Influence of predation risk on individual spatial positioning and willingness to leave a safe refuge in a social benthic fish
Certain individuals tend to occupy frontal positions within social groups. Less is known about how predation risk can affect individual spatial positioning and group fidelity. We tracked individuals within groups goldfish (Carassius auratus) as they left a safe, covered, microhabitat to enter a risk...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Behavioral ecology and sociobiology 2018-06, Vol.72 (6), p.1-10, Article 87 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 10 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Behavioral ecology and sociobiology |
container_volume | 72 |
creator | Balaban-Feld, Jesse Mitchell, William A. Kotler, Burt P. Vijayan, Sundararaj Elem, Lotan T. Tov Abramsky, Zvika |
description | Certain individuals tend to occupy frontal positions within social groups. Less is known about how predation risk can affect individual spatial positioning and group fidelity. We tracked individuals within groups goldfish (Carassius auratus) as they left a safe, covered, microhabitat to enter a risky, open-water, microhabitat over 2 days: one with and one without an avian predator (little egret—Egretta garzetta) present. For each day, an outing index was calculated to take into account both individual order of emergence from the refuge and the proportion of outings participated in. Prior to the experiment, fish were individually marked for identification, measured, and tested for boldness to enter a novel area. Body size did not predict individual outing index scores on either control or experimental days. Boldness index scores influenced outing index scores only on days with an egret present. We found individual outing index scores to be relatively consistent across both days, regardless of the presence of a predator. However, the presence of a predator increased the mean outing index score of the highest ranked fish and decreased the number of fish that occupied lead positions, suggesting that risk amplified the behaviour of the boldest fish. Furthermore, the presence of the predator decreased individual willingness to leave the safety of cover. Thus, we show that the introduction of a predator influenced social group movement and that the boldest individuals emerge at the front of the group under risk. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00265-018-2499-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2036666015</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44857371</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44857371</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-9a60453a3f25bb2880dabc23da6c15ea7a5d4e933984caca8212ae4d08ef4e603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1q3TAQhUVpoLdJHqCLgqBrt6Mf2_IyhDYNBLJJ1mKuPL7RrSs5kp2QRd-9Mg7prtocMTrfGXEY-yTgqwBov2UA2dQVCFNJ3XWVeMd2QitZQdvI92wHSkNVa60-sI85HwGgEcbs2J_rMIwLBUc8DnxK1OPsY-DJ51-8qA-9f_L9giPPU3kqOsXsV48PB46h589-HMs9UM58jnwkfCKOPONAPNGwHKikrIPoVnxPYX7wjg8-P5yxkwHHTOevesruf3y_u_xZ3dxeXV9e3FROg56rDhvQtUI1yHq_l8ZAj3snVY-NEzVhi3WvqVOqM9qhQyOFRNI9GBo0NaBO2Zctd0rxcaE822NcUigrrQTVlAOiLi6xuVyKOZev2yn535herAC7tmy3lm1p2a4tW1EYuTG5eMOB0r_k_0GfN-iY55jetmht6la1Qv0FDIaK_Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2036666015</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of predation risk on individual spatial positioning and willingness to leave a safe refuge in a social benthic fish</title><source>Springer Journals</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Balaban-Feld, Jesse ; Mitchell, William A. ; Kotler, Burt P. ; Vijayan, Sundararaj ; Elem, Lotan T. Tov ; Abramsky, Zvika</creator><creatorcontrib>Balaban-Feld, Jesse ; Mitchell, William A. ; Kotler, Burt P. ; Vijayan, Sundararaj ; Elem, Lotan T. Tov ; Abramsky, Zvika</creatorcontrib><description>Certain individuals tend to occupy frontal positions within social groups. Less is known about how predation risk can affect individual spatial positioning and group fidelity. We tracked individuals within groups goldfish (Carassius auratus) as they left a safe, covered, microhabitat to enter a risky, open-water, microhabitat over 2 days: one with and one without an avian predator (little egret—Egretta garzetta) present. For each day, an outing index was calculated to take into account both individual order of emergence from the refuge and the proportion of outings participated in. Prior to the experiment, fish were individually marked for identification, measured, and tested for boldness to enter a novel area. Body size did not predict individual outing index scores on either control or experimental days. Boldness index scores influenced outing index scores only on days with an egret present. We found individual outing index scores to be relatively consistent across both days, regardless of the presence of a predator. However, the presence of a predator increased the mean outing index score of the highest ranked fish and decreased the number of fish that occupied lead positions, suggesting that risk amplified the behaviour of the boldest fish. Furthermore, the presence of the predator decreased individual willingness to leave the safety of cover. Thus, we show that the introduction of a predator influenced social group movement and that the boldest individuals emerge at the front of the group under risk.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0340-5443</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0762</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00265-018-2499-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer</publisher><subject>Amplification ; Animal Ecology ; Behavioral Sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Body size ; Carassius auratus ; Fish ; Fish behavior ; Habitats ; Life Sciences ; Marine environment ; Microenvironments ; Microhabitats ; Original Article ; Predation ; Prey ; Risk ; Risk taking ; Tracking ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 2018-06, Vol.72 (6), p.1-10, Article 87</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-9a60453a3f25bb2880dabc23da6c15ea7a5d4e933984caca8212ae4d08ef4e603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-9a60453a3f25bb2880dabc23da6c15ea7a5d4e933984caca8212ae4d08ef4e603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44857371$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44857371$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318,58016,58249</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Balaban-Feld, Jesse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, William A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kotler, Burt P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vijayan, Sundararaj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elem, Lotan T. Tov</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abramsky, Zvika</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of predation risk on individual spatial positioning and willingness to leave a safe refuge in a social benthic fish</title><title>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</title><addtitle>Behav Ecol Sociobiol</addtitle><description>Certain individuals tend to occupy frontal positions within social groups. Less is known about how predation risk can affect individual spatial positioning and group fidelity. We tracked individuals within groups goldfish (Carassius auratus) as they left a safe, covered, microhabitat to enter a risky, open-water, microhabitat over 2 days: one with and one without an avian predator (little egret—Egretta garzetta) present. For each day, an outing index was calculated to take into account both individual order of emergence from the refuge and the proportion of outings participated in. Prior to the experiment, fish were individually marked for identification, measured, and tested for boldness to enter a novel area. Body size did not predict individual outing index scores on either control or experimental days. Boldness index scores influenced outing index scores only on days with an egret present. We found individual outing index scores to be relatively consistent across both days, regardless of the presence of a predator. However, the presence of a predator increased the mean outing index score of the highest ranked fish and decreased the number of fish that occupied lead positions, suggesting that risk amplified the behaviour of the boldest fish. Furthermore, the presence of the predator decreased individual willingness to leave the safety of cover. Thus, we show that the introduction of a predator influenced social group movement and that the boldest individuals emerge at the front of the group under risk.</description><subject>Amplification</subject><subject>Animal Ecology</subject><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>Carassius auratus</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fish behavior</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Marine environment</subject><subject>Microenvironments</subject><subject>Microhabitats</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Prey</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk taking</subject><subject>Tracking</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0340-5443</issn><issn>1432-0762</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1q3TAQhUVpoLdJHqCLgqBrt6Mf2_IyhDYNBLJJ1mKuPL7RrSs5kp2QRd-9Mg7prtocMTrfGXEY-yTgqwBov2UA2dQVCFNJ3XWVeMd2QitZQdvI92wHSkNVa60-sI85HwGgEcbs2J_rMIwLBUc8DnxK1OPsY-DJ51-8qA-9f_L9giPPU3kqOsXsV48PB46h589-HMs9UM58jnwkfCKOPONAPNGwHKikrIPoVnxPYX7wjg8-P5yxkwHHTOevesruf3y_u_xZ3dxeXV9e3FROg56rDhvQtUI1yHq_l8ZAj3snVY-NEzVhi3WvqVOqM9qhQyOFRNI9GBo0NaBO2Zctd0rxcaE822NcUigrrQTVlAOiLi6xuVyKOZev2yn535herAC7tmy3lm1p2a4tW1EYuTG5eMOB0r_k_0GfN-iY55jetmht6la1Qv0FDIaK_Q</recordid><startdate>20180601</startdate><enddate>20180601</enddate><creator>Balaban-Feld, Jesse</creator><creator>Mitchell, William A.</creator><creator>Kotler, Burt P.