Linking lidar and forest modeling to assess biomass estimation across scales and disturbance states
Light detection and ranging (lidar) is currently the state-of-the-art remote sensing technology for measuring the 3D structures of forests. Studies have shown that various lidar-derived metrics can be used to predict forest attributes, such as aboveground biomass. However, finding out which metric w...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Remote sensing of environment 2018-02, Vol.205, p.199-209 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 209 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 199 |
container_title | Remote sensing of environment |
container_volume | 205 |
creator | Knapp, Nikolai Fischer, Rico Huth, Andreas |
description | Light detection and ranging (lidar) is currently the state-of-the-art remote sensing technology for measuring the 3D structures of forests. Studies have shown that various lidar-derived metrics can be used to predict forest attributes, such as aboveground biomass. However, finding out which metric works best at which scale and under which conditions requires extensive field inventories as ground-truth data. The goal of our study was to overcome the limitations of inventory data by complementing field-derived data with virtual forest stands from a dynamic forest model. The simulated stands were used to compare 29 different lidar metrics for their utility as predictors of tropical forest biomass at different spatial scales. We used the process-based forest model FORMIND, developed a lidar simulation model, based on the Beer-Lambert law of light extinction, and applied it to a tropical forest in Panama. Simulation scenarios comprised undisturbed primary forests and stands exposed to logging and fire disturbance regimes, resulting in mosaics of different successional stages, totaling 3.7 million trees on 4200ha. The simulated forest was sampled with the lidar model. Several lidar metrics, in particular height metrics, showed good correlations with forest biomass, even for disturbed forest. Estimation errors (nRMSE) increased with decreasing spatial scale from 30% (20-m scale) for the best metrics. At the often used 1-ha scale, the top-of-canopy height obtained from canopy height models with fine to relatively coarse pixel resolutions (1 to 10m) yielded the most accurate biomass predictions, with nRMSE |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.rse.2017.11.018 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2024403769</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0034425717305679</els_id><sourcerecordid>2024403769</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-dc054bea4ef566dcafeb97c8b140bcbbcfebe49a16c4be7b777afeddb08ba5693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIHcLPEOWE3deJUnFDFS6rEBc6WHxvkkMbFTpH4e9yWM6d9zezODmPXCCUCNrd9GROVFaAsEUvA9oTNsJXLAiSIUzYDWIhCVLU8Zxcp9QBYtxJnzK79-OnHDz54pyPXo-NdiJQmvgmOhv1kClynRClx48MmpzyP_UZPPoxc2xhyJ1k9UDrQnU_TLho9WuJp0hOlS3bW6SHR1V-cs_fHh7fVc7F-fXpZ3a8LK0BOhbNQC0NaUFc3jbO6I7OUtjUowFhjbK5JLDU2NsOkkVJmiHMGWqPrZrmYs5vj3m0MX7ssUvVhF8d8UlVQCQELeUDhEXVQHqlT25i_iT8KQe29VL3KXqq9lwpRZS8z5-7IoSz_21NUyXrKHzofyU7KBf8P-xcroYAP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2024403769</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Linking lidar and forest modeling to assess biomass estimation across scales and disturbance states</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Knapp, Nikolai ; Fischer, Rico ; Huth, Andreas</creator><creatorcontrib>Knapp, Nikolai ; Fischer, Rico ; Huth, Andreas</creatorcontrib><description>Light detection and ranging (lidar) is currently the state-of-the-art remote sensing technology for measuring the 3D structures of forests. Studies have shown that various lidar-derived metrics can be used to predict forest attributes, such as aboveground biomass. However, finding out which metric works best at which scale and under which conditions requires extensive field inventories as ground-truth data. The goal of our study was to overcome the limitations of inventory data by complementing field-derived data with virtual forest stands from a dynamic forest model. The simulated stands were used to compare 29 different lidar metrics for their utility as predictors of tropical forest biomass at different spatial scales. We used the process-based forest model FORMIND, developed a lidar simulation model, based on the Beer-Lambert law of light extinction, and applied it to a tropical forest in Panama. Simulation scenarios comprised undisturbed primary forests and stands exposed to logging and fire disturbance regimes, resulting in mosaics of different successional stages, totaling 3.7 million trees on 4200ha. The simulated forest was sampled with the lidar model. Several lidar metrics, in particular height metrics, showed good correlations with forest biomass, even for disturbed forest. Estimation errors (nRMSE) increased with decreasing spatial scale from <10% (200-m scale) to >30% (20-m scale) for the best metrics. At the often used 1-ha scale, the top-of-canopy height obtained from canopy height models with fine to relatively coarse pixel resolutions (1 to 10m) yielded the most accurate biomass predictions, with nRMSE<6% for undisturbed and nRMSE<9% for disturbed forests. This study represents the first time dynamic modeling of a tropical forest has been combined with lidar remote sensing to systematically investigate lidar-to-biomass relationships for varying lidar metrics, scales and disturbance states. In the future, this approach can be used to explore the potential of remote sensing of other forest attributes, e.g., carbon dynamics, and other remote sensing systems, e.g., spaceborne lidar and radar.
[Display omitted]
•Novel approach for Lidar-to-biomass calibration•Forest model generated 4200ha of heterogeneous tropical forest inventory data.•Lidar sampling of the virtual stands was simulated.•Twenty-nine Lidar metrics were tested as potential biomass predictors.•RMSE are presented for varying metrics, resolutions and disturbances.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-4257</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0704</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2017.11.018</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aboveground biomass ; Biomass ; Canopies ; Computer simulation ; Detection ; Disturbance ; Dynamic models ; Estimation errors ; Extinction ; Forest biomass ; Forest modeling ; Forests ; Lidar ; Lidar simulation ; Light ; Logging ; Modelling ; Mosaics ; Radar ; Remote sensing ; Resolution ; Scale ; Studies ; Tropical forest ; Tropical forests</subject><ispartof>Remote sensing of environment, 2018-02, Vol.205, p.199-209</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Feb 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-dc054bea4ef566dcafeb97c8b140bcbbcfebe49a16c4be7b777afeddb08ba5693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-dc054bea4ef566dcafeb97c8b140bcbbcfebe49a16c4be7b777afeddb08ba5693</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.11.018$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Knapp, Nikolai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Rico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huth, Andreas</creatorcontrib><title>Linking lidar and forest modeling to assess biomass estimation across scales and disturbance states</title><title>Remote sensing of environment</title><description>Light detection and ranging (lidar) is currently the state-of-the-art remote sensing technology for measuring the 3D structures of forests. Studies have shown that various lidar-derived metrics can be used to predict forest attributes, such as aboveground biomass. However, finding out which metric works best at which scale and under which conditions requires extensive field inventories as ground-truth data. The goal of our study was to overcome the limitations of inventory data by complementing field-derived data with virtual forest stands from a dynamic forest model. The simulated stands were used to compare 29 different lidar metrics for their utility as predictors of tropical forest biomass at different spatial scales. We used the process-based forest model FORMIND, developed a lidar simulation model, based on the Beer-Lambert law of light extinction, and applied it to a tropical forest in Panama. Simulation scenarios comprised undisturbed primary forests and stands exposed to logging and fire disturbance regimes, resulting in mosaics of different successional stages, totaling 3.7 million trees on 4200ha. The simulated forest was sampled with the lidar model. Several lidar metrics, in particular height metrics, showed good correlations with forest biomass, even for disturbed forest. Estimation errors (nRMSE) increased with decreasing spatial scale from <10% (200-m scale) to >30% (20-m scale) for the best metrics. At the often used 1-ha scale, the top-of-canopy height obtained from canopy height models with fine to relatively coarse pixel resolutions (1 to 10m) yielded the most accurate biomass predictions, with nRMSE<6% for undisturbed and nRMSE<9% for disturbed forests. This study represents the first time dynamic modeling of a tropical forest has been combined with lidar remote sensing to systematically investigate lidar-to-biomass relationships for varying lidar metrics, scales and disturbance states. In the future, this approach can be used to explore the potential of remote sensing of other forest attributes, e.g., carbon dynamics, and other remote sensing systems, e.g., spaceborne lidar and radar.
[Display omitted]
•Novel approach for Lidar-to-biomass calibration•Forest model generated 4200ha of heterogeneous tropical forest inventory data.•Lidar sampling of the virtual stands was simulated.•Twenty-nine Lidar metrics were tested as potential biomass predictors.•RMSE are presented for varying metrics, resolutions and disturbances.</description><subject>Aboveground biomass</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Canopies</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Detection</subject><subject>Disturbance</subject><subject>Dynamic models</subject><subject>Estimation errors</subject><subject>Extinction</subject><subject>Forest biomass</subject><subject>Forest modeling</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Lidar</subject><subject>Lidar simulation</subject><subject>Light</subject><subject>Logging</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Mosaics</subject><subject>Radar</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Resolution</subject><subject>Scale</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tropical forest</subject><subject>Tropical forests</subject><issn>0034-4257</issn><issn>1879-0704</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIHcLPEOWE3deJUnFDFS6rEBc6WHxvkkMbFTpH4e9yWM6d9zezODmPXCCUCNrd9GROVFaAsEUvA9oTNsJXLAiSIUzYDWIhCVLU8Zxcp9QBYtxJnzK79-OnHDz54pyPXo-NdiJQmvgmOhv1kClynRClx48MmpzyP_UZPPoxc2xhyJ1k9UDrQnU_TLho9WuJp0hOlS3bW6SHR1V-cs_fHh7fVc7F-fXpZ3a8LK0BOhbNQC0NaUFc3jbO6I7OUtjUowFhjbK5JLDU2NsOkkVJmiHMGWqPrZrmYs5vj3m0MX7ssUvVhF8d8UlVQCQELeUDhEXVQHqlT25i_iT8KQe29VL3KXqq9lwpRZS8z5-7IoSz_21NUyXrKHzofyU7KBf8P-xcroYAP</recordid><startdate>20180201</startdate><enddate>20180201</enddate><creator>Knapp, Nikolai</creator><creator>Fischer, Rico</creator><creator>Huth, Andreas</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180201</creationdate><title>Linking lidar and forest modeling to assess biomass estimation across scales and disturbance states</title><author>Knapp, Nikolai ; Fischer, Rico ; Huth, Andreas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-dc054bea4ef566dcafeb97c8b140bcbbcfebe49a16c4be7b777afeddb08ba5693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aboveground biomass</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Canopies</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Detection</topic><topic>Disturbance</topic><topic>Dynamic models</topic><topic>Estimation errors</topic><topic>Extinction</topic><topic>Forest biomass</topic><topic>Forest modeling</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Lidar</topic><topic>Lidar simulation</topic><topic>Light</topic><topic>Logging</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Mosaics</topic><topic>Radar</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Resolution</topic><topic>Scale</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tropical forest</topic><topic>Tropical forests</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Knapp, Nikolai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Rico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huth, Andreas</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Remote sensing of environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Knapp, Nikolai</au><au>Fischer, Rico</au><au>Huth, Andreas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Linking lidar and forest modeling to assess biomass estimation across scales and disturbance states</atitle><jtitle>Remote sensing of environment</jtitle><date>2018-02-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>205</volume><spage>199</spage><epage>209</epage><pages>199-209</pages><issn>0034-4257</issn><eissn>1879-0704</eissn><abstract>Light detection and ranging (lidar) is currently the state-of-the-art remote sensing technology for measuring the 3D structures of forests. Studies have shown that various lidar-derived metrics can be used to predict forest attributes, such as aboveground biomass. However, finding out which metric works best at which scale and under which conditions requires extensive field inventories as ground-truth data. The goal of our study was to overcome the limitations of inventory data by complementing field-derived data with virtual forest stands from a dynamic forest model. The simulated stands were used to compare 29 different lidar metrics for their utility as predictors of tropical forest biomass at different spatial scales. We used the process-based forest model FORMIND, developed a lidar simulation model, based on the Beer-Lambert law of light extinction, and applied it to a tropical forest in Panama. Simulation scenarios comprised undisturbed primary forests and stands exposed to logging and fire disturbance regimes, resulting in mosaics of different successional stages, totaling 3.7 million trees on 4200ha. The simulated forest was sampled with the lidar model. Several lidar metrics, in particular height metrics, showed good correlations with forest biomass, even for disturbed forest. Estimation errors (nRMSE) increased with decreasing spatial scale from <10% (200-m scale) to >30% (20-m scale) for the best metrics. At the often used 1-ha scale, the top-of-canopy height obtained from canopy height models with fine to relatively coarse pixel resolutions (1 to 10m) yielded the most accurate biomass predictions, with nRMSE<6% for undisturbed and nRMSE<9% for disturbed forests. This study represents the first time dynamic modeling of a tropical forest has been combined with lidar remote sensing to systematically investigate lidar-to-biomass relationships for varying lidar metrics, scales and disturbance states. In the future, this approach can be used to explore the potential of remote sensing of other forest attributes, e.g., carbon dynamics, and other remote sensing systems, e.g., spaceborne lidar and radar.
[Display omitted]
•Novel approach for Lidar-to-biomass calibration•Forest model generated 4200ha of heterogeneous tropical forest inventory data.•Lidar sampling of the virtual stands was simulated.•Twenty-nine Lidar metrics were tested as potential biomass predictors.•RMSE are presented for varying metrics, resolutions and disturbances.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.rse.2017.11.018</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0034-4257 |
ispartof | Remote sensing of environment, 2018-02, Vol.205, p.199-209 |
issn | 0034-4257 1879-0704 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2024403769 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Aboveground biomass Biomass Canopies Computer simulation Detection Disturbance Dynamic models Estimation errors Extinction Forest biomass Forest modeling Forests Lidar Lidar simulation Light Logging Modelling Mosaics Radar Remote sensing Resolution Scale Studies Tropical forest Tropical forests |
title | Linking lidar and forest modeling to assess biomass estimation across scales and disturbance states |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T11%3A54%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Linking%20lidar%20and%20forest%20modeling%20to%20assess%20biomass%20estimation%20across%20scales%20and%20disturbance%20states&rft.jtitle=Remote%20sensing%20of%20environment&rft.au=Knapp,%20Nikolai&rft.date=2018-02-01&rft.volume=205&rft.spage=199&rft.epage=209&rft.pages=199-209&rft.issn=0034-4257&rft.eissn=1879-0704&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.rse.2017.11.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2024403769%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2024403769&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0034425717305679&rfr_iscdi=true |