Comparison of two sensor technologies for solar irradiance measurement in a desert environment

•Comparison of irradiance measurements from thermopile and photodiode radiometers.•Two stations with redundant instrumentation in desert environment of Kuwait.•Results for global horizontal, diffuse horizontal and direct normal irradiance.•Good agreement found overall, with deviations under specific...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Solar energy 2018-02, Vol.161, p.194-206
Hauptverfasser: Al-Rasheedi, Majed, Gueymard, Christian A., Ismail, Alaa, Hussain, Tahani
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 206
container_issue
container_start_page 194
container_title Solar energy
container_volume 161
creator Al-Rasheedi, Majed
Gueymard, Christian A.
Ismail, Alaa
Hussain, Tahani
description •Comparison of irradiance measurements from thermopile and photodiode radiometers.•Two stations with redundant instrumentation in desert environment of Kuwait.•Results for global horizontal, diffuse horizontal and direct normal irradiance.•Good agreement found overall, with deviations under specific conditions.•Spectral and cosine error corrections of photodiode radiometers could be improved. Using 24 months of 1-min radiometric measurements conducted at two remote arid sites in Kuwait, the impact of sensor technology (thermopile vs. photodiode with rotating shadowband) on the magnitude of the three components of solar irradiance (global, direct and diffuse) is analyzed. The deviations (photodiode minus thermopile) are typically affected by both sun zenith angle and irradiance magnitude. For the global and direct components, most deviations (91% in the case of GHI, 87–91% in the case of DNI, depending on site) are within ±5%, and can thus be considered satisfactory. Larger deviations in direct and global irradiance are typically found under low zenith angles (summer conditions). The main source of concern is the negative bias and intricate pattern found in the diffuse deviations, most of the time. Only 46–61% of the deviations (depending on site) are within ±5%. The diffuse issue seems to be caused by an insufficient spectral correction of the diffuse reading. The so-called “cat ear” angular issue (a sudden spike in sensitivity for an angle of incidence ≈80°, combined with a sudden drop in sensitivity beyond ≈85°) is also still present in the direct and global irradiance measurements under clear conditions. The present results underline the imperfect nature of the empirical corrections typically applied to photodiode instruments to improve their irradiance estimates. Nonetheless, the deviations observed here are sufficiently low in general to guarantee good resource assessments, even under harsh and variable desert conditions, to the condition that the photodiode instruments are properly calibrated on site during periods whose atmospheric conditions are representative of the whole year, and their readings are duly corrected with the best possible algorithms.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.solener.2017.12.058
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2019061613</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0038092X17311404</els_id><sourcerecordid>2019061613</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-4285797ee9563556de472be268a095da2a07f9a5dda7b7b8ce269f4204a9c00b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9LxDAQxYMouK5-BCHguTVJm6Y5iSz-gwUvCp4MaTPVLNtknXQVv71Zdu-eBua9N4_5EXLJWckZb65XZYprCIClYFyVXJRMtkdkxmvFCy6kOiYzxqq2YFq8nZKzlFYsG3mrZuR9EceNRZ9ioHGg00-kCUKKSCfoP0Ncxw8PiQ55kUssUo9onbehBzqCTVuEEcJEfaCWOkiAE4Xw7TGG3f6cnAx2neDiMOfk9f7uZfFYLJ8fnha3y6KvtJyKWrRSaQWgZVNJ2TiolehANK1lWjorLFODttI5qzrVtX2W9FALVlvdM9ZVc3K1v7vB-LWFNJlV3GLIlSYz0azhDa-yS-5dPcaUEAazQT9a_DWcmR1KszIHlLuYMlyYjDLnbvY5yC98-6ym3kNG4DxCPxkX_T8X_gDmBYEt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2019061613</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of two sensor technologies for solar irradiance measurement in a desert environment</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Al-Rasheedi, Majed ; Gueymard, Christian A. ; Ismail, Alaa ; Hussain, Tahani</creator><creatorcontrib>Al-Rasheedi, Majed ; Gueymard, Christian A. ; Ismail, Alaa ; Hussain, Tahani</creatorcontrib><description>•Comparison of irradiance measurements from thermopile and photodiode radiometers.•Two stations with redundant instrumentation in desert environment of Kuwait.•Results for global horizontal, diffuse horizontal and direct normal irradiance.•Good agreement found overall, with deviations under specific conditions.•Spectral and cosine error corrections of photodiode radiometers could be improved. Using 24 months of 1-min radiometric measurements conducted at two remote arid sites in Kuwait, the impact of sensor technology (thermopile vs. photodiode with rotating shadowband) on the magnitude of the three components of solar irradiance (global, direct and diffuse) is analyzed. The deviations (photodiode minus thermopile) are typically affected by both sun zenith angle and irradiance magnitude. For the global and direct components, most deviations (91% in the case of GHI, 87–91% in the case of DNI, depending on site) are within ±5%, and can thus be considered satisfactory. Larger deviations in direct and global irradiance are typically found under low zenith angles (summer conditions). The main source of concern is the negative bias and intricate pattern found in the diffuse deviations, most of the time. Only 46–61% of the deviations (depending on site) are within ±5%. The diffuse issue seems to be caused by an insufficient spectral correction of the diffuse reading. The so-called “cat ear” angular issue (a sudden spike in sensitivity for an angle of incidence ≈80°, combined with a sudden drop in sensitivity beyond ≈85°) is also still present in the direct and global irradiance measurements under clear conditions. The present results underline the imperfect nature of the empirical corrections typically applied to photodiode instruments to improve their irradiance estimates. Nonetheless, the deviations observed here are sufficiently low in general to guarantee good resource assessments, even under harsh and variable desert conditions, to the condition that the photodiode instruments are properly calibrated on site during periods whose atmospheric conditions are representative of the whole year, and their readings are duly corrected with the best possible algorithms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-092X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-1257</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2017.12.058</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Aridity ; Atmospheric conditions ; Desert environments ; Deserts ; Direct normal irradiance (DNI) ; Empirical analysis ; Global horizontal irradiance (GHI) ; Incidence angle ; Irradiance ; Radiometry ; Remote sensors ; Sensitivity ; Sensors ; Solar energy ; Solar resource ; Zenith</subject><ispartof>Solar energy, 2018-02, Vol.161, p.194-206</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Feb 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-4285797ee9563556de472be268a095da2a07f9a5dda7b7b8ce269f4204a9c00b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-4285797ee9563556de472be268a095da2a07f9a5dda7b7b8ce269f4204a9c00b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2017.12.058$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Al-Rasheedi, Majed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gueymard, Christian A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ismail, Alaa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussain, Tahani</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of two sensor technologies for solar irradiance measurement in a desert environment</title><title>Solar energy</title><description>•Comparison of irradiance measurements from thermopile and photodiode radiometers.•Two stations with redundant instrumentation in desert environment of Kuwait.•Results for global horizontal, diffuse horizontal and direct normal irradiance.•Good agreement found overall, with deviations under specific conditions.•Spectral and cosine error corrections of photodiode radiometers could be improved. Using 24 months of 1-min radiometric measurements conducted at two remote arid sites in Kuwait, the impact of sensor technology (thermopile vs. photodiode with rotating shadowband) on the magnitude of the three components of solar irradiance (global, direct and diffuse) is analyzed. The deviations (photodiode minus thermopile) are typically affected by both sun zenith angle and irradiance magnitude. For the global and direct components, most deviations (91% in the case of GHI, 87–91% in the case of DNI, depending on site) are within ±5%, and can thus be considered satisfactory. Larger deviations in direct and global irradiance are typically found under low zenith angles (summer conditions). The main source of concern is the negative bias and intricate pattern found in the diffuse deviations, most of the time. Only 46–61% of the deviations (depending on site) are within ±5%. The diffuse issue seems to be caused by an insufficient spectral correction of the diffuse reading. The so-called “cat ear” angular issue (a sudden spike in sensitivity for an angle of incidence ≈80°, combined with a sudden drop in sensitivity beyond ≈85°) is also still present in the direct and global irradiance measurements under clear conditions. The present results underline the imperfect nature of the empirical corrections typically applied to photodiode instruments to improve their irradiance estimates. Nonetheless, the deviations observed here are sufficiently low in general to guarantee good resource assessments, even under harsh and variable desert conditions, to the condition that the photodiode instruments are properly calibrated on site during periods whose atmospheric conditions are representative of the whole year, and their readings are duly corrected with the best possible algorithms.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Aridity</subject><subject>Atmospheric conditions</subject><subject>Desert environments</subject><subject>Deserts</subject><subject>Direct normal irradiance (DNI)</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Global horizontal irradiance (GHI)</subject><subject>Incidence angle</subject><subject>Irradiance</subject><subject>Radiometry</subject><subject>Remote sensors</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Solar energy</subject><subject>Solar resource</subject><subject>Zenith</subject><issn>0038-092X</issn><issn>1471-1257</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE9LxDAQxYMouK5-BCHguTVJm6Y5iSz-gwUvCp4MaTPVLNtknXQVv71Zdu-eBua9N4_5EXLJWckZb65XZYprCIClYFyVXJRMtkdkxmvFCy6kOiYzxqq2YFq8nZKzlFYsG3mrZuR9EceNRZ9ioHGg00-kCUKKSCfoP0Ncxw8PiQ55kUssUo9onbehBzqCTVuEEcJEfaCWOkiAE4Xw7TGG3f6cnAx2neDiMOfk9f7uZfFYLJ8fnha3y6KvtJyKWrRSaQWgZVNJ2TiolehANK1lWjorLFODttI5qzrVtX2W9FALVlvdM9ZVc3K1v7vB-LWFNJlV3GLIlSYz0azhDa-yS-5dPcaUEAazQT9a_DWcmR1KszIHlLuYMlyYjDLnbvY5yC98-6ym3kNG4DxCPxkX_T8X_gDmBYEt</recordid><startdate>20180201</startdate><enddate>20180201</enddate><creator>Al-Rasheedi, Majed</creator><creator>Gueymard, Christian A.</creator><creator>Ismail, Alaa</creator><creator>Hussain, Tahani</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Pergamon Press Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180201</creationdate><title>Comparison of two sensor technologies for solar irradiance measurement in a desert environment</title><author>Al-Rasheedi, Majed ; Gueymard, Christian A. ; Ismail, Alaa ; Hussain, Tahani</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-4285797ee9563556de472be268a095da2a07f9a5dda7b7b8ce269f4204a9c00b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Aridity</topic><topic>Atmospheric conditions</topic><topic>Desert environments</topic><topic>Deserts</topic><topic>Direct normal irradiance (DNI)</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Global horizontal irradiance (GHI)</topic><topic>Incidence angle</topic><topic>Irradiance</topic><topic>Radiometry</topic><topic>Remote sensors</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Solar energy</topic><topic>Solar resource</topic><topic>Zenith</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Al-Rasheedi, Majed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gueymard, Christian A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ismail, Alaa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussain, Tahani</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Solar energy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Al-Rasheedi, Majed</au><au>Gueymard, Christian A.</au><au>Ismail, Alaa</au><au>Hussain, Tahani</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of two sensor technologies for solar irradiance measurement in a desert environment</atitle><jtitle>Solar energy</jtitle><date>2018-02-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>161</volume><spage>194</spage><epage>206</epage><pages>194-206</pages><issn>0038-092X</issn><eissn>1471-1257</eissn><abstract>•Comparison of irradiance measurements from thermopile and photodiode radiometers.•Two stations with redundant instrumentation in desert environment of Kuwait.•Results for global horizontal, diffuse horizontal and direct normal irradiance.•Good agreement found overall, with deviations under specific conditions.•Spectral and cosine error corrections of photodiode radiometers could be improved. Using 24 months of 1-min radiometric measurements conducted at two remote arid sites in Kuwait, the impact of sensor technology (thermopile vs. photodiode with rotating shadowband) on the magnitude of the three components of solar irradiance (global, direct and diffuse) is analyzed. The deviations (photodiode minus thermopile) are typically affected by both sun zenith angle and irradiance magnitude. For the global and direct components, most deviations (91% in the case of GHI, 87–91% in the case of DNI, depending on site) are within ±5%, and can thus be considered satisfactory. Larger deviations in direct and global irradiance are typically found under low zenith angles (summer conditions). The main source of concern is the negative bias and intricate pattern found in the diffuse deviations, most of the time. Only 46–61% of the deviations (depending on site) are within ±5%. The diffuse issue seems to be caused by an insufficient spectral correction of the diffuse reading. The so-called “cat ear” angular issue (a sudden spike in sensitivity for an angle of incidence ≈80°, combined with a sudden drop in sensitivity beyond ≈85°) is also still present in the direct and global irradiance measurements under clear conditions. The present results underline the imperfect nature of the empirical corrections typically applied to photodiode instruments to improve their irradiance estimates. Nonetheless, the deviations observed here are sufficiently low in general to guarantee good resource assessments, even under harsh and variable desert conditions, to the condition that the photodiode instruments are properly calibrated on site during periods whose atmospheric conditions are representative of the whole year, and their readings are duly corrected with the best possible algorithms.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.solener.2017.12.058</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0038-092X
ispartof Solar energy, 2018-02, Vol.161, p.194-206
issn 0038-092X
1471-1257
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2019061613
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Algorithms
Aridity
Atmospheric conditions
Desert environments
Deserts
Direct normal irradiance (DNI)
Empirical analysis
Global horizontal irradiance (GHI)
Incidence angle
Irradiance
Radiometry
Remote sensors
Sensitivity
Sensors
Solar energy
Solar resource
Zenith
title Comparison of two sensor technologies for solar irradiance measurement in a desert environment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T14%3A45%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20two%20sensor%20technologies%20for%20solar%20irradiance%20measurement%20in%20a%20desert%20environment&rft.jtitle=Solar%20energy&rft.au=Al-Rasheedi,%20Majed&rft.date=2018-02-01&rft.volume=161&rft.spage=194&rft.epage=206&rft.pages=194-206&rft.issn=0038-092X&rft.eissn=1471-1257&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.solener.2017.12.058&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2019061613%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2019061613&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0038092X17311404&rfr_iscdi=true