Grading written projects: What approaches do students find most helpful?
Conscientious marketing faculty spend extensive hours grading student essays and projects. As instructors work on grading papers, they may wonder how effective their comments are. The author explored how students in a marketing principles class reported their use of various grading methods. Students...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of education for business 2008-01, Vol.83 (6), p.325-330 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 330 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 325 |
| container_title | Journal of education for business |
| container_volume | 83 |
| creator | Smith, Lois J |
| description | Conscientious marketing faculty spend extensive hours grading student essays and projects. As instructors work on grading papers, they may wonder how effective their comments are. The author explored how students in a marketing principles class reported their use of various grading methods. Students generally preferred rubrics with ratings and accompanying comments and indicated that they used comments to understand their grades and also to improve their writing. Students appreciated feedback on what they did well on projects and how they could have improved. (Contains 3 tables.) |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3200/JOEB.83.6.325-330 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_202821148</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ805275</ericid><sourcerecordid>1543163191</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-680b736bdb694470867f4689bb7399d2464651d0d5b7c25fed06880509ebe8f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFT0tLw0AQXkTBWL2reCjeU2d39jE5aonVUuhFz0uT3UiCpnU3Rfz3bonoaR7fi4-xKw4zFAB3y3X5MCOc6XSqHBGOWMYLCWlV-phlQIS5QIGn7CzGDgAUcJOxy0XYuLZ_m36Fdhh8P92FbefrIZ6zk2bzHv3F75yw18fyZf6Ur9aL5_n9Kq-FwSHXBJVBXblKF1IaIG0aqamo0rconJBaasUdOFWZWqjGO9BEKbzwladG4oTdjr4p-HPv42C77T70KdIKECQ4l5RIfCTVYRtj8I3dhfZjE74tB3vobw_9LaHV6VQ29U-am1HjQ1v_8ctlChdGJfh6hF27-7cjRAOAP34qXMk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>202821148</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Grading written projects: What approaches do students find most helpful?</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Smith, Lois J</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, Lois J</creatorcontrib><description>Conscientious marketing faculty spend extensive hours grading student essays and projects. As instructors work on grading papers, they may wonder how effective their comments are. The author explored how students in a marketing principles class reported their use of various grading methods. Students generally preferred rubrics with ratings and accompanying comments and indicated that they used comments to understand their grades and also to improve their writing. Students appreciated feedback on what they did well on projects and how they could have improved. (Contains 3 tables.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-2323</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1940-3356</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3200/JOEB.83.6.325-330</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Heldref Publications</publisher><subject>Best practice ; Best Practices ; Bewertung ; Business Administration Education ; College Students ; Educational Experience ; Educational Facilities Improvement ; Error Correction ; Essays ; Feedback ; Feedback (Response) ; Grading ; Grammar ; Learning ; Marketing ; Methods ; Millennials ; Peer review ; R&D ; Research & development ; Scoring Rubrics ; Secondary Schools ; Spelling ; Student Attitudes ; Student Empowerment ; Student Evaluation ; Student writing ; Students ; Studies ; Teaching ; Teaching Methods ; USA ; Wirtschaftspädagogik ; Wissenschaftliches Arbeiten ; Writing (Composition) ; Writing Assignments ; Writing Evaluation ; Writing Exercises</subject><ispartof>Journal of education for business, 2008-01, Vol.83 (6), p.325-330</ispartof><rights>Copyright Heldref Publications Jul/Aug 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-680b736bdb694470867f4689bb7399d2464651d0d5b7c25fed06880509ebe8f43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://www.fachportal-paedagogik.de/fis_bildung/suche/fis_set.html?FId=833700$$DAccess content in the German Education Portal$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ805275$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, Lois J</creatorcontrib><title>Grading written projects: What approaches do students find most helpful?</title><title>Journal of education for business</title><description>Conscientious marketing faculty spend extensive hours grading student essays and projects. As instructors work on grading papers, they may wonder how effective their comments are. The author explored how students in a marketing principles class reported their use of various grading methods. Students generally preferred rubrics with ratings and accompanying comments and indicated that they used comments to understand their grades and also to improve their writing. Students appreciated feedback on what they did well on projects and how they could have improved. (Contains 3 tables.)</description><subject>Best practice</subject><subject>Best Practices</subject><subject>Bewertung</subject><subject>Business Administration Education</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Educational Experience</subject><subject>Educational Facilities Improvement</subject><subject>Error Correction</subject><subject>Essays</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>Grading</subject><subject>Grammar</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Millennials</subject><subject>Peer review</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Scoring Rubrics</subject><subject>Secondary Schools</subject><subject>Spelling</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Student Empowerment</subject><subject>Student Evaluation</subject><subject>Student writing</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>USA</subject><subject>Wirtschaftspädagogik</subject><subject>Wissenschaftliches Arbeiten</subject><subject>Writing (Composition)</subject><subject>Writing Assignments</subject><subject>Writing Evaluation</subject><subject>Writing Exercises</subject><issn>0883-2323</issn><issn>1940-3356</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpFT0tLw0AQXkTBWL2reCjeU2d39jE5aonVUuhFz0uT3UiCpnU3Rfz3bonoaR7fi4-xKw4zFAB3y3X5MCOc6XSqHBGOWMYLCWlV-phlQIS5QIGn7CzGDgAUcJOxy0XYuLZ_m36Fdhh8P92FbefrIZ6zk2bzHv3F75yw18fyZf6Ur9aL5_n9Kq-FwSHXBJVBXblKF1IaIG0aqamo0rconJBaasUdOFWZWqjGO9BEKbzwladG4oTdjr4p-HPv42C77T70KdIKECQ4l5RIfCTVYRtj8I3dhfZjE74tB3vobw_9LaHV6VQ29U-am1HjQ1v_8ctlChdGJfh6hF27-7cjRAOAP34qXMk</recordid><startdate>20080101</startdate><enddate>20080101</enddate><creator>Smith, Lois J</creator><general>Heldref Publications</general><general>Taylor & Francis Inc</general><scope>9S6</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080101</creationdate><title>Grading written projects</title><author>Smith, Lois J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-680b736bdb694470867f4689bb7399d2464651d0d5b7c25fed06880509ebe8f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Best practice</topic><topic>Best Practices</topic><topic>Bewertung</topic><topic>Business Administration Education</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Educational Experience</topic><topic>Educational Facilities Improvement</topic><topic>Error Correction</topic><topic>Essays</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>Grading</topic><topic>Grammar</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Millennials</topic><topic>Peer review</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Scoring Rubrics</topic><topic>Secondary Schools</topic><topic>Spelling</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Student Empowerment</topic><topic>Student Evaluation</topic><topic>Student writing</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>USA</topic><topic>Wirtschaftspädagogik</topic><topic>Wissenschaftliches Arbeiten</topic><topic>Writing (Composition)</topic><topic>Writing Assignments</topic><topic>Writing Evaluation</topic><topic>Writing Exercises</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, Lois J</creatorcontrib><collection>FIS Bildung Literaturdatenbank</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of education for business</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, Lois J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ805275</ericid><atitle>Grading written projects: What approaches do students find most helpful?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of education for business</jtitle><date>2008-01-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>325</spage><epage>330</epage><pages>325-330</pages><issn>0883-2323</issn><eissn>1940-3356</eissn><abstract>Conscientious marketing faculty spend extensive hours grading student essays and projects. As instructors work on grading papers, they may wonder how effective their comments are. The author explored how students in a marketing principles class reported their use of various grading methods. Students generally preferred rubrics with ratings and accompanying comments and indicated that they used comments to understand their grades and also to improve their writing. Students appreciated feedback on what they did well on projects and how they could have improved. (Contains 3 tables.)</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Heldref Publications</pub><doi>10.3200/JOEB.83.6.325-330</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0883-2323 |
| ispartof | Journal of education for business, 2008-01, Vol.83 (6), p.325-330 |
| issn | 0883-2323 1940-3356 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_202821148 |
| source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; EBSCOhost Education Source |
| subjects | Best practice Best Practices Bewertung Business Administration Education College Students Educational Experience Educational Facilities Improvement Error Correction Essays Feedback Feedback (Response) Grading Grammar Learning Marketing Methods Millennials Peer review R&D Research & development Scoring Rubrics Secondary Schools Spelling Student Attitudes Student Empowerment Student Evaluation Student writing Students Studies Teaching Teaching Methods USA Wirtschaftspädagogik Wissenschaftliches Arbeiten Writing (Composition) Writing Assignments Writing Evaluation Writing Exercises |
| title | Grading written projects: What approaches do students find most helpful? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T02%3A42%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Grading%20written%20projects:%20What%20approaches%20do%20students%20find%20most%20helpful?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20education%20for%20business&rft.au=Smith,%20Lois%20J&rft.date=2008-01-01&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=325&rft.epage=330&rft.pages=325-330&rft.issn=0883-2323&rft.eissn=1940-3356&rft_id=info:doi/10.3200/JOEB.83.6.325-330&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1543163191%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=202821148&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ805275&rfr_iscdi=true |