Delinking, food sovereignty, and populist agronomy: notes on an intellectual history of the peasant path in the global South
The article examines the weakness of discourses around food sovereignty in Southwest Asia and North Africa, and examines some older currents resembling the food sovereignty discourse. The author first historically situates the emergence of food sovereignty. He discusses agro-ecology – the ‘technics’...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Review of African political economy 2018-03, Vol.45 (155), p.64-84 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 84 |
---|---|
container_issue | 155 |
container_start_page | 64 |
container_title | Review of African political economy |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Ajl, Max |
description | The article examines the weakness of discourses around food sovereignty in Southwest Asia and North Africa, and examines some older currents resembling the food sovereignty discourse. The author first historically situates the emergence of food sovereignty. He discusses agro-ecology – the ‘technics’(or social embeddedness of technology) of food sovereignty – and its national-popular content, before then developing elements of the delinking paradigm. He goes on to discuss Tunisian nationalpopular and Third Worldist agronomists’ and economists’ efforts to develop technics and frameworks for food sovereignty in the 1970s and 1980s. The article compares the food sovereignty paradigm with auto-centred, self-reliant development proposals, and the proposals of the Tunisian economists and agronomists.
Cet article examine la fragilité des discours portant autour de la souveraineté alimentaire en Asie du Sud-Ouest et en Afrique du Nord, ainsi que d’autres arguments plus datés sur le même thème. L’auteur commence par situer historiquement l’émergence du concept de souveraineté alimentaire. Il débat l’agroécologie - les « techniques » (ou l’inclusion sociale de la technologie) de la souveraineté alimentaire - et son contenu national-populiste, avant de développer sur le paradigme de la déconnexion. Il examine ensuite les efforts des agronomes et économistes nationalpopulistes tunisiens ainsi que ceux des tiers-mondistes pour développer les techniques et l’encadrement suffisants afin d’aboutir à une souveraineté alimentaire dans les années 1970 et 1980. Cet article compare le paradigme de la souveraineté alimentaire aux propositions de développement autosuffisant, autocentré, ainsi qu’aux propositions des économistes et agronomes tunisiens. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/03056244.2018.1443437 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2035226278</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48540811</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48540811</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-cb3c8a56ca9cca67040ddeeb6f119dcc41657cc02a59a6c2b6785b6bc2dac7d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM1KAzEURoMoWKuPUBhw26k3_-lSqlWh4EbXIXOTKVPbyZhMhb69HVpd3c0534VDyITCjIKBB-AgFRNixoCaGRWCC64vyIhqASXVDC7JaGDKAbomNzlvACgTUo4Iewrbpv1q2vW0qGP0RY4_IYVm3faHaeFaX3Sx22-b3BdunWIbd4dbclW7bQ535zsmn8vnj8VruXp_eVs8rkrkXPUlVhyNkwrdHNEpDQK8D6FSNaVzjyiokhoRmJNzp5BVShtZqQqZd6g942Nyf9rtUvzeh9zbTdyn9vjSMuCSMcW0OVLyRGGKOadQ2y41O5cOloId8ti_PHbIY895jt7k5G1yH9O_JIwUYCjlv64xYUQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2035226278</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Delinking, food sovereignty, and populist agronomy: notes on an intellectual history of the peasant path in the global South</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ajl, Max</creator><creatorcontrib>Ajl, Max</creatorcontrib><description>The article examines the weakness of discourses around food sovereignty in Southwest Asia and North Africa, and examines some older currents resembling the food sovereignty discourse. The author first historically situates the emergence of food sovereignty. He discusses agro-ecology – the ‘technics’(or social embeddedness of technology) of food sovereignty – and its national-popular content, before then developing elements of the delinking paradigm. He goes on to discuss Tunisian nationalpopular and Third Worldist agronomists’ and economists’ efforts to develop technics and frameworks for food sovereignty in the 1970s and 1980s. The article compares the food sovereignty paradigm with auto-centred, self-reliant development proposals, and the proposals of the Tunisian economists and agronomists.
Cet article examine la fragilité des discours portant autour de la souveraineté alimentaire en Asie du Sud-Ouest et en Afrique du Nord, ainsi que d’autres arguments plus datés sur le même thème. L’auteur commence par situer historiquement l’émergence du concept de souveraineté alimentaire. Il débat l’agroécologie - les « techniques » (ou l’inclusion sociale de la technologie) de la souveraineté alimentaire - et son contenu national-populiste, avant de développer sur le paradigme de la déconnexion. Il examine ensuite les efforts des agronomes et économistes nationalpopulistes tunisiens ainsi que ceux des tiers-mondistes pour développer les techniques et l’encadrement suffisants afin d’aboutir à une souveraineté alimentaire dans les années 1970 et 1980. Cet article compare le paradigme de la souveraineté alimentaire aux propositions de développement autosuffisant, autocentré, ainsi qu’aux propositions des économistes et agronomes tunisiens.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-6244</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1740-1720</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/03056244.2018.1443437</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Taylor & Francis, Ltd</publisher><subject>Agricultural development ; Discourse analysis ; Discourses ; Ecology ; Economists ; Embeddedness ; Food ; History ; History of ideas ; Human ecology ; Populism ; Public private partnerships ; Sovereignty ; Strength ; Technology</subject><ispartof>Review of African political economy, 2018-03, Vol.45 (155), p.64-84</ispartof><rights>2018 ROAPE Publications Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-cb3c8a56ca9cca67040ddeeb6f119dcc41657cc02a59a6c2b6785b6bc2dac7d23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-cb3c8a56ca9cca67040ddeeb6f119dcc41657cc02a59a6c2b6785b6bc2dac7d23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48540811$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48540811$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,33753,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ajl, Max</creatorcontrib><title>Delinking, food sovereignty, and populist agronomy: notes on an intellectual history of the peasant path in the global South</title><title>Review of African political economy</title><description>The article examines the weakness of discourses around food sovereignty in Southwest Asia and North Africa, and examines some older currents resembling the food sovereignty discourse. The author first historically situates the emergence of food sovereignty. He discusses agro-ecology – the ‘technics’(or social embeddedness of technology) of food sovereignty – and its national-popular content, before then developing elements of the delinking paradigm. He goes on to discuss Tunisian nationalpopular and Third Worldist agronomists’ and economists’ efforts to develop technics and frameworks for food sovereignty in the 1970s and 1980s. The article compares the food sovereignty paradigm with auto-centred, self-reliant development proposals, and the proposals of the Tunisian economists and agronomists.
Cet article examine la fragilité des discours portant autour de la souveraineté alimentaire en Asie du Sud-Ouest et en Afrique du Nord, ainsi que d’autres arguments plus datés sur le même thème. L’auteur commence par situer historiquement l’émergence du concept de souveraineté alimentaire. Il débat l’agroécologie - les « techniques » (ou l’inclusion sociale de la technologie) de la souveraineté alimentaire - et son contenu national-populiste, avant de développer sur le paradigme de la déconnexion. Il examine ensuite les efforts des agronomes et économistes nationalpopulistes tunisiens ainsi que ceux des tiers-mondistes pour développer les techniques et l’encadrement suffisants afin d’aboutir à une souveraineté alimentaire dans les années 1970 et 1980. Cet article compare le paradigme de la souveraineté alimentaire aux propositions de développement autosuffisant, autocentré, ainsi qu’aux propositions des économistes et agronomes tunisiens.</description><subject>Agricultural development</subject><subject>Discourse analysis</subject><subject>Discourses</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Economists</subject><subject>Embeddedness</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>History of ideas</subject><subject>Human ecology</subject><subject>Populism</subject><subject>Public private partnerships</subject><subject>Sovereignty</subject><subject>Strength</subject><subject>Technology</subject><issn>0305-6244</issn><issn>1740-1720</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kM1KAzEURoMoWKuPUBhw26k3_-lSqlWh4EbXIXOTKVPbyZhMhb69HVpd3c0534VDyITCjIKBB-AgFRNixoCaGRWCC64vyIhqASXVDC7JaGDKAbomNzlvACgTUo4Iewrbpv1q2vW0qGP0RY4_IYVm3faHaeFaX3Sx22-b3BdunWIbd4dbclW7bQ535zsmn8vnj8VruXp_eVs8rkrkXPUlVhyNkwrdHNEpDQK8D6FSNaVzjyiokhoRmJNzp5BVShtZqQqZd6g942Nyf9rtUvzeh9zbTdyn9vjSMuCSMcW0OVLyRGGKOadQ2y41O5cOloId8ti_PHbIY895jt7k5G1yH9O_JIwUYCjlv64xYUQ</recordid><startdate>20180301</startdate><enddate>20180301</enddate><creator>Ajl, Max</creator><general>Taylor & Francis, Ltd</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180301</creationdate><title>Delinking, food sovereignty, and populist agronomy</title><author>Ajl, Max</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-cb3c8a56ca9cca67040ddeeb6f119dcc41657cc02a59a6c2b6785b6bc2dac7d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Agricultural development</topic><topic>Discourse analysis</topic><topic>Discourses</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Economists</topic><topic>Embeddedness</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>History of ideas</topic><topic>Human ecology</topic><topic>Populism</topic><topic>Public private partnerships</topic><topic>Sovereignty</topic><topic>Strength</topic><topic>Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ajl, Max</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Review of African political economy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ajl, Max</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Delinking, food sovereignty, and populist agronomy: notes on an intellectual history of the peasant path in the global South</atitle><jtitle>Review of African political economy</jtitle><date>2018-03-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>155</issue><spage>64</spage><epage>84</epage><pages>64-84</pages><issn>0305-6244</issn><eissn>1740-1720</eissn><abstract>The article examines the weakness of discourses around food sovereignty in Southwest Asia and North Africa, and examines some older currents resembling the food sovereignty discourse. The author first historically situates the emergence of food sovereignty. He discusses agro-ecology – the ‘technics’(or social embeddedness of technology) of food sovereignty – and its national-popular content, before then developing elements of the delinking paradigm. He goes on to discuss Tunisian nationalpopular and Third Worldist agronomists’ and economists’ efforts to develop technics and frameworks for food sovereignty in the 1970s and 1980s. The article compares the food sovereignty paradigm with auto-centred, self-reliant development proposals, and the proposals of the Tunisian economists and agronomists.
Cet article examine la fragilité des discours portant autour de la souveraineté alimentaire en Asie du Sud-Ouest et en Afrique du Nord, ainsi que d’autres arguments plus datés sur le même thème. L’auteur commence par situer historiquement l’émergence du concept de souveraineté alimentaire. Il débat l’agroécologie - les « techniques » (ou l’inclusion sociale de la technologie) de la souveraineté alimentaire - et son contenu national-populiste, avant de développer sur le paradigme de la déconnexion. Il examine ensuite les efforts des agronomes et économistes nationalpopulistes tunisiens ainsi que ceux des tiers-mondistes pour développer les techniques et l’encadrement suffisants afin d’aboutir à une souveraineté alimentaire dans les années 1970 et 1980. Cet article compare le paradigme de la souveraineté alimentaire aux propositions de développement autosuffisant, autocentré, ainsi qu’aux propositions des économistes et agronomes tunisiens.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1080/03056244.2018.1443437</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0305-6244 |
ispartof | Review of African political economy, 2018-03, Vol.45 (155), p.64-84 |
issn | 0305-6244 1740-1720 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2035226278 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; Jstor Complete Legacy; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Agricultural development Discourse analysis Discourses Ecology Economists Embeddedness Food History History of ideas Human ecology Populism Public private partnerships Sovereignty Strength Technology |
title | Delinking, food sovereignty, and populist agronomy: notes on an intellectual history of the peasant path in the global South |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T23%3A19%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Delinking,%20food%20sovereignty,%20and%20populist%20agronomy:%20notes%20on%20an%20intellectual%20history%20of%20the%20peasant%20path%20in%20the%20global%20South&rft.jtitle=Review%20of%20African%20political%20economy&rft.au=Ajl,%20Max&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=155&rft.spage=64&rft.epage=84&rft.pages=64-84&rft.issn=0305-6244&rft.eissn=1740-1720&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/03056244.2018.1443437&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48540811%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2035226278&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=48540811&rfr_iscdi=true |