Protein identification before and after glyphosate exposure in Lolium multiflorum genotypes
BACKGROUND Weeds reduce crop yields, and among the methods used to control these plants, the use of chemicals is preferred. However, the repeated application of herbicides with the same mechanism of action selects for resistant populations. The aim of this study was to evaluate glyphosate resistance...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pest management science 2018-05, Vol.74 (5), p.1125-1133 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1133 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1125 |
container_title | Pest management science |
container_volume | 74 |
creator | Barroso, Arthur AM de S Costa, Marilia G Neto, Nelson J dos Santos, Juciléia I Balbuena, Tiago S Carbonari, Caio A Alves, Pedro LCA |
description | BACKGROUND
Weeds reduce crop yields, and among the methods used to control these plants, the use of chemicals is preferred. However, the repeated application of herbicides with the same mechanism of action selects for resistant populations. The aim of this study was to evaluate glyphosate resistance in Lolium multiflorum (Lam.) and relate the resistance to protein expression in the absence and presence of the herbicide using a metabolic‐proteomic approach.
RESULTS
Glyphosate resistance was confirmed, with a sevenfold difference in resistance between susceptible and resistant genotypes. Among the possible mechanisms affecting resistance, mutations in the enzyme 5‐enolpyruvylshikimate‐3‐phosphate synthase (EPSPS), herbicide differential translocation and overexpression of EPSPS are suggested. Susceptible plants had higher growth than did resistant plants in the absence of the herbicide, in addition to greater expression of protein groups related to photosynthesis and to tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses. With application of glyphosate, resistant plants maintained their metabolism and began to express EPSPS and other candidate proteins related to herbicide resistance.
CONCLUSIONS
In the absence of glyphosate, the susceptible plants would replace the resistant plants over time, and abiotic or biotic stresses would accelerate this process. Resistance in plants resulted from a combination of target‐site and non‐target‐site resistance mechanisms. We identified several candidate proteins that could be investigated in future studies on glyphosate resistance. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry
Non‐target‐site glyphosate resistance mechanisms in weeds continue to be unclear. In this study, some proteins were found to be differentially expressed in susceptible and resistant plants before and after glyphosate contact. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ps.4831 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2018566180</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2018566180</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3451-1bb5d235d41eac5a4383fdc5bd98072a4e81320d01f524ee9b90f7d4e5340e913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMobk7xH0jBCy-kmqTJllzK8AsGDlQQvAhpczIzuqYmLdp_b-fm7rw6B87zPgdehE4JviIY0-s6XjGRkT00JJyOUyal2N_t4m2AjmJcYoyllPQQDaikHAsphuh9HnwDrkqcgapx1hW6cb5KcrA-QKIrk2jbQEgWZVd_-KgbSOC79rHtr31s5kvXrpJVW_bh0od-X0Dlm66GeIwOrC4jnGznCL3e3b5MH9LZ0_3j9GaWFhnjJCV5zg3NuGEEdME1y0RmTcFzIwWeUM1AkIxig4nllAHIXGI7MQx4xjBIko3Q-cZbB__ZQmzU0reh6l8qiong4zERuKcuNlQRfIwBrKqDW-nQKYLVukRVR7UusSfPtr42X4HZcX-t9cDlBvhyJXT_edT8-Vf3A_Ieez4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2018566180</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Protein identification before and after glyphosate exposure in Lolium multiflorum genotypes</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Barroso, Arthur AM ; de S Costa, Marilia G ; Neto, Nelson J ; dos Santos, Juciléia I ; Balbuena, Tiago S ; Carbonari, Caio A ; Alves, Pedro LCA</creator><creatorcontrib>Barroso, Arthur AM ; de S Costa, Marilia G ; Neto, Nelson J ; dos Santos, Juciléia I ; Balbuena, Tiago S ; Carbonari, Caio A ; Alves, Pedro LCA</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND
Weeds reduce crop yields, and among the methods used to control these plants, the use of chemicals is preferred. However, the repeated application of herbicides with the same mechanism of action selects for resistant populations. The aim of this study was to evaluate glyphosate resistance in Lolium multiflorum (Lam.) and relate the resistance to protein expression in the absence and presence of the herbicide using a metabolic‐proteomic approach.
RESULTS
Glyphosate resistance was confirmed, with a sevenfold difference in resistance between susceptible and resistant genotypes. Among the possible mechanisms affecting resistance, mutations in the enzyme 5‐enolpyruvylshikimate‐3‐phosphate synthase (EPSPS), herbicide differential translocation and overexpression of EPSPS are suggested. Susceptible plants had higher growth than did resistant plants in the absence of the herbicide, in addition to greater expression of protein groups related to photosynthesis and to tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses. With application of glyphosate, resistant plants maintained their metabolism and began to express EPSPS and other candidate proteins related to herbicide resistance.
CONCLUSIONS
In the absence of glyphosate, the susceptible plants would replace the resistant plants over time, and abiotic or biotic stresses would accelerate this process. Resistance in plants resulted from a combination of target‐site and non‐target‐site resistance mechanisms. We identified several candidate proteins that could be investigated in future studies on glyphosate resistance. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry
Non‐target‐site glyphosate resistance mechanisms in weeds continue to be unclear. In this study, some proteins were found to be differentially expressed in susceptible and resistant plants before and after glyphosate contact.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-498X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-4998</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ps.4831</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29250898</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>aromatic amino acids ; Control methods ; Crop yield ; Genotype ; Genotypes ; Glycine - analogs & derivatives ; Glycine - pharmacology ; Glyphosate ; glyphosate resistance mechanisms ; heat shock protein ; Herbicide resistance ; Herbicide Resistance - genetics ; Herbicides ; Herbicides - pharmacology ; Lolium - drug effects ; Lolium - genetics ; Lolium - growth & development ; Lolium multiflorum ; Metabolism ; Mutation ; Photosynthesis ; Plant Proteins - genetics ; Plant Proteins - metabolism ; Plants (botany) ; Proteins ; Proteome - drug effects ; shikimic acid ; stress tolerance ; Stresses ; Translocation</subject><ispartof>Pest management science, 2018-05, Vol.74 (5), p.1125-1133</ispartof><rights>2017 Society of Chemical Industry</rights><rights>2017 Society of Chemical Industry.</rights><rights>2018 Society of Chemical Industry</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3451-1bb5d235d41eac5a4383fdc5bd98072a4e81320d01f524ee9b90f7d4e5340e913</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3451-1bb5d235d41eac5a4383fdc5bd98072a4e81320d01f524ee9b90f7d4e5340e913</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0383-2529 ; 0000-0001-7687-1396</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fps.4831$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fps.4831$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29250898$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barroso, Arthur AM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de S Costa, Marilia G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neto, Nelson J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>dos Santos, Juciléia I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balbuena, Tiago S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carbonari, Caio A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alves, Pedro LCA</creatorcontrib><title>Protein identification before and after glyphosate exposure in Lolium multiflorum genotypes</title><title>Pest management science</title><addtitle>Pest Manag Sci</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND
Weeds reduce crop yields, and among the methods used to control these plants, the use of chemicals is preferred. However, the repeated application of herbicides with the same mechanism of action selects for resistant populations. The aim of this study was to evaluate glyphosate resistance in Lolium multiflorum (Lam.) and relate the resistance to protein expression in the absence and presence of the herbicide using a metabolic‐proteomic approach.
RESULTS
Glyphosate resistance was confirmed, with a sevenfