Assessment of Anticipated Emotions in Moral Transgressions
This paper describes the reliability and validity of the assessment of anticipated emotions in the context of moral transgressions in a sample of 1,179 children aged 6-13 years (M = 9.1; SD = 1.8, 49.0% girls), with a special interest in the domain and developmental specificity of the instrument. To...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of psychological assessment : official organ of the European Association of Psychological Assessment 2018-03, Vol.34 (2), p.111-126 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This paper describes the reliability and validity of the
assessment of anticipated emotions in the context of moral transgressions in a
sample of 1,179 children aged 6-13 years
(M = 9.1;
SD = 1.8, 49.0% girls), with a special interest
in the domain and developmental specificity of the instrument. To evaluate the
concurrent and predictive validity, we also examined the relation between
anticipated emotions and antisocial and prosocial tendencies and sympathy at two
time points. The instrument consisted of six transgression scenarios covering
three domains: unfairness (not winning fairly, not keeping word), omission of a
prosocial duty (not sharing, not helping), and victimization (verbal bullying,
relational bullying). Results show sufficient internal consistency and a
one-factor structure of the anticipated emotions, indicating a lack of domain
variability of the assessment of anticipated emotions. Additionally, emotions
following hypothetical moral transgressions showed some developmental
variability. Whereas no relation was found between anticipated emotions and
antisocial tendencies, anticipated negative emotions following the moral
transgressions were positively related to prosocial tendencies and sympathy.
This provides preliminary evidence for the concurrent and predictive validity of
the instrument. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1015-5759 2151-2426 |
DOI: | 10.1027/1015-5759/a000467 |