Occurrence of Legionella in Nonpotable Reclaimed Water

Legionella was monitored in reclaimed water systems and were detected by culture in 50% of 115 samples, while 80% of the samples were positive by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). The lowest level of Legionella was in a system that practiced biological nutrient removal and maintained an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal - American Water Works Association 2018-03, Vol.110 (3), p.15-27
Hauptverfasser: Johnson, William J., Jjemba, Patrick K., Bukhari, Zia, LeChevallier, Mark W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 27
container_issue 3
container_start_page 15
container_title Journal - American Water Works Association
container_volume 110
creator Johnson, William J.
Jjemba, Patrick K.
Bukhari, Zia
LeChevallier, Mark W.
description Legionella was monitored in reclaimed water systems and were detected by culture in 50% of 115 samples, while 80% of the samples were positive by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). The lowest level of Legionella was in a system that practiced biological nutrient removal and maintained an average 0.3 mg/L free chlorine residual. The difference between qPCR and ethidium monoazide treated samples was used as an indicator of viability, and the greatest difference was in a chloraminated system, where the molecular method indicated a 9% viability. Ninety‐six percent of the species were L. pneumophila, and 87% were identified as L. pneumophila serotype 1. Total amoebae (summed as cysts or trophozoites) were detected in 100% of samples from all six systems, and were mostly (50–95%) in the active trophozoite phase. In the chloraminated system, 87% of the mesophilic amoebae and 66% of the thermophilic amoebae were in the cyst phase.
doi_str_mv 10.5942/jawwa.2018.110.0021
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2029634222</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2029634222</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3341-fc29cff539fe89bbf9eaa777f08bbf6d139ea5bf6b5ac6b7474ce343076ca7da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkN1Kw0AQhRdRsFafwJuA16n7m03uLMU_KBZEqXfLZDMrKWm2bhpK395N4wN4NTOHc87AR8gtozNVSH6_gcMBZpyyfMaiRilnZ2TClGJpngtxTiaUUpEyRb8uyVXXbeLJFJMTkq2s7UPA1mLiXbLE79q32DSQ1G3y5tud30PZYPKOtoF6i1Wyhj2Ga3LhoOnw5m9OyefT48fiJV2unl8X82VqhZAsdZYX1jklCod5UZauQACttaN5PLKKiSiouJUKbFZqqaVFIQXVmQVdgZiSu7F3F_xPj93ebHwf2vjScMqLTEjOeXSJ0WWD77qAzuxCvYVwNIyaAZA5ATIDIBMBmQFQTD2MqUPd4PE_ETNfr-eDEoVTxS8J621g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2029634222</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Occurrence of Legionella in Nonpotable Reclaimed Water</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Johnson, William J. ; Jjemba, Patrick K. ; Bukhari, Zia ; LeChevallier, Mark W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Johnson, William J. ; Jjemba, Patrick K. ; Bukhari, Zia ; LeChevallier, Mark W.</creatorcontrib><description>Legionella was monitored in reclaimed water systems and were detected by culture in 50% of 115 samples, while 80% of the samples were positive by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). The lowest level of Legionella was in a system that practiced biological nutrient removal and maintained an average 0.3 mg/L free chlorine residual. The difference between qPCR and ethidium monoazide treated samples was used as an indicator of viability, and the greatest difference was in a chloraminated system, where the molecular method indicated a 9% viability. Ninety‐six percent of the species were L. pneumophila, and 87% were identified as L. pneumophila serotype 1. Total amoebae (summed as cysts or trophozoites) were detected in 100% of samples from all six systems, and were mostly (50–95%) in the active trophozoite phase. In the chloraminated system, 87% of the mesophilic amoebae and 66% of the thermophilic amoebae were in the cyst phase.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-150X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-8833</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5942/jawwa.2018.110.0021</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>amoebae ; chloramine ; Chlorine ; Cysts ; Legionella ; Legionnaires disease ; Mineral nutrients ; Nucleotide sequence ; Nutrient removal ; PCR ; Polymerase chain reaction ; Reclaimed water ; Removal ; trophozoite ; Trophozoites ; Viability ; Water</subject><ispartof>Journal - American Water Works Association, 2018-03, Vol.110 (3), p.15-27</ispartof><rights>2018 American Water Works Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Water Works Association Mar 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3341-fc29cff539fe89bbf9eaa777f08bbf6d139ea5bf6b5ac6b7474ce343076ca7da3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3341-fc29cff539fe89bbf9eaa777f08bbf6d139ea5bf6b5ac6b7474ce343076ca7da3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.5942%2Fjawwa.2018.110.0021$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.5942%2Fjawwa.2018.110.0021$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johnson, William J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jjemba, Patrick K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bukhari, Zia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LeChevallier, Mark W.</creatorcontrib><title>Occurrence of Legionella in Nonpotable Reclaimed Water</title><title>Journal - American Water Works Association</title><description>Legionella was monitored in reclaimed water systems and were detected by culture in 50% of 115 samples, while 80% of the samples were positive by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). The lowest level of Legionella was in a system that practiced biological nutrient removal and maintained an average 0.3 mg/L free chlorine residual. The difference between qPCR and ethidium monoazide treated samples was used as an indicator of viability, and the greatest difference was in a chloraminated system, where the molecular method indicated a 9% viability. Ninety‐six percent of the species were L. pneumophila, and 87% were identified as L. pneumophila serotype 1. Total amoebae (summed as cysts or trophozoites) were detected in 100% of samples from all six systems, and were mostly (50–95%) in the active trophozoite phase. In the chloraminated system, 87% of the mesophilic amoebae and 66% of the thermophilic amoebae were in the cyst phase.</description><subject>amoebae</subject><subject>chloramine</subject><subject>Chlorine</subject><subject>Cysts</subject><subject>Legionella</subject><subject>Legionnaires disease</subject><subject>Mineral nutrients</subject><subject>Nucleotide sequence</subject><subject>Nutrient removal</subject><subject>PCR</subject><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Reclaimed water</subject><subject>Removal</subject><subject>trophozoite</subject><subject>Trophozoites</subject><subject>Viability</subject><subject>Water</subject><issn>0003-150X</issn><issn>1551-8833</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkN1Kw0AQhRdRsFafwJuA16n7m03uLMU_KBZEqXfLZDMrKWm2bhpK395N4wN4NTOHc87AR8gtozNVSH6_gcMBZpyyfMaiRilnZ2TClGJpngtxTiaUUpEyRb8uyVXXbeLJFJMTkq2s7UPA1mLiXbLE79q32DSQ1G3y5tud30PZYPKOtoF6i1Wyhj2Ga3LhoOnw5m9OyefT48fiJV2unl8X82VqhZAsdZYX1jklCod5UZauQACttaN5PLKKiSiouJUKbFZqqaVFIQXVmQVdgZiSu7F3F_xPj93ebHwf2vjScMqLTEjOeXSJ0WWD77qAzuxCvYVwNIyaAZA5ATIDIBMBmQFQTD2MqUPd4PE_ETNfr-eDEoVTxS8J621g</recordid><startdate>201803</startdate><enddate>201803</enddate><creator>Johnson, William J.</creator><creator>Jjemba, Patrick K.</creator><creator>Bukhari, Zia</creator><creator>LeChevallier, Mark W.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>American Water Works Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201803</creationdate><title>Occurrence of Legionella in Nonpotable Reclaimed Water</title><author>Johnson, William J. ; Jjemba, Patrick K. ; Bukhari, Zia ; LeChevallier, Mark W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3341-fc29cff539fe89bbf9eaa777f08bbf6d139ea5bf6b5ac6b7474ce343076ca7da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>amoebae</topic><topic>chloramine</topic><topic>Chlorine</topic><topic>Cysts</topic><topic>Legionella</topic><topic>Legionnaires disease</topic><topic>Mineral nutrients</topic><topic>Nucleotide sequence</topic><topic>Nutrient removal</topic><topic>PCR</topic><topic>Polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Reclaimed water</topic><topic>Removal</topic><topic>trophozoite</topic><topic>Trophozoites</topic><topic>Viability</topic><topic>Water</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johnson, William J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jjemba, Patrick K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bukhari, Zia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LeChevallier, Mark W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal - American Water Works Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johnson, William J.</au><au>Jjemba, Patrick K.</au><au>Bukhari, Zia</au><au>LeChevallier, Mark W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Occurrence of Legionella in Nonpotable Reclaimed Water</atitle><jtitle>Journal - American Water Works Association</jtitle><date>2018-03</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>110</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>15</spage><epage>27</epage><pages>15-27</pages><issn>0003-150X</issn><eissn>1551-8833</eissn><abstract>Legionella was monitored in reclaimed water systems and were detected by culture in 50% of 115 samples, while 80% of the samples were positive by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). The lowest level of Legionella was in a system that practiced biological nutrient removal and maintained an average 0.3 mg/L free chlorine residual. The difference between qPCR and ethidium monoazide treated samples was used as an indicator of viability, and the greatest difference was in a chloraminated system, where the molecular method indicated a 9% viability. Ninety‐six percent of the species were L. pneumophila, and 87% were identified as L. pneumophila serotype 1. Total amoebae (summed as cysts or trophozoites) were detected in 100% of samples from all six systems, and were mostly (50–95%) in the active trophozoite phase. In the chloraminated system, 87% of the mesophilic amoebae and 66% of the thermophilic amoebae were in the cyst phase.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.5942/jawwa.2018.110.0021</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-150X
ispartof Journal - American Water Works Association, 2018-03, Vol.110 (3), p.15-27
issn 0003-150X
1551-8833
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2029634222
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects amoebae
chloramine
Chlorine
Cysts
Legionella
Legionnaires disease
Mineral nutrients
Nucleotide sequence
Nutrient removal
PCR
Polymerase chain reaction
Reclaimed water
Removal
trophozoite
Trophozoites
Viability
Water
title Occurrence of Legionella in Nonpotable Reclaimed Water
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T01%3A28%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Occurrence%20of%20Legionella%20in%20Nonpotable%20Reclaimed%20Water&rft.jtitle=Journal%20-%20American%20Water%20Works%20Association&rft.au=Johnson,%20William%20J.&rft.date=2018-03&rft.volume=110&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=15&rft.epage=27&rft.pages=15-27&rft.issn=0003-150X&rft.eissn=1551-8833&rft_id=info:doi/10.5942/jawwa.2018.110.0021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2029634222%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2029634222&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true