Do You See What I See? An Investigation of the Aesthetic Experience in the Laboratory and Museum

Two studies examined people's aesthetic experiences of art in the laboratory and the museum. The theoretical framework guiding the research was based on the Mirror Model of Art (Tinio, 2013), which proposes that the process of artistic creation and artistic reception mirror each other. Study 1...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts creativity, and the arts, 2017-08, Vol.11 (3), p.265-275
Hauptverfasser: Specker, Eva, Tinio, Pablo P. L, van Elk, Michiel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 275
container_issue 3
container_start_page 265
container_title Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts
container_volume 11
creator Specker, Eva
Tinio, Pablo P. L
van Elk, Michiel
description Two studies examined people's aesthetic experiences of art in the laboratory and the museum. The theoretical framework guiding the research was based on the Mirror Model of Art (Tinio, 2013), which proposes that the process of artistic creation and artistic reception mirror each other. Study 1 used a think-aloud protocol to assess people's natural and spontaneous reactions while looking at art. Study 2 examined whether presenting information about an artwork in a certain order (lower-order to higher-order information or higher-order to lower-order information) enhances aspects of the aesthetic experience and retention of information about art. Studies 1 and 2 were each conducted both in a laboratory and in a museum. The results replicate those of previous research that showed that the aesthetic experience of art is enhanced in the museum as compared with the laboratory setting. In addition, the results show that the effects of presenting information in a certain order (lower-order to higher-order information) depend on the context of presentation: museum visitors were better able to remember information about art than laboratory participants. Overall, the findings suggest that the Mirror Model is a good representation of how people naturally process art, but that certain aspects of the model could be optimized.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/aca0000107
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2018647218</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1928259486</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a323t-81271e83afbf6592eecd03bb2cd655c4183a70f45fe29eca3c7b5bb4491310b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0eElC64QsssQMF_Eocr1BVClQqYgEIWBnHndBUbRzsBNG_x6UgdsxmRnOP7owuQkeUnFHC5bmxhsSiRG6hfao4Tbgiz9uor2ROBee5IkqJnV8tV9keOghhToiQnGX76PXS4RfX4XsA_DQzLR6vxws8qPG4_oDQVm-mrVyNXYnbGeBBXM2grSwefTbgK6gt4Kr-1iamcN60zq-wqaf4tgvQLQ_RbmkWAfo_vYcer0YPw5tkcnc9Hg4mieGMt0lOmaSQc1MWZZYqBmCnhBcFs9MsTa2gUZKkFGkJTIE13MoiLQohFOWUFJL30PHGt_HuvYtf6rnrfB1PakZongnJosc_FFUsZ6kSeRapkw1lvQvBQ6kbXy2NX2lK9Dp3_Zd7hE83sGmMbsLKGh_jWUCwnfdQt2tWU6q5ZlnKvwATIoBc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1928259486</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do You See What I See? An Investigation of the Aesthetic Experience in the Laboratory and Museum</title><source>ARTbibliographies Modern</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Specker, Eva ; Tinio, Pablo P. L ; van Elk, Michiel</creator><contributor>Silvia, Paul J ; Reiter-Palmon, Roni ; Tinio, Pablo</contributor><creatorcontrib>Specker, Eva ; Tinio, Pablo P. L ; van Elk, Michiel ; Silvia, Paul J ; Reiter-Palmon, Roni ; Tinio, Pablo</creatorcontrib><description>Two studies examined people's aesthetic experiences of art in the laboratory and the museum. The theoretical framework guiding the research was based on the Mirror Model of Art (Tinio, 2013), which proposes that the process of artistic creation and artistic reception mirror each other. Study 1 used a think-aloud protocol to assess people's natural and spontaneous reactions while looking at art. Study 2 examined whether presenting information about an artwork in a certain order (lower-order to higher-order information or higher-order to lower-order information) enhances aspects of the aesthetic experience and retention of information about art. Studies 1 and 2 were each conducted both in a laboratory and in a museum. The results replicate those of previous research that showed that the aesthetic experience of art is enhanced in the museum as compared with the laboratory setting. In addition, the results show that the effects of presenting information in a certain order (lower-order to higher-order information) depend on the context of presentation: museum visitors were better able to remember information about art than laboratory participants. Overall, the findings suggest that the Mirror Model is a good representation of how people naturally process art, but that certain aspects of the model could be optimized.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1931-3896</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781433890994</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1433890992</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1931-390X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/aca0000107</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Educational Publishing Foundation</publisher><subject>Aesthetic Preferences ; Aesthetics ; Art Education ; Creativity ; Experimental Laboratories ; Female ; Human ; Laboratories ; Male ; Museums ; Theory ; Visual arts</subject><ispartof>Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts, 2017-08, Vol.11 (3), p.265-275</ispartof><rights>2017 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2017, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Aug 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a323t-81271e83afbf6592eecd03bb2cd655c4183a70f45fe29eca3c7b5bb4491310b73</citedby><orcidid>0000-0003-0836-045X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30995</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Silvia, Paul J</contributor><contributor>Reiter-Palmon, Roni</contributor><contributor>Tinio, Pablo</contributor><creatorcontrib>Specker, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tinio, Pablo P. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Elk, Michiel</creatorcontrib><title>Do You See What I See? An Investigation of the Aesthetic Experience in the Laboratory and Museum</title><title>Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts</title><description>Two studies examined people's aesthetic experiences of art in the laboratory and the museum. The theoretical framework guiding the research was based on the Mirror Model of Art (Tinio, 2013), which proposes that the process of artistic creation and artistic reception mirror each other. Study 1 used a think-aloud protocol to assess people's natural and spontaneous reactions while looking at art. Study 2 examined whether presenting information about an artwork in a certain order (lower-order to higher-order information or higher-order to lower-order information) enhances aspects of the aesthetic experience and retention of information about art. Studies 1 and 2 were each conducted both in a laboratory and in a museum. The results replicate those of previous research that showed that the aesthetic experience of art is enhanced in the museum as compared with the laboratory setting. In addition, the results show that the effects of presenting information in a certain order (lower-order to higher-order information) depend on the context of presentation: museum visitors were better able to remember information about art than laboratory participants. Overall, the findings suggest that the Mirror Model is a good representation of how people naturally process art, but that certain aspects of the model could be optimized.</description><subject>Aesthetic Preferences</subject><subject>Aesthetics</subject><subject>Art Education</subject><subject>Creativity</subject><subject>Experimental Laboratories</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Museums</subject><subject>Theory</subject><subject>Visual arts</subject><issn>1931-3896</issn><issn>1931-390X</issn><isbn>9781433890994</isbn><isbn>1433890992</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QI</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0eElC64QsssQMF_Eocr1BVClQqYgEIWBnHndBUbRzsBNG_x6UgdsxmRnOP7owuQkeUnFHC5bmxhsSiRG6hfao4Tbgiz9uor2ROBee5IkqJnV8tV9keOghhToiQnGX76PXS4RfX4XsA_DQzLR6vxws8qPG4_oDQVm-mrVyNXYnbGeBBXM2grSwefTbgK6gt4Kr-1iamcN60zq-wqaf4tgvQLQ_RbmkWAfo_vYcer0YPw5tkcnc9Hg4mieGMt0lOmaSQc1MWZZYqBmCnhBcFs9MsTa2gUZKkFGkJTIE13MoiLQohFOWUFJL30PHGt_HuvYtf6rnrfB1PakZongnJosc_FFUsZ6kSeRapkw1lvQvBQ6kbXy2NX2lK9Dp3_Zd7hE83sGmMbsLKGh_jWUCwnfdQt2tWU6q5ZlnKvwATIoBc</recordid><startdate>201708</startdate><enddate>201708</enddate><creator>Specker, Eva</creator><creator>Tinio, Pablo P. L</creator><creator>van Elk, Michiel</creator><general>Educational Publishing Foundation</general><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QI</scope><scope>8XN</scope><scope>~I4</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0836-045X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201708</creationdate><title>Do You See What I See? An Investigation of the Aesthetic Experience in the Laboratory and Museum</title><author>Specker, Eva ; Tinio, Pablo P. L ; van Elk, Michiel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a323t-81271e83afbf6592eecd03bb2cd655c4183a70f45fe29eca3c7b5bb4491310b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aesthetic Preferences</topic><topic>Aesthetics</topic><topic>Art Education</topic><topic>Creativity</topic><topic>Experimental Laboratories</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Museums</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>Visual arts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Specker, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tinio, Pablo P. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Elk, Michiel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ARTbibliographies Modern</collection><collection>International Bibliography of Art (IBA)</collection><collection>ARTbibliographies Modern (ABM) for DFG</collection><jtitle>Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Specker, Eva</au><au>Tinio, Pablo P. L</au><au>van Elk, Michiel</au><au>Silvia, Paul J</au><au>Reiter-Palmon, Roni</au><au>Tinio, Pablo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do You See What I See? An Investigation of the Aesthetic Experience in the Laboratory and Museum</atitle><jtitle>Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts</jtitle><date>2017-08</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>265</spage><epage>275</epage><pages>265-275</pages><issn>1931-3896</issn><eissn>1931-390X</eissn><isbn>9781433890994</isbn><isbn>1433890992</isbn><abstract>Two studies examined people's aesthetic experiences of art in the laboratory and the museum. The theoretical framework guiding the research was based on the Mirror Model of Art (Tinio, 2013), which proposes that the process of artistic creation and artistic reception mirror each other. Study 1 used a think-aloud protocol to assess people's natural and spontaneous reactions while looking at art. Study 2 examined whether presenting information about an artwork in a certain order (lower-order to higher-order information or higher-order to lower-order information) enhances aspects of the aesthetic experience and retention of information about art. Studies 1 and 2 were each conducted both in a laboratory and in a museum. The results replicate those of previous research that showed that the aesthetic experience of art is enhanced in the museum as compared with the laboratory setting. In addition, the results show that the effects of presenting information in a certain order (lower-order to higher-order information) depend on the context of presentation: museum visitors were better able to remember information about art than laboratory participants. Overall, the findings suggest that the Mirror Model is a good representation of how people naturally process art, but that certain aspects of the model could be optimized.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Educational Publishing Foundation</pub><doi>10.1037/aca0000107</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0836-045X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1931-3896
ispartof Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts, 2017-08, Vol.11 (3), p.265-275
issn 1931-3896
1931-390X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2018647218
source ARTbibliographies Modern; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Aesthetic Preferences
Aesthetics
Art Education
Creativity
Experimental Laboratories
Female
Human
Laboratories
Male
Museums
Theory
Visual arts
title Do You See What I See? An Investigation of the Aesthetic Experience in the Laboratory and Museum
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T09%3A22%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20You%20See%20What%20I%20See?%20An%20Investigation%20of%20the%20Aesthetic%20Experience%20in%20the%20Laboratory%20and%20Museum&rft.jtitle=Psychology%20of%20aesthetics,%20creativity,%20and%20the%20arts&rft.au=Specker,%20Eva&rft.date=2017-08&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=265&rft.epage=275&rft.pages=265-275&rft.issn=1931-3896&rft.eissn=1931-390X&rft.isbn=9781433890994&rft.isbn_list=1433890992&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/aca0000107&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1928259486%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1928259486&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true