Gone with the forest: Assessing global woodpecker conservation from land use patterns

Aim: As a result of their ecological traits, woodpeckers (Picidae, Aves) are highly sensitive to forest cover change. We explored the current land cover in areas of high species richness of woodpeckers to determinate regions where urgent conservation actions are needed. In addition, we identified wo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diversity & distributions 2018-05, Vol.24 (5/6), p.640-651
Hauptverfasser: Vergara-Tabares, David L., Lammertink, Martjan, Schaaf, Alejandro A., Nori, Javier, Verga, Ernesto G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 651
container_issue 5/6
container_start_page 640
container_title Diversity & distributions
container_volume 24
creator Vergara-Tabares, David L.
Lammertink, Martjan
Schaaf, Alejandro A.
Nori, Javier
Verga, Ernesto G.
description Aim: As a result of their ecological traits, woodpeckers (Picidae, Aves) are highly sensitive to forest cover change. We explored the current land cover in areas of high species richness of woodpeckers to determinate regions where urgent conservation actions are needed. In addition, we identified woodpecker species that are sensitive to forest loss and that have high levels of human habitat modification and low levels of protection (through protected areas) in their distribution ranges. Location: Global. Methods: We joined available range maps for all extant 254 woodpecker species with information of their conservation status and tolerances to human habitat modifications and generated a richness map of woodpecker species worldwide. Then, we associated this information (the richness pattern and individual species' maps) with land cover and protected areas (PAs) maps. Result: We found that the foremost woodpecker species richness hotspot is in Southeast Asia and is highly modified. At the second species richness hotspot in the eastern Andes, we observed a front of deforestation at its southern extreme and a greater deforested area in its northern extreme but most of its area remains with forest coverage. At the species level, 17 species that are sensitive to forest modification experience extensive deforestation and have low extents of PAs in their ranges. Main conclusions: The most diverse woodpecker hotspots are mostly occupied by human-modified landscapes, and a large portion of the species there avoids anthropogenic environments. The level of representation of woodpecker species in PAs is low as a global general pattern, although slightly better in Asia. Our global analysis of threats to woodpecker from land use patterns reiterates the urgent conservation needs for Southeast Asian forests. Finally, based on our results, we recommend a reevaluation for inclusion in the Red List of five woodpecker species.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ddi.12710
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_24P</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2025089684</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44896986</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44896986</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3540-d0cef078aca7752bdd3ad274623f6d145baee7952400021fb998284ceb7427c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDFPwzAQhS0EEqUw8AOQLDExpLUdx07YKgqlUiWWMluOfWlT0jjYKVX_PYYCG7fcDd-79_QQuqZkROOMra1HlElKTtCAcskSLjg7jXcqRFJkVJyjixA2hJA0zdgAvc5cC3hf92vcrwFXzkPo7_EkBAihbld41bhSN3jvnO3AvIHHxrUB_Ifua9fiyrstbnRr8S4A7nTfg2_DJTqrdBPg6mcP0fLpcfnwnCxeZvOHySIxacZJYomBishcGy1lxkprU22Z5IKllbCUZ6UGkEXGeMzLaFUWRc5ybqCUnEmTDtHt8W3n3fsuBlcbt_NtdFSMsIzkhch5pO6OlPEuBA-V6ny91f6gKFFfpalYmvouLbLjI7uvGzj8D6rpdP6ruDkqNqF3_k_BeTQvcpF-Av7td5E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2025089684</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gone with the forest: Assessing global woodpecker conservation from land use patterns</title><source>Open Access: Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Journals</source><creator>Vergara-Tabares, David L. ; Lammertink, Martjan ; Schaaf, Alejandro A. ; Nori, Javier ; Verga, Ernesto G.</creator><contributor>Albright, Thomas</contributor><creatorcontrib>Vergara-Tabares, David L. ; Lammertink, Martjan ; Schaaf, Alejandro A. ; Nori, Javier ; Verga, Ernesto G. ; Albright, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>Aim: As a result of their ecological traits, woodpeckers (Picidae, Aves) are highly sensitive to forest cover change. We explored the current land cover in areas of high species richness of woodpeckers to determinate regions where urgent conservation actions are needed. In addition, we identified woodpecker species that are sensitive to forest loss and that have high levels of human habitat modification and low levels of protection (through protected areas) in their distribution ranges. Location: Global. Methods: We joined available range maps for all extant 254 woodpecker species with information of their conservation status and tolerances to human habitat modifications and generated a richness map of woodpecker species worldwide. Then, we associated this information (the richness pattern and individual species' maps) with land cover and protected areas (PAs) maps. Result: We found that the foremost woodpecker species richness hotspot is in Southeast Asia and is highly modified. At the second species richness hotspot in the eastern Andes, we observed a front of deforestation at its southern extreme and a greater deforested area in its northern extreme but most of its area remains with forest coverage. At the species level, 17 species that are sensitive to forest modification experience extensive deforestation and have low extents of PAs in their ranges. Main conclusions: The most diverse woodpecker hotspots are mostly occupied by human-modified landscapes, and a large portion of the species there avoids anthropogenic environments. The level of representation of woodpecker species in PAs is low as a global general pattern, although slightly better in Asia. Our global analysis of threats to woodpecker from land use patterns reiterates the urgent conservation needs for Southeast Asian forests. Finally, based on our results, we recommend a reevaluation for inclusion in the Red List of five woodpecker species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1366-9516</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-4642</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ddi.12710</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</publisher><subject>Aichi targets ; Anthropogenic factors ; BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH ; Conservation ; Conservation status ; Deforestation ; Ecological effects ; Forest conservation ; Forest management ; Forests ; human‐modified habitats ; Land conservation ; Land cover ; Land use ; Landscape ; logging ; Protected areas ; Red List ; Species richness ; Threat evaluation ; Tolerances ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Diversity &amp; distributions, 2018-05, Vol.24 (5/6), p.640-651</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2018 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3540-d0cef078aca7752bdd3ad274623f6d145baee7952400021fb998284ceb7427c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3540-d0cef078aca7752bdd3ad274623f6d145baee7952400021fb998284ceb7427c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7127-7934</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44896986$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44896986$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1416,11553,27915,27916,45565,45566,46043,46467,58008,58241</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fddi.12710$$EView_record_in_Wiley-Blackwell$$FView_record_in_$$GWiley-Blackwell</linktorsrc></links><search><contributor>Albright, Thomas</contributor><creatorcontrib>Vergara-Tabares, David L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lammertink, Martjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaaf, Alejandro A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nori, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verga, Ernesto G.</creatorcontrib><title>Gone with the forest: Assessing global woodpecker conservation from land use patterns</title><title>Diversity &amp; distributions</title><description>Aim: As a result of their ecological traits, woodpeckers (Picidae, Aves) are highly sensitive to forest cover change. We explored the current land cover in areas of high species richness of woodpeckers to determinate regions where urgent conservation actions are needed. In addition, we identified woodpecker species that are sensitive to forest loss and that have high levels of human habitat modification and low levels of protection (through protected areas) in their distribution ranges. Location: Global. Methods: We joined available range maps for all extant 254 woodpecker species with information of their conservation status and tolerances to human habitat modifications and generated a richness map of woodpecker species worldwide. Then, we associated this information (the richness pattern and individual species' maps) with land cover and protected areas (PAs) maps. Result: We found that the foremost woodpecker species richness hotspot is in Southeast Asia and is highly modified. At the second species richness hotspot in the eastern Andes, we observed a front of deforestation at its southern extreme and a greater deforested area in its northern extreme but most of its area remains with forest coverage. At the species level, 17 species that are sensitive to forest modification experience extensive deforestation and have low extents of PAs in their ranges. Main conclusions: The most diverse woodpecker hotspots are mostly occupied by human-modified landscapes, and a large portion of the species there avoids anthropogenic environments. The level of representation of woodpecker species in PAs is low as a global general pattern, although slightly better in Asia. Our global analysis of threats to woodpecker from land use patterns reiterates the urgent conservation needs for Southeast Asian forests. Finally, based on our results, we recommend a reevaluation for inclusion in the Red List of five woodpecker species.</description><subject>Aichi targets</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation status</subject><subject>Deforestation</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Forest conservation</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>human‐modified habitats</subject><subject>Land conservation</subject><subject>Land cover</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>logging</subject><subject>Protected areas</subject><subject>Red List</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Threat evaluation</subject><subject>Tolerances</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>1366-9516</issn><issn>1472-4642</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kDFPwzAQhS0EEqUw8AOQLDExpLUdx07YKgqlUiWWMluOfWlT0jjYKVX_PYYCG7fcDd-79_QQuqZkROOMra1HlElKTtCAcskSLjg7jXcqRFJkVJyjixA2hJA0zdgAvc5cC3hf92vcrwFXzkPo7_EkBAihbld41bhSN3jvnO3AvIHHxrUB_Ifua9fiyrstbnRr8S4A7nTfg2_DJTqrdBPg6mcP0fLpcfnwnCxeZvOHySIxacZJYomBishcGy1lxkprU22Z5IKllbCUZ6UGkEXGeMzLaFUWRc5ybqCUnEmTDtHt8W3n3fsuBlcbt_NtdFSMsIzkhch5pO6OlPEuBA-V6ny91f6gKFFfpalYmvouLbLjI7uvGzj8D6rpdP6ruDkqNqF3_k_BeTQvcpF-Av7td5E</recordid><startdate>201805</startdate><enddate>201805</enddate><creator>Vergara-Tabares, David L.</creator><creator>Lammertink, Martjan</creator><creator>Schaaf, Alejandro A.</creator><creator>Nori, Javier</creator><creator>Verga, Ernesto G.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>M7N</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7127-7934</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201805</creationdate><title>Gone with the forest: Assessing global woodpecker conservation from land use patterns</title><author>Vergara-Tabares, David L. ; Lammertink, Martjan ; Schaaf, Alejandro A. ; Nori, Javier ; Verga, Ernesto G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3540-d0cef078aca7752bdd3ad274623f6d145baee7952400021fb998284ceb7427c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aichi targets</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation status</topic><topic>Deforestation</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Forest conservation</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>human‐modified habitats</topic><topic>Land conservation</topic><topic>Land cover</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>logging</topic><topic>Protected areas</topic><topic>Red List</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Threat evaluation</topic><topic>Tolerances</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vergara-Tabares, David L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lammertink, Martjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaaf, Alejandro A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nori, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verga, Ernesto G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><jtitle>Diversity &amp; distributions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vergara-Tabares, David L.</au><au>Lammertink, Martjan</au><au>Schaaf, Alejandro A.</au><au>Nori, Javier</au><au>Verga, Ernesto G.</au><au>Albright, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gone with the forest: Assessing global woodpecker conservation from land use patterns</atitle><jtitle>Diversity &amp; distributions</jtitle><date>2018-05</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>5/6</issue><spage>640</spage><epage>651</epage><pages>640-651</pages><issn>1366-9516</issn><eissn>1472-4642</eissn><abstract>Aim: As a result of their ecological traits, woodpeckers (Picidae, Aves) are highly sensitive to forest cover change. We explored the current land cover in areas of high species richness of woodpeckers to determinate regions where urgent conservation actions are needed. In addition, we identified woodpecker species that are sensitive to forest loss and that have high levels of human habitat modification and low levels of protection (through protected areas) in their distribution ranges. Location: Global. Methods: We joined available range maps for all extant 254 woodpecker species with information of their conservation status and tolerances to human habitat modifications and generated a richness map of woodpecker species worldwide. Then, we associated this information (the richness pattern and individual species' maps) with land cover and protected areas (PAs) maps. Result: We found that the foremost woodpecker species richness hotspot is in Southeast Asia and is highly modified. At the second species richness hotspot in the eastern Andes, we observed a front of deforestation at its southern extreme and a greater deforested area in its northern extreme but most of its area remains with forest coverage. At the species level, 17 species that are sensitive to forest modification experience extensive deforestation and have low extents of PAs in their ranges. Main conclusions: The most diverse woodpecker hotspots are mostly occupied by human-modified landscapes, and a large portion of the species there avoids anthropogenic environments. The level of representation of woodpecker species in PAs is low as a global general pattern, although slightly better in Asia. Our global analysis of threats to woodpecker from land use patterns reiterates the urgent conservation needs for Southeast Asian forests. Finally, based on our results, we recommend a reevaluation for inclusion in the Red List of five woodpecker species.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/ddi.12710</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7127-7934</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1366-9516
ispartof Diversity & distributions, 2018-05, Vol.24 (5/6), p.640-651
issn 1366-9516
1472-4642
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2025089684
source Open Access: Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Journals
subjects Aichi targets
Anthropogenic factors
BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH
Conservation
Conservation status
Deforestation
Ecological effects
Forest conservation
Forest management
Forests
human‐modified habitats
Land conservation
Land cover
Land use
Landscape
logging
Protected areas
Red List
Species richness
Threat evaluation
Tolerances
Wildlife conservation
title Gone with the forest: Assessing global woodpecker conservation from land use patterns
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T19%3A31%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_24P&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gone%20with%20the%20forest:%20Assessing%20global%20woodpecker%20conservation%20from%20land%20use%20patterns&rft.jtitle=Diversity%20&%20distributions&rft.au=Vergara-Tabares,%20David%20L.&rft.date=2018-05&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=5/6&rft.spage=640&rft.epage=651&rft.pages=640-651&rft.issn=1366-9516&rft.eissn=1472-4642&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ddi.12710&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_24P%3E44896986%3C/jstor_24P%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2025089684&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=44896986&rfr_iscdi=true