Nationality and religion

Although both of the categories of nationality and religion are difficult to define, it is nonetheless necessary to do so. Having done so, one can proceed with clarifying what is distinctive of each of them, and, thus, be in a position to ascertain their points of convergence and difference. Evaluat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Nations and nationalism 2018-04, Vol.24 (2), p.258-270
1. Verfasser:	Grosby, Steven
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	axial age Citizenship Convergence Cultural groups Methodological individualism nation primordial Religion salvation territorial kinship
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	270
container_issue	2
container_start_page	258
container_title	Nations and nationalism
container_volume	24
creator	Grosby, Steven
description	Although both of the categories of nationality and religion are difficult to define, it is nonetheless necessary to do so. Having done so, one can proceed with clarifying what is distinctive of each of them, and, thus, be in a position to ascertain their points of convergence and difference. Evaluation of the contribution of Anthony Smith to our understanding of the relation between nationality and religion is the point of departure for a re‐examination of the relation.
doi_str_mv	10.1111/nana.12365
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2030542463</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2030542463</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3015-7447cc4cc8c64a2ade5162a8acc0fd1737a861a319350c582e3e5893c52528633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j0FPwzAMRiMEEmNw4cRxEjekjjiJk_RYTQyQpnKBc2SlGepU2pF0Qv33dCtnfLH16dnyY-wW-BLGemyppSUIqfGMzUDpPLMg8vNxlqgy5MZesquUdpxzg6Bm7K6kvu5aaup-WFBbLWJo6s8xuWYXW2pSuPnrc_axfnpfvWSbt-fXVbHJvOSAmVHKeK-8t14rElQFBC3Ikvd8W4GRhqwGkpBL5B6tCDKgzaVHgcJqKefsfrq7j933IaTe7bpDHB9KTnDJUQl1oh4myscupRi2bh_rL4qDA-6O5u5o7k7mIwwT_FM3YfiHdGVRFtPOL5TCWC0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2030542463</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nationality and religion</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Political Science Complete (EBSCOhost)</source><creator>Grosby, Steven</creator><creatorcontrib>Grosby, Steven</creatorcontrib><description>Although both of the categories of nationality and religion are difficult to define, it is nonetheless necessary to do so. Having done so, one can proceed with clarifying what is distinctive of each of them, and, thus, be in a position to ascertain their points of convergence and difference. Evaluation of the contribution of Anthony Smith to our understanding of the relation between nationality and religion is the point of departure for a re‐examination of the relation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1354-5078</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8129</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/nana.12365</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>axial age ; Citizenship ; Convergence ; Cultural groups ; Methodological individualism ; nation ; primordial ; Religion ; salvation ; territorial kinship</subject><ispartof>Nations and nationalism, 2018-04, Vol.24 (2), p.258-270</ispartof><rights>The author(s) 2018. Nations and Nationalism © ASEN/John Wiley & Sons Ltd 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3015-7447cc4cc8c64a2ade5162a8acc0fd1737a861a319350c582e3e5893c52528633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3015-7447cc4cc8c64a2ade5162a8acc0fd1737a861a319350c582e3e5893c52528633</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fnana.12365$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fnana.12365$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,33774,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grosby, Steven</creatorcontrib><title>Nationality and religion</title><title>Nations and nationalism</title><description>Although both of the categories of nationality and religion are difficult to define, it is nonetheless necessary to do so. Having done so, one can proceed with clarifying what is distinctive of each of them, and, thus, be in a position to ascertain their points of convergence and difference. Evaluation of the contribution of Anthony Smith to our understanding of the relation between nationality and religion is the point of departure for a re‐examination of the relation.</description><subject>axial age</subject><subject>Citizenship</subject><subject>Convergence</subject><subject>Cultural groups</subject><subject>Methodological individualism</subject><subject>nation</subject><subject>primordial</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>salvation</subject><subject>territorial kinship</subject><issn>1354-5078</issn><issn>1469-8129</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9j0FPwzAMRiMEEmNw4cRxEjekjjiJk_RYTQyQpnKBc2SlGepU2pF0Qv33dCtnfLH16dnyY-wW-BLGemyppSUIqfGMzUDpPLMg8vNxlqgy5MZesquUdpxzg6Bm7K6kvu5aaup-WFBbLWJo6s8xuWYXW2pSuPnrc_axfnpfvWSbt-fXVbHJvOSAmVHKeK-8t14rElQFBC3Ikvd8W4GRhqwGkpBL5B6tCDKgzaVHgcJqKefsfrq7j933IaTe7bpDHB9KTnDJUQl1oh4myscupRi2bh_rL4qDA-6O5u5o7k7mIwwT_FM3YfiHdGVRFtPOL5TCWC0</recordid><startdate>201804</startdate><enddate>201804</enddate><creator>Grosby, Steven</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201804</creationdate><title>Nationality and religion</title><author>Grosby, Steven</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3015-7447cc4cc8c64a2ade5162a8acc0fd1737a861a319350c582e3e5893c52528633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>axial age</topic><topic>Citizenship</topic><topic>Convergence</topic><topic>Cultural groups</topic><topic>Methodological individualism</topic><topic>nation</topic><topic>primordial</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>salvation</topic><topic>territorial kinship</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grosby, Steven</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Nations and nationalism</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grosby, Steven</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nationality and religion</atitle><jtitle>Nations and nationalism</jtitle><date>2018-04</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>258</spage><epage>270</epage><pages>258-270</pages><issn>1354-5078</issn><eissn>1469-8129</eissn><abstract>Although both of the categories of nationality and religion are difficult to define, it is nonetheless necessary to do so. Having done so, one can proceed with clarifying what is distinctive of each of them, and, thus, be in a position to ascertain their points of convergence and difference. Evaluation of the contribution of Anthony Smith to our understanding of the relation between nationality and religion is the point of departure for a re‐examination of the relation.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/nana.12365</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 1354-5078
ispartof	Nations and nationalism, 2018-04, Vol.24 (2), p.258-270
issn	1354-5078 1469-8129
language	eng
recordid	cdi_proquest_journals_2030542463
source	Wiley-Blackwell Journals; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; Political Science Complete (EBSCOhost)
subjects	axial age Citizenship Convergence Cultural groups Methodological individualism nation primordial Religion salvation territorial kinship
title	Nationality and religion
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T10%3A45%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nationality%20and%20religion&rft.jtitle=Nations%20and%20nationalism&rft.au=Grosby,%20Steven&rft.date=2018-04&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=258&rft.epage=270&rft.pages=258-270&rft.issn=1354-5078&rft.eissn=1469-8129&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/nana.12365&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2030542463%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2030542463&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true