Inlet tube spacing and protrusion inlet effects on multiple circular tubes in the laminar, transitional and turbulent flow regimes

[Display omitted] •Inlet effects of tube spacing and a protrusion inlet on transitional flow.•Inlet flow maldistribution delayed and decreased the transitional flow regime.•Decreased tube spacing led to increased maldistribution.•Free convection dampened maldistribution effect for a square-edged inl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of heat and mass transfer 2018-03, Vol.118, p.257-274
Hauptverfasser: Meyer, Josua P., Everts, Marilize, Hall, Andrew T.C., Mulock-Houwer, Franscois A., Joubert, Martin, Pallent, Leslie M.J., Vause, Erin S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 274
container_issue
container_start_page 257
container_title International journal of heat and mass transfer
container_volume 118
creator Meyer, Josua P.
Everts, Marilize
Hall, Andrew T.C.
Mulock-Houwer, Franscois A.
Joubert, Martin
Pallent, Leslie M.J.
Vause, Erin S.
description [Display omitted] •Inlet effects of tube spacing and a protrusion inlet on transitional flow.•Inlet flow maldistribution delayed and decreased the transitional flow regime.•Decreased tube spacing led to increased maldistribution.•Free convection dampened maldistribution effect for a square-edged inlet.•Free convection did not dampen maldistribution effect due to protrusion inlet. The purpose of this study was to investigate inlet tube spacing and protrusion effects on multiple circular tubes in the laminar, transitional and turbulent flow regimes. An experimental set-up was built for this investigation and three configurations of test sections were investigated. The first was a single-tube test section for validation purposes, of which the results were compared with literature. The second was two multi-tube test sections with three tubes spaced at different pitches. The third configuration was similar to configuration two, except that the centre tube had a small protrusion. All the tubes had an inner diameter of 3.97 mm, and long tube lengths of 6 m were used to ensure fully developed flow. The tubes were electrically heated that ensured a constant heat flux heating condition. Water was used as the test fluid, and the Prandtl number varied between 3 and 7. The experiments were conducted at heat fluxes of 2, 3 and 4 kW/m2 for Reynolds numbers between 1000 and 7000, to ensure that the transitional flow regime, as well as sufficient parts of the laminar and turbulent flow regimes, were covered. The tubes were spaced apart from each other at 1.25, 1.4 and 1.5 times the outer tube diameter, and the protrusion of the centre tube was 10% of the tube inner diameter. It was found that an increased pitch ratio dampened the inlet disturbances in the centre tube and reduced the flow asymmetry in the side tubes, therefore the differences in the critical Reynolds numbers and transition gradients of the three tubes decreased. As the inlet disturbances were damped in the centre tube, transitional was delayed compared to a single tube with a square-edged inlet. For the side tubes, the increased flow asymmetry led to increased critical Reynolds numbers, as well as increased transition gradients. The presence of a protrusion inlet in the centre tube significantly increased the asymmetry of the flow in the side tubes, which led to an additional increase in the critical Reynolds numbers and the transition gradients increased. Free convection effects also led to increased criti
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.10.125
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2019028403</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S001793101733541X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2019028403</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-64f8d06976d325e6507bc79c1b878d8a4c1947882e143498d453143026d87183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwHyyxMJBiO07sbKCKj6JKLN0j17m0jpyk2A6IlV-Ok7KxMNm-e_zo7kXohpIFJTS_axam2YMKrfI-ONX5GtyCESoWI8GyEzSjUhQJo7I4RTMSO0mRUnKOLrxvxifh-Qx9rzoLAYdhC9gflDbdDquuwgfXBzd403fYTATUNejgcSy0gw3mYAFr4_RglZu--wjisAdsVWs65W7xNJYJ0aHsJA2D2w4WuoBr239iBzvTgr9EZ7WyHq5-zznaPD1uli_J-u15tXxYJ5ozGZKc17IieSHyKmUZ5BkRWy0KTbdSyEoqrmnBhZQMKE95ISuepfFGWF5JQWU6R9dHbVztfQAfyqYfXBzNlzG2gjDJSRqp-yOlXe-9g7o8ONMq91VSUo7Bl035N_jRICaCZVHxelRAXObDxK7XBjoNlXExwrLqzf9lP4RkmlU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2019028403</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inlet tube spacing and protrusion inlet effects on multiple circular tubes in the laminar, transitional and turbulent flow regimes</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Meyer, Josua P. ; Everts, Marilize ; Hall, Andrew T.C. ; Mulock-Houwer, Franscois A. ; Joubert, Martin ; Pallent, Leslie M.J. ; Vause, Erin S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Josua P. ; Everts, Marilize ; Hall, Andrew T.C. ; Mulock-Houwer, Franscois A. ; Joubert, Martin ; Pallent, Leslie M.J. ; Vause, Erin S.</creatorcontrib><description>[Display omitted] •Inlet effects of tube spacing and a protrusion inlet on transitional flow.•Inlet flow maldistribution delayed and decreased the transitional flow regime.•Decreased tube spacing led to increased maldistribution.•Free convection dampened maldistribution effect for a square-edged inlet.•Free convection did not dampen maldistribution effect due to protrusion inlet. The purpose of this study was to investigate inlet tube spacing and protrusion effects on multiple circular tubes in the laminar, transitional and turbulent flow regimes. An experimental set-up was built for this investigation and three configurations of test sections were investigated. The first was a single-tube test section for validation purposes, of which the results were compared with literature. The second was two multi-tube test sections with three tubes spaced at different pitches. The third configuration was similar to configuration two, except that the centre tube had a small protrusion. All the tubes had an inner diameter of 3.97 mm, and long tube lengths of 6 m were used to ensure fully developed flow. The tubes were electrically heated that ensured a constant heat flux heating condition. Water was used as the test fluid, and the Prandtl number varied between 3 and 7. The experiments were conducted at heat fluxes of 2, 3 and 4 kW/m2 for Reynolds numbers between 1000 and 7000, to ensure that the transitional flow regime, as well as sufficient parts of the laminar and turbulent flow regimes, were covered. The tubes were spaced apart from each other at 1.25, 1.4 and 1.5 times the outer tube diameter, and the protrusion of the centre tube was 10% of the tube inner diameter. It was found that an increased pitch ratio dampened the inlet disturbances in the centre tube and reduced the flow asymmetry in the side tubes, therefore the differences in the critical Reynolds numbers and transition gradients of the three tubes decreased. As the inlet disturbances were damped in the centre tube, transitional was delayed compared to a single tube with a square-edged inlet. For the side tubes, the increased flow asymmetry led to increased critical Reynolds numbers, as well as increased transition gradients. The presence of a protrusion inlet in the centre tube significantly increased the asymmetry of the flow in the side tubes, which led to an additional increase in the critical Reynolds numbers and the transition gradients increased. Free convection effects also led to increased critical Reynolds numbers and transition gradients, as well as decreased differences between the results of the tubes in the multi-tube set-up when a square-edged inlet was used. However, free convection effects were not able to dampen the inlet disturbances caused by a protrusion inlet in the centre tube.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-9310</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2189</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.10.125</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Asymmetry ; Circular tubes ; Configurations ; Disturbances ; Fluid dynamics ; Fluid flow ; Free convection ; Friction factor ; Heat exchangers ; Heat flux ; Heat transfer ; Heat transfer coefficient ; Inlet effects ; Laminar flow ; Maldistribution ; Multiple tubes ; Pitch ; Prandtl number ; Protrusion ; Reynolds number ; Shell and tube ; Transition ; Tube spacing ; Turbulence ; Turbulent flow</subject><ispartof>International journal of heat and mass transfer, 2018-03, Vol.118, p.257-274</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Mar 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-64f8d06976d325e6507bc79c1b878d8a4c1947882e143498d453143026d87183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-64f8d06976d325e6507bc79c1b878d8a4c1947882e143498d453143026d87183</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3675-5494</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001793101733541X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Josua P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Everts, Marilize</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Andrew T.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulock-Houwer, Franscois A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joubert, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pallent, Leslie M.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vause, Erin S.</creatorcontrib><title>Inlet tube spacing and protrusion inlet effects on multiple circular tubes in the laminar, transitional and turbulent flow regimes</title><title>International journal of heat and mass transfer</title><description>[Display omitted] •Inlet effects of tube spacing and a protrusion inlet on transitional flow.•Inlet flow maldistribution delayed and decreased the transitional flow regime.•Decreased tube spacing led to increased maldistribution.•Free convection dampened maldistribution effect for a square-edged inlet.•Free convection did not dampen maldistribution effect due to protrusion inlet. The purpose of this study was to investigate inlet tube spacing and protrusion effects on multiple circular tubes in the laminar, transitional and turbulent flow regimes. An experimental set-up was built for this investigation and three configurations of test sections were investigated. The first was a single-tube test section for validation purposes, of which the results were compared with literature. The second was two multi-tube test sections with three tubes spaced at different pitches. The third configuration was similar to configuration two, except that the centre tube had a small protrusion. All the tubes had an inner diameter of 3.97 mm, and long tube lengths of 6 m were used to ensure fully developed flow. The tubes were electrically heated that ensured a constant heat flux heating condition. Water was used as the test fluid, and the Prandtl number varied between 3 and 7. The experiments were conducted at heat fluxes of 2, 3 and 4 kW/m2 for Reynolds numbers between 1000 and 7000, to ensure that the transitional flow regime, as well as sufficient parts of the laminar and turbulent flow regimes, were covered. The tubes were spaced apart from each other at 1.25, 1.4 and 1.5 times the outer tube diameter, and the protrusion of the centre tube was 10% of the tube inner diameter. It was found that an increased pitch ratio dampened the inlet disturbances in the centre tube and reduced the flow asymmetry in the side tubes, therefore the differences in the critical Reynolds numbers and transition gradients of the three tubes decreased. As the inlet disturbances were damped in the centre tube, transitional was delayed compared to a single tube with a square-edged inlet. For the side tubes, the increased flow asymmetry led to increased critical Reynolds numbers, as well as increased transition gradients. The presence of a protrusion inlet in the centre tube significantly increased the asymmetry of the flow in the side tubes, which led to an additional increase in the critical Reynolds numbers and the transition gradients increased. Free convection effects also led to increased critical Reynolds numbers and transition gradients, as well as decreased differences between the results of the tubes in the multi-tube set-up when a square-edged inlet was used. However, free convection effects were not able to dampen the inlet disturbances caused by a protrusion inlet in the centre tube.</description><subject>Asymmetry</subject><subject>Circular tubes</subject><subject>Configurations</subject><subject>Disturbances</subject><subject>Fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>Free convection</subject><subject>Friction factor</subject><subject>Heat exchangers</subject><subject>Heat flux</subject><subject>Heat transfer</subject><subject>Heat transfer coefficient</subject><subject>Inlet effects</subject><subject>Laminar flow</subject><subject>Maldistribution</subject><subject>Multiple tubes</subject><subject>Pitch</subject><subject>Prandtl number</subject><subject>Protrusion</subject><subject>Reynolds number</subject><subject>Shell and tube</subject><subject>Transition</subject><subject>Tube spacing</subject><subject>Turbulence</subject><subject>Turbulent flow</subject><issn>0017-9310</issn><issn>1879-2189</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwHyyxMJBiO07sbKCKj6JKLN0j17m0jpyk2A6IlV-Ok7KxMNm-e_zo7kXohpIFJTS_axam2YMKrfI-ONX5GtyCESoWI8GyEzSjUhQJo7I4RTMSO0mRUnKOLrxvxifh-Qx9rzoLAYdhC9gflDbdDquuwgfXBzd403fYTATUNejgcSy0gw3mYAFr4_RglZu--wjisAdsVWs65W7xNJYJ0aHsJA2D2w4WuoBr239iBzvTgr9EZ7WyHq5-zznaPD1uli_J-u15tXxYJ5ozGZKc17IieSHyKmUZ5BkRWy0KTbdSyEoqrmnBhZQMKE95ISuepfFGWF5JQWU6R9dHbVztfQAfyqYfXBzNlzG2gjDJSRqp-yOlXe-9g7o8ONMq91VSUo7Bl035N_jRICaCZVHxelRAXObDxK7XBjoNlXExwrLqzf9lP4RkmlU</recordid><startdate>201803</startdate><enddate>201803</enddate><creator>Meyer, Josua P.</creator><creator>Everts, Marilize</creator><creator>Hall, Andrew T.C.</creator><creator>Mulock-Houwer, Franscois A.</creator><creator>Joubert, Martin</creator><creator>Pallent, Leslie M.J.</creator><creator>Vause, Erin S.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3675-5494</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201803</creationdate><title>Inlet tube spacing and protrusion inlet effects on multiple circular tubes in the laminar, transitional and turbulent flow regimes</title><author>Meyer, Josua P. ; Everts, Marilize ; Hall, Andrew T.C. ; Mulock-Houwer, Franscois A. ; Joubert, Martin ; Pallent, Leslie M.J. ; Vause, Erin S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-64f8d06976d325e6507bc79c1b878d8a4c1947882e143498d453143026d87183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Asymmetry</topic><topic>Circular tubes</topic><topic>Configurations</topic><topic>Disturbances</topic><topic>Fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>Free convection</topic><topic>Friction factor</topic><topic>Heat exchangers</topic><topic>Heat flux</topic><topic>Heat transfer</topic><topic>Heat transfer coefficient</topic><topic>Inlet effects</topic><topic>Laminar flow</topic><topic>Maldistribution</topic><topic>Multiple tubes</topic><topic>Pitch</topic><topic>Prandtl number</topic><topic>Protrusion</topic><topic>Reynolds number</topic><topic>Shell and tube</topic><topic>Transition</topic><topic>Tube spacing</topic><topic>Turbulence</topic><topic>Turbulent flow</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Josua P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Everts, Marilize</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Andrew T.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulock-Houwer, Franscois A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joubert, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pallent, Leslie M.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vause, Erin S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>International journal of heat and mass transfer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meyer, Josua P.</au><au>Everts, Marilize</au><au>Hall, Andrew T.C.</au><au>Mulock-Houwer, Franscois A.</au><au>Joubert, Martin</au><au>Pallent, Leslie M.J.</au><au>Vause, Erin S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inlet tube spacing and protrusion inlet effects on multiple circular tubes in the laminar, transitional and turbulent flow regimes</atitle><jtitle>International journal of heat and mass transfer</jtitle><date>2018-03</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>118</volume><spage>257</spage><epage>274</epage><pages>257-274</pages><issn>0017-9310</issn><eissn>1879-2189</eissn><abstract>[Display omitted] •Inlet effects of tube spacing and a protrusion inlet on transitional flow.•Inlet flow maldistribution delayed and decreased the transitional flow regime.•Decreased tube spacing led to increased maldistribution.•Free convection dampened maldistribution effect for a square-edged inlet.•Free convection did not dampen maldistribution effect due to protrusion inlet. The purpose of this study was to investigate inlet tube spacing and protrusion effects on multiple circular tubes in the laminar, transitional and turbulent flow regimes. An experimental set-up was built for this investigation and three configurations of test sections were investigated. The first was a single-tube test section for validation purposes, of which the results were compared with literature. The second was two multi-tube test sections with three tubes spaced at different pitches. The third configuration was similar to configuration two, except that the centre tube had a small protrusion. All the tubes had an inner diameter of 3.97 mm, and long tube lengths of 6 m were used to ensure fully developed flow. The tubes were electrically heated that ensured a constant heat flux heating condition. Water was used as the test fluid, and the Prandtl number varied between 3 and 7. The experiments were conducted at heat fluxes of 2, 3 and 4 kW/m2 for Reynolds numbers between 1000 and 7000, to ensure that the transitional flow regime, as well as sufficient parts of the laminar and turbulent flow regimes, were covered. The tubes were spaced apart from each other at 1.25, 1.4 and 1.5 times the outer tube diameter, and the protrusion of the centre tube was 10% of the tube inner diameter. It was found that an increased pitch ratio dampened the inlet disturbances in the centre tube and reduced the flow asymmetry in the side tubes, therefore the differences in the critical Reynolds numbers and transition gradients of the three tubes decreased. As the inlet disturbances were damped in the centre tube, transitional was delayed compared to a single tube with a square-edged inlet. For the side tubes, the increased flow asymmetry led to increased critical Reynolds numbers, as well as increased transition gradients. The presence of a protrusion inlet in the centre tube significantly increased the asymmetry of the flow in the side tubes, which led to an additional increase in the critical Reynolds numbers and the transition gradients increased. Free convection effects also led to increased critical Reynolds numbers and transition gradients, as well as decreased differences between the results of the tubes in the multi-tube set-up when a square-edged inlet was used. However, free convection effects were not able to dampen the inlet disturbances caused by a protrusion inlet in the centre tube.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.10.125</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3675-5494</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0017-9310
ispartof International journal of heat and mass transfer, 2018-03, Vol.118, p.257-274
issn 0017-9310
1879-2189
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2019028403
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Asymmetry
Circular tubes
Configurations
Disturbances
Fluid dynamics
Fluid flow
Free convection
Friction factor
Heat exchangers
Heat flux
Heat transfer
Heat transfer coefficient
Inlet effects
Laminar flow
Maldistribution
Multiple tubes
Pitch
Prandtl number
Protrusion
Reynolds number
Shell and tube
Transition
Tube spacing
Turbulence
Turbulent flow
title Inlet tube spacing and protrusion inlet effects on multiple circular tubes in the laminar, transitional and turbulent flow regimes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T19%3A19%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inlet%20tube%20spacing%20and%20protrusion%20inlet%20effects%20on%20multiple%20circular%20tubes%20in%20the%20laminar,%20transitional%20and%20turbulent%20flow%20regimes&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20heat%20and%20mass%20transfer&rft.au=Meyer,%20Josua%20P.&rft.date=2018-03&rft.volume=118&rft.spage=257&rft.epage=274&rft.pages=257-274&rft.issn=0017-9310&rft.eissn=1879-2189&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.10.125&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2019028403%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2019028403&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S001793101733541X&rfr_iscdi=true