Interface reduction of linear mechanical systems with a modular setup

The modular design of technical products offers many advantages. For example, development costs can be reduced if single problem-solving components can be reused in various settings. Taking the same approach in a simulative environment leads to substructured models, such as in elastic multibody syst...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Multibody system dynamics 2018-05, Vol.43 (1), p.1-19
Hauptverfasser: Holzwarth, Philip, Walker, Nadine, Eberhard, Peter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 19
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Multibody system dynamics
container_volume 43
creator Holzwarth, Philip
Walker, Nadine
Eberhard, Peter
description The modular design of technical products offers many advantages. For example, development costs can be reduced if single problem-solving components can be reused in various settings. Taking the same approach in a simulative environment leads to substructured models, such as in elastic multibody systems or substructured finite-element models. To reduce simulation times, model order reduction is applied to each component of the system. The goal is to store reduced models that may be reused in various settings in a common database. The more precise the information about acting forces on the models is, the more modern model order reduction schemes, like moment matching with Krylov subspace methods, can make use of their inherent advantages. If the separate components are connected at many points, then the straightforward application of block Krylov methods leads to large reduced systems. Therefore, the “exact” information about the interfaces, that is, all admissible directions of force application, must be reduced to the most important ones. The novel contribution in this paper is a unifying framework for interface reduction techniques applied to substructured systems. The presented reduction technique is able to provide models for a database and can be automatized. Besides the theoretical derivation of the method, a numerical benchmark model is evaluated, and benefits and drawbacks are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11044-017-9599-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2023437610</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2023437610</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-6d44f15746b9af0ff09aab8b61ccaed62205b2141999f5672d6260c9995217f03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_wF3AdfQmk0mapZSqhYIbBXchk0nslHnUJIPMvzdlBFeu7oNzzr18CN1SuKcA8iFSCpwToJKoUikynaEFLWVBmGQf57kvVpyUgsMluorxAMBoydUCbbZ9csEb63Bw9WhTM_R48LhtemcC7pzdm76xpsVxisl1EX83aY8N7oZ6bLMiujQer9GFN210N791id6fNm_rF7J7fd6uH3fEMrFKRNSc-_wVF5UyHrwHZUy1qgS11rhaMAZlxSinSilfCsnySoDNU8mo9FAs0d2cewzD1-hi0odhDH0-qRmwghdS0JOKziobhhiD8_oYms6ESVPQJ1p6pqUzLX2ipafsYbMnZm3_6cJf8v-mH-MVbPs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2023437610</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interface reduction of linear mechanical systems with a modular setup</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Holzwarth, Philip ; Walker, Nadine ; Eberhard, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Holzwarth, Philip ; Walker, Nadine ; Eberhard, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>The modular design of technical products offers many advantages. For example, development costs can be reduced if single problem-solving components can be reused in various settings. Taking the same approach in a simulative environment leads to substructured models, such as in elastic multibody systems or substructured finite-element models. To reduce simulation times, model order reduction is applied to each component of the system. The goal is to store reduced models that may be reused in various settings in a common database. The more precise the information about acting forces on the models is, the more modern model order reduction schemes, like moment matching with Krylov subspace methods, can make use of their inherent advantages. If the separate components are connected at many points, then the straightforward application of block Krylov methods leads to large reduced systems. Therefore, the “exact” information about the interfaces, that is, all admissible directions of force application, must be reduced to the most important ones. The novel contribution in this paper is a unifying framework for interface reduction techniques applied to substructured systems. The presented reduction technique is able to provide models for a database and can be automatized. Besides the theoretical derivation of the method, a numerical benchmark model is evaluated, and benefits and drawbacks are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1384-5640</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-272X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11044-017-9599-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Automotive Engineering ; Computer simulation ; Control ; Dynamical Systems ; Electrical Engineering ; Engineering ; Environment models ; Finite element method ; Mechanical Engineering ; Mechanical systems ; Model reduction ; Modular design ; Modular systems ; Multibody systems ; Optimization ; Problem solving ; Subspace methods ; Vibration</subject><ispartof>Multibody system dynamics, 2018-05, Vol.43 (1), p.1-19</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science &amp; Business Media 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-6d44f15746b9af0ff09aab8b61ccaed62205b2141999f5672d6260c9995217f03</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1809-4407</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11044-017-9599-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11044-017-9599-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,41493,42562,51324</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Holzwarth, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Nadine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eberhard, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Interface reduction of linear mechanical systems with a modular setup</title><title>Multibody system dynamics</title><addtitle>Multibody Syst Dyn</addtitle><description>The modular design of technical products offers many advantages. For example, development costs can be reduced if single problem-solving components can be reused in various settings. Taking the same approach in a simulative environment leads to substructured models, such as in elastic multibody systems or substructured finite-element models. To reduce simulation times, model order reduction is applied to each component of the system. The goal is to store reduced models that may be reused in various settings in a common database. The more precise the information about acting forces on the models is, the more modern model order reduction schemes, like moment matching with Krylov subspace methods, can make use of their inherent advantages. If the separate components are connected at many points, then the straightforward application of block Krylov methods leads to large reduced systems. Therefore, the “exact” information about the interfaces, that is, all admissible directions of force application, must be reduced to the most important ones. The novel contribution in this paper is a unifying framework for interface reduction techniques applied to substructured systems. The presented reduction technique is able to provide models for a database and can be automatized. Besides the theoretical derivation of the method, a numerical benchmark model is evaluated, and benefits and drawbacks are discussed.</description><subject>Automotive Engineering</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Dynamical Systems</subject><subject>Electrical Engineering</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Environment models</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Mechanical Engineering</subject><subject>Mechanical systems</subject><subject>Model reduction</subject><subject>Modular design</subject><subject>Modular systems</subject><subject>Multibody systems</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Problem solving</subject><subject>Subspace methods</subject><subject>Vibration</subject><issn>1384-5640</issn><issn>1573-272X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_wF3AdfQmk0mapZSqhYIbBXchk0nslHnUJIPMvzdlBFeu7oNzzr18CN1SuKcA8iFSCpwToJKoUikynaEFLWVBmGQf57kvVpyUgsMluorxAMBoydUCbbZ9csEb63Bw9WhTM_R48LhtemcC7pzdm76xpsVxisl1EX83aY8N7oZ6bLMiujQer9GFN210N791id6fNm_rF7J7fd6uH3fEMrFKRNSc-_wVF5UyHrwHZUy1qgS11rhaMAZlxSinSilfCsnySoDNU8mo9FAs0d2cewzD1-hi0odhDH0-qRmwghdS0JOKziobhhiD8_oYms6ESVPQJ1p6pqUzLX2ipafsYbMnZm3_6cJf8v-mH-MVbPs</recordid><startdate>20180501</startdate><enddate>20180501</enddate><creator>Holzwarth, Philip</creator><creator>Walker, Nadine</creator><creator>Eberhard, Peter</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1809-4407</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180501</creationdate><title>Interface reduction of linear mechanical systems with a modular setup</title><author>Holzwarth, Philip ; Walker, Nadine ; Eberhard, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-6d44f15746b9af0ff09aab8b61ccaed62205b2141999f5672d6260c9995217f03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Automotive Engineering</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Dynamical Systems</topic><topic>Electrical Engineering</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Environment models</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Mechanical Engineering</topic><topic>Mechanical systems</topic><topic>Model reduction</topic><topic>Modular design</topic><topic>Modular systems</topic><topic>Multibody systems</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Problem solving</topic><topic>Subspace methods</topic><topic>Vibration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Holzwarth, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Nadine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eberhard, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Multibody system dynamics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Holzwarth, Philip</au><au>Walker, Nadine</au><au>Eberhard, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interface reduction of linear mechanical systems with a modular setup</atitle><jtitle>Multibody system dynamics</jtitle><stitle>Multibody Syst Dyn</stitle><date>2018-05-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>19</epage><pages>1-19</pages><issn>1384-5640</issn><eissn>1573-272X</eissn><abstract>The modular design of technical products offers many advantages. For example, development costs can be reduced if single problem-solving components can be reused in various settings. Taking the same approach in a simulative environment leads to substructured models, such as in elastic multibody systems or substructured finite-element models. To reduce simulation times, model order reduction is applied to each component of the system. The goal is to store reduced models that may be reused in various settings in a common database. The more precise the information about acting forces on the models is, the more modern model order reduction schemes, like moment matching with Krylov subspace methods, can make use of their inherent advantages. If the separate components are connected at many points, then the straightforward application of block Krylov methods leads to large reduced systems. Therefore, the “exact” information about the interfaces, that is, all admissible directions of force application, must be reduced to the most important ones. The novel contribution in this paper is a unifying framework for interface reduction techniques applied to substructured systems. The presented reduction technique is able to provide models for a database and can be automatized. Besides the theoretical derivation of the method, a numerical benchmark model is evaluated, and benefits and drawbacks are discussed.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11044-017-9599-y</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1809-4407</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1384-5640
ispartof Multibody system dynamics, 2018-05, Vol.43 (1), p.1-19
issn 1384-5640
1573-272X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2023437610
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Automotive Engineering
Computer simulation
Control
Dynamical Systems
Electrical Engineering
Engineering
Environment models
Finite element method
Mechanical Engineering
Mechanical systems
Model reduction
Modular design
Modular systems
Multibody systems
Optimization
Problem solving
Subspace methods
Vibration
title Interface reduction of linear mechanical systems with a modular setup
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T01%3A03%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interface%20reduction%20of%20linear%20mechanical%20systems%20with%20a%20modular%20setup&rft.jtitle=Multibody%20system%20dynamics&rft.au=Holzwarth,%20Philip&rft.date=2018-05-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=19&rft.pages=1-19&rft.issn=1384-5640&rft.eissn=1573-272X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11044-017-9599-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2023437610%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2023437610&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true