An empirical analysis of risk mitigation in the pharmaceutical industry supply chain: A developing-country perspective
Global pharmaceutical supply-chain risk mitigation has become an important issue in the corporate boardroom. This article reports on the empirical findings of the quantification of risks that decision makers consider most important when deciding on a risk portfolio to mitigate and the manner in whic...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Thunderbird international business review 2010-01, Vol.52 (1), p.54 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 54 |
container_title | Thunderbird international business review |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Enyinda, Chris I Mbah, Chris H N Ogbuehi, Alphonso |
description | Global pharmaceutical supply-chain risk mitigation has become an important issue in the corporate boardroom. This article reports on the empirical findings of the quantification of risks that decision makers consider most important when deciding on a risk portfolio to mitigate and the manner in which risks are prioritized according to their importance. The empirical findings suggest that decision makers attached great importance to counterfeit, Food and Drugs Board, and exchange-rate fluctuations. With respect to risk-mitigation strategies, risk reduction is considered most important, followed by risk avoidance. Dynamic sensitivity analysis with respect to a change (increase) in the Food and Drugs Board did not result in any change in the ranking of risk policy options, while a change (increase) in counterfeit resulted in a change in the ranking between risk reduction and risk avoidance. Risk avoidance ranked number one, followed by risk reduction. Implications distilled from this article are far-reaching for the Ghanaian pharmaceutical firms' managers. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_202784622</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1919296271</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2027846223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjk1qwzAQRkVoIe7PHYbsDbLq2El2pqT0AN0boUziSWVJ0UgG375O6QG6et_iffBWoqi2SpbNrq0fli33TVm3jVqLJ-arlJWsqm0hps4BjoEiGW1BO21nJgZ_hkj8DSMluuhE3gE5SANCGHQctcGcfh_kTplTnIFzCHYGM2hyB-jghBNaH8hdSuOzuysBIwc0iSZ8EY9nbRlf__gsNh_Hr_fPMkR_y8ipv_oclxrulVTtrm6UevuX9APxCE8D</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>202784622</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An empirical analysis of risk mitigation in the pharmaceutical industry supply chain: A developing-country perspective</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Enyinda, Chris I ; Mbah, Chris H N ; Ogbuehi, Alphonso</creator><creatorcontrib>Enyinda, Chris I ; Mbah, Chris H N ; Ogbuehi, Alphonso</creatorcontrib><description>Global pharmaceutical supply-chain risk mitigation has become an important issue in the corporate boardroom. This article reports on the empirical findings of the quantification of risks that decision makers consider most important when deciding on a risk portfolio to mitigate and the manner in which risks are prioritized according to their importance. The empirical findings suggest that decision makers attached great importance to counterfeit, Food and Drugs Board, and exchange-rate fluctuations. With respect to risk-mitigation strategies, risk reduction is considered most important, followed by risk avoidance. Dynamic sensitivity analysis with respect to a change (increase) in the Food and Drugs Board did not result in any change in the ranking of risk policy options, while a change (increase) in counterfeit resulted in a change in the ranking between risk reduction and risk avoidance. Risk avoidance ranked number one, followed by risk reduction. Implications distilled from this article are far-reaching for the Ghanaian pharmaceutical firms' managers. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1096-4762</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6874</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Periodicals Inc</publisher><subject>Counterfeiting ; Decision making ; Developing countries ; LDCs ; Pharmaceutical industry ; Risk management ; Sensitivity analysis ; Studies ; Supply chains</subject><ispartof>Thunderbird international business review, 2010-01, Vol.52 (1), p.54</ispartof><rights>Copyright Wiley Periodicals Inc. Jan/Feb 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27843</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Enyinda, Chris I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mbah, Chris H N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogbuehi, Alphonso</creatorcontrib><title>An empirical analysis of risk mitigation in the pharmaceutical industry supply chain: A developing-country perspective</title><title>Thunderbird international business review</title><description>Global pharmaceutical supply-chain risk mitigation has become an important issue in the corporate boardroom. This article reports on the empirical findings of the quantification of risks that decision makers consider most important when deciding on a risk portfolio to mitigate and the manner in which risks are prioritized according to their importance. The empirical findings suggest that decision makers attached great importance to counterfeit, Food and Drugs Board, and exchange-rate fluctuations. With respect to risk-mitigation strategies, risk reduction is considered most important, followed by risk avoidance. Dynamic sensitivity analysis with respect to a change (increase) in the Food and Drugs Board did not result in any change in the ranking of risk policy options, while a change (increase) in counterfeit resulted in a change in the ranking between risk reduction and risk avoidance. Risk avoidance ranked number one, followed by risk reduction. Implications distilled from this article are far-reaching for the Ghanaian pharmaceutical firms' managers. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Counterfeiting</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical industry</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Supply chains</subject><issn>1096-4762</issn><issn>1520-6874</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjk1qwzAQRkVoIe7PHYbsDbLq2El2pqT0AN0boUziSWVJ0UgG375O6QG6et_iffBWoqi2SpbNrq0fli33TVm3jVqLJ-arlJWsqm0hps4BjoEiGW1BO21nJgZ_hkj8DSMluuhE3gE5SANCGHQctcGcfh_kTplTnIFzCHYGM2hyB-jghBNaH8hdSuOzuysBIwc0iSZ8EY9nbRlf__gsNh_Hr_fPMkR_y8ipv_oclxrulVTtrm6UevuX9APxCE8D</recordid><startdate>20100101</startdate><enddate>20100101</enddate><creator>Enyinda, Chris I</creator><creator>Mbah, Chris H N</creator><creator>Ogbuehi, Alphonso</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100101</creationdate><title>An empirical analysis of risk mitigation in the pharmaceutical industry supply chain: A developing-country perspective</title><author>Enyinda, Chris I ; Mbah, Chris H N ; Ogbuehi, Alphonso</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2027846223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Counterfeiting</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical industry</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Supply chains</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Enyinda, Chris I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mbah, Chris H N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogbuehi, Alphonso</creatorcontrib><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Thunderbird international business review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Enyinda, Chris I</au><au>Mbah, Chris H N</au><au>Ogbuehi, Alphonso</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An empirical analysis of risk mitigation in the pharmaceutical industry supply chain: A developing-country perspective</atitle><jtitle>Thunderbird international business review</jtitle><date>2010-01-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>54</spage><pages>54-</pages><issn>1096-4762</issn><eissn>1520-6874</eissn><abstract>Global pharmaceutical supply-chain risk mitigation has become an important issue in the corporate boardroom. This article reports on the empirical findings of the quantification of risks that decision makers consider most important when deciding on a risk portfolio to mitigate and the manner in which risks are prioritized according to their importance. The empirical findings suggest that decision makers attached great importance to counterfeit, Food and Drugs Board, and exchange-rate fluctuations. With respect to risk-mitigation strategies, risk reduction is considered most important, followed by risk avoidance. Dynamic sensitivity analysis with respect to a change (increase) in the Food and Drugs Board did not result in any change in the ranking of risk policy options, while a change (increase) in counterfeit resulted in a change in the ranking between risk reduction and risk avoidance. Risk avoidance ranked number one, followed by risk reduction. Implications distilled from this article are far-reaching for the Ghanaian pharmaceutical firms' managers. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals Inc</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1096-4762 |
ispartof | Thunderbird international business review, 2010-01, Vol.52 (1), p.54 |
issn | 1096-4762 1520-6874 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_202784622 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index; Business Source Complete |
subjects | Counterfeiting Decision making Developing countries LDCs Pharmaceutical industry Risk management Sensitivity analysis Studies Supply chains |
title | An empirical analysis of risk mitigation in the pharmaceutical industry supply chain: A developing-country perspective |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T05%3A48%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20empirical%20analysis%20of%20risk%20mitigation%20in%20the%20pharmaceutical%20industry%20supply%20chain:%20A%20developing-country%20perspective&rft.jtitle=Thunderbird%20international%20business%20review&rft.au=Enyinda,%20Chris%20I&rft.date=2010-01-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=54&rft.pages=54-&rft.issn=1096-4762&rft.eissn=1520-6874&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1919296271%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=202784622&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |