A "Commonest" Manifesto: Property and the General Welfare
Historians of the colonial period generally agree that the Revolution was fought to foster and preserve property, the term conventionally understood then as now to mean private property. The authors' discussion of property and the general welfare, called a "Commonest Manifesto," divid...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American business law journal 2009-03, Vol.46 (1), p.103-137 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 137 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 103 |
container_title | American business law journal |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Lee Reed, O. Clayton Hipp, E. |
description | Historians of the colonial period generally agree that the Revolution was fought to foster and preserve property, the term conventionally understood then as now to mean private property. The authors' discussion of property and the general welfare, called a "Commonest Manifesto," divides into four parts. Part II defines "property" and "general welfare" so that agreement or disagreement with the thesis concerning property's promotion of the general welfare can proceed from commonly grasped terms. Part III provides a brief history of property and how the borders of exclusive right relate over the centuries to the general welfare. Part IV suggests why natural law approaches to private property in the contemporary era may help explain but fail to provide adequate justification for the property system, which is justified instead on a consequentialist basis as an accommodation principally to new resource production. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1744-1714.2009.01073.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_203413176</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1665640431</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4103-9a4d4e8ff1849e2c2e721309ba8b716884471b49569bf9d87cece3d321ac44c63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkFFPgzAUhRujiXP6H5q9g720o9QHk4k6NXP6oFniy02BEkEGs7C4_XuLGJ_tS-9Nzzn39iOEAvPBnfPSBymEBxKEHzCmfAZMcn93QEZ_D4dkxBgLPCnD8JictG3pWgAZjoia0UncrNdNbdpuQh91XeSuai7os202xnZ7quuMdu-Gzk1trK7oylS5tuaUHOW6as3Z7z0mr7c3L_Gdt3ia38ezhZcKYNxTWmTCRHkOkVAmSAMjA-BMJTpKJIRRJISERKhpqJJcZZFMTWp4xgPQqRBpyMdkMuRubPO5dbth2Wxt7UZiwLgA7v7hRNEgSm3TttbkuLHFWts9AsOeE5bY48AeB_ac8IcT7pz1crB-FZXZ_9uHs6vFQ1-6AG8IKNrO7P4CtP3AUHI5xdVyjm_T5TXnMUPJvwH6EHro</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>203413176</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A "Commonest" Manifesto: Property and the General Welfare</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Lee Reed, O. ; Clayton Hipp, E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee Reed, O. ; Clayton Hipp, E.</creatorcontrib><description>Historians of the colonial period generally agree that the Revolution was fought to foster and preserve property, the term conventionally understood then as now to mean private property. The authors' discussion of property and the general welfare, called a "Commonest Manifesto," divides into four parts. Part II defines "property" and "general welfare" so that agreement or disagreement with the thesis concerning property's promotion of the general welfare can proceed from commonly grasped terms. Part III provides a brief history of property and how the borders of exclusive right relate over the centuries to the general welfare. Part IV suggests why natural law approaches to private property in the contemporary era may help explain but fail to provide adequate justification for the property system, which is justified instead on a consequentialist basis as an accommodation principally to new resource production.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-7766</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-1714</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1714.2009.01073.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ABLJAN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Private property ; Property rights ; Public domain ; Studies ; Transfer taxes</subject><ispartof>American business law journal, 2009-03, Vol.46 (1), p.103-137</ispartof><rights>2009, Copyright the Authors. Journal compilation © 2009, Academy of Legal Studies in Business</rights><rights>Copyright Academy of Legal Studies in Business Spring 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4103-9a4d4e8ff1849e2c2e721309ba8b716884471b49569bf9d87cece3d321ac44c63</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1744-1714.2009.01073.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1744-1714.2009.01073.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee Reed, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clayton Hipp, E.</creatorcontrib><title>A "Commonest" Manifesto: Property and the General Welfare</title><title>American business law journal</title><description>Historians of the colonial period generally agree that the Revolution was fought to foster and preserve property, the term conventionally understood then as now to mean private property. The authors' discussion of property and the general welfare, called a "Commonest Manifesto," divides into four parts. Part II defines "property" and "general welfare" so that agreement or disagreement with the thesis concerning property's promotion of the general welfare can proceed from commonly grasped terms. Part III provides a brief history of property and how the borders of exclusive right relate over the centuries to the general welfare. Part IV suggests why natural law approaches to private property in the contemporary era may help explain but fail to provide adequate justification for the property system, which is justified instead on a consequentialist basis as an accommodation principally to new resource production.</description><subject>Private property</subject><subject>Property rights</subject><subject>Public domain</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Transfer taxes</subject><issn>0002-7766</issn><issn>1744-1714</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkFFPgzAUhRujiXP6H5q9g720o9QHk4k6NXP6oFniy02BEkEGs7C4_XuLGJ_tS-9Nzzn39iOEAvPBnfPSBymEBxKEHzCmfAZMcn93QEZ_D4dkxBgLPCnD8JictG3pWgAZjoia0UncrNdNbdpuQh91XeSuai7os202xnZ7quuMdu-Gzk1trK7oylS5tuaUHOW6as3Z7z0mr7c3L_Gdt3ia38ezhZcKYNxTWmTCRHkOkVAmSAMjA-BMJTpKJIRRJISERKhpqJJcZZFMTWp4xgPQqRBpyMdkMuRubPO5dbth2Wxt7UZiwLgA7v7hRNEgSm3TttbkuLHFWts9AsOeE5bY48AeB_ac8IcT7pz1crB-FZXZ_9uHs6vFQ1-6AG8IKNrO7P4CtP3AUHI5xdVyjm_T5TXnMUPJvwH6EHro</recordid><startdate>200903</startdate><enddate>200903</enddate><creator>Lee Reed, O.</creator><creator>Clayton Hipp, E.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Academy of Legal Studies in Business</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200903</creationdate><title>A "Commonest" Manifesto: Property and the General Welfare</title><author>Lee Reed, O. ; Clayton Hipp, E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4103-9a4d4e8ff1849e2c2e721309ba8b716884471b49569bf9d87cece3d321ac44c63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Private property</topic><topic>Property rights</topic><topic>Public domain</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Transfer taxes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee Reed, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clayton Hipp, E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>American business law journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee Reed, O.</au><au>Clayton Hipp, E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A "Commonest" Manifesto: Property and the General Welfare</atitle><jtitle>American business law journal</jtitle><date>2009-03</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>103</spage><epage>137</epage><pages>103-137</pages><issn>0002-7766</issn><eissn>1744-1714</eissn><coden>ABLJAN</coden><abstract>Historians of the colonial period generally agree that the Revolution was fought to foster and preserve property, the term conventionally understood then as now to mean private property. The authors' discussion of property and the general welfare, called a "Commonest Manifesto," divides into four parts. Part II defines "property" and "general welfare" so that agreement or disagreement with the thesis concerning property's promotion of the general welfare can proceed from commonly grasped terms. Part III provides a brief history of property and how the borders of exclusive right relate over the centuries to the general welfare. Part IV suggests why natural law approaches to private property in the contemporary era may help explain but fail to provide adequate justification for the property system, which is justified instead on a consequentialist basis as an accommodation principally to new resource production.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1744-1714.2009.01073.x</doi><tpages>35</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-7766 |
ispartof | American business law journal, 2009-03, Vol.46 (1), p.103-137 |
issn | 0002-7766 1744-1714 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_203413176 |
source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Private property Property rights Public domain Studies Transfer taxes |
title | A "Commonest" Manifesto: Property and the General Welfare |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T02%3A42%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20%22Commonest%22%20Manifesto:%20Property%20and%20the%20General%20Welfare&rft.jtitle=American%20business%20law%20journal&rft.au=Lee%20Reed,%20O.&rft.date=2009-03&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=103&rft.epage=137&rft.pages=103-137&rft.issn=0002-7766&rft.eissn=1744-1714&rft.coden=ABLJAN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1744-1714.2009.01073.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1665640431%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=203413176&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |