Conventional and unconventional political participation in times of financial crisis in the Netherlands, 2002–2012
In this contribution, we investigate the extent to which the recent financial crisis has affected levels of political participation in general and more particularly within privileged and underprivileged societal groups in the Netherlands. We derive competing and complementary theoretical proposition...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta politica 2018-04, Vol.53 (2), p.283-304 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 304 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 283 |
container_title | Acta politica |
container_volume | 53 |
creator | Linssen, Rik Scheepers, Peer Grotenhuis, Manfred te Schmeets, Hans |
description | In this contribution, we investigate the extent to which the recent financial crisis has affected levels of political participation in general and more particularly within privileged and underprivileged societal groups in the Netherlands. We derive competing and complementary theoretical propositions about the possible effects of the economic downturn on conventional and unconventional modes of political participation. Economic decline might mobilize people to voice their concerns in the political arena, especially via unconventional modes of political participation such as demonstrating. As privileged societal groups are more likely to participate in politics, economic decline may widen the initial differences between privileged and underprivileged societal groups in their level of political participation. We use the Dutch Parliamentary Election Studies collected before (2002–2006), at the onset of the Eurocrisis (2006–2010) and after prolonged periods of recession (2008–2012) to empirically assess these competing claims. Our results show a slight decrease in conventional modes of political participation and a slight increase in unconventional modes of political participation during the recent financial and economic crisis. We do not find that the relationship between the economic crisis and political participation changes significantly differently for privileged and underprivileged groups in the Netherlands. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1057/s41269-017-0051-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2024671279</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2024671279</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-9f79d0a5f016f2f845779de08190800d3e3b61aed6263326d21a8c47571c71713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1LxDAQDaLguvoDvAW8Wp1J2qQ9yuIXiF70HGKaaJZuuiZdwZv_wX_oLzG1gl68zAxv3nvDPEIOEU4QKnmaSmSiKQBlAVBhwbfIDGWJBZYotskMALAQNcIu2UtpCcAYcDEjw6IPrzYMvg-6ozq0dBPMX2jdd37wZpx0zINf63FDfaCDX9lEe0edDzoYnzkm-uTT9_LZ0luba-yyazqmLN_8fP9ggGyf7DjdJXvw0-fk4eL8fnFV3NxdXi_ObgrDq2YoGiebFnTlAIVjri4rmQELNTZQA7Tc8keB2raCCc6ZaBnq2pSykmgkSuRzcjT5rmP_srFpUMt-E_NXSTFgpZDIZJNZOLFM7FOK1ql19Csd3xSCGsNVU7gqh6vGcBXPGjZpUuaGJxt_nf8XfQEWYHxx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2024671279</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conventional and unconventional political participation in times of financial crisis in the Netherlands, 2002–2012</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Linssen, Rik ; Scheepers, Peer ; Grotenhuis, Manfred te ; Schmeets, Hans</creator><creatorcontrib>Linssen, Rik ; Scheepers, Peer ; Grotenhuis, Manfred te ; Schmeets, Hans</creatorcontrib><description>In this contribution, we investigate the extent to which the recent financial crisis has affected levels of political participation in general and more particularly within privileged and underprivileged societal groups in the Netherlands. We derive competing and complementary theoretical propositions about the possible effects of the economic downturn on conventional and unconventional modes of political participation. Economic decline might mobilize people to voice their concerns in the political arena, especially via unconventional modes of political participation such as demonstrating. As privileged societal groups are more likely to participate in politics, economic decline may widen the initial differences between privileged and underprivileged societal groups in their level of political participation. We use the Dutch Parliamentary Election Studies collected before (2002–2006), at the onset of the Eurocrisis (2006–2010) and after prolonged periods of recession (2008–2012) to empirically assess these competing claims. Our results show a slight decrease in conventional modes of political participation and a slight increase in unconventional modes of political participation during the recent financial and economic crisis. We do not find that the relationship between the economic crisis and political participation changes significantly differently for privileged and underprivileged groups in the Netherlands.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-6810</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-1416</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1057/s41269-017-0051-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Palgrave Macmillan UK</publisher><subject>Comparative Politics ; Disadvantaged ; Donations ; Economic crisis ; Economic decline ; European cultural groups ; European Politics ; Parliamentary elections ; Participation ; Political behavior ; Political finance ; Political participation ; Political Science ; Political Science and International Relations ; Political Science and International Studies ; Politics ; Recessions</subject><ispartof>Acta politica, 2018-04, Vol.53 (2), p.283-304</ispartof><rights>Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2017</rights><rights>Copyright Palgrave Macmillan Apr 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-9f79d0a5f016f2f845779de08190800d3e3b61aed6263326d21a8c47571c71713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-9f79d0a5f016f2f845779de08190800d3e3b61aed6263326d21a8c47571c71713</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057/s41269-017-0051-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41269-017-0051-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12826,27323,27903,27904,33753,41466,42535,51296</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Linssen, Rik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheepers, Peer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grotenhuis, Manfred te</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmeets, Hans</creatorcontrib><title>Conventional and unconventional political participation in times of financial crisis in the Netherlands, 2002–2012</title><title>Acta politica</title><addtitle>Acta Polit</addtitle><description>In this contribution, we investigate the extent to which the recent financial crisis has affected levels of political participation in general and more particularly within privileged and underprivileged societal groups in the Netherlands. We derive competing and complementary theoretical propositions about the possible effects of the economic downturn on conventional and unconventional modes of political participation. Economic decline might mobilize people to voice their concerns in the political arena, especially via unconventional modes of political participation such as demonstrating. As privileged societal groups are more likely to participate in politics, economic decline may widen the initial differences between privileged and underprivileged societal groups in their level of political participation. We use the Dutch Parliamentary Election Studies collected before (2002–2006), at the onset of the Eurocrisis (2006–2010) and after prolonged periods of recession (2008–2012) to empirically assess these competing claims. Our results show a slight decrease in conventional modes of political participation and a slight increase in unconventional modes of political participation during the recent financial and economic crisis. We do not find that the relationship between the economic crisis and political participation changes significantly differently for privileged and underprivileged groups in the Netherlands.</description><subject>Comparative Politics</subject><subject>Disadvantaged</subject><subject>Donations</subject><subject>Economic crisis</subject><subject>Economic decline</subject><subject>European cultural groups</subject><subject>European Politics</subject><subject>Parliamentary elections</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Political behavior</subject><subject>Political finance</subject><subject>Political participation</subject><subject>Political Science</subject><subject>Political Science and International Relations</subject><subject>Political Science and International Studies</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Recessions</subject><issn>0001-6810</issn><issn>1741-1416</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UE1LxDAQDaLguvoDvAW8Wp1J2qQ9yuIXiF70HGKaaJZuuiZdwZv_wX_oLzG1gl68zAxv3nvDPEIOEU4QKnmaSmSiKQBlAVBhwbfIDGWJBZYotskMALAQNcIu2UtpCcAYcDEjw6IPrzYMvg-6ozq0dBPMX2jdd37wZpx0zINf63FDfaCDX9lEe0edDzoYnzkm-uTT9_LZ0luba-yyazqmLN_8fP9ggGyf7DjdJXvw0-fk4eL8fnFV3NxdXi_ObgrDq2YoGiebFnTlAIVjri4rmQELNTZQA7Tc8keB2raCCc6ZaBnq2pSykmgkSuRzcjT5rmP_srFpUMt-E_NXSTFgpZDIZJNZOLFM7FOK1ql19Csd3xSCGsNVU7gqh6vGcBXPGjZpUuaGJxt_nf8XfQEWYHxx</recordid><startdate>20180401</startdate><enddate>20180401</enddate><creator>Linssen, Rik</creator><creator>Scheepers, Peer</creator><creator>Grotenhuis, Manfred te</creator><creator>Schmeets, Hans</creator><general>Palgrave Macmillan UK</general><general>Palgrave Macmillan</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180401</creationdate><title>Conventional and unconventional political participation in times of financial crisis in the Netherlands, 2002–2012</title><author>Linssen, Rik ; Scheepers, Peer ; Grotenhuis, Manfred te ; Schmeets, Hans</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-9f79d0a5f016f2f845779de08190800d3e3b61aed6263326d21a8c47571c71713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Comparative Politics</topic><topic>Disadvantaged</topic><topic>Donations</topic><topic>Economic crisis</topic><topic>Economic decline</topic><topic>European cultural groups</topic><topic>European Politics</topic><topic>Parliamentary elections</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Political behavior</topic><topic>Political finance</topic><topic>Political participation</topic><topic>Political Science</topic><topic>Political Science and International Relations</topic><topic>Political Science and International Studies</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Recessions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Linssen, Rik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheepers, Peer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grotenhuis, Manfred te</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmeets, Hans</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Acta politica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Linssen, Rik</au><au>Scheepers, Peer</au><au>Grotenhuis, Manfred te</au><au>Schmeets, Hans</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conventional and unconventional political participation in times of financial crisis in the Netherlands, 2002–2012</atitle><jtitle>Acta politica</jtitle><stitle>Acta Polit</stitle><date>2018-04-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>283</spage><epage>304</epage><pages>283-304</pages><issn>0001-6810</issn><eissn>1741-1416</eissn><abstract>In this contribution, we investigate the extent to which the recent financial crisis has affected levels of political participation in general and more particularly within privileged and underprivileged societal groups in the Netherlands. We derive competing and complementary theoretical propositions about the possible effects of the economic downturn on conventional and unconventional modes of political participation. Economic decline might mobilize people to voice their concerns in the political arena, especially via unconventional modes of political participation such as demonstrating. As privileged societal groups are more likely to participate in politics, economic decline may widen the initial differences between privileged and underprivileged societal groups in their level of political participation. We use the Dutch Parliamentary Election Studies collected before (2002–2006), at the onset of the Eurocrisis (2006–2010) and after prolonged periods of recession (2008–2012) to empirically assess these competing claims. Our results show a slight decrease in conventional modes of political participation and a slight increase in unconventional modes of political participation during the recent financial and economic crisis. We do not find that the relationship between the economic crisis and political participation changes significantly differently for privileged and underprivileged groups in the Netherlands.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Palgrave Macmillan UK</pub><doi>10.1057/s41269-017-0051-3</doi><tpages>22</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-6810 |
ispartof | Acta politica, 2018-04, Vol.53 (2), p.283-304 |
issn | 0001-6810 1741-1416 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2024671279 |
source | SpringerLink Journals; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Comparative Politics Disadvantaged Donations Economic crisis Economic decline European cultural groups European Politics Parliamentary elections Participation Political behavior Political finance Political participation Political Science Political Science and International Relations Political Science and International Studies Politics Recessions |
title | Conventional and unconventional political participation in times of financial crisis in the Netherlands, 2002–2012 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T07%3A47%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conventional%20and%20unconventional%20political%20participation%20in%20times%20of%20financial%20crisis%20in%20the%20Netherlands,%202002%E2%80%932012&rft.jtitle=Acta%20politica&rft.au=Linssen,%20Rik&rft.date=2018-04-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=283&rft.epage=304&rft.pages=283-304&rft.issn=0001-6810&rft.eissn=1741-1416&rft_id=info:doi/10.1057/s41269-017-0051-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2024671279%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2024671279&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |