Comparison of two sensor technologies for solar irradiance measurement in a desert environment
•Comparison of irradiance measurements from thermopile and photodiode radiometers.•Two stations with redundant instrumentation in desert environment of Kuwait.•Results for global horizontal, diffuse horizontal and direct normal irradiance.•Good agreement found overall, with deviations under specific...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Solar energy 2018-02, Vol.161, p.194-206 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 206 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 194 |
container_title | Solar energy |
container_volume | 161 |
creator | Al-Rasheedi, Majed Gueymard, Christian A. Ismail, Alaa Hussain, Tahani |
description | •Comparison of irradiance measurements from thermopile and photodiode radiometers.•Two stations with redundant instrumentation in desert environment of Kuwait.•Results for global horizontal, diffuse horizontal and direct normal irradiance.•Good agreement found overall, with deviations under specific conditions.•Spectral and cosine error corrections of photodiode radiometers could be improved.
Using 24 months of 1-min radiometric measurements conducted at two remote arid sites in Kuwait, the impact of sensor technology (thermopile vs. photodiode with rotating shadowband) on the magnitude of the three components of solar irradiance (global, direct and diffuse) is analyzed. The deviations (photodiode minus thermopile) are typically affected by both sun zenith angle and irradiance magnitude. For the global and direct components, most deviations (91% in the case of GHI, 87–91% in the case of DNI, depending on site) are within ±5%, and can thus be considered satisfactory. Larger deviations in direct and global irradiance are typically found under low zenith angles (summer conditions). The main source of concern is the negative bias and intricate pattern found in the diffuse deviations, most of the time. Only 46–61% of the deviations (depending on site) are within ±5%. The diffuse issue seems to be caused by an insufficient spectral correction of the diffuse reading. The so-called “cat ear” angular issue (a sudden spike in sensitivity for an angle of incidence ≈80°, combined with a sudden drop in sensitivity beyond ≈85°) is also still present in the direct and global irradiance measurements under clear conditions. The present results underline the imperfect nature of the empirical corrections typically applied to photodiode instruments to improve their irradiance estimates. Nonetheless, the deviations observed here are sufficiently low in general to guarantee good resource assessments, even under harsh and variable desert conditions, to the condition that the photodiode instruments are properly calibrated on site during periods whose atmospheric conditions are representative of the whole year, and their readings are duly corrected with the best possible algorithms. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.solener.2017.12.058 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2019061613</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0038092X17311404</els_id><sourcerecordid>2019061613</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-4285797ee9563556de472be268a095da2a07f9a5dda7b7b8ce269f4204a9c00b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9LxDAQxYMouK5-BCHguTVJm6Y5iSz-gwUvCp4MaTPVLNtknXQVv71Zdu-eBua9N4_5EXLJWckZb65XZYprCIClYFyVXJRMtkdkxmvFCy6kOiYzxqq2YFq8nZKzlFYsG3mrZuR9EceNRZ9ioHGg00-kCUKKSCfoP0Ncxw8PiQ55kUssUo9onbehBzqCTVuEEcJEfaCWOkiAE4Xw7TGG3f6cnAx2neDiMOfk9f7uZfFYLJ8fnha3y6KvtJyKWrRSaQWgZVNJ2TiolehANK1lWjorLFODttI5qzrVtX2W9FALVlvdM9ZVc3K1v7vB-LWFNJlV3GLIlSYz0azhDa-yS-5dPcaUEAazQT9a_DWcmR1KszIHlLuYMlyYjDLnbvY5yC98-6ym3kNG4DxCPxkX_T8X_gDmBYEt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2019061613</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of two sensor technologies for solar irradiance measurement in a desert environment</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Al-Rasheedi, Majed ; Gueymard, Christian A. ; Ismail, Alaa ; Hussain, Tahani</creator><creatorcontrib>Al-Rasheedi, Majed ; Gueymard, Christian A. ; Ismail, Alaa ; Hussain, Tahani</creatorcontrib><description>•Comparison of irradiance measurements from thermopile and photodiode radiometers.•Two stations with redundant instrumentation in desert environment of Kuwait.•Results for global horizontal, diffuse horizontal and direct normal irradiance.•Good agreement found overall, with deviations under specific conditions.•Spectral and cosine error corrections of photodiode radiometers could be improved.
Using 24 months of 1-min radiometric measurements conducted at two remote arid sites in Kuwait, the impact of sensor technology (thermopile vs. photodiode with rotating shadowband) on the magnitude of the three components of solar irradiance (global, direct and diffuse) is analyzed. The deviations (photodiode minus thermopile) are typically affected by both sun zenith angle and irradiance magnitude. For the global and direct components, most deviations (91% in the case of GHI, 87–91% in the case of DNI, depending on site) are within ±5%, and can thus be considered satisfactory. Larger deviations in direct and global irradiance are typically found under low zenith angles (summer conditions). The main source of concern is the negative bias and intricate pattern found in the diffuse deviations, most of the time. Only 46–61% of the deviations (depending on site) are within ±5%. The diffuse issue seems to be caused by an insufficient spectral correction of the diffuse reading. The so-called “cat ear” angular issue (a sudden spike in sensitivity for an angle of incidence ≈80°, combined with a sudden drop in sensitivity beyond ≈85°) is also still present in the direct and global irradiance measurements under clear conditions. The present results underline the imperfect nature of the empirical corrections typically applied to photodiode instruments to improve their irradiance estimates. Nonetheless, the deviations observed here are sufficiently low in general to guarantee good resource assessments, even under harsh and variable desert conditions, to the condition that the photodiode instruments are properly calibrated on site during periods whose atmospheric conditions are representative of the whole year, and their readings are duly corrected with the best possible algorithms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-092X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-1257</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2017.12.058</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Aridity ; Atmospheric conditions ; Desert environments ; Deserts ; Direct normal irradiance (DNI) ; Empirical analysis ; Global horizontal irradiance (GHI) ; Incidence angle ; Irradiance ; Radiometry ; Remote sensors ; Sensitivity ; Sensors ; Solar energy ; Solar resource ; Zenith</subject><ispartof>Solar energy, 2018-02, Vol.161, p.194-206</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Feb 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-4285797ee9563556de472be268a095da2a07f9a5dda7b7b8ce269f4204a9c00b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-4285797ee9563556de472be268a095da2a07f9a5dda7b7b8ce269f4204a9c00b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2017.12.058$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Al-Rasheedi, Majed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gueymard, Christian A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ismail, Alaa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussain, Tahani</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of two sensor technologies for solar irradiance measurement in a desert environment</title><title>Solar energy</title><description>•Comparison of irradiance measurements from thermopile and photodiode radiometers.•Two stations with redundant instrumentation in desert environment of Kuwait.•Results for global horizontal, diffuse horizontal and direct normal irradiance.•Good agreement found overall, with deviations under specific conditions.•Spectral and cosine error corrections of photodiode radiometers could be improved.
Using 24 months of 1-min radiometric measurements conducted at two remote arid sites in Kuwait, the impact of sensor technology (thermopile vs. photodiode with rotating shadowband) on the magnitude of the three components of solar irradiance (global, direct and diffuse) is analyzed. The deviations (photodiode minus thermopile) are typically affected by both sun zenith angle and irradiance magnitude. For the global and direct components, most deviations (91% in the case of GHI, 87–91% in the case of DNI, depending on site) are within ±5%, and can thus be considered satisfactory. Larger deviations in direct and global irradiance are typically found under low zenith angles (summer conditions). The main source of concern is the negative bias and intricate pattern found in the diffuse deviations, most of the time. Only 46–61% of the deviations (depending on site) are within ±5%. The diffuse issue seems to be caused by an insufficient spectral correction of the diffuse reading. The so-called “cat ear” angular issue (a sudden spike in sensitivity for an angle of incidence ≈80°, combined with a sudden drop in sensitivity beyond ≈85°) is also still present in the direct and global irradiance measurements under clear conditions. The present results underline the imperfect nature of the empirical corrections typically applied to photodiode instruments to improve their irradiance estimates. Nonetheless, the deviations observed here are sufficiently low in general to guarantee good resource assessments, even under harsh and variable desert conditions, to the condition that the photodiode instruments are properly calibrated on site during periods whose atmospheric conditions are representative of the whole year, and their readings are duly corrected with the best possible algorithms.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Aridity</subject><subject>Atmospheric conditions</subject><subject>Desert environments</subject><subject>Deserts</subject><subject>Direct normal irradiance (DNI)</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Global horizontal irradiance (GHI)</subject><subject>Incidence angle</subject><subject>Irradiance</subject><subject>Radiometry</subject><subject>Remote sensors</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Solar energy</subject><subject>Solar resource</subject><subject>Zenith</subject><issn>0038-092X</issn><issn>1471-1257</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE9LxDAQxYMouK5-BCHguTVJm6Y5iSz-gwUvCp4MaTPVLNtknXQVv71Zdu-eBua9N4_5EXLJWckZb65XZYprCIClYFyVXJRMtkdkxmvFCy6kOiYzxqq2YFq8nZKzlFYsG3mrZuR9EceNRZ9ioHGg00-kCUKKSCfoP0Ncxw8PiQ55kUssUo9onbehBzqCTVuEEcJEfaCWOkiAE4Xw7TGG3f6cnAx2neDiMOfk9f7uZfFYLJ8fnha3y6KvtJyKWrRSaQWgZVNJ2TiolehANK1lWjorLFODttI5qzrVtX2W9FALVlvdM9ZVc3K1v7vB-LWFNJlV3GLIlSYz0azhDa-yS-5dPcaUEAazQT9a_DWcmR1KszIHlLuYMlyYjDLnbvY5yC98-6ym3kNG4DxCPxkX_T8X_gDmBYEt</recordid><startdate>20180201</startdate><enddate>20180201</enddate><creator>Al-Rasheedi, Majed</creator><creator>Gueymard, Christian A.</creator><creator>Ismail, Alaa</creator><creator>Hussain, Tahani</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Pergamon Press Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180201</creationdate><title>Comparison of two sensor technologies for solar irradiance measurement in a desert environment</title><author>Al-Rasheedi, Majed ; Gueymard, Christian A. ; Ismail, Alaa ; Hussain, Tahani</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-4285797ee9563556de472be268a095da2a07f9a5dda7b7b8ce269f4204a9c00b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Aridity</topic><topic>Atmospheric conditions</topic><topic>Desert environments</topic><topic>Deserts</topic><topic>Direct normal irradiance (DNI)</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Global horizontal irradiance (GHI)</topic><topic>Incidence angle</topic><topic>Irradiance</topic><topic>Radiometry</topic><topic>Remote sensors</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Solar energy</topic><topic>Solar resource</topic><topic>Zenith</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Al-Rasheedi, Majed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gueymard, Christian A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ismail, Alaa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussain, Tahani</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Solar energy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Al-Rasheedi, Majed</au><au>Gueymard, Christian A.</au><au>Ismail, Alaa</au><au>Hussain, Tahani</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of two sensor technologies for solar irradiance measurement in a desert environment</atitle><jtitle>Solar energy</jtitle><date>2018-02-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>161</volume><spage>194</spage><epage>206</epage><pages>194-206</pages><issn>0038-092X</issn><eissn>1471-1257</eissn><abstract>•Comparison of irradiance measurements from thermopile and photodiode radiometers.•Two stations with redundant instrumentation in desert environment of Kuwait.•Results for global horizontal, diffuse horizontal and direct normal irradiance.•Good agreement found overall, with deviations under specific conditions.•Spectral and cosine error corrections of photodiode radiometers could be improved.
Using 24 months of 1-min radiometric measurements conducted at two remote arid sites in Kuwait, the impact of sensor technology (thermopile vs. photodiode with rotating shadowband) on the magnitude of the three components of solar irradiance (global, direct and diffuse) is analyzed. The deviations (photodiode minus thermopile) are typically affected by both sun zenith angle and irradiance magnitude. For the global and direct components, most deviations (91% in the case of GHI, 87–91% in the case of DNI, depending on site) are within ±5%, and can thus be considered satisfactory. Larger deviations in direct and global irradiance are typically found under low zenith angles (summer conditions). The main source of concern is the negative bias and intricate pattern found in the diffuse deviations, most of the time. Only 46–61% of the deviations (depending on site) are within ±5%. The diffuse issue seems to be caused by an insufficient spectral correction of the diffuse reading. The so-called “cat ear” angular issue (a sudden spike in sensitivity for an angle of incidence ≈80°, combined with a sudden drop in sensitivity beyond ≈85°) is also still present in the direct and global irradiance measurements under clear conditions. The present results underline the imperfect nature of the empirical corrections typically applied to photodiode instruments to improve their irradiance estimates. Nonetheless, the deviations observed here are sufficiently low in general to guarantee good resource assessments, even under harsh and variable desert conditions, to the condition that the photodiode instruments are properly calibrated on site during periods whose atmospheric conditions are representative of the whole year, and their readings are duly corrected with the best possible algorithms.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.solener.2017.12.058</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0038-092X |
ispartof | Solar energy, 2018-02, Vol.161, p.194-206 |
issn | 0038-092X 1471-1257 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2019061613 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Algorithms Aridity Atmospheric conditions Desert environments Deserts Direct normal irradiance (DNI) Empirical analysis Global horizontal irradiance (GHI) Incidence angle Irradiance Radiometry Remote sensors Sensitivity Sensors Solar energy Solar resource Zenith |
title | Comparison of two sensor technologies for solar irradiance measurement in a desert environment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T14%3A45%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20two%20sensor%20technologies%20for%20solar%20irradiance%20measurement%20in%20a%20desert%20environment&rft.jtitle=Solar%20energy&rft.au=Al-Rasheedi,%20Majed&rft.date=2018-02-01&rft.volume=161&rft.spage=194&rft.epage=206&rft.pages=194-206&rft.issn=0038-092X&rft.eissn=1471-1257&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.solener.2017.12.058&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2019061613%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2019061613&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0038092X17311404&rfr_iscdi=true |