Texas law review</jtitle><date>2001-04-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>79</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1037</spage><pages>1037-</pages><issn>0040-4411</issn><eissn>1942-857X</eissn><coden>TXLRA2</coden><abstract>In 2 companion cases decided during the October 1998 Term, the Supreme Court raised significant barriers to federal intellectual property suits against state governments. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. College Savings Bank held that the constitutional doctrine of state sovereign immunity blocked Congress's effort to subject states to liability for patent infringement under the Patent and Plant Variety Protection Remedy Clarification Act. The other case, College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board, similarly held that Congress could not subject states to damages liability for false advertising under the Lanham Act. While neither of these cases dealt with the copyright laws implicated by our hypothetical, the 5th Circuit has already relied on Florida Prepaid and College Savings Bank to also bar copyright suits against state entities. These developments have sparked efforts in Congress to amend the federal intellectual property laws to ensure that state governments will remain accountable for violations of federal rights. In this Article, it is considered what form such legislation ought to take in order to withstand future constitutional challenge.</abstract><cop>Austin</cop><pub>University of Texas, Austin, School of Law Publications, Inc</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0040-4411 |
ispartof | Texas law review, 2001-04, Vol.79 (5), p.1037 |
issn | 0040-4411 1942-857X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_203679435 |
source | Business Source Complete |
subjects | Accountability Bills Compliance Copyright Federal court decisions Federal state relations Higher education Immunity from prosecution Infringement Intellectual property Law Prepaid services Privileges & immunities Proposals Savings banks State government Supreme Court decisions Violations Waivers |
title | State accountability for violations of intellectual property rights: How to "fix" Florida prepaid (and how not to) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T06%3A16%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=State%20accountability%20for%20violations%20of%20intellectual%20property%20rights:%20How%20to%20%22fix%22%20Florida%20prepaid%20(and%20how%20not%20to)&rft.jtitle=Texas%20law%20review&rft.au=Berman,%20Mitchell%20N&rft.date=2001-04-01&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1037&rft.pages=1037-&rft.issn=0040-4411&rft.eissn=1942-857X&rft.coden=TXLRA2&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E72672578%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=203679435&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |