An empirical analysis of risk mitigation in the pharmaceutical industry supply chain: A developing-country perspective

Global pharmaceutical supply-chain risk mitigation has become an important issue in the corporate boardroom. This article reports on the empirical findings of the quantification of risks that decision makers consider most important when deciding on a risk portfolio to mitigate and the manner in whic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Thunderbird international business review 2010-01, Vol.52 (1), p.54
Hauptverfasser: Enyinda, Chris I, Mbah, Chris H N, Ogbuehi, Alphonso
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 54
container_title Thunderbird international business review
container_volume 52
creator Enyinda, Chris I
Mbah, Chris H N
Ogbuehi, Alphonso
description Global pharmaceutical supply-chain risk mitigation has become an important issue in the corporate boardroom. This article reports on the empirical findings of the quantification of risks that decision makers consider most important when deciding on a risk portfolio to mitigate and the manner in which risks are prioritized according to their importance. The empirical findings suggest that decision makers attached great importance to counterfeit, Food and Drugs Board, and exchange-rate fluctuations. With respect to risk-mitigation strategies, risk reduction is considered most important, followed by risk avoidance. Dynamic sensitivity analysis with respect to a change (increase) in the Food and Drugs Board did not result in any change in the ranking of risk policy options, while a change (increase) in counterfeit resulted in a change in the ranking between risk reduction and risk avoidance. Risk avoidance ranked number one, followed by risk reduction. Implications distilled from this article are far-reaching for the Ghanaian pharmaceutical firms' managers. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_202784622</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1919296271</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2027846223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjk1qwzAQRkVoIe7PHYbsDbLq2El2pqT0AN0boUziSWVJ0UgG375O6QG6et_iffBWoqi2SpbNrq0fli33TVm3jVqLJ-arlJWsqm0hps4BjoEiGW1BO21nJgZ_hkj8DSMluuhE3gE5SANCGHQctcGcfh_kTplTnIFzCHYGM2hyB-jghBNaH8hdSuOzuysBIwc0iSZ8EY9nbRlf__gsNh_Hr_fPMkR_y8ipv_oclxrulVTtrm6UevuX9APxCE8D</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>202784622</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An empirical analysis of risk mitigation in the pharmaceutical industry supply chain: A developing-country perspective</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Enyinda, Chris I ; Mbah, Chris H N ; Ogbuehi, Alphonso</creator><creatorcontrib>Enyinda, Chris I ; Mbah, Chris H N ; Ogbuehi, Alphonso</creatorcontrib><description>Global pharmaceutical supply-chain risk mitigation has become an important issue in the corporate boardroom. This article reports on the empirical findings of the quantification of risks that decision makers consider most important when deciding on a risk portfolio to mitigate and the manner in which risks are prioritized according to their importance. The empirical findings suggest that decision makers attached great importance to counterfeit, Food and Drugs Board, and exchange-rate fluctuations. With respect to risk-mitigation strategies, risk reduction is considered most important, followed by risk avoidance. Dynamic sensitivity analysis with respect to a change (increase) in the Food and Drugs Board did not result in any change in the ranking of risk policy options, while a change (increase) in counterfeit resulted in a change in the ranking between risk reduction and risk avoidance. Risk avoidance ranked number one, followed by risk reduction. Implications distilled from this article are far-reaching for the Ghanaian pharmaceutical firms' managers. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1096-4762</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6874</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Periodicals Inc</publisher><subject>Counterfeiting ; Decision making ; Developing countries ; LDCs ; Pharmaceutical industry ; Risk management ; Sensitivity analysis ; Studies ; Supply chains</subject><ispartof>Thunderbird international business review, 2010-01, Vol.52 (1), p.54</ispartof><rights>Copyright Wiley Periodicals Inc. Jan/Feb 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27843</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Enyinda, Chris I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mbah, Chris H N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogbuehi, Alphonso</creatorcontrib><title>An empirical analysis of risk mitigation in the pharmaceutical industry supply chain: A developing-country perspective</title><title>Thunderbird international business review</title><description>Global pharmaceutical supply-chain risk mitigation has become an important issue in the corporate boardroom. This article reports on the empirical findings of the quantification of risks that decision makers consider most important when deciding on a risk portfolio to mitigate and the manner in which risks are prioritized according to their importance. The empirical findings suggest that decision makers attached great importance to counterfeit, Food and Drugs Board, and exchange-rate fluctuations. With respect to risk-mitigation strategies, risk reduction is considered most important, followed by risk avoidance. Dynamic sensitivity analysis with respect to a change (increase) in the Food and Drugs Board did not result in any change in the ranking of risk policy options, while a change (increase) in counterfeit resulted in a change in the ranking between risk reduction and risk avoidance. Risk avoidance ranked number one, followed by risk reduction. Implications distilled from this article are far-reaching for the Ghanaian pharmaceutical firms' managers. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Counterfeiting</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical industry</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Supply chains</subject><issn>1096-4762</issn><issn>1520-6874</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjk1qwzAQRkVoIe7PHYbsDbLq2El2pqT0AN0boUziSWVJ0UgG375O6QG6et_iffBWoqi2SpbNrq0fli33TVm3jVqLJ-arlJWsqm0hps4BjoEiGW1BO21nJgZ_hkj8DSMluuhE3gE5SANCGHQctcGcfh_kTplTnIFzCHYGM2hyB-jghBNaH8hdSuOzuysBIwc0iSZ8EY9nbRlf__gsNh_Hr_fPMkR_y8ipv_oclxrulVTtrm6UevuX9APxCE8D</recordid><startdate>20100101</startdate><enddate>20100101</enddate><creator>Enyinda, Chris I</creator><creator>Mbah, Chris H N</creator><creator>Ogbuehi, Alphonso</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100101</creationdate><title>An empirical analysis of risk mitigation in the pharmaceutical industry supply chain: A developing-country perspective</title><author>Enyinda, Chris I ; Mbah, Chris H N ; Ogbuehi, Alphonso</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2027846223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Counterfeiting</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical industry</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Supply chains</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Enyinda, Chris I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mbah, Chris H N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogbuehi, Alphonso</creatorcontrib><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Thunderbird international business review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Enyinda, Chris I</au><au>Mbah, Chris H N</au><au>Ogbuehi, Alphonso</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An empirical analysis of risk mitigation in the pharmaceutical industry supply chain: A developing-country perspective</atitle><jtitle>Thunderbird international business review</jtitle><date>2010-01-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>54</spage><pages>54-</pages><issn>1096-4762</issn><eissn>1520-6874</eissn><abstract>Global pharmaceutical supply-chain risk mitigation has become an important issue in the corporate boardroom. This article reports on the empirical findings of the quantification of risks that decision makers consider most important when deciding on a risk portfolio to mitigate and the manner in which risks are prioritized according to their importance. The empirical findings suggest that decision makers attached great importance to counterfeit, Food and Drugs Board, and exchange-rate fluctuations. With respect to risk-mitigation strategies, risk reduction is considered most important, followed by risk avoidance. Dynamic sensitivity analysis with respect to a change (increase) in the Food and Drugs Board did not result in any change in the ranking of risk policy options, while a change (increase) in counterfeit resulted in a change in the ranking between risk reduction and risk avoidance. Risk avoidance ranked number one, followed by risk reduction. Implications distilled from this article are far-reaching for the Ghanaian pharmaceutical firms' managers. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals Inc</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1096-4762
ispartof Thunderbird international business review, 2010-01, Vol.52 (1), p.54
issn 1096-4762
1520-6874
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_202784622
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index; Business Source Complete
subjects Counterfeiting
Decision making
Developing countries
LDCs
Pharmaceutical industry
Risk management
Sensitivity analysis
Studies
Supply chains
title An empirical analysis of risk mitigation in the pharmaceutical industry supply chain: A developing-country perspective
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T05%3A48%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20empirical%20analysis%20of%20risk%20mitigation%20in%20the%20pharmaceutical%20industry%20supply%20chain:%20A%20developing-country%20perspective&rft.jtitle=Thunderbird%20international%20business%20review&rft.au=Enyinda,%20Chris%20I&rft.date=2010-01-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=54&rft.pages=54-&rft.issn=1096-4762&rft.eissn=1520-6874&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1919296271%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=202784622&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true