Do You See What I See? An Investigation of the Aesthetic Experience in the Laboratory and Museum
Two studies examined people's aesthetic experiences of art in the laboratory and the museum. The theoretical framework guiding the research was based on the Mirror Model of Art (Tinio, 2013), which proposes that the process of artistic creation and artistic reception mirror each other. Study 1...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts creativity, and the arts, 2017-08, Vol.11 (3), p.265-275 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 275 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 265 |
container_title | Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Specker, Eva Tinio, Pablo P. L van Elk, Michiel |
description | Two studies examined people's aesthetic experiences of art in the laboratory and the museum. The theoretical framework guiding the research was based on the Mirror Model of Art (Tinio, 2013), which proposes that the process of artistic creation and artistic reception mirror each other. Study 1 used a think-aloud protocol to assess people's natural and spontaneous reactions while looking at art. Study 2 examined whether presenting information about an artwork in a certain order (lower-order to higher-order information or higher-order to lower-order information) enhances aspects of the aesthetic experience and retention of information about art. Studies 1 and 2 were each conducted both in a laboratory and in a museum. The results replicate those of previous research that showed that the aesthetic experience of art is enhanced in the museum as compared with the laboratory setting. In addition, the results show that the effects of presenting information in a certain order (lower-order to higher-order information) depend on the context of presentation: museum visitors were better able to remember information about art than laboratory participants. Overall, the findings suggest that the Mirror Model is a good representation of how people naturally process art, but that certain aspects of the model could be optimized. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/aca0000107 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2018647218</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1928259486</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a323t-81271e83afbf6592eecd03bb2cd655c4183a70f45fe29eca3c7b5bb4491310b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0eElC64QsssQMF_Eocr1BVClQqYgEIWBnHndBUbRzsBNG_x6UgdsxmRnOP7owuQkeUnFHC5bmxhsSiRG6hfao4Tbgiz9uor2ROBee5IkqJnV8tV9keOghhToiQnGX76PXS4RfX4XsA_DQzLR6vxws8qPG4_oDQVm-mrVyNXYnbGeBBXM2grSwefTbgK6gt4Kr-1iamcN60zq-wqaf4tgvQLQ_RbmkWAfo_vYcer0YPw5tkcnc9Hg4mieGMt0lOmaSQc1MWZZYqBmCnhBcFs9MsTa2gUZKkFGkJTIE13MoiLQohFOWUFJL30PHGt_HuvYtf6rnrfB1PakZongnJosc_FFUsZ6kSeRapkw1lvQvBQ6kbXy2NX2lK9Dp3_Zd7hE83sGmMbsLKGh_jWUCwnfdQt2tWU6q5ZlnKvwATIoBc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1928259486</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do You See What I See? An Investigation of the Aesthetic Experience in the Laboratory and Museum</title><source>ARTbibliographies Modern</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Specker, Eva ; Tinio, Pablo P. L ; van Elk, Michiel</creator><contributor>Silvia, Paul J ; Reiter-Palmon, Roni ; Tinio, Pablo</contributor><creatorcontrib>Specker, Eva ; Tinio, Pablo P. L ; van Elk, Michiel ; Silvia, Paul J ; Reiter-Palmon, Roni ; Tinio, Pablo</creatorcontrib><description>Two studies examined people's aesthetic experiences of art in the laboratory and the museum. The theoretical framework guiding the research was based on the Mirror Model of Art (Tinio, 2013), which proposes that the process of artistic creation and artistic reception mirror each other. Study 1 used a think-aloud protocol to assess people's natural and spontaneous reactions while looking at art. Study 2 examined whether presenting information about an artwork in a certain order (lower-order to higher-order information or higher-order to lower-order information) enhances aspects of the aesthetic experience and retention of information about art. Studies 1 and 2 were each conducted both in a laboratory and in a museum. The results replicate those of previous research that showed that the aesthetic experience of art is enhanced in the museum as compared with the laboratory setting. In addition, the results show that the effects of presenting information in a certain order (lower-order to higher-order information) depend on the context of presentation: museum visitors were better able to remember information about art than laboratory participants. Overall, the findings suggest that the Mirror Model is a good representation of how people naturally process art, but that certain aspects of the model could be optimized.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1931-3896</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781433890994</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1433890992</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1931-390X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/aca0000107</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Educational Publishing Foundation</publisher><subject>Aesthetic Preferences ; Aesthetics ; Art Education ; Creativity ; Experimental Laboratories ; Female ; Human ; Laboratories ; Male ; Museums ; Theory ; Visual arts</subject><ispartof>Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts, 2017-08, Vol.11 (3), p.265-275</ispartof><rights>2017 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2017, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Aug 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a323t-81271e83afbf6592eecd03bb2cd655c4183a70f45fe29eca3c7b5bb4491310b73</citedby><orcidid>0000-0003-0836-045X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30995</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Silvia, Paul J</contributor><contributor>Reiter-Palmon, Roni</contributor><contributor>Tinio, Pablo</contributor><creatorcontrib>Specker, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tinio, Pablo P. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Elk, Michiel</creatorcontrib><title>Do You See What I See? An Investigation of the Aesthetic Experience in the Laboratory and Museum</title><title>Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts</title><description>Two studies examined people's aesthetic experiences of art in the laboratory and the museum. The theoretical framework guiding the research was based on the Mirror Model of Art (Tinio, 2013), which proposes that the process of artistic creation and artistic reception mirror each other. Study 1 used a think-aloud protocol to assess people's natural and spontaneous reactions while looking at art. Study 2 examined whether presenting information about an artwork in a certain order (lower-order to higher-order information or higher-order to lower-order information) enhances aspects of the aesthetic experience and retention of information about art. Studies 1 and 2 were each conducted both in a laboratory and in a museum. The results replicate those of previous research that showed that the aesthetic experience of art is enhanced in the museum as compared with the laboratory setting. In addition, the results show that the effects of presenting information in a certain order (lower-order to higher-order information) depend on the context of presentation: museum visitors were better able to remember information about art than laboratory participants. Overall, the findings suggest that the Mirror Model is a good representation of how people naturally process art, but that certain aspects of the model could be optimized.</description><subject>Aesthetic Preferences</subject><subject>Aesthetics</subject><subject>Art Education</subject><subject>Creativity</subject><subject>Experimental Laboratories</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Museums</subject><subject>Theory</subject><subject>Visual arts</subject><issn>1931-3896</issn><issn>1931-390X</issn><isbn>9781433890994</isbn><isbn>1433890992</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QI</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0eElC64QsssQMF_Eocr1BVClQqYgEIWBnHndBUbRzsBNG_x6UgdsxmRnOP7owuQkeUnFHC5bmxhsSiRG6hfao4Tbgiz9uor2ROBee5IkqJnV8tV9keOghhToiQnGX76PXS4RfX4XsA_DQzLR6vxws8qPG4_oDQVm-mrVyNXYnbGeBBXM2grSwefTbgK6gt4Kr-1iamcN60zq-wqaf4tgvQLQ_RbmkWAfo_vYcer0YPw5tkcnc9Hg4mieGMt0lOmaSQc1MWZZYqBmCnhBcFs9MsTa2gUZKkFGkJTIE13MoiLQohFOWUFJL30PHGt_HuvYtf6rnrfB1PakZongnJosc_FFUsZ6kSeRapkw1lvQvBQ6kbXy2NX2lK9Dp3_Zd7hE83sGmMbsLKGh_jWUCwnfdQt2tWU6q5ZlnKvwATIoBc</recordid><startdate>201708</startdate><enddate>201708</enddate><creator>Specker, Eva</creator><creator>Tinio, Pablo P. L</creator><creator>van Elk, Michiel</creator><general>Educational Publishing Foundation</general><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QI</scope><scope>8XN</scope><scope>~I4</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0836-045X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201708</creationdate><title>Do You See What I See? An Investigation of the Aesthetic Experience in the Laboratory and Museum</title><author>Specker, Eva ; Tinio, Pablo P. L ; van Elk, Michiel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a323t-81271e83afbf6592eecd03bb2cd655c4183a70f45fe29eca3c7b5bb4491310b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aesthetic Preferences</topic><topic>Aesthetics</topic><topic>Art Education</topic><topic>Creativity</topic><topic>Experimental Laboratories</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Museums</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>Visual arts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Specker, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tinio, Pablo P. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Elk, Michiel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ARTbibliographies Modern</collection><collection>International Bibliography of Art (IBA)</collection><collection>ARTbibliographies Modern (ABM) for DFG</collection><jtitle>Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Specker, Eva</au><au>Tinio, Pablo P. L</au><au>van Elk, Michiel</au><au>Silvia, Paul J</au><au>Reiter-Palmon, Roni</au><au>Tinio, Pablo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do You See What I See? An Investigation of the Aesthetic Experience in the Laboratory and Museum</atitle><jtitle>Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts</jtitle><date>2017-08</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>265</spage><epage>275</epage><pages>265-275</pages><issn>1931-3896</issn><eissn>1931-390X</eissn><isbn>9781433890994</isbn><isbn>1433890992</isbn><abstract>Two studies examined people's aesthetic experiences of art in the laboratory and the museum. The theoretical framework guiding the research was based on the Mirror Model of Art (Tinio, 2013), which proposes that the process of artistic creation and artistic reception mirror each other. Study 1 used a think-aloud protocol to assess people's natural and spontaneous reactions while looking at art. Study 2 examined whether presenting information about an artwork in a certain order (lower-order to higher-order information or higher-order to lower-order information) enhances aspects of the aesthetic experience and retention of information about art. Studies 1 and 2 were each conducted both in a laboratory and in a museum. The results replicate those of previous research that showed that the aesthetic experience of art is enhanced in the museum as compared with the laboratory setting. In addition, the results show that the effects of presenting information in a certain order (lower-order to higher-order information) depend on the context of presentation: museum visitors were better able to remember information about art than laboratory participants. Overall, the findings suggest that the Mirror Model is a good representation of how people naturally process art, but that certain aspects of the model could be optimized.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Educational Publishing Foundation</pub><doi>10.1037/aca0000107</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0836-045X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1931-3896 |
ispartof | Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts, 2017-08, Vol.11 (3), p.265-275 |
issn | 1931-3896 1931-390X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2018647218 |
source | ARTbibliographies Modern; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Aesthetic Preferences Aesthetics Art Education Creativity Experimental Laboratories Female Human Laboratories Male Museums Theory Visual arts |
title | Do You See What I See? An Investigation of the Aesthetic Experience in the Laboratory and Museum |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T09%3A22%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20You%20See%20What%20I%20See?%20An%20Investigation%20of%20the%20Aesthetic%20Experience%20in%20the%20Laboratory%20and%20Museum&rft.jtitle=Psychology%20of%20aesthetics,%20creativity,%20and%20the%20arts&rft.au=Specker,%20Eva&rft.date=2017-08&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=265&rft.epage=275&rft.pages=265-275&rft.issn=1931-3896&rft.eissn=1931-390X&rft.isbn=9781433890994&rft.isbn_list=1433890992&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/aca0000107&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1928259486%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1928259486&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |