Local and regional specialization in plant–pollinator networks
Specialization of species is often studied in ecology but its quantification and meaning is disputed. More recently, ecological network analysis has been widely used as a tool to quantify specialization, but here its true meaning is also debated. However, irrespective of the tool used, the geographi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Oikos 2018-04, Vol.127 (4), p.531-537 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 537 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 531 |
container_title | Oikos |
container_volume | 127 |
creator | Carstensen, Daniel W. Trøjelsgaard, Kristian Ollerton, Jeff Morellato, Leonor Patricia C. |
description | Specialization of species is often studied in ecology but its quantification and meaning is disputed. More recently, ecological network analysis has been widely used as a tool to quantify specialization, but here its true meaning is also debated. However, irrespective of the tool used, the geographic scale at which specialization is measured remains central. Consequently, we use data sets of plant–pollinator networks from Brazil and the Canary Islands to explore specialization at local and regional scales. We ask how local specialization of a species is related to its regional specialization, and whether or not species tend to interact with a non‐random set of partners in local communities. Local and regional specialization were strongly correlated around the 1:1 line, indicating that species conserve their specialization levels across spatial scales. Furthermore, most plants and pollinators also showed link conservatism repeatedly across local communities, and thus seem to be constrained in their fundamental niche. However, some species are more constrained than others, indicating true specialists. We argue that several geographically separated populations should be evaluated in order to provide a robust evaluation of species specialization. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/oik.04436 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2020690781</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2020690781</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3316-430b32982afdcb79f1420b590c0b9f0c1d3b57dd2379858d6650ff6a3437d5c63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kL9OwzAQhy0EEqUw8AaRmBhSznFixxuoolBRqQvMluM_yG2Ig52qKhPvwBvyJJiWlVtO99N3p9OH0CWGCU514916AmVJ6BEaYQqQAwN6jEYABHJccH6KzmJcAQBjrByh24VXss1kp7NgXp3v0hB7o5xs3YccUpC5Lutb2Q3fn1-9b1vXycGHrDPD1od1PEcnVrbRXPz1MXqZ3T9PH_PF8mE-vVvkihBM85JAQwpeF9Jq1TBucVlAU3FQ0HALCmvSVEzrgjBeV7WmtAJrqSQlYbpSlIzR1eFuH_z7xsRBrPwmpHejKKAAyoHVOFHXB0oFH2MwVvTBvcmwExjEryCRBIm9oMRODuzWtWb3PyiW86f9wg9Gm2dh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2020690781</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Local and regional specialization in plant–pollinator networks</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Carstensen, Daniel W. ; Trøjelsgaard, Kristian ; Ollerton, Jeff ; Morellato, Leonor Patricia C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Carstensen, Daniel W. ; Trøjelsgaard, Kristian ; Ollerton, Jeff ; Morellato, Leonor Patricia C.</creatorcontrib><description>Specialization of species is often studied in ecology but its quantification and meaning is disputed. More recently, ecological network analysis has been widely used as a tool to quantify specialization, but here its true meaning is also debated. However, irrespective of the tool used, the geographic scale at which specialization is measured remains central. Consequently, we use data sets of plant–pollinator networks from Brazil and the Canary Islands to explore specialization at local and regional scales. We ask how local specialization of a species is related to its regional specialization, and whether or not species tend to interact with a non‐random set of partners in local communities. Local and regional specialization were strongly correlated around the 1:1 line, indicating that species conserve their specialization levels across spatial scales. Furthermore, most plants and pollinators also showed link conservatism repeatedly across local communities, and thus seem to be constrained in their fundamental niche. However, some species are more constrained than others, indicating true specialists. We argue that several geographically separated populations should be evaluated in order to provide a robust evaluation of species specialization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0030-1299</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0706</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/oik.04436</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Ecological monitoring ; Evaluation ; Local communities ; Network analysis ; Niches ; Pollinators ; Specialization ; Species</subject><ispartof>Oikos, 2018-04, Vol.127 (4), p.531-537</ispartof><rights>2017 The Authors</rights><rights>Oikos © 2017 Nordic Society Oikos</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3316-430b32982afdcb79f1420b590c0b9f0c1d3b57dd2379858d6650ff6a3437d5c63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3316-430b32982afdcb79f1420b590c0b9f0c1d3b57dd2379858d6650ff6a3437d5c63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Foik.04436$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Foik.04436$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carstensen, Daniel W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trøjelsgaard, Kristian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ollerton, Jeff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morellato, Leonor Patricia C.</creatorcontrib><title>Local and regional specialization in plant–pollinator networks</title><title>Oikos</title><description>Specialization of species is often studied in ecology but its quantification and meaning is disputed. More recently, ecological network analysis has been widely used as a tool to quantify specialization, but here its true meaning is also debated. However, irrespective of the tool used, the geographic scale at which specialization is measured remains central. Consequently, we use data sets of plant–pollinator networks from Brazil and the Canary Islands to explore specialization at local and regional scales. We ask how local specialization of a species is related to its regional specialization, and whether or not species tend to interact with a non‐random set of partners in local communities. Local and regional specialization were strongly correlated around the 1:1 line, indicating that species conserve their specialization levels across spatial scales. Furthermore, most plants and pollinators also showed link conservatism repeatedly across local communities, and thus seem to be constrained in their fundamental niche. However, some species are more constrained than others, indicating true specialists. We argue that several geographically separated populations should be evaluated in order to provide a robust evaluation of species specialization.</description><subject>Ecological monitoring</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Local communities</subject><subject>Network analysis</subject><subject>Niches</subject><subject>Pollinators</subject><subject>Specialization</subject><subject>Species</subject><issn>0030-1299</issn><issn>1600-0706</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kL9OwzAQhy0EEqUw8AaRmBhSznFixxuoolBRqQvMluM_yG2Ig52qKhPvwBvyJJiWlVtO99N3p9OH0CWGCU514916AmVJ6BEaYQqQAwN6jEYABHJccH6KzmJcAQBjrByh24VXss1kp7NgXp3v0hB7o5xs3YccUpC5Lutb2Q3fn1-9b1vXycGHrDPD1od1PEcnVrbRXPz1MXqZ3T9PH_PF8mE-vVvkihBM85JAQwpeF9Jq1TBucVlAU3FQ0HALCmvSVEzrgjBeV7WmtAJrqSQlYbpSlIzR1eFuH_z7xsRBrPwmpHejKKAAyoHVOFHXB0oFH2MwVvTBvcmwExjEryCRBIm9oMRODuzWtWb3PyiW86f9wg9Gm2dh</recordid><startdate>201804</startdate><enddate>201804</enddate><creator>Carstensen, Daniel W.</creator><creator>Trøjelsgaard, Kristian</creator><creator>Ollerton, Jeff</creator><creator>Morellato, Leonor Patricia C.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201804</creationdate><title>Local and regional specialization in plant–pollinator networks</title><author>Carstensen, Daniel W. ; Trøjelsgaard, Kristian ; Ollerton, Jeff ; Morellato, Leonor Patricia C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3316-430b32982afdcb79f1420b590c0b9f0c1d3b57dd2379858d6650ff6a3437d5c63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Ecological monitoring</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Local communities</topic><topic>Network analysis</topic><topic>Niches</topic><topic>Pollinators</topic><topic>Specialization</topic><topic>Species</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carstensen, Daniel W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trøjelsgaard, Kristian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ollerton, Jeff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morellato, Leonor Patricia C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Oikos</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carstensen, Daniel W.</au><au>Trøjelsgaard, Kristian</au><au>Ollerton, Jeff</au><au>Morellato, Leonor Patricia C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Local and regional specialization in plant–pollinator networks</atitle><jtitle>Oikos</jtitle><date>2018-04</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>127</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>531</spage><epage>537</epage><pages>531-537</pages><issn>0030-1299</issn><eissn>1600-0706</eissn><abstract>Specialization of species is often studied in ecology but its quantification and meaning is disputed. More recently, ecological network analysis has been widely used as a tool to quantify specialization, but here its true meaning is also debated. However, irrespective of the tool used, the geographic scale at which specialization is measured remains central. Consequently, we use data sets of plant–pollinator networks from Brazil and the Canary Islands to explore specialization at local and regional scales. We ask how local specialization of a species is related to its regional specialization, and whether or not species tend to interact with a non‐random set of partners in local communities. Local and regional specialization were strongly correlated around the 1:1 line, indicating that species conserve their specialization levels across spatial scales. Furthermore, most plants and pollinators also showed link conservatism repeatedly across local communities, and thus seem to be constrained in their fundamental niche. However, some species are more constrained than others, indicating true specialists. We argue that several geographically separated populations should be evaluated in order to provide a robust evaluation of species specialization.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/oik.04436</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0030-1299 |
ispartof | Oikos, 2018-04, Vol.127 (4), p.531-537 |
issn | 0030-1299 1600-0706 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2020690781 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Ecological monitoring Evaluation Local communities Network analysis Niches Pollinators Specialization Species |
title | Local and regional specialization in plant–pollinator networks |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T14%3A07%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Local%20and%20regional%20specialization%20in%20plant%E2%80%93pollinator%20networks&rft.jtitle=Oikos&rft.au=Carstensen,%20Daniel%20W.&rft.date=2018-04&rft.volume=127&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=531&rft.epage=537&rft.pages=531-537&rft.issn=0030-1299&rft.eissn=1600-0706&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/oik.04436&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2020690781%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2020690781&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |