Geophysical Surveys as Landscape Archaeology
Recent advances in technology and practice allow geophysical surveys in archaeology to produce maps of subsurface features over large areas and in potentially great detail. It is shown through a series of case studies from two regions in North America that archaeo-geophysical surveys can produce pri...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American antiquity 2003-07, Vol.68 (3), p.435-457 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 457 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 435 |
container_title | American antiquity |
container_volume | 68 |
creator | Kvamme, Kenneth L. |
description | Recent advances in technology and practice allow geophysical surveys in archaeology to produce maps of subsurface features over large areas and in potentially great detail. It is shown through a series of case studies from two regions in North America that archaeo-geophysical surveys can produce primary information suitable for the study of site content, structure and organization, for examining spatial patterns and relationships, and for directly confronting specific questions about a site and the past. Because large buried cultural landscapes can now be revealed, it is argued that an alternative perspective on regional or landscape archaeology may be possible because space can be viewed in terms of tens of hectares as opposed to the tens of square meters typical of archaeological excavations. Moreover, by placing focus on such buried features as dwellings, storage facilities, public structures, middens, fortifications, trails, or garden spaces that are not commonly revealed through most contemporary surface inspection methods, a richer view of archaeology, the past, and cultural landscapes can be achieved. Archaeo-geophysical surveys can also play an important role in Cultural Resource Management (CRM) contexts as feature discovery tools for focusing expensive excavations, thereby reducing the amount needed and lowering costs. Their utility is weighed against shovel test pits as a primitive and costly form of prospecting. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2307/3557103 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_203263517</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_2307_3557103</cupid><galeid>A107423423</galeid><jstor_id>3557103</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A107423423</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c596t-65aeda0a667799cfab76ff023cf3f6854d27b74dd176cb303016b289b5bf6b523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0lFr2zAQAGBRVmjWjf6FMFZGoW5PUiTZj1nY0kBoH7o-i7MsuQ6OlUrOWP79VBJWMkIJEgjEd6cTd4RcULhhHNQtF0JR4CdkwDgTmQA5-kAGAMAyxak8Ix9jXABQDjwfkOup9avnTWwMtsPHdfhtN3GIcTjHrooGV3Y4DuYZrW99vflETh220X7enefk6eePX5O7bP4wnU3G88yIQvaZFGgrBJRSqaIwDkslnQPGjeNO5mJUMVWqUVVRJU2Z6gAqS5YXpSidLAXj5-TLNu8q-Je1jb1e-HXo0pOaAWeSC6oSyraoxtbqpnO-D2hq29mAre-sa9L1mIIaMZ528jcHfFqVXTbmYMDVXkAyvf3T17iOUc8e74-3d7Pj7ffp0Tafzvdtdsga37a2tjp1aPKw779tvQk-xmCdXoVmiWGjKejXUdK7UUryctcPTDPRuoCdaeIbF0DzQsjkvm7dIvY-vJNu9ymDyzI0VSruX3__t38BBNXXwQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>203263517</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Geophysical Surveys as Landscape Archaeology</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Kvamme, Kenneth L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kvamme, Kenneth L.</creatorcontrib><description>Recent advances in technology and practice allow geophysical surveys in archaeology to produce maps of subsurface features over large areas and in potentially great detail. It is shown through a series of case studies from two regions in North America that archaeo-geophysical surveys can produce primary information suitable for the study of site content, structure and organization, for examining spatial patterns and relationships, and for directly confronting specific questions about a site and the past. Because large buried cultural landscapes can now be revealed, it is argued that an alternative perspective on regional or landscape archaeology may be possible because space can be viewed in terms of tens of hectares as opposed to the tens of square meters typical of archaeological excavations. Moreover, by placing focus on such buried features as dwellings, storage facilities, public structures, middens, fortifications, trails, or garden spaces that are not commonly revealed through most contemporary surface inspection methods, a richer view of archaeology, the past, and cultural landscapes can be achieved. Archaeo-geophysical surveys can also play an important role in Cultural Resource Management (CRM) contexts as feature discovery tools for focusing expensive excavations, thereby reducing the amount needed and lowering costs. Their utility is weighed against shovel test pits as a primitive and costly form of prospecting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-7316</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2325-5064</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3557103</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AANTAM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, US: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Archaeological evidence ; Archaeological excavation ; Archaeological methods ; Archaeological sites ; Archaeological surveys ; Archaeology ; Ditches ; Electrical resistivity ; Excavation and methods ; Excavations ; Field method ; Field study ; Forums ; Geophysical methods ; Geophysical surveying ; Landscape ; Magnetic surveys ; Methodology and general studies ; Methods ; Polls & surveys ; Prehistory and protohistory ; Prospecting ; Space ; Survey ; Trading posts</subject><ispartof>American antiquity, 2003-07, Vol.68 (3), p.435-457</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 2003</rights><rights>Copyright 2003 Society for American Archaeology</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2003 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>Copyright Society for American Archaeology Jul 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c596t-65aeda0a667799cfab76ff023cf3f6854d27b74dd176cb303016b289b5bf6b523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c596t-65aeda0a667799cfab76ff023cf3f6854d27b74dd176cb303016b289b5bf6b523</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3557103$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3557103$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15018956$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kvamme, Kenneth L.</creatorcontrib><title>Geophysical Surveys as Landscape Archaeology</title><title>American antiquity</title><addtitle>Am. antiq</addtitle><description>Recent advances in technology and practice allow geophysical surveys in archaeology to produce maps of subsurface features over large areas and in potentially great detail. It is shown through a series of case studies from two regions in North America that archaeo-geophysical surveys can produce primary information suitable for the study of site content, structure and organization, for examining spatial patterns and relationships, and for directly confronting specific questions about a site and the past. Because large buried cultural landscapes can now be revealed, it is argued that an alternative perspective on regional or landscape archaeology may be possible because space can be viewed in terms of tens of hectares as opposed to the tens of square meters typical of archaeological excavations. Moreover, by placing focus on such buried features as dwellings, storage facilities, public structures, middens, fortifications, trails, or garden spaces that are not commonly revealed through most contemporary surface inspection methods, a richer view of archaeology, the past, and cultural landscapes can be achieved. Archaeo-geophysical surveys can also play an important role in Cultural Resource Management (CRM) contexts as feature discovery tools for focusing expensive excavations, thereby reducing the amount needed and lowering costs. Their utility is weighed against shovel test pits as a primitive and costly form of prospecting.</description><subject>Archaeological evidence</subject><subject>Archaeological excavation</subject><subject>Archaeological methods</subject><subject>Archaeological sites</subject><subject>Archaeological surveys</subject><subject>Archaeology</subject><subject>Ditches</subject><subject>Electrical resistivity</subject><subject>Excavation and methods</subject><subject>Excavations</subject><subject>Field method</subject><subject>Field study</subject><subject>Forums</subject><subject>Geophysical methods</subject><subject>Geophysical surveying</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Magnetic surveys</subject><subject>Methodology and general studies</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Prehistory and protohistory</subject><subject>Prospecting</subject><subject>Space</subject><subject>Survey</subject><subject>Trading posts</subject><issn>0002-7316</issn><issn>2325-5064</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0lFr2zAQAGBRVmjWjf6FMFZGoW5PUiTZj1nY0kBoH7o-i7MsuQ6OlUrOWP79VBJWMkIJEgjEd6cTd4RcULhhHNQtF0JR4CdkwDgTmQA5-kAGAMAyxak8Ix9jXABQDjwfkOup9avnTWwMtsPHdfhtN3GIcTjHrooGV3Y4DuYZrW99vflETh220X7enefk6eePX5O7bP4wnU3G88yIQvaZFGgrBJRSqaIwDkslnQPGjeNO5mJUMVWqUVVRJU2Z6gAqS5YXpSidLAXj5-TLNu8q-Je1jb1e-HXo0pOaAWeSC6oSyraoxtbqpnO-D2hq29mAre-sa9L1mIIaMZ528jcHfFqVXTbmYMDVXkAyvf3T17iOUc8e74-3d7Pj7ffp0Tafzvdtdsga37a2tjp1aPKw779tvQk-xmCdXoVmiWGjKejXUdK7UUryctcPTDPRuoCdaeIbF0DzQsjkvm7dIvY-vJNu9ymDyzI0VSruX3__t38BBNXXwQ</recordid><startdate>20030701</startdate><enddate>20030701</enddate><creator>Kvamme, Kenneth L.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Society for American Archaeology</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>IBG</scope><scope>IHI</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>8XN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030701</creationdate><title>Geophysical Surveys as Landscape Archaeology</title><author>Kvamme, Kenneth L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c596t-65aeda0a667799cfab76ff023cf3f6854d27b74dd176cb303016b289b5bf6b523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Archaeological evidence</topic><topic>Archaeological excavation</topic><topic>Archaeological methods</topic><topic>Archaeological sites</topic><topic>Archaeological surveys</topic><topic>Archaeology</topic><topic>Ditches</topic><topic>Electrical resistivity</topic><topic>Excavation and methods</topic><topic>Excavations</topic><topic>Field method</topic><topic>Field study</topic><topic>Forums</topic><topic>Geophysical methods</topic><topic>Geophysical surveying</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Magnetic surveys</topic><topic>Methodology and general studies</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Prehistory and protohistory</topic><topic>Prospecting</topic><topic>Space</topic><topic>Survey</topic><topic>Trading posts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kvamme, Kenneth L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Biography</collection><collection>Gale In Context: U.S. History</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>International Bibliography of Art (IBA)</collection><jtitle>American antiquity</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kvamme, Kenneth L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Geophysical Surveys as Landscape Archaeology</atitle><jtitle>American antiquity</jtitle><addtitle>Am. antiq</addtitle><date>2003-07-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>435</spage><epage>457</epage><pages>435-457</pages><issn>0002-7316</issn><eissn>2325-5064</eissn><coden>AANTAM</coden><abstract>Recent advances in technology and practice allow geophysical surveys in archaeology to produce maps of subsurface features over large areas and in potentially great detail. It is shown through a series of case studies from two regions in North America that archaeo-geophysical surveys can produce primary information suitable for the study of site content, structure and organization, for examining spatial patterns and relationships, and for directly confronting specific questions about a site and the past. Because large buried cultural landscapes can now be revealed, it is argued that an alternative perspective on regional or landscape archaeology may be possible because space can be viewed in terms of tens of hectares as opposed to the tens of square meters typical of archaeological excavations. Moreover, by placing focus on such buried features as dwellings, storage facilities, public structures, middens, fortifications, trails, or garden spaces that are not commonly revealed through most contemporary surface inspection methods, a richer view of archaeology, the past, and cultural landscapes can be achieved. Archaeo-geophysical surveys can also play an important role in Cultural Resource Management (CRM) contexts as feature discovery tools for focusing expensive excavations, thereby reducing the amount needed and lowering costs. Their utility is weighed against shovel test pits as a primitive and costly form of prospecting.</abstract><cop>New York, US</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.2307/3557103</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-7316 |
ispartof | American antiquity, 2003-07, Vol.68 (3), p.435-457 |
issn | 0002-7316 2325-5064 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_203263517 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Archaeological evidence Archaeological excavation Archaeological methods Archaeological sites Archaeological surveys Archaeology Ditches Electrical resistivity Excavation and methods Excavations Field method Field study Forums Geophysical methods Geophysical surveying Landscape Magnetic surveys Methodology and general studies Methods Polls & surveys Prehistory and protohistory Prospecting Space Survey Trading posts |
title | Geophysical Surveys as Landscape Archaeology |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T14%3A44%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Geophysical%20Surveys%20as%20Landscape%20Archaeology&rft.jtitle=American%20antiquity&rft.au=Kvamme,%20Kenneth%20L.&rft.date=2003-07-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=435&rft.epage=457&rft.pages=435-457&rft.issn=0002-7316&rft.eissn=2325-5064&rft.coden=AANTAM&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3557103&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA107423423%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=203263517&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A107423423&rft_cupid=10_2307_3557103&rft_jstor_id=3557103&rfr_iscdi=true |