Protein identification before and after glyphosate exposure in Lolium multiflorum genotypes

BACKGROUND Weeds reduce crop yields, and among the methods used to control these plants, the use of chemicals is preferred. However, the repeated application of herbicides with the same mechanism of action selects for resistant populations. The aim of this study was to evaluate glyphosate resistance...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pest management science 2018-05, Vol.74 (5), p.1125-1133
Hauptverfasser: Barroso, Arthur AM, de S Costa, Marilia G, Neto, Nelson J, dos Santos, Juciléia I, Balbuena, Tiago S, Carbonari, Caio A, Alves, Pedro LCA
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1133
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1125
container_title Pest management science
container_volume 74
creator Barroso, Arthur AM
de S Costa, Marilia G
Neto, Nelson J
dos Santos, Juciléia I
Balbuena, Tiago S
Carbonari, Caio A
Alves, Pedro LCA
description BACKGROUND Weeds reduce crop yields, and among the methods used to control these plants, the use of chemicals is preferred. However, the repeated application of herbicides with the same mechanism of action selects for resistant populations. The aim of this study was to evaluate glyphosate resistance in Lolium multiflorum (Lam.) and relate the resistance to protein expression in the absence and presence of the herbicide using a metabolic‐proteomic approach. RESULTS Glyphosate resistance was confirmed, with a sevenfold difference in resistance between susceptible and resistant genotypes. Among the possible mechanisms affecting resistance, mutations in the enzyme 5‐enolpyruvylshikimate‐3‐phosphate synthase (EPSPS), herbicide differential translocation and overexpression of EPSPS are suggested. Susceptible plants had higher growth than did resistant plants in the absence of the herbicide, in addition to greater expression of protein groups related to photosynthesis and to tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses. With application of glyphosate, resistant plants maintained their metabolism and began to express EPSPS and other candidate proteins related to herbicide resistance. CONCLUSIONS In the absence of glyphosate, the susceptible plants would replace the resistant plants over time, and abiotic or biotic stresses would accelerate this process. Resistance in plants resulted from a combination of target‐site and non‐target‐site resistance mechanisms. We identified several candidate proteins that could be investigated in future studies on glyphosate resistance. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry Non‐target‐site glyphosate resistance mechanisms in weeds continue to be unclear. In this study, some proteins were found to be differentially expressed in susceptible and resistant plants before and after glyphosate contact.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ps.4831
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2018566180</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2018566180</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3451-1bb5d235d41eac5a4383fdc5bd98072a4e81320d01f524ee9b90f7d4e5340e913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMobk7xH0jBCy-kmqTJllzK8AsGDlQQvAhpczIzuqYmLdp_b-fm7rw6B87zPgdehE4JviIY0-s6XjGRkT00JJyOUyal2N_t4m2AjmJcYoyllPQQDaikHAsphuh9HnwDrkqcgapx1hW6cb5KcrA-QKIrk2jbQEgWZVd_-KgbSOC79rHtr31s5kvXrpJVW_bh0od-X0Dlm66GeIwOrC4jnGznCL3e3b5MH9LZ0_3j9GaWFhnjJCV5zg3NuGEEdME1y0RmTcFzIwWeUM1AkIxig4nllAHIXGI7MQx4xjBIko3Q-cZbB__ZQmzU0reh6l8qiong4zERuKcuNlQRfIwBrKqDW-nQKYLVukRVR7UusSfPtr42X4HZcX-t9cDlBvhyJXT_edT8-Vf3A_Ieez4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2018566180</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Protein identification before and after glyphosate exposure in Lolium multiflorum genotypes</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Barroso, Arthur AM ; de S Costa, Marilia G ; Neto, Nelson J ; dos Santos, Juciléia I ; Balbuena, Tiago S ; Carbonari, Caio A ; Alves, Pedro LCA</creator><creatorcontrib>Barroso, Arthur AM ; de S Costa, Marilia G ; Neto, Nelson J ; dos Santos, Juciléia I ; Balbuena, Tiago S ; Carbonari, Caio A ; Alves, Pedro LCA</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND Weeds reduce crop yields, and among the methods used to control these plants, the use of chemicals is preferred. However, the repeated application of herbicides with the same mechanism of action selects for resistant populations. The aim of this study was to evaluate glyphosate resistance in Lolium multiflorum (Lam.) and relate the resistance to protein expression in the absence and presence of the herbicide using a metabolic‐proteomic approach. RESULTS Glyphosate resistance was confirmed, with a sevenfold difference in resistance between susceptible and resistant genotypes. Among the possible mechanisms affecting resistance, mutations in the enzyme 5‐enolpyruvylshikimate‐3‐phosphate synthase (EPSPS), herbicide differential translocation and overexpression of EPSPS are suggested. Susceptible plants had higher growth than did resistant plants in the absence of the herbicide, in addition to greater expression of protein groups related to photosynthesis and to tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses. With application of glyphosate, resistant plants maintained their metabolism and began to express EPSPS and other candidate proteins related to herbicide resistance. CONCLUSIONS In the absence of glyphosate, the susceptible plants would replace the resistant plants over time, and abiotic or biotic stresses would accelerate this process. Resistance in plants resulted from a combination of target‐site and non‐target‐site resistance mechanisms. We identified several candidate proteins that could be investigated in future studies on glyphosate resistance. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry Non‐target‐site glyphosate resistance mechanisms in weeds continue to be unclear. In this study, some proteins were found to be differentially expressed in susceptible and resistant plants before and after glyphosate contact.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-498X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-4998</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ps.4831</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29250898</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>aromatic amino acids ; Control methods ; Crop yield ; Genotype ; Genotypes ; Glycine - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Glycine - pharmacology ; Glyphosate ; glyphosate resistance mechanisms ; heat shock protein ; Herbicide resistance ; Herbicide Resistance - genetics ; Herbicides ; Herbicides - pharmacology ; Lolium - drug effects ; Lolium - genetics ; Lolium - growth &amp; development ; Lolium multiflorum ; Metabolism ; Mutation ; Photosynthesis ; Plant Proteins - genetics ; Plant Proteins - metabolism ; Plants (botany) ; Proteins ; Proteome - drug effects ; shikimic acid ; stress tolerance ; Stresses ; Translocation</subject><ispartof>Pest management science, 2018-05, Vol.74 (5), p.1125-1133</ispartof><rights>2017 Society of Chemical Industry</rights><rights>2017 Society of Chemical Industry.</rights><rights>2018 Society of Chemical Industry</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3451-1bb5d235d41eac5a4383fdc5bd98072a4e81320d01f524ee9b90f7d4e5340e913</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3451-1bb5d235d41eac5a4383fdc5bd98072a4e81320d01f524ee9b90f7d4e5340e913</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0383-2529 ; 0000-0001-7687-1396</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fps.4831$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fps.4831$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29250898$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barroso, Arthur AM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de S Costa, Marilia G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neto, Nelson J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>dos Santos, Juciléia I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balbuena, Tiago S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carbonari, Caio A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alves, Pedro LCA</creatorcontrib><title>Protein identification before and after glyphosate exposure in Lolium multiflorum genotypes</title><title>Pest management science</title><addtitle>Pest Manag Sci</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND Weeds reduce crop yields, and among the methods used to control these plants, the use of chemicals is preferred. However, the repeated application of herbicides with the same mechanism of action selects for resistant populations. The aim of this study was to evaluate glyphosate resistance in Lolium multiflorum (Lam.) and relate the resistance to protein expression in the absence and presence of the herbicide using a metabolic‐proteomic approach. RESULTS Glyphosate resistance was confirmed, with a sevenfold difference in resistance between susceptible and resistant genotypes. Among the possible mechanisms affecting resistance, mutations in the enzyme 5‐enolpyruvylshikimate‐3‐phosphate synthase (EPSPS), herbicide differential translocation and overexpression of EPSPS are suggested. Susceptible plants had higher growth than did resistant plants in the absence of the herbicide, in addition to greater expression of protein groups related to photosynthesis and to tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses. With application of glyphosate, resistant plants maintained their metabolism and began to express EPSPS and other candidate proteins related to herbicide resistance. CONCLUSIONS In the absence of glyphosate, the susceptible plants would replace the resistant plants over time, and abiotic or biotic stresses would accelerate this process. Resistance in plants resulted from a combination of target‐site and non‐target‐site resistance mechanisms. We identified several candidate proteins that could be investigated in future studies on glyphosate resistance. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry Non‐target‐site glyphosate resistance mechanisms in weeds continue to be unclear. In this study, some proteins were found to be differentially expressed in susceptible and resistant plants before and after glyphosate contact.</description><subject>aromatic amino acids</subject><subject>Control methods</subject><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>Genotype</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Glycine - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Glycine - pharmacology</subject><subject>Glyphosate</subject><subject>glyphosate resistance mechanisms</subject><subject>heat shock protein</subject><subject>Herbicide resistance</subject><subject>Herbicide Resistance - genetics</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Herbicides - pharmacology</subject><subject>Lolium - drug effects</subject><subject>Lolium - genetics</subject><subject>Lolium - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Lolium multiflorum</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Photosynthesis</subject><subject>Plant Proteins - genetics</subject><subject>Plant Proteins - metabolism</subject><subject>Plants (botany)</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Proteome - drug effects</subject><subject>shikimic acid</subject><subject>stress tolerance</subject><subject>Stresses</subject><subject>Translocation</subject><issn>1526-498X</issn><issn>1526-4998</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMobk7xH0jBCy-kmqTJllzK8AsGDlQQvAhpczIzuqYmLdp_b-fm7rw6B87zPgdehE4JviIY0-s6XjGRkT00JJyOUyal2N_t4m2AjmJcYoyllPQQDaikHAsphuh9HnwDrkqcgapx1hW6cb5KcrA-QKIrk2jbQEgWZVd_-KgbSOC79rHtr31s5kvXrpJVW_bh0od-X0Dlm66GeIwOrC4jnGznCL3e3b5MH9LZ0_3j9GaWFhnjJCV5zg3NuGEEdME1y0RmTcFzIwWeUM1AkIxig4nllAHIXGI7MQx4xjBIko3Q-cZbB__ZQmzU0reh6l8qiong4zERuKcuNlQRfIwBrKqDW-nQKYLVukRVR7UusSfPtr42X4HZcX-t9cDlBvhyJXT_edT8-Vf3A_Ieez4</recordid><startdate>201805</startdate><enddate>201805</enddate><creator>Barroso, Arthur AM</creator><creator>de S Costa, Marilia G</creator><creator>Neto, Nelson J</creator><creator>dos Santos, Juciléia I</creator><creator>Balbuena, Tiago S</creator><creator>Carbonari, Caio A</creator><creator>Alves, Pedro LCA</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0383-2529</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7687-1396</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201805</creationdate><title>Protein identification before and after glyphosate exposure in Lolium multiflorum genotypes</title><author>Barroso, Arthur AM ; de S Costa, Marilia G ; Neto, Nelson J ; dos Santos, Juciléia I ; Balbuena, Tiago S ; Carbonari, Caio A ; Alves, Pedro LCA</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3451-1bb5d235d41eac5a4383fdc5bd98072a4e81320d01f524ee9b90f7d4e5340e913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>aromatic amino acids</topic><topic>Control methods</topic><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>Genotype</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Glycine - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Glycine - pharmacology</topic><topic>Glyphosate</topic><topic>glyphosate resistance mechanisms</topic><topic>heat shock protein</topic><topic>Herbicide resistance</topic><topic>Herbicide Resistance - genetics</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Herbicides - pharmacology</topic><topic>Lolium - drug effects</topic><topic>Lolium - genetics</topic><topic>Lolium - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Lolium multiflorum</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Photosynthesis</topic><topic>Plant Proteins - genetics</topic><topic>Plant Proteins - metabolism</topic><topic>Plants (botany)</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Proteome - drug effects</topic><topic>shikimic acid</topic><topic>stress tolerance</topic><topic>Stresses</topic><topic>Translocation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barroso, Arthur AM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de S Costa, Marilia G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neto, Nelson J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>dos Santos, Juciléia I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balbuena, Tiago S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carbonari, Caio A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alves, Pedro LCA</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Pest management science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barroso, Arthur AM</au><au>de S Costa, Marilia G</au><au>Neto, Nelson J</au><au>dos Santos, Juciléia I</au><au>Balbuena, Tiago S</au><au>Carbonari, Caio A</au><au>Alves, Pedro LCA</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Protein identification before and after glyphosate exposure in Lolium multiflorum genotypes</atitle><jtitle>Pest management science</jtitle><addtitle>Pest Manag Sci</addtitle><date>2018-05</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1125</spage><epage>1133</epage><pages>1125-1133</pages><issn>1526-498X</issn><eissn>1526-4998</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND Weeds reduce crop yields, and among the methods used to control these plants, the use of chemicals is preferred. However, the repeated application of herbicides with the same mechanism of action selects for resistant populations. The aim of this study was to evaluate glyphosate resistance in Lolium multiflorum (Lam.) and relate the resistance to protein expression in the absence and presence of the herbicide using a metabolic‐proteomic approach. RESULTS Glyphosate resistance was confirmed, with a sevenfold difference in resistance between susceptible and resistant genotypes. Among the possible mechanisms affecting resistance, mutations in the enzyme 5‐enolpyruvylshikimate‐3‐phosphate synthase (EPSPS), herbicide differential translocation and overexpression of EPSPS are suggested. Susceptible plants had higher growth than did resistant plants in the absence of the herbicide, in addition to greater expression of protein groups related to photosynthesis and to tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses. With application of glyphosate, resistant plants maintained their metabolism and began to express EPSPS and other candidate proteins related to herbicide resistance. CONCLUSIONS In the absence of glyphosate, the susceptible plants would replace the resistant plants over time, and abiotic or biotic stresses would accelerate this process. Resistance in plants resulted from a combination of target‐site and non‐target‐site resistance mechanisms. We identified several candidate proteins that could be investigated in future studies on glyphosate resistance. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry Non‐target‐site glyphosate resistance mechanisms in weeds continue to be unclear. In this study, some proteins were found to be differentially expressed in susceptible and resistant plants before and after glyphosate contact.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>29250898</pmid><doi>10.1002/ps.4831</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0383-2529</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7687-1396</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1526-498X
ispartof Pest management science, 2018-05, Vol.74 (5), p.1125-1133
issn 1526-498X
1526-4998
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2018566180
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE
subjects aromatic amino acids
Control methods
Crop yield
Genotype
Genotypes
Glycine - analogs & derivatives
Glycine - pharmacology
Glyphosate
glyphosate resistance mechanisms
heat shock protein
Herbicide resistance
Herbicide Resistance - genetics
Herbicides
Herbicides - pharmacology
Lolium - drug effects
Lolium - genetics
Lolium - growth & development
Lolium multiflorum
Metabolism
Mutation
Photosynthesis
Plant Proteins - genetics
Plant Proteins - metabolism
Plants (botany)
Proteins
Proteome - drug effects
shikimic acid
stress tolerance
Stresses
Translocation
title Protein identification before and after glyphosate exposure in Lolium multiflorum genotypes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T23%3A45%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Protein%20identification%20before%20and%20after%20glyphosate%20exposure%20in%20Lolium%20multiflorum%20genotypes&rft.jtitle=Pest%20management%20science&rft.au=Barroso,%20Arthur%20AM&rft.date=2018-05&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1125&rft.epage=1133&rft.pages=1125-1133&rft.issn=1526-498X&rft.eissn=1526-4998&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ps.4831&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2018566180%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2018566180&rft_id=info:pmid/29250898&rfr_iscdi=true