Tidal Stage Changes in Structure and Diversity of Intertidal Benthic Diatom Assemblages: a Case Study from Two Contrasting Charleston Harbor Flats

Benthic microalgae are key contributors to near shore food webs and sediment stabilization. Temporal variability in microaigal biomass and production throughout the tidal cycle has been well documented; however, due to limitations of traditional methods of analysis patterns of community composition...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Estuaries and coasts 2018-05, Vol.41 (3), p.772-783
Hauptverfasser: Rivera-Garcia, Luis G., Hill-Spanik, Kristina M., Berthrong, Sean T., Plante, Craig J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 783
container_issue 3
container_start_page 772
container_title Estuaries and coasts
container_volume 41
creator Rivera-Garcia, Luis G.
Hill-Spanik, Kristina M.
Berthrong, Sean T.
Plante, Craig J.
description Benthic microalgae are key contributors to near shore food webs and sediment stabilization. Temporal variability in microaigal biomass and production throughout the tidal cycle has been well documented; however, due to limitations of traditional methods of analysis patterns of community composition and diversity over such time scales have not been revealed. To explore the latter and better understand how short-term changes throughout the tidal cycle may affect community functioning, we compared benthic diatom composition and diversity over tidal stage shifts. We employed two disparate molecular techniques (denaturing gel gradient electrophoresis with Sanger DNA sequencing of excised bands and high-throughput community metagenome sequencing) to characterize diatom assemblages in representative muddy and sandy intertidal sites in Charleston Harbor, SC, USA. In support of prior studies, we found higher diatom diversity in sandbar as compared to mudflat sediments. Spatial differences were stronger relative to tidal temporal differences, although diversity metrics generally were highest after prolonged tidal immersion as compared to low-tide emersion or just after immersion at flood tide. Composition of the diatom assemblage differed markedly between sites, with species in genera Halamphora, Amphora, and Navicula dominating the sandbar, whereas Cyclotella, Skeletonema, and Thalassiosira were the most prevalent genera on the mudflat. Diatom composition differed by tidal stage, with assemblages during low-tide exposure distinct from samples taken after immersion. Both sandbar and mudflat sediments exhibited increases in relative proportion of epipelic diatoms and decreases in plank-tonic taxa during low-tide exposure. Our findings of short-term changes in species composition and dominance could inform primary productivity models to better estimate understudied diatom contributions in heterogeneous and highly variable tidal systems.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12237-017-0312-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2019741217</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44858069</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44858069</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-d6468eb9121d07cb9c6dfe77cd0447d1715f6b693ab8edaeec427feb7d31783c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtO3DAUhqOqSKXQB-iikqWuU3xLnLCjaQeQkFgwXVuOfTJklLHh2KGa1-gT4yEV7FhYtnz-i_0VxVdGfzBK1VlknAtVUpaXYLyUH4pjVlVtyZVgH1_PXHwqPse4pVRWFZXHxb_16MxE7pLZAOnujd9AJKPPFzjbNCMQ4x35NT4BxjHtSRjItU-A6cX2E3y6H22emxR25CJG2PVTjornxJDORMhBs9uTAfN4_TeQLviEJqbRbw51OEFMwZMrg31AsppMiqfF0WCmCF_-7yfFn9XvdXdV3txeXncXN6UVokmlq2XdQN8yzhxVtm9t7QZQyjoqpXJMsWqo-7oVpm_AGQAruRqgV04w1QgrTorvS-4Dhsc5v0Nvw4w-V2pOWatkTlZZxRaVxRAjwqAfcNwZ3GtG9QG9XtDrjF4f0GuZPXzxxKzNRPEt-T3Tt8W0zUTwtUXKpmpo_sYzZeOSDw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2019741217</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tidal Stage Changes in Structure and Diversity of Intertidal Benthic Diatom Assemblages: a Case Study from Two Contrasting Charleston Harbor Flats</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Rivera-Garcia, Luis G. ; Hill-Spanik, Kristina M. ; Berthrong, Sean T. ; Plante, Craig J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rivera-Garcia, Luis G. ; Hill-Spanik, Kristina M. ; Berthrong, Sean T. ; Plante, Craig J.</creatorcontrib><description>Benthic microalgae are key contributors to near shore food webs and sediment stabilization. Temporal variability in microaigal biomass and production throughout the tidal cycle has been well documented; however, due to limitations of traditional methods of analysis patterns of community composition and diversity over such time scales have not been revealed. To explore the latter and better understand how short-term changes throughout the tidal cycle may affect community functioning, we compared benthic diatom composition and diversity over tidal stage shifts. We employed two disparate molecular techniques (denaturing gel gradient electrophoresis with Sanger DNA sequencing of excised bands and high-throughput community metagenome sequencing) to characterize diatom assemblages in representative muddy and sandy intertidal sites in Charleston Harbor, SC, USA. In support of prior studies, we found higher diatom diversity in sandbar as compared to mudflat sediments. Spatial differences were stronger relative to tidal temporal differences, although diversity metrics generally were highest after prolonged tidal immersion as compared to low-tide emersion or just after immersion at flood tide. Composition of the diatom assemblage differed markedly between sites, with species in genera Halamphora, Amphora, and Navicula dominating the sandbar, whereas Cyclotella, Skeletonema, and Thalassiosira were the most prevalent genera on the mudflat. Diatom composition differed by tidal stage, with assemblages during low-tide exposure distinct from samples taken after immersion. Both sandbar and mudflat sediments exhibited increases in relative proportion of epipelic diatoms and decreases in plank-tonic taxa during low-tide exposure. Our findings of short-term changes in species composition and dominance could inform primary productivity models to better estimate understudied diatom contributions in heterogeneous and highly variable tidal systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1559-2723</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-2731</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12237-017-0312-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer Science+Business Media</publisher><subject>Analytical methods ; Case studies ; Coastal Sciences ; Communities ; Community composition ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; Diatoms ; DNA ; DNA sequences ; DNA sequencing ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecology ; Environment ; Environmental Management ; Food chains ; Food webs ; Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology ; Gels ; Immersion ; Microalgae ; Mud flats ; Plankton ; Primary production ; Sand bars ; Sediment ; Sediments ; Sequencing ; Short-term changes ; Spatial variations ; Species composition ; Temporal variations ; Tidal cycles ; Tides ; Water and Health</subject><ispartof>Estuaries and coasts, 2018-05, Vol.41 (3), p.772-783</ispartof><rights>Coastal and Estuarine Research Federation 2018</rights><rights>Coastal and Estuarine Research Federation 2017</rights><rights>Estuaries and Coasts is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-d6468eb9121d07cb9c6dfe77cd0447d1715f6b693ab8edaeec427feb7d31783c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-d6468eb9121d07cb9c6dfe77cd0447d1715f6b693ab8edaeec427feb7d31783c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3632-5291</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44858069$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44858069$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rivera-Garcia, Luis G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill-Spanik, Kristina M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berthrong, Sean T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plante, Craig J.</creatorcontrib><title>Tidal Stage Changes in Structure and Diversity of Intertidal Benthic Diatom Assemblages: a Case Study from Two Contrasting Charleston Harbor Flats</title><title>Estuaries and coasts</title><addtitle>Estuaries and Coasts</addtitle><description>Benthic microalgae are key contributors to near shore food webs and sediment stabilization. Temporal variability in microaigal biomass and production throughout the tidal cycle has been well documented; however, due to limitations of traditional methods of analysis patterns of community composition and diversity over such time scales have not been revealed. To explore the latter and better understand how short-term changes throughout the tidal cycle may affect community functioning, we compared benthic diatom composition and diversity over tidal stage shifts. We employed two disparate molecular techniques (denaturing gel gradient electrophoresis with Sanger DNA sequencing of excised bands and high-throughput community metagenome sequencing) to characterize diatom assemblages in representative muddy and sandy intertidal sites in Charleston Harbor, SC, USA. In support of prior studies, we found higher diatom diversity in sandbar as compared to mudflat sediments. Spatial differences were stronger relative to tidal temporal differences, although diversity metrics generally were highest after prolonged tidal immersion as compared to low-tide emersion or just after immersion at flood tide. Composition of the diatom assemblage differed markedly between sites, with species in genera Halamphora, Amphora, and Navicula dominating the sandbar, whereas Cyclotella, Skeletonema, and Thalassiosira were the most prevalent genera on the mudflat. Diatom composition differed by tidal stage, with assemblages during low-tide exposure distinct from samples taken after immersion. Both sandbar and mudflat sediments exhibited increases in relative proportion of epipelic diatoms and decreases in plank-tonic taxa during low-tide exposure. Our findings of short-term changes in species composition and dominance could inform primary productivity models to better estimate understudied diatom contributions in heterogeneous and highly variable tidal systems.</description><subject>Analytical methods</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Coastal Sciences</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Community composition</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>Diatoms</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA sequences</subject><subject>DNA sequencing</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Food chains</subject><subject>Food webs</subject><subject>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Gels</subject><subject>Immersion</subject><subject>Microalgae</subject><subject>Mud flats</subject><subject>Plankton</subject><subject>Primary production</subject><subject>Sand bars</subject><subject>Sediment</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Sequencing</subject><subject>Short-term changes</subject><subject>Spatial variations</subject><subject>Species composition</subject><subject>Temporal variations</subject><subject>Tidal cycles</subject><subject>Tides</subject><subject>Water and Health</subject><issn>1559-2723</issn><issn>1559-2731</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtO3DAUhqOqSKXQB-iikqWuU3xLnLCjaQeQkFgwXVuOfTJklLHh2KGa1-gT4yEV7FhYtnz-i_0VxVdGfzBK1VlknAtVUpaXYLyUH4pjVlVtyZVgH1_PXHwqPse4pVRWFZXHxb_16MxE7pLZAOnujd9AJKPPFzjbNCMQ4x35NT4BxjHtSRjItU-A6cX2E3y6H22emxR25CJG2PVTjornxJDORMhBs9uTAfN4_TeQLviEJqbRbw51OEFMwZMrg31AsppMiqfF0WCmCF_-7yfFn9XvdXdV3txeXncXN6UVokmlq2XdQN8yzhxVtm9t7QZQyjoqpXJMsWqo-7oVpm_AGQAruRqgV04w1QgrTorvS-4Dhsc5v0Nvw4w-V2pOWatkTlZZxRaVxRAjwqAfcNwZ3GtG9QG9XtDrjF4f0GuZPXzxxKzNRPEt-T3Tt8W0zUTwtUXKpmpo_sYzZeOSDw</recordid><startdate>20180501</startdate><enddate>20180501</enddate><creator>Rivera-Garcia, Luis G.</creator><creator>Hill-Spanik, Kristina M.</creator><creator>Berthrong, Sean T.</creator><creator>Plante, Craig J.</creator><general>Springer Science+Business Media</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3632-5291</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180501</creationdate><title>Tidal Stage Changes in Structure and Diversity of Intertidal Benthic Diatom Assemblages: a Case Study from Two Contrasting Charleston Harbor Flats</title><author>Rivera-Garcia, Luis G. ; Hill-Spanik, Kristina M. ; Berthrong, Sean T. ; Plante, Craig J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-d6468eb9121d07cb9c6dfe77cd0447d1715f6b693ab8edaeec427feb7d31783c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Analytical methods</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Coastal Sciences</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Community composition</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>Diatoms</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA sequences</topic><topic>DNA sequencing</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Food chains</topic><topic>Food webs</topic><topic>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Gels</topic><topic>Immersion</topic><topic>Microalgae</topic><topic>Mud flats</topic><topic>Plankton</topic><topic>Primary production</topic><topic>Sand bars</topic><topic>Sediment</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Sequencing</topic><topic>Short-term changes</topic><topic>Spatial variations</topic><topic>Species composition</topic><topic>Temporal variations</topic><topic>Tidal cycles</topic><topic>Tides</topic><topic>Water and Health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rivera-Garcia, Luis G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill-Spanik, Kristina M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berthrong, Sean T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plante, Craig J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Estuaries and coasts</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rivera-Garcia, Luis G.</au><au>Hill-Spanik, Kristina M.</au><au>Berthrong, Sean T.</au><au>Plante, Craig J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tidal Stage Changes in Structure and Diversity of Intertidal Benthic Diatom Assemblages: a Case Study from Two Contrasting Charleston Harbor Flats</atitle><jtitle>Estuaries and coasts</jtitle><stitle>Estuaries and Coasts</stitle><date>2018-05-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>772</spage><epage>783</epage><pages>772-783</pages><issn>1559-2723</issn><eissn>1559-2731</eissn><abstract>Benthic microalgae are key contributors to near shore food webs and sediment stabilization. Temporal variability in microaigal biomass and production throughout the tidal cycle has been well documented; however, due to limitations of traditional methods of analysis patterns of community composition and diversity over such time scales have not been revealed. To explore the latter and better understand how short-term changes throughout the tidal cycle may affect community functioning, we compared benthic diatom composition and diversity over tidal stage shifts. We employed two disparate molecular techniques (denaturing gel gradient electrophoresis with Sanger DNA sequencing of excised bands and high-throughput community metagenome sequencing) to characterize diatom assemblages in representative muddy and sandy intertidal sites in Charleston Harbor, SC, USA. In support of prior studies, we found higher diatom diversity in sandbar as compared to mudflat sediments. Spatial differences were stronger relative to tidal temporal differences, although diversity metrics generally were highest after prolonged tidal immersion as compared to low-tide emersion or just after immersion at flood tide. Composition of the diatom assemblage differed markedly between sites, with species in genera Halamphora, Amphora, and Navicula dominating the sandbar, whereas Cyclotella, Skeletonema, and Thalassiosira were the most prevalent genera on the mudflat. Diatom composition differed by tidal stage, with assemblages during low-tide exposure distinct from samples taken after immersion. Both sandbar and mudflat sediments exhibited increases in relative proportion of epipelic diatoms and decreases in plank-tonic taxa during low-tide exposure. Our findings of short-term changes in species composition and dominance could inform primary productivity models to better estimate understudied diatom contributions in heterogeneous and highly variable tidal systems.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer Science+Business Media</pub><doi>10.1007/s12237-017-0312-4</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3632-5291</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1559-2723
ispartof Estuaries and coasts, 2018-05, Vol.41 (3), p.772-783
issn 1559-2723
1559-2731
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2019741217
source SpringerNature Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Analytical methods
Case studies
Coastal Sciences
Communities
Community composition
Deoxyribonucleic acid
Diatoms
DNA
DNA sequences
DNA sequencing
Earth and Environmental Science
Ecology
Environment
Environmental Management
Food chains
Food webs
Freshwater & Marine Ecology
Gels
Immersion
Microalgae
Mud flats
Plankton
Primary production
Sand bars
Sediment
Sediments
Sequencing
Short-term changes
Spatial variations
Species composition
Temporal variations
Tidal cycles
Tides
Water and Health
title Tidal Stage Changes in Structure and Diversity of Intertidal Benthic Diatom Assemblages: a Case Study from Two Contrasting Charleston Harbor Flats
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T04%3A01%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tidal%20Stage%20Changes%20in%20Structure%20and%20Diversity%20of%20Intertidal%20Benthic%20Diatom%20Assemblages:%20a%20Case%20Study%20from%20Two%20Contrasting%20Charleston%20Harbor%20Flats&rft.jtitle=Estuaries%20and%20coasts&rft.au=Rivera-Garcia,%20Luis%20G.&rft.date=2018-05-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=772&rft.epage=783&rft.pages=772-783&rft.issn=1559-2723&rft.eissn=1559-2731&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12237-017-0312-4&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44858069%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2019741217&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=44858069&rfr_iscdi=true