Metabolic response to an inflammatory challenge in pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake 1

Selection for residual feed intake (RFI), which is used to select animals for feed efficiency, also influences nutrient partitioning between growth and maintenance functions. This study was designed to investigate if selection for reduced RFI can alter the trade-off between growth and immunity and c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of animal science 2016-02, Vol.94 (2), p.563-573
Hauptverfasser: Merlot, E, Gilbert, H, Le Floc'h, N
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 573
container_issue 2
container_start_page 563
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 94
creator Merlot, E
Gilbert, H
Le Floc'h, N
description Selection for residual feed intake (RFI), which is used to select animals for feed efficiency, also influences nutrient partitioning between growth and maintenance functions. This study was designed to investigate if selection for reduced RFI can alter the trade-off between growth and immunity and contributes to differences in metabolic responses to an inflammatory challenge. Piglets from 2 lines divergently selected on RFI (low: RFI^sup -^, n = 10, and high: RFI^sup +^, n = 11) were challenged at 55 d of age (on d 0) with complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA) to induce a noninfectious pneumonia. Plasma haptoglobin and nutrient concentrations (in fasted state and 2 h after feeding) were determined from d -1 to d 7, and tissue protein metabolism was determined on d 8. Haptoglobin concentrations were greater from d 1 to d 7 relative to d -1 (P < 0.01). Feed intake was less on d 1 than on the other days (P < 0.001), as was total AA plasma concentrations at fasted state (P < 0.05). Fasted concentrations of His (P = 0.06) and Trp (P = 0.05) tended to be less, those of Val were less (P < 0.05), and fed concentrations of Lys were increased (P < 0.05) on d 7 compared to d -1. Uremia was less on d 7 than on d -1 at fasted state (P < 0.05), whereas it did not vary at fed state (P > 0.1). Fasted glucose and insulin plasma concentrations were stable across days (P > 0.1). In the fed state and in only RFI^sup +^ pigs, glucose concentration was greater on d 1 than on d 3, 5, and 7 (P < 0.05). Total AA, Gln, Ile, Leu, Pro (P < 0.05), and hydroxyproline (P = 0.07) were less in RFI^sup -^ than RFI^sup +^ pigs at fed state, whereas Ala and Gly were less in RFI^sup -^ pigs at fasted and fed states (P < 0.05). Citrulline (P < 0.05) and Met (P < 0.01) concentrations were greater in RFI^sup -^ than RFI^sup +^ pigs in the fasted state, whereas Asp was greater in RFI^sup -^ pigs in both fasted and fed states (P < 0.05). On d 8, liver and LM protein synthesis tended to be lower (P = 0.07 and 0.09, respectively) and liver calpain activity was greater (P = 0.07) in RFI^sup -^ than RFI^sup +^ pigs. Liver and LM proteasome did not differ between lines (P > 0.1). The metabolic differences between lines were not associated with differences in feed intake, ADG between d -1 and d 8, and haptoglobin concentration (P > 0.1). Thus, it seems that that, using different metabolic strategies, both lines coped similarly with the CFA challenge. Contrary to our hypothesis, this experiment showed, in you
doi_str_mv 10.2527/jas2015-9445
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2033280347</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2033280347</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p567-e7692cfdee2004bdda03992e0353bc445e6c8c7fd25c1ac3553724dfb4bbb53e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j81KxDAYRYMoOI7ufICA62rypWmapQz-wYib2Q_5-VI7ZpLadIR5eyu6dnXhcDmXS8g1Z7cgQd3tTAHGZaXrWp6QBZcgK8EbcUoWjAGv2pbDObkoZccYB6nlgnSvOBmbY-_oiGXIqSCdMjWJ9ilEs9-bKY9H6t5NjJg6nDEd-q5Q33_h2GGa4pEWjOgm9DTk8UfT-4OJNOBM-jSZD6T8kpwFEwte_eWSbB4fNqvnav329LK6X1eDbFSFqtHggkcExmrrvWFCa0AmpLBufoWNa50KHqTjxgkphYLaB1tba6VAsSQ3v9phzJ8HLNN2lw9jmhe3wISAlola_dfiSmmtW62F-AZa2GWD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1779998993</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Metabolic response to an inflammatory challenge in pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake 1</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Merlot, E ; Gilbert, H ; Le Floc'h, N</creator><creatorcontrib>Merlot, E ; Gilbert, H ; Le Floc'h, N</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Selection for residual feed intake (RFI), which is used to select animals for feed efficiency, also influences nutrient partitioning between growth and maintenance functions. This study was designed to investigate if selection for reduced RFI can alter the trade-off between growth and immunity and contributes to differences in metabolic responses to an inflammatory challenge. Piglets from 2 lines divergently selected on RFI (low: RFI^sup -^, n = 10, and high: RFI^sup +^, n = 11) were challenged at 55 d of age (on d 0) with complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA) to induce a noninfectious pneumonia. Plasma haptoglobin and nutrient concentrations (in fasted state and 2 h after feeding) were determined from d -1 to d 7, and tissue protein metabolism was determined on d 8. Haptoglobin concentrations were greater from d 1 to d 7 relative to d -1 (P < 0.01). Feed intake was less on d 1 than on the other days (P < 0.001), as was total AA plasma concentrations at fasted state (P < 0.05). Fasted concentrations of His (P = 0.06) and Trp (P = 0.05) tended to be less, those of Val were less (P < 0.05), and fed concentrations of Lys were increased (P < 0.05) on d 7 compared to d -1. Uremia was less on d 7 than on d -1 at fasted state (P < 0.05), whereas it did not vary at fed state (P > 0.1). Fasted glucose and insulin plasma concentrations were stable across days (P > 0.1). In the fed state and in only RFI^sup +^ pigs, glucose concentration was greater on d 1 than on d 3, 5, and 7 (P < 0.05). Total AA, Gln, Ile, Leu, Pro (P < 0.05), and hydroxyproline (P = 0.07) were less in RFI^sup -^ than RFI^sup +^ pigs at fed state, whereas Ala and Gly were less in RFI^sup -^ pigs at fasted and fed states (P < 0.05). Citrulline (P < 0.05) and Met (P < 0.01) concentrations were greater in RFI^sup -^ than RFI^sup +^ pigs in the fasted state, whereas Asp was greater in RFI^sup -^ pigs in both fasted and fed states (P < 0.05). On d 8, liver and LM protein synthesis tended to be lower (P = 0.07 and 0.09, respectively) and liver calpain activity was greater (P = 0.07) in RFI^sup -^ than RFI^sup +^ pigs. Liver and LM proteasome did not differ between lines (P > 0.1). The metabolic differences between lines were not associated with differences in feed intake, ADG between d -1 and d 8, and haptoglobin concentration (P > 0.1). Thus, it seems that that, using different metabolic strategies, both lines coped similarly with the CFA challenge. Contrary to our hypothesis, this experiment showed, in young pigs, no advantage of RFI^sup +^ animals in response to an inflammatory challenge.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/jas2015-9445</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Amino acids ; Animals ; Calpain ; Citrulline ; Feed efficiency ; Feeds ; Freund's adjuvant ; Glucose ; Haptoglobin ; Hogs ; Hydroxyproline ; Immunity ; Inflammation ; Insulin ; Liver ; Metabolic response ; Metabolism ; Nutrient concentrations ; Nutrients ; Proteasomes ; Protein biosynthesis ; Protein metabolism ; Protein synthesis ; Protein turnover ; Proteins ; Studies ; Swine ; Uremia</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2016-02, Vol.94 (2), p.563-573</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Society of Animal Science Feb 2016</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press, UK Feb 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Merlot, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Floc'h, N</creatorcontrib><title>Metabolic response to an inflammatory challenge in pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake 1</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description><![CDATA[Selection for residual feed intake (RFI), which is used to select animals for feed efficiency, also influences nutrient partitioning between growth and maintenance functions. This study was designed to investigate if selection for reduced RFI can alter the trade-off between growth and immunity and contributes to differences in metabolic responses to an inflammatory challenge. Piglets from 2 lines divergently selected on RFI (low: RFI^sup -^, n = 10, and high: RFI^sup +^, n = 11) were challenged at 55 d of age (on d 0) with complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA) to induce a noninfectious pneumonia. Plasma haptoglobin and nutrient concentrations (in fasted state and 2 h after feeding) were determined from d -1 to d 7, and tissue protein metabolism was determined on d 8. Haptoglobin concentrations were greater from d 1 to d 7 relative to d -1 (P < 0.01). Feed intake was less on d 1 than on the other days (P < 0.001), as was total AA plasma concentrations at fasted state (P < 0.05). Fasted concentrations of His (P = 0.06) and Trp (P = 0.05) tended to be less, those of Val were less (P < 0.05), and fed concentrations of Lys were increased (P < 0.05) on d 7 compared to d -1. Uremia was less on d 7 than on d -1 at fasted state (P < 0.05), whereas it did not vary at fed state (P > 0.1). Fasted glucose and insulin plasma concentrations were stable across days (P > 0.1). In the fed state and in only RFI^sup +^ pigs, glucose concentration was greater on d 1 than on d 3, 5, and 7 (P < 0.05). Total AA, Gln, Ile, Leu, Pro (P < 0.05), and hydroxyproline (P = 0.07) were less in RFI^sup -^ than RFI^sup +^ pigs at fed state, whereas Ala and Gly were less in RFI^sup -^ pigs at fasted and fed states (P < 0.05). Citrulline (P < 0.05) and Met (P < 0.01) concentrations were greater in RFI^sup -^ than RFI^sup +^ pigs in the fasted state, whereas Asp was greater in RFI^sup -^ pigs in both fasted and fed states (P < 0.05). On d 8, liver and LM protein synthesis tended to be lower (P = 0.07 and 0.09, respectively) and liver calpain activity was greater (P = 0.07) in RFI^sup -^ than RFI^sup +^ pigs. Liver and LM proteasome did not differ between lines (P > 0.1). The metabolic differences between lines were not associated with differences in feed intake, ADG between d -1 and d 8, and haptoglobin concentration (P > 0.1). Thus, it seems that that, using different metabolic strategies, both lines coped similarly with the CFA challenge. Contrary to our hypothesis, this experiment showed, in young pigs, no advantage of RFI^sup +^ animals in response to an inflammatory challenge.]]></description><subject>Amino acids</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Calpain</subject><subject>Citrulline</subject><subject>Feed efficiency</subject><subject>Feeds</subject><subject>Freund's adjuvant</subject><subject>Glucose</subject><subject>Haptoglobin</subject><subject>Hogs</subject><subject>Hydroxyproline</subject><subject>Immunity</subject><subject>Inflammation</subject><subject>Insulin</subject><subject>Liver</subject><subject>Metabolic response</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Nutrient concentrations</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Proteasomes</subject><subject>Protein biosynthesis</subject><subject>Protein metabolism</subject><subject>Protein synthesis</subject><subject>Protein turnover</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Uremia</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9j81KxDAYRYMoOI7ufICA62rypWmapQz-wYib2Q_5-VI7ZpLadIR5eyu6dnXhcDmXS8g1Z7cgQd3tTAHGZaXrWp6QBZcgK8EbcUoWjAGv2pbDObkoZccYB6nlgnSvOBmbY-_oiGXIqSCdMjWJ9ilEs9-bKY9H6t5NjJg6nDEd-q5Q33_h2GGa4pEWjOgm9DTk8UfT-4OJNOBM-jSZD6T8kpwFEwte_eWSbB4fNqvnav329LK6X1eDbFSFqtHggkcExmrrvWFCa0AmpLBufoWNa50KHqTjxgkphYLaB1tba6VAsSQ3v9phzJ8HLNN2lw9jmhe3wISAlola_dfiSmmtW62F-AZa2GWD</recordid><startdate>20160201</startdate><enddate>20160201</enddate><creator>Merlot, E</creator><creator>Gilbert, H</creator><creator>Le Floc'h, N</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160201</creationdate><title>Metabolic response to an inflammatory challenge in pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake 1</title><author>Merlot, E ; Gilbert, H ; Le Floc'h, N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p567-e7692cfdee2004bdda03992e0353bc445e6c8c7fd25c1ac3553724dfb4bbb53e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Amino acids</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Calpain</topic><topic>Citrulline</topic><topic>Feed efficiency</topic><topic>Feeds</topic><topic>Freund's adjuvant</topic><topic>Glucose</topic><topic>Haptoglobin</topic><topic>Hogs</topic><topic>Hydroxyproline</topic><topic>Immunity</topic><topic>Inflammation</topic><topic>Insulin</topic><topic>Liver</topic><topic>Metabolic response</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Nutrient concentrations</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Proteasomes</topic><topic>Protein biosynthesis</topic><topic>Protein metabolism</topic><topic>Protein synthesis</topic><topic>Protein turnover</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Uremia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Merlot, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Floc'h, N</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Merlot, E</au><au>Gilbert, H</au><au>Le Floc'h, N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Metabolic response to an inflammatory challenge in pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake 1</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2016-02-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>563</spage><epage>573</epage><pages>563-573</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Selection for residual feed intake (RFI), which is used to select animals for feed efficiency, also influences nutrient partitioning between growth and maintenance functions. This study was designed to investigate if selection for reduced RFI can alter the trade-off between growth and immunity and contributes to differences in metabolic responses to an inflammatory challenge. Piglets from 2 lines divergently selected on RFI (low: RFI^sup -^, n = 10, and high: RFI^sup +^, n = 11) were challenged at 55 d of age (on d 0) with complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA) to induce a noninfectious pneumonia. Plasma haptoglobin and nutrient concentrations (in fasted state and 2 h after feeding) were determined from d -1 to d 7, and tissue protein metabolism was determined on d 8. Haptoglobin concentrations were greater from d 1 to d 7 relative to d -1 (P < 0.01). Feed intake was less on d 1 than on the other days (P < 0.001), as was total AA plasma concentrations at fasted state (P < 0.05). Fasted concentrations of His (P = 0.06) and Trp (P = 0.05) tended to be less, those of Val were less (P < 0.05), and fed concentrations of Lys were increased (P < 0.05) on d 7 compared to d -1. Uremia was less on d 7 than on d -1 at fasted state (P < 0.05), whereas it did not vary at fed state (P > 0.1). Fasted glucose and insulin plasma concentrations were stable across days (P > 0.1). In the fed state and in only RFI^sup +^ pigs, glucose concentration was greater on d 1 than on d 3, 5, and 7 (P < 0.05). Total AA, Gln, Ile, Leu, Pro (P < 0.05), and hydroxyproline (P = 0.07) were less in RFI^sup -^ than RFI^sup +^ pigs at fed state, whereas Ala and Gly were less in RFI^sup -^ pigs at fasted and fed states (P < 0.05). Citrulline (P < 0.05) and Met (P < 0.01) concentrations were greater in RFI^sup -^ than RFI^sup +^ pigs in the fasted state, whereas Asp was greater in RFI^sup -^ pigs in both fasted and fed states (P < 0.05). On d 8, liver and LM protein synthesis tended to be lower (P = 0.07 and 0.09, respectively) and liver calpain activity was greater (P = 0.07) in RFI^sup -^ than RFI^sup +^ pigs. Liver and LM proteasome did not differ between lines (P > 0.1). The metabolic differences between lines were not associated with differences in feed intake, ADG between d -1 and d 8, and haptoglobin concentration (P > 0.1). Thus, it seems that that, using different metabolic strategies, both lines coped similarly with the CFA challenge. Contrary to our hypothesis, this experiment showed, in young pigs, no advantage of RFI^sup +^ animals in response to an inflammatory challenge.]]></abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.2527/jas2015-9445</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8812
ispartof Journal of animal science, 2016-02, Vol.94 (2), p.563-573
issn 0021-8812
1525-3163
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2033280347
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Amino acids
Animals
Calpain
Citrulline
Feed efficiency
Feeds
Freund's adjuvant
Glucose
Haptoglobin
Hogs
Hydroxyproline
Immunity
Inflammation
Insulin
Liver
Metabolic response
Metabolism
Nutrient concentrations
Nutrients
Proteasomes
Protein biosynthesis
Protein metabolism
Protein synthesis
Protein turnover
Proteins
Studies
Swine
Uremia
title Metabolic response to an inflammatory challenge in pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake 1
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T03%3A59%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Metabolic%20response%20to%20an%20inflammatory%20challenge%20in%20pigs%20divergently%20selected%20for%20residual%20feed%20intake%201&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Merlot,%20E&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=563&rft.epage=573&rft.pages=563-573&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/jas2015-9445&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2033280347%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1779998993&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true