Why We Need to Return to the Ethics of Political Representation
[...]the systemic turn risks obfuscating the impact of structural inequalities on the functioning of representative systems. In this sense, articulating standards becomes a way of identifying the standard violations and misuses of representatives' extensive powers (Rubenstein 2014). Because of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PS, political science & politics political science & politics, 2018-04, Vol.51 (2), p.309-313 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 313 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 309 |
container_title | PS, political science & politics |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Severs, Eline Dovi, Suzanne |
description | [...]the systemic turn risks obfuscating the impact of structural inequalities on the functioning of representative systems. In this sense, articulating standards becomes a way of identifying the standard violations and misuses of representatives' extensive powers (Rubenstein 2014). Because of our attention to contextualized power relations, our identification of standards also is compatible with Disch's (2015) citizens' perspective: we treat vulnerable groups (those worthy of scholarly attention) as contingent on context-specific power relations. Drawing on the literature about colonial cultural brokers, they demonstrate how contemporary ethnic-minority representatives serve as bridges, uniting yet also keeping social groups separate. Because they embody the symbolic boundaries routinely drawn up between social groups, minority representatives are well suited to transform the relationships between social groups to make them more equitable. [...]the articles in this symposium provide an important foundation for future research. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1049096517002414 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2021485163</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1049096517002414</cupid><sourcerecordid>2021485163</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2754-470ebf36f92f23472181b9b68b0ecf0bd9e21acda5dfdb190c12438233b62c843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UEtLAzEQDqJgrf4AbwHPq5k8djcnkVIfUFR80OOSZCd2S9utSXrovzelBQ_iXOaD7zHDR8glsGtgUN28A5Oa6VJBxRiXII_IAJSoCqWFOs4408WOPyVnMc5ZnlqxAbmdzrZ0ivQZsaWpp2-YNmG1Q2mGdJxmnYu09_S1X3Spc2aRFeuAEVfJpK5fnZMTbxYRLw57SD7vxx-jx2Ly8vA0upsUjldKFrJiaL0oveaeC1lxqMFqW9aWofPMtho5GNca1frWgmYOuBQ1F8KW3NVSDMnVPncd-u8NxtTM-_xoPtlwxkHWCkqRVbBXudDHGNA369AtTdg2wJpdT82fnrJHHDxmaUPXfuFv9P-uHzJMZ-M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2021485163</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why We Need to Return to the Ethics of Political Representation</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Severs, Eline ; Dovi, Suzanne</creator><creatorcontrib>Severs, Eline ; Dovi, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><description>[...]the systemic turn risks obfuscating the impact of structural inequalities on the functioning of representative systems. In this sense, articulating standards becomes a way of identifying the standard violations and misuses of representatives' extensive powers (Rubenstein 2014). Because of our attention to contextualized power relations, our identification of standards also is compatible with Disch's (2015) citizens' perspective: we treat vulnerable groups (those worthy of scholarly attention) as contingent on context-specific power relations. Drawing on the literature about colonial cultural brokers, they demonstrate how contemporary ethnic-minority representatives serve as bridges, uniting yet also keeping social groups separate. Because they embody the symbolic boundaries routinely drawn up between social groups, minority representatives are well suited to transform the relationships between social groups to make them more equitable. [...]the articles in this symposium provide an important foundation for future research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1049-0965</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5935</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1049096517002414</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Audiences ; Benchmarking ; Citizenship ; Creativity ; Democracy ; Democratic Values ; Elections ; Ethics ; Evaluative Thinking ; Governance ; Philosophy ; Political representation ; Political science ; Politics ; Symposium: The Good Representative 2.0 ; Xenophobia</subject><ispartof>PS, political science & politics, 2018-04, Vol.51 (2), p.309-313</ispartof><rights>Copyright © American Political Science Association 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2754-470ebf36f92f23472181b9b68b0ecf0bd9e21acda5dfdb190c12438233b62c843</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2754-470ebf36f92f23472181b9b68b0ecf0bd9e21acda5dfdb190c12438233b62c843</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1049096517002414/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,12824,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Severs, Eline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dovi, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><title>Why We Need to Return to the Ethics of Political Representation</title><title>PS, political science & politics</title><addtitle>APSC</addtitle><description>[...]the systemic turn risks obfuscating the impact of structural inequalities on the functioning of representative systems. In this sense, articulating standards becomes a way of identifying the standard violations and misuses of representatives' extensive powers (Rubenstein 2014). Because of our attention to contextualized power relations, our identification of standards also is compatible with Disch's (2015) citizens' perspective: we treat vulnerable groups (those worthy of scholarly attention) as contingent on context-specific power relations. Drawing on the literature about colonial cultural brokers, they demonstrate how contemporary ethnic-minority representatives serve as bridges, uniting yet also keeping social groups separate. Because they embody the symbolic boundaries routinely drawn up between social groups, minority representatives are well suited to transform the relationships between social groups to make them more equitable. [...]the articles in this symposium provide an important foundation for future research.</description><subject>Audiences</subject><subject>Benchmarking</subject><subject>Citizenship</subject><subject>Creativity</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Democratic Values</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Evaluative Thinking</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Political representation</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Symposium: The Good Representative 2.0</subject><subject>Xenophobia</subject><issn>1049-0965</issn><issn>1537-5935</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UEtLAzEQDqJgrf4AbwHPq5k8djcnkVIfUFR80OOSZCd2S9utSXrovzelBQ_iXOaD7zHDR8glsGtgUN28A5Oa6VJBxRiXII_IAJSoCqWFOs4408WOPyVnMc5ZnlqxAbmdzrZ0ivQZsaWpp2-YNmG1Q2mGdJxmnYu09_S1X3Spc2aRFeuAEVfJpK5fnZMTbxYRLw57SD7vxx-jx2Ly8vA0upsUjldKFrJiaL0oveaeC1lxqMFqW9aWofPMtho5GNca1frWgmYOuBQ1F8KW3NVSDMnVPncd-u8NxtTM-_xoPtlwxkHWCkqRVbBXudDHGNA369AtTdg2wJpdT82fnrJHHDxmaUPXfuFv9P-uHzJMZ-M</recordid><startdate>201804</startdate><enddate>201804</enddate><creator>Severs, Eline</creator><creator>Dovi, Suzanne</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201804</creationdate><title>Why We Need to Return to the Ethics of Political Representation</title><author>Severs, Eline ; Dovi, Suzanne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2754-470ebf36f92f23472181b9b68b0ecf0bd9e21acda5dfdb190c12438233b62c843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Audiences</topic><topic>Benchmarking</topic><topic>Citizenship</topic><topic>Creativity</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Democratic Values</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Evaluative Thinking</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Political representation</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Symposium: The Good Representative 2.0</topic><topic>Xenophobia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Severs, Eline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dovi, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>PS, political science & politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Severs, Eline</au><au>Dovi, Suzanne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why We Need to Return to the Ethics of Political Representation</atitle><jtitle>PS, political science & politics</jtitle><addtitle>APSC</addtitle><date>2018-04</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>309</spage><epage>313</epage><pages>309-313</pages><issn>1049-0965</issn><eissn>1537-5935</eissn><abstract>[...]the systemic turn risks obfuscating the impact of structural inequalities on the functioning of representative systems. In this sense, articulating standards becomes a way of identifying the standard violations and misuses of representatives' extensive powers (Rubenstein 2014). Because of our attention to contextualized power relations, our identification of standards also is compatible with Disch's (2015) citizens' perspective: we treat vulnerable groups (those worthy of scholarly attention) as contingent on context-specific power relations. Drawing on the literature about colonial cultural brokers, they demonstrate how contemporary ethnic-minority representatives serve as bridges, uniting yet also keeping social groups separate. Because they embody the symbolic boundaries routinely drawn up between social groups, minority representatives are well suited to transform the relationships between social groups to make them more equitable. [...]the articles in this symposium provide an important foundation for future research.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1049096517002414</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1049-0965 |
ispartof | PS, political science & politics, 2018-04, Vol.51 (2), p.309-313 |
issn | 1049-0965 1537-5935 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2021485163 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Audiences Benchmarking Citizenship Creativity Democracy Democratic Values Elections Ethics Evaluative Thinking Governance Philosophy Political representation Political science Politics Symposium: The Good Representative 2.0 Xenophobia |
title | Why We Need to Return to the Ethics of Political Representation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T19%3A10%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20We%20Need%20to%20Return%20to%20the%20Ethics%20of%20Political%20Representation&rft.jtitle=PS,%20political%20science%20&%20politics&rft.au=Severs,%20Eline&rft.date=2018-04&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=309&rft.epage=313&rft.pages=309-313&rft.issn=1049-0965&rft.eissn=1537-5935&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1049096517002414&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2021485163%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2021485163&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1049096517002414&rfr_iscdi=true |