</creator><creator>Vijayan, Sundararaj</creator><creator>Elem, Lotan T. Tov</creator><creator>Abramsky, Zvika</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180601</creationdate><title>Influence of predation risk on individual spatial positioning and willingness to leave a safe refuge in a social benthic fish</title><author>Balaban-Feld, Jesse ; Mitchell, William A. ; Kotler, Burt P. ; Vijayan, Sundararaj ; Elem, Lotan T. Tov ; Abramsky, Zvika</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-9a60453a3f25bb2880dabc23da6c15ea7a5d4e933984caca8212ae4d08ef4e603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Amplification</topic><topic>Animal Ecology</topic><topic>Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>Carassius auratus</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fish behavior</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Marine environment</topic><topic>Microenvironments</topic><topic>Microhabitats</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Prey</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk taking</topic><topic>Tracking</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Balaban-Feld, Jesse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, William A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kotler, Burt P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vijayan, Sundararaj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elem, Lotan T. Tov</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abramsky, Zvika</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Agricultural & Environmental Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Journals</collection><collection>Sociology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Balaban-Feld, Jesse</au><au>Mitchell, William A.</au><au>Kotler, Burt P.</au><au>Vijayan, Sundararaj</au><au>Elem, Lotan T. Tov</au><au>Abramsky, Zvika</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of predation risk on individual spatial positioning and willingness to leave a safe refuge in a social benthic fish</atitle><jtitle>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</jtitle><stitle>Behav Ecol Sociobiol</stitle><date>2018-06-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>1-10</pages><artnum>87</artnum><issn>0340-5443</issn><eissn>1432-0762</eissn><abstract>Certain individuals tend to occupy frontal positions within social groups. Less is known about how predation risk can affect individual spatial positioning and group fidelity. We tracked individuals within groups goldfish (Carassius auratus) as they left a safe, covered, microhabitat to enter a risky, open-water, microhabitat over 2 days: one with and one without an avian predator (little egret—Egretta garzetta) present. For each day, an outing index was calculated to take into account both individual order of emergence from the refuge and the proportion of outings participated in. Prior to the experiment, fish were individually marked for identification, measured, and tested for boldness to enter a novel area. Body size did not predict individual outing index scores on either control or experimental days. Boldness index scores influenced outing index scores only on days with an egret present. We found individual outing index scores to be relatively consistent across both days, regardless of the presence of a predator. However, the presence of a predator increased the mean outing index score of the highest ranked fish and decreased the number of fish that occupied lead positions, suggesting that risk amplified the behaviour of the boldest fish. Furthermore, the presence of the predator decreased individual willingness to leave the safety of cover. Thus, we show that the introduction of a predator influenced social group movement and that the boldest individuals emerge at the front of the group under risk.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s00265-018-2499-1</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0340-5443 |
ispartof | Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 2018-06, Vol.72 (6), p.1-10, Article 87 |
issn | 0340-5443 1432-0762 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2036666015 |
source | Springer Journals; JSTOR |
subjects | Amplification Animal Ecology Behavioral Sciences Biomedical and Life Sciences Body size Carassius auratus Fish Fish behavior Habitats Life Sciences Marine environment Microenvironments Microhabitats Original Article Predation Prey Risk Risk taking Tracking Zoology |
title | Influence of predation risk on individual spatial positioning and willingness to leave a safe refuge in a social benthic fish |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T17%3A31%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20predation%20risk%20on%20individual%20spatial%20positioning%20and%20willingness%20to%20leave%20a%20safe%20refuge%20in%20a%20social%20benthic%20fish&rft.jtitle=Behavioral%20ecology%20and%20sociobiology&rft.au=Balaban-Feld,%20Jesse&rft.date=2018-06-01&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=1-10&rft.artnum=87&rft.issn=0340-5443&rft.eissn=1432-0762&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00265-018-2499-1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44857371%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2036666015&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=44857371&rfr_iscdi=true |