Interface reduction of linear mechanical systems with a modular setup
The modular design of technical products offers many advantages. For example, development costs can be reduced if single problem-solving components can be reused in various settings. Taking the same approach in a simulative environment leads to substructured models, such as in elastic multibody syst...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Multibody system dynamics 2018-05, Vol.43 (1), p.1-19 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 19 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Multibody system dynamics |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Holzwarth, Philip Walker, Nadine Eberhard, Peter |
description | The modular design of technical products offers many advantages. For example, development costs can be reduced if single problem-solving components can be reused in various settings. Taking the same approach in a simulative environment leads to substructured models, such as in elastic multibody systems or substructured finite-element models. To reduce simulation times, model order reduction is applied to each component of the system. The goal is to store reduced models that may be reused in various settings in a common database. The more precise the information about acting forces on the models is, the more modern model order reduction schemes, like moment matching with Krylov subspace methods, can make use of their inherent advantages. If the separate components are connected at many points, then the straightforward application of block Krylov methods leads to large reduced systems. Therefore, the “exact” information about the interfaces, that is, all admissible directions of force application, must be reduced to the most important ones. The novel contribution in this paper is a unifying framework for interface reduction techniques applied to substructured systems. The presented reduction technique is able to provide models for a database and can be automatized. Besides the theoretical derivation of the method, a numerical benchmark model is evaluated, and benefits and drawbacks are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11044-017-9599-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2023437610</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2023437610</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-6d44f15746b9af0ff09aab8b61ccaed62205b2141999f5672d6260c9995217f03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_wF3AdfQmk0mapZSqhYIbBXchk0nslHnUJIPMvzdlBFeu7oNzzr18CN1SuKcA8iFSCpwToJKoUikynaEFLWVBmGQf57kvVpyUgsMluorxAMBoydUCbbZ9csEb63Bw9WhTM_R48LhtemcC7pzdm76xpsVxisl1EX83aY8N7oZ6bLMiujQer9GFN210N791id6fNm_rF7J7fd6uH3fEMrFKRNSc-_wVF5UyHrwHZUy1qgS11rhaMAZlxSinSilfCsnySoDNU8mo9FAs0d2cewzD1-hi0odhDH0-qRmwghdS0JOKziobhhiD8_oYms6ESVPQJ1p6pqUzLX2ipafsYbMnZm3_6cJf8v-mH-MVbPs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2023437610</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interface reduction of linear mechanical systems with a modular setup</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Holzwarth, Philip ; Walker, Nadine ; Eberhard, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Holzwarth, Philip ; Walker, Nadine ; Eberhard, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>The modular design of technical products offers many advantages. For example, development costs can be reduced if single problem-solving components can be reused in various settings. Taking the same approach in a simulative environment leads to substructured models, such as in elastic multibody systems or substructured finite-element models. To reduce simulation times, model order reduction is applied to each component of the system. The goal is to store reduced models that may be reused in various settings in a common database. The more precise the information about acting forces on the models is, the more modern model order reduction schemes, like moment matching with Krylov subspace methods, can make use of their inherent advantages. If the separate components are connected at many points, then the straightforward application of block Krylov methods leads to large reduced systems. Therefore, the “exact” information about the interfaces, that is, all admissible directions of force application, must be reduced to the most important ones. The novel contribution in this paper is a unifying framework for interface reduction techniques applied to substructured systems. The presented reduction technique is able to provide models for a database and can be automatized. Besides the theoretical derivation of the method, a numerical benchmark model is evaluated, and benefits and drawbacks are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1384-5640</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-272X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11044-017-9599-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Automotive Engineering ; Computer simulation ; Control ; Dynamical Systems ; Electrical Engineering ; Engineering ; Environment models ; Finite element method ; Mechanical Engineering ; Mechanical systems ; Model reduction ; Modular design ; Modular systems ; Multibody systems ; Optimization ; Problem solving ; Subspace methods ; Vibration</subject><ispartof>Multibody system dynamics, 2018-05, Vol.43 (1), p.1-19</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science & Business Media 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-6d44f15746b9af0ff09aab8b61ccaed62205b2141999f5672d6260c9995217f03</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1809-4407</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11044-017-9599-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11044-017-9599-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,41493,42562,51324</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Holzwarth, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Nadine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eberhard, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Interface reduction of linear mechanical systems with a modular setup</title><title>Multibody system dynamics</title><addtitle>Multibody Syst Dyn</addtitle><description>The modular design of technical products offers many advantages. For example, development costs can be reduced if single problem-solving components can be reused in various settings. Taking the same approach in a simulative environment leads to substructured models, such as in elastic multibody systems or substructured finite-element models. To reduce simulation times, model order reduction is applied to each component of the system. The goal is to store reduced models that may be reused in various settings in a common database. The more precise the information about acting forces on the models is, the more modern model order reduction schemes, like moment matching with Krylov subspace methods, can make use of their inherent advantages. If the separate components are connected at many points, then the straightforward application of block Krylov methods leads to large reduced systems. Therefore, the “exact” information about the interfaces, that is, all admissible directions of force application, must be reduced to the most important ones. The novel contribution in this paper is a unifying framework for interface reduction techniques applied to substructured systems. The presented reduction technique is able to provide models for a database and can be automatized. Besides the theoretical derivation of the method, a numerical benchmark model is evaluated, and benefits and drawbacks are discussed.</description><subject>Automotive Engineering</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Dynamical Systems</subject><subject>Electrical Engineering</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Environment models</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Mechanical Engineering</subject><subject>Mechanical systems</subject><subject>Model reduction</subject><subject>Modular design</subject><subject>Modular systems</subject><subject>Multibody systems</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Problem solving</subject><subject>Subspace methods</subject><subject>Vibration</subject><issn>1384-5640</issn><issn>1573-272X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_wF3AdfQmk0mapZSqhYIbBXchk0nslHnUJIPMvzdlBFeu7oNzzr18CN1SuKcA8iFSCpwToJKoUikynaEFLWVBmGQf57kvVpyUgsMluorxAMBoydUCbbZ9csEb63Bw9WhTM_R48LhtemcC7pzdm76xpsVxisl1EX83aY8N7oZ6bLMiujQer9GFN210N791id6fNm_rF7J7fd6uH3fEMrFKRNSc-_wVF5UyHrwHZUy1qgS11rhaMAZlxSinSilfCsnySoDNU8mo9FAs0d2cewzD1-hi0odhDH0-qRmwghdS0JOKziobhhiD8_oYms6ESVPQJ1p6pqUzLX2ipafsYbMnZm3_6cJf8v-mH-MVbPs</recordid><startdate>20180501</startdate><enddate>20180501</enddate><creator>Holzwarth, Philip</creator><creator>Walker, Nadine</creator><creator>Eberhard, Peter</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1809-4407</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180501</creationdate><title>Interface reduction of linear mechanical systems with a modular setup</title><author>Holzwarth, Philip ; Walker, Nadine ; Eberhard, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-6d44f15746b9af0ff09aab8b61ccaed62205b2141999f5672d6260c9995217f03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Automotive Engineering</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Dynamical Systems</topic><topic>Electrical Engineering</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Environment models</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Mechanical Engineering</topic><topic>Mechanical systems</topic><topic>Model reduction</topic><topic>Modular design</topic><topic>Modular systems</topic><topic>Multibody systems</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Problem solving</topic><topic>Subspace methods</topic><topic>Vibration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Holzwarth, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Nadine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eberhard, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Multibody system dynamics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Holzwarth, Philip</au><au>Walker, Nadine</au><au>Eberhard, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interface reduction of linear mechanical systems with a modular setup</atitle><jtitle>Multibody system dynamics</jtitle><stitle>Multibody Syst Dyn</stitle><date>2018-05-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>19</epage><pages>1-19</pages><issn>1384-5640</issn><eissn>1573-272X</eissn><abstract>The modular design of technical products offers many advantages. For example, development costs can be reduced if single problem-solving components can be reused in various settings. Taking the same approach in a simulative environment leads to substructured models, such as in elastic multibody systems or substructured finite-element models. To reduce simulation times, model order reduction is applied to each component of the system. The goal is to store reduced models that may be reused in various settings in a common database. The more precise the information about acting forces on the models is, the more modern model order reduction schemes, like moment matching with Krylov subspace methods, can make use of their inherent advantages. If the separate components are connected at many points, then the straightforward application of block Krylov methods leads to large reduced systems. Therefore, the “exact” information about the interfaces, that is, all admissible directions of force application, must be reduced to the most important ones. The novel contribution in this paper is a unifying framework for interface reduction techniques applied to substructured systems. The presented reduction technique is able to provide models for a database and can be automatized. Besides the theoretical derivation of the method, a numerical benchmark model is evaluated, and benefits and drawbacks are discussed.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11044-017-9599-y</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1809-4407</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1384-5640 |
ispartof | Multibody system dynamics, 2018-05, Vol.43 (1), p.1-19 |
issn | 1384-5640 1573-272X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2023437610 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Automotive Engineering Computer simulation Control Dynamical Systems Electrical Engineering Engineering Environment models Finite element method Mechanical Engineering Mechanical systems Model reduction Modular design Modular systems Multibody systems Optimization Problem solving Subspace methods Vibration |
title | Interface reduction of linear mechanical systems with a modular setup |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T01%3A03%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interface%20reduction%20of%20linear%20mechanical%20systems%20with%20a%20modular%20setup&rft.jtitle=Multibody%20system%20dynamics&rft.au=Holzwarth,%20Philip&rft.date=2018-05-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=19&rft.pages=1-19&rft.issn=1384-5640&rft.eissn=1573-272X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11044-017-9599-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2023437610%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2023437610&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |