Revised recommended methods for analyzing crater size‐frequency distributions

Impact crater populations help us to understand solar system dynamics, planetary surface histories, and surface modification processes. A single previous effort to standardize how crater data are displayed in graphs, tables, and archives was in a 1978 NASA report by the Crater Analysis Techniques Wo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Meteoritics & planetary science 2018-04, Vol.53 (4), p.891-931
Hauptverfasser: Robbins, Stuart J., Riggs, Jamie D., Weaver, Brian P., Bierhaus, Edward B., Chapman, Clark R., Kirchoff, Michelle R., Singer, Kelsi N., Gaddis, Lisa R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 931
container_issue 4
container_start_page 891
container_title Meteoritics & planetary science
container_volume 53
creator Robbins, Stuart J.
Riggs, Jamie D.
Weaver, Brian P.
Bierhaus, Edward B.
Chapman, Clark R.
Kirchoff, Michelle R.
Singer, Kelsi N.
Gaddis, Lisa R.
description Impact crater populations help us to understand solar system dynamics, planetary surface histories, and surface modification processes. A single previous effort to standardize how crater data are displayed in graphs, tables, and archives was in a 1978 NASA report by the Crater Analysis Techniques Working Group, published in 1979 in Icarus. The report had a significant lasting effect, but later decades brought major advances in statistical and computer sciences while the crater field has remained fairly stagnant. In this new work, we revisit the fundamental techniques for displaying and analyzing crater population data and demonstrate better statistical methods that can be used. Specifically, we address (1) how crater size‐frequency distributions (SFDs) are constructed, (2) how error bars are assigned to SFDs, and (3) how SFDs are fit to power‐laws and other models. We show how the new methods yield results similar to those of previous techniques in that the SFDs have familiar shapes but better account for multiple sources of uncertainty. We also recommend graphic, display, and archiving methods that reflect computers’ capabilities and fulfill NASA's current requirements for Data Management Plans.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/maps.12990
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2023510080</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2023510080</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4260-6f1b683321bbda076b04ac224354861a6e677b5e4a239e37b62668db0524a92e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqWw4QsisUNK8StOvKwqXlJREY-1ZScTcNXExU5B6YpP4Bv5ElzCmtnMXZwZ3XsROiV4QuJcNHodJoRKiffQiEiepRnBeD9qXIhUslweoqMQlhizjDA-QosHeLcBqsRD6ZoG2irqBrpXV4Wkdj7RrV71W9u-JKXXHfgk2C18f37VHt420JZ9UtnQeWs2nXVtOEYHtV4FOPnbY_R8dfk0u0nni-vb2XSeak4FTkVNjCgYo8SYSuNcGMx1SSlnGS8E0QJEnpsMuKZMAsuNoEIUlcEZ5VpSYGN0Nvxdexd9hE4t3cZHr0FRTNkudYEjdT5QpXcheKjV2ttG-14RrHaFqV1h6rewCJMB_rAr6P8h1d30_nG4-QF0kW7w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2023510080</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Revised recommended methods for analyzing crater size‐frequency distributions</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><creator>Robbins, Stuart J. ; Riggs, Jamie D. ; Weaver, Brian P. ; Bierhaus, Edward B. ; Chapman, Clark R. ; Kirchoff, Michelle R. ; Singer, Kelsi N. ; Gaddis, Lisa R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Robbins, Stuart J. ; Riggs, Jamie D. ; Weaver, Brian P. ; Bierhaus, Edward B. ; Chapman, Clark R. ; Kirchoff, Michelle R. ; Singer, Kelsi N. ; Gaddis, Lisa R.</creatorcontrib><description>Impact crater populations help us to understand solar system dynamics, planetary surface histories, and surface modification processes. A single previous effort to standardize how crater data are displayed in graphs, tables, and archives was in a 1978 NASA report by the Crater Analysis Techniques Working Group, published in 1979 in Icarus. The report had a significant lasting effect, but later decades brought major advances in statistical and computer sciences while the crater field has remained fairly stagnant. In this new work, we revisit the fundamental techniques for displaying and analyzing crater population data and demonstrate better statistical methods that can be used. Specifically, we address (1) how crater size‐frequency distributions (SFDs) are constructed, (2) how error bars are assigned to SFDs, and (3) how SFDs are fit to power‐laws and other models. We show how the new methods yield results similar to those of previous techniques in that the SFDs have familiar shapes but better account for multiple sources of uncertainty. We also recommend graphic, display, and archiving methods that reflect computers’ capabilities and fulfill NASA's current requirements for Data Management Plans.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1086-9379</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1945-5100</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/maps.12990</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Archives &amp; records ; Archiving ; Computer simulation ; Craters ; Data management ; Planetary surfaces ; Population (statistical) ; Solar system ; Statistical methods ; System dynamics</subject><ispartof>Meteoritics &amp; planetary science, 2018-04, Vol.53 (4), p.891-931</ispartof><rights>The Meteoritical Society, 2018.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 The Meteoritical Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4260-6f1b683321bbda076b04ac224354861a6e677b5e4a239e37b62668db0524a92e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4260-6f1b683321bbda076b04ac224354861a6e677b5e4a239e37b62668db0524a92e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9953-5483 ; 0000-0003-3045-8445 ; 0000-0002-3367-2730 ; 0000-0002-8585-2549 ; 0000-0001-5890-9821</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fmaps.12990$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fmaps.12990$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27903,27904,45553,45554,46388,46812</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Robbins, Stuart J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riggs, Jamie D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weaver, Brian P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bierhaus, Edward B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, Clark R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirchoff, Michelle R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singer, Kelsi N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaddis, Lisa R.</creatorcontrib><title>Revised recommended methods for analyzing crater size‐frequency distributions</title><title>Meteoritics &amp; planetary science</title><description>Impact crater populations help us to understand solar system dynamics, planetary surface histories, and surface modification processes. A single previous effort to standardize how crater data are displayed in graphs, tables, and archives was in a 1978 NASA report by the Crater Analysis Techniques Working Group, published in 1979 in Icarus. The report had a significant lasting effect, but later decades brought major advances in statistical and computer sciences while the crater field has remained fairly stagnant. In this new work, we revisit the fundamental techniques for displaying and analyzing crater population data and demonstrate better statistical methods that can be used. Specifically, we address (1) how crater size‐frequency distributions (SFDs) are constructed, (2) how error bars are assigned to SFDs, and (3) how SFDs are fit to power‐laws and other models. We show how the new methods yield results similar to those of previous techniques in that the SFDs have familiar shapes but better account for multiple sources of uncertainty. We also recommend graphic, display, and archiving methods that reflect computers’ capabilities and fulfill NASA's current requirements for Data Management Plans.</description><subject>Archives &amp; records</subject><subject>Archiving</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Craters</subject><subject>Data management</subject><subject>Planetary surfaces</subject><subject>Population (statistical)</subject><subject>Solar system</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>System dynamics</subject><issn>1086-9379</issn><issn>1945-5100</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqWw4QsisUNK8StOvKwqXlJREY-1ZScTcNXExU5B6YpP4Bv5ElzCmtnMXZwZ3XsROiV4QuJcNHodJoRKiffQiEiepRnBeD9qXIhUslweoqMQlhizjDA-QosHeLcBqsRD6ZoG2irqBrpXV4Wkdj7RrV71W9u-JKXXHfgk2C18f37VHt420JZ9UtnQeWs2nXVtOEYHtV4FOPnbY_R8dfk0u0nni-vb2XSeak4FTkVNjCgYo8SYSuNcGMx1SSlnGS8E0QJEnpsMuKZMAsuNoEIUlcEZ5VpSYGN0Nvxdexd9hE4t3cZHr0FRTNkudYEjdT5QpXcheKjV2ttG-14RrHaFqV1h6rewCJMB_rAr6P8h1d30_nG4-QF0kW7w</recordid><startdate>201804</startdate><enddate>201804</enddate><creator>Robbins, Stuart J.</creator><creator>Riggs, Jamie D.</creator><creator>Weaver, Brian P.</creator><creator>Bierhaus, Edward B.</creator><creator>Chapman, Clark R.</creator><creator>Kirchoff, Michelle R.</creator><creator>Singer, Kelsi N.</creator><creator>Gaddis, Lisa R.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9953-5483</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3045-8445</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3367-2730</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8585-2549</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5890-9821</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201804</creationdate><title>Revised recommended methods for analyzing crater size‐frequency distributions</title><author>Robbins, Stuart J. ; Riggs, Jamie D. ; Weaver, Brian P. ; Bierhaus, Edward B. ; Chapman, Clark R. ; Kirchoff, Michelle R. ; Singer, Kelsi N. ; Gaddis, Lisa R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4260-6f1b683321bbda076b04ac224354861a6e677b5e4a239e37b62668db0524a92e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Archives &amp; records</topic><topic>Archiving</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Craters</topic><topic>Data management</topic><topic>Planetary surfaces</topic><topic>Population (statistical)</topic><topic>Solar system</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>System dynamics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Robbins, Stuart J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riggs, Jamie D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weaver, Brian P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bierhaus, Edward B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, Clark R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirchoff, Michelle R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singer, Kelsi N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaddis, Lisa R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Meteoritics &amp; planetary science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Robbins, Stuart J.</au><au>Riggs, Jamie D.</au><au>Weaver, Brian P.</au><au>Bierhaus, Edward B.</au><au>Chapman, Clark R.</au><au>Kirchoff, Michelle R.</au><au>Singer, Kelsi N.</au><au>Gaddis, Lisa R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Revised recommended methods for analyzing crater size‐frequency distributions</atitle><jtitle>Meteoritics &amp; planetary science</jtitle><date>2018-04</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>891</spage><epage>931</epage><pages>891-931</pages><issn>1086-9379</issn><eissn>1945-5100</eissn><abstract>Impact crater populations help us to understand solar system dynamics, planetary surface histories, and surface modification processes. A single previous effort to standardize how crater data are displayed in graphs, tables, and archives was in a 1978 NASA report by the Crater Analysis Techniques Working Group, published in 1979 in Icarus. The report had a significant lasting effect, but later decades brought major advances in statistical and computer sciences while the crater field has remained fairly stagnant. In this new work, we revisit the fundamental techniques for displaying and analyzing crater population data and demonstrate better statistical methods that can be used. Specifically, we address (1) how crater size‐frequency distributions (SFDs) are constructed, (2) how error bars are assigned to SFDs, and (3) how SFDs are fit to power‐laws and other models. We show how the new methods yield results similar to those of previous techniques in that the SFDs have familiar shapes but better account for multiple sources of uncertainty. We also recommend graphic, display, and archiving methods that reflect computers’ capabilities and fulfill NASA's current requirements for Data Management Plans.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/maps.12990</doi><tpages>41</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9953-5483</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3045-8445</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3367-2730</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8585-2549</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5890-9821</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1086-9379
ispartof Meteoritics & planetary science, 2018-04, Vol.53 (4), p.891-931
issn 1086-9379
1945-5100
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2023510080
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; Wiley Free Content
subjects Archives & records
Archiving
Computer simulation
Craters
Data management
Planetary surfaces
Population (statistical)
Solar system
Statistical methods
System dynamics
title Revised recommended methods for analyzing crater size‐frequency distributions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T05%3A58%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Revised%20recommended%20methods%20for%20analyzing%20crater%20size%E2%80%90frequency%20distributions&rft.jtitle=Meteoritics%20&%20planetary%20science&rft.au=Robbins,%20Stuart%20J.&rft.date=2018-04&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=891&rft.epage=931&rft.pages=891-931&rft.issn=1086-9379&rft.eissn=1945-5100&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/maps.12990&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2023510080%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2023510080&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true