Evaluating the Effectiveness of a State-Mandated Benchmark Reading Assessment: mClass Reading 3D (Text Reading and Comprehension)
We examined which of two instruments (Text Reading and Comprehension inventory [TRC] or a traditional informal reading inventory [IRI]) provides the more valid assessment of a primary-grade student's reading instructional level. The TRC is currently the required, benchmark reading assessment fo...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Reading psychology 2018-05, Vol.39 (4), p.303-334 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 334 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 303 |
| container_title | Reading psychology |
| container_volume | 39 |
| creator | Snow, Amie B Morris, Darrell Perney, Jan |
| description | We examined which of two instruments (Text Reading and Comprehension inventory [TRC] or a traditional informal reading inventory [IRI]) provides the more valid assessment of a primary-grade student's reading instructional level. The TRC is currently the required, benchmark reading assessment for students in grades K-3 in the state of North Carolina. The TRC and IRI were administered to 196 students in grades 1-3. Results showed that the TRC, when compared to the IRI, (a) underestimated students' reading instructional level, and (b) took three times as long to administer. Suggestions for improving the instrument are offered. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/02702711.2017.1422302 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2019383269</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1174419</ericid><sourcerecordid>2019383269</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-e314e4c7c15838d19f47597325827acfc0a75931b2092daca3fd24c9cd8d59083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_YRDwRi8689EuqXez1i8mgs7rEtNT17mmM8mGXvrPTdkHHDic5H3ek7wIDSgZUiLJFWEiFKVDRqgY0pgxTtgB6tGE0YiMZHKIep0m6kTH6MS5OSE0kSPRQ3_5Wi1WytfmE_sZ4LyqQPt6DQacw22FFX7zykP0rEwZeolvwOhZo-wXfgVVdtzYuSBuwPhr3GQLFcDdFb_FF1P48fuD4IKztllamIFxdWsuT9FRpRYOzra9j97v8mn2EE1e7h-z8STSnHAfAacxxFro8HAuS5pWsUhSwVkimVC60kSFmdMPRlJWKq14VbJYp7qUZZISyfvofOO7tO33Cpwv5u3KmrCyCLmlXHI2SoMq2ai0bZ2zUBVLW4ff_haUFF3axS7tjhLFNu3ADTYc2FrvmfyJUhHHwf0feKJ7GA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2019383269</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating the Effectiveness of a State-Mandated Benchmark Reading Assessment: mClass Reading 3D (Text Reading and Comprehension)</title><source>Education Source (EBSCOhost)</source><creator>Snow, Amie B ; Morris, Darrell ; Perney, Jan</creator><creatorcontrib>Snow, Amie B ; Morris, Darrell ; Perney, Jan</creatorcontrib><description>We examined which of two instruments (Text Reading and Comprehension inventory [TRC] or a traditional informal reading inventory [IRI]) provides the more valid assessment of a primary-grade student's reading instructional level. The TRC is currently the required, benchmark reading assessment for students in grades K-3 in the state of North Carolina. The TRC and IRI were administered to 196 students in grades 1-3. Results showed that the TRC, when compared to the IRI, (a) underestimated students' reading instructional level, and (b) took three times as long to administer. Suggestions for improving the instrument are offered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0270-2711</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1521-0685</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/02702711.2017.1422302</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: Routledge</publisher><subject>Alternative Assessment ; Benchmarking ; Comparative Analysis ; Early Childhood Education ; Educational evaluation ; Elementary education ; Grade 1 ; Grade 2 ; Grade 3 ; Informal Reading Inventories ; Outcomes of Education ; Reading Comprehension ; Reading instruction ; Reading Tests ; Scores ; Standardized Tests ; Test Validity ; Timed Tests ; Word Recognition</subject><ispartof>Reading psychology, 2018-05, Vol.39 (4), p.303-334</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-e314e4c7c15838d19f47597325827acfc0a75931b2092daca3fd24c9cd8d59083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-e314e4c7c15838d19f47597325827acfc0a75931b2092daca3fd24c9cd8d59083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1174419$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Snow, Amie B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, Darrell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perney, Jan</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating the Effectiveness of a State-Mandated Benchmark Reading Assessment: mClass Reading 3D (Text Reading and Comprehension)</title><title>Reading psychology</title><description>We examined which of two instruments (Text Reading and Comprehension inventory [TRC] or a traditional informal reading inventory [IRI]) provides the more valid assessment of a primary-grade student's reading instructional level. The TRC is currently the required, benchmark reading assessment for students in grades K-3 in the state of North Carolina. The TRC and IRI were administered to 196 students in grades 1-3. Results showed that the TRC, when compared to the IRI, (a) underestimated students' reading instructional level, and (b) took three times as long to administer. Suggestions for improving the instrument are offered.</description><subject>Alternative Assessment</subject><subject>Benchmarking</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Early Childhood Education</subject><subject>Educational evaluation</subject><subject>Elementary education</subject><subject>Grade 1</subject><subject>Grade 2</subject><subject>Grade 3</subject><subject>Informal Reading Inventories</subject><subject>Outcomes of Education</subject><subject>Reading Comprehension</subject><subject>Reading instruction</subject><subject>Reading Tests</subject><subject>Scores</subject><subject>Standardized Tests</subject><subject>Test Validity</subject><subject>Timed Tests</subject><subject>Word Recognition</subject><issn>0270-2711</issn><issn>1521-0685</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_YRDwRi8689EuqXez1i8mgs7rEtNT17mmM8mGXvrPTdkHHDic5H3ek7wIDSgZUiLJFWEiFKVDRqgY0pgxTtgB6tGE0YiMZHKIep0m6kTH6MS5OSE0kSPRQ3_5Wi1WytfmE_sZ4LyqQPt6DQacw22FFX7zykP0rEwZeolvwOhZo-wXfgVVdtzYuSBuwPhr3GQLFcDdFb_FF1P48fuD4IKztllamIFxdWsuT9FRpRYOzra9j97v8mn2EE1e7h-z8STSnHAfAacxxFro8HAuS5pWsUhSwVkimVC60kSFmdMPRlJWKq14VbJYp7qUZZISyfvofOO7tO33Cpwv5u3KmrCyCLmlXHI2SoMq2ai0bZ2zUBVLW4ff_haUFF3axS7tjhLFNu3ADTYc2FrvmfyJUhHHwf0feKJ7GA</recordid><startdate>20180519</startdate><enddate>20180519</enddate><creator>Snow, Amie B</creator><creator>Morris, Darrell</creator><creator>Perney, Jan</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180519</creationdate><title>Evaluating the Effectiveness of a State-Mandated Benchmark Reading Assessment: mClass Reading 3D (Text Reading and Comprehension)</title><author>Snow, Amie B ; Morris, Darrell ; Perney, Jan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-e314e4c7c15838d19f47597325827acfc0a75931b2092daca3fd24c9cd8d59083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Alternative Assessment</topic><topic>Benchmarking</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Early Childhood Education</topic><topic>Educational evaluation</topic><topic>Elementary education</topic><topic>Grade 1</topic><topic>Grade 2</topic><topic>Grade 3</topic><topic>Informal Reading Inventories</topic><topic>Outcomes of Education</topic><topic>Reading Comprehension</topic><topic>Reading instruction</topic><topic>Reading Tests</topic><topic>Scores</topic><topic>Standardized Tests</topic><topic>Test Validity</topic><topic>Timed Tests</topic><topic>Word Recognition</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Snow, Amie B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, Darrell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perney, Jan</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Reading psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Snow, Amie B</au><au>Morris, Darrell</au><au>Perney, Jan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1174419</ericid><atitle>Evaluating the Effectiveness of a State-Mandated Benchmark Reading Assessment: mClass Reading 3D (Text Reading and Comprehension)</atitle><jtitle>Reading psychology</jtitle><date>2018-05-19</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>303</spage><epage>334</epage><pages>303-334</pages><issn>0270-2711</issn><eissn>1521-0685</eissn><abstract>We examined which of two instruments (Text Reading and Comprehension inventory [TRC] or a traditional informal reading inventory [IRI]) provides the more valid assessment of a primary-grade student's reading instructional level. The TRC is currently the required, benchmark reading assessment for students in grades K-3 in the state of North Carolina. The TRC and IRI were administered to 196 students in grades 1-3. Results showed that the TRC, when compared to the IRI, (a) underestimated students' reading instructional level, and (b) took three times as long to administer. Suggestions for improving the instrument are offered.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/02702711.2017.1422302</doi><tpages>32</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0270-2711 |
| ispartof | Reading psychology, 2018-05, Vol.39 (4), p.303-334 |
| issn | 0270-2711 1521-0685 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2019383269 |
| source | Education Source (EBSCOhost) |
| subjects | Alternative Assessment Benchmarking Comparative Analysis Early Childhood Education Educational evaluation Elementary education Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Informal Reading Inventories Outcomes of Education Reading Comprehension Reading instruction Reading Tests Scores Standardized Tests Test Validity Timed Tests Word Recognition |
| title | Evaluating the Effectiveness of a State-Mandated Benchmark Reading Assessment: mClass Reading 3D (Text Reading and Comprehension) |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T08%3A42%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20the%20Effectiveness%20of%20a%20State-Mandated%20Benchmark%20Reading%20Assessment:%20mClass%20Reading%203D%20(Text%20Reading%20and%20Comprehension)&rft.jtitle=Reading%20psychology&rft.au=Snow,%20Amie%20B&rft.date=2018-05-19&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=303&rft.epage=334&rft.pages=303-334&rft.issn=0270-2711&rft.eissn=1521-0685&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/02702711.2017.1422302&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2019383269%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2019383269&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1174419&rfr_iscdi=true |