Stability and emission analysis of crude rapeseed oil combustion

The investigation of renewable liquid fuels has received high attention in the combustion science of the past decades. However, the combustion of crude rapeseed oil has received less attention due to its poor combustion properties. Therefore, the scope of the current paper is to experimentally inves...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Fuel processing technology 2017-02, Vol.156, p.204-210
Hauptverfasser: Józsa, Viktor, Kun-Balog, Attila
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 210
container_issue
container_start_page 204
container_title Fuel processing technology
container_volume 156
creator Józsa, Viktor
Kun-Balog, Attila
description The investigation of renewable liquid fuels has received high attention in the combustion science of the past decades. However, the combustion of crude rapeseed oil has received less attention due to its poor combustion properties. Therefore, the scope of the current paper is to experimentally investigate its utilization in an atmospheric test rig designed for 15kW combustion power. For the current investigation, a lean premixing and prevaporizing burner equipped with an airblast atomizer was used. During the investigation, the combustion air flow rate and the atomizing pressure were varied. For comparison, the same measurement series were carried out utilizing diesel oil. Stable combustion of rapeseed oil was limited by inadequate atomization, critical swirl number, and blowout. By contrast, diesel oil combustion was only limited by blowout. The emission of CO and NOX were compared to an actual decree from which emphasized that CO governed the overall emissions. The optima are located at similar atomizing pressure and primary equivalence ratio for both fuels. Therefore, crude rapeseed oil might be an appropriate substitute for diesel oil in steady combustion. •Crude rapeseed and diesel oil combustion were compared under atmospheric conditions.•Rapeseed oil flame was not stable above a critical swirl number.•The averaged CO and NOX emissions of rapeseed and diesel oil combustion were similar.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.fuproc.2016.11.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2032481775</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378382016309596</els_id><sourcerecordid>2032481775</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-ebb36d215c7d07f126e66e6dd87a4cc0e8f9259026e137ada880f1c755b821bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1LxDAQDaLguvoPPBQ8t84kbZO9iLL4BQse1HNIkymkdDdr0gr7742sZ2FgeMN7j3mPsWuECgHb26Hq530MtuIZVYgVQH3CFqikKCUqdcoWIKQqheJwzi5SGgCgaVZywe7fJ9P50U-HwuxcQVufkg-7DMx4SD4VoS9snB0V0ewpEbki-LGwYdvNacrMS3bWmzHR1d9ess-nx4_1S7l5e35dP2xKKyROJXWdaB3HxkoHskfeUpvHOSVNbS2Q6le8WUG-o5DGGaWgRyubplMcOyuW7Obom4N-zZQmPYQ55i-T5iB4rVDKJrPqI8vGkFKkXu-j35p40Aj6tys96GNX-rcrjahzV1l2d5RRTvDtKepkPe0sOR_JTtoF_7_BDyLXdGY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2032481775</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stability and emission analysis of crude rapeseed oil combustion</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Józsa, Viktor ; Kun-Balog, Attila</creator><creatorcontrib>Józsa, Viktor ; Kun-Balog, Attila</creatorcontrib><description>The investigation of renewable liquid fuels has received high attention in the combustion science of the past decades. However, the combustion of crude rapeseed oil has received less attention due to its poor combustion properties. Therefore, the scope of the current paper is to experimentally investigate its utilization in an atmospheric test rig designed for 15kW combustion power. For the current investigation, a lean premixing and prevaporizing burner equipped with an airblast atomizer was used. During the investigation, the combustion air flow rate and the atomizing pressure were varied. For comparison, the same measurement series were carried out utilizing diesel oil. Stable combustion of rapeseed oil was limited by inadequate atomization, critical swirl number, and blowout. By contrast, diesel oil combustion was only limited by blowout. The emission of CO and NOX were compared to an actual decree from which emphasized that CO governed the overall emissions. The optima are located at similar atomizing pressure and primary equivalence ratio for both fuels. Therefore, crude rapeseed oil might be an appropriate substitute for diesel oil in steady combustion. •Crude rapeseed and diesel oil combustion were compared under atmospheric conditions.•Rapeseed oil flame was not stable above a critical swirl number.•The averaged CO and NOX emissions of rapeseed and diesel oil combustion were similar.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-3820</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7188</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2016.11.004</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Air flow ; Atomizing ; Crude oil ; Diesel fuels ; Emission analysis ; Emissions ; Equivalence ratio ; Flame stability ; Flow velocity ; Fuels ; Liquid fuels ; Nitrogen oxides ; Pollutant emission ; Premixing ; Pressure ; Rapeseed ; Rapeseed oil ; Stability analysis ; Studies ; Swirl burner</subject><ispartof>Fuel processing technology, 2017-02, Vol.156, p.204-210</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Feb 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-ebb36d215c7d07f126e66e6dd87a4cc0e8f9259026e137ada880f1c755b821bc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-ebb36d215c7d07f126e66e6dd87a4cc0e8f9259026e137ada880f1c755b821bc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1220-3748</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2016.11.004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Józsa, Viktor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kun-Balog, Attila</creatorcontrib><title>Stability and emission analysis of crude rapeseed oil combustion</title><title>Fuel processing technology</title><description>The investigation of renewable liquid fuels has received high attention in the combustion science of the past decades. However, the combustion of crude rapeseed oil has received less attention due to its poor combustion properties. Therefore, the scope of the current paper is to experimentally investigate its utilization in an atmospheric test rig designed for 15kW combustion power. For the current investigation, a lean premixing and prevaporizing burner equipped with an airblast atomizer was used. During the investigation, the combustion air flow rate and the atomizing pressure were varied. For comparison, the same measurement series were carried out utilizing diesel oil. Stable combustion of rapeseed oil was limited by inadequate atomization, critical swirl number, and blowout. By contrast, diesel oil combustion was only limited by blowout. The emission of CO and NOX were compared to an actual decree from which emphasized that CO governed the overall emissions. The optima are located at similar atomizing pressure and primary equivalence ratio for both fuels. Therefore, crude rapeseed oil might be an appropriate substitute for diesel oil in steady combustion. •Crude rapeseed and diesel oil combustion were compared under atmospheric conditions.•Rapeseed oil flame was not stable above a critical swirl number.•The averaged CO and NOX emissions of rapeseed and diesel oil combustion were similar.</description><subject>Air flow</subject><subject>Atomizing</subject><subject>Crude oil</subject><subject>Diesel fuels</subject><subject>Emission analysis</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Equivalence ratio</subject><subject>Flame stability</subject><subject>Flow velocity</subject><subject>Fuels</subject><subject>Liquid fuels</subject><subject>Nitrogen oxides</subject><subject>Pollutant emission</subject><subject>Premixing</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Rapeseed</subject><subject>Rapeseed oil</subject><subject>Stability analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Swirl burner</subject><issn>0378-3820</issn><issn>1873-7188</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UE1LxDAQDaLguvoPPBQ8t84kbZO9iLL4BQse1HNIkymkdDdr0gr7742sZ2FgeMN7j3mPsWuECgHb26Hq530MtuIZVYgVQH3CFqikKCUqdcoWIKQqheJwzi5SGgCgaVZywe7fJ9P50U-HwuxcQVufkg-7DMx4SD4VoS9snB0V0ewpEbki-LGwYdvNacrMS3bWmzHR1d9ess-nx4_1S7l5e35dP2xKKyROJXWdaB3HxkoHskfeUpvHOSVNbS2Q6le8WUG-o5DGGaWgRyubplMcOyuW7Obom4N-zZQmPYQ55i-T5iB4rVDKJrPqI8vGkFKkXu-j35p40Aj6tys96GNX-rcrjahzV1l2d5RRTvDtKepkPe0sOR_JTtoF_7_BDyLXdGY</recordid><startdate>20170201</startdate><enddate>20170201</enddate><creator>Józsa, Viktor</creator><creator>Kun-Balog, Attila</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1220-3748</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170201</creationdate><title>Stability and emission analysis of crude rapeseed oil combustion</title><author>Józsa, Viktor ; Kun-Balog, Attila</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-ebb36d215c7d07f126e66e6dd87a4cc0e8f9259026e137ada880f1c755b821bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Air flow</topic><topic>Atomizing</topic><topic>Crude oil</topic><topic>Diesel fuels</topic><topic>Emission analysis</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Equivalence ratio</topic><topic>Flame stability</topic><topic>Flow velocity</topic><topic>Fuels</topic><topic>Liquid fuels</topic><topic>Nitrogen oxides</topic><topic>Pollutant emission</topic><topic>Premixing</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Rapeseed</topic><topic>Rapeseed oil</topic><topic>Stability analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Swirl burner</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Józsa, Viktor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kun-Balog, Attila</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Fuel processing technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Józsa, Viktor</au><au>Kun-Balog, Attila</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stability and emission analysis of crude rapeseed oil combustion</atitle><jtitle>Fuel processing technology</jtitle><date>2017-02-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>156</volume><spage>204</spage><epage>210</epage><pages>204-210</pages><issn>0378-3820</issn><eissn>1873-7188</eissn><abstract>The investigation of renewable liquid fuels has received high attention in the combustion science of the past decades. However, the combustion of crude rapeseed oil has received less attention due to its poor combustion properties. Therefore, the scope of the current paper is to experimentally investigate its utilization in an atmospheric test rig designed for 15kW combustion power. For the current investigation, a lean premixing and prevaporizing burner equipped with an airblast atomizer was used. During the investigation, the combustion air flow rate and the atomizing pressure were varied. For comparison, the same measurement series were carried out utilizing diesel oil. Stable combustion of rapeseed oil was limited by inadequate atomization, critical swirl number, and blowout. By contrast, diesel oil combustion was only limited by blowout. The emission of CO and NOX were compared to an actual decree from which emphasized that CO governed the overall emissions. The optima are located at similar atomizing pressure and primary equivalence ratio for both fuels. Therefore, crude rapeseed oil might be an appropriate substitute for diesel oil in steady combustion. •Crude rapeseed and diesel oil combustion were compared under atmospheric conditions.•Rapeseed oil flame was not stable above a critical swirl number.•The averaged CO and NOX emissions of rapeseed and diesel oil combustion were similar.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.fuproc.2016.11.004</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1220-3748</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-3820
ispartof Fuel processing technology, 2017-02, Vol.156, p.204-210
issn 0378-3820
1873-7188
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2032481775
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Air flow
Atomizing
Crude oil
Diesel fuels
Emission analysis
Emissions
Equivalence ratio
Flame stability
Flow velocity
Fuels
Liquid fuels
Nitrogen oxides
Pollutant emission
Premixing
Pressure
Rapeseed
Rapeseed oil
Stability analysis
Studies
Swirl burner
title Stability and emission analysis of crude rapeseed oil combustion
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T12%3A45%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stability%20and%20emission%20analysis%20of%20crude%20rapeseed%20oil%20combustion&rft.jtitle=Fuel%20processing%20technology&rft.au=J%C3%B3zsa,%20Viktor&rft.date=2017-02-01&rft.volume=156&rft.spage=204&rft.epage=210&rft.pages=204-210&rft.issn=0378-3820&rft.eissn=1873-7188&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fuproc.2016.11.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2032481775%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2032481775&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0378382016309596&rfr_iscdi=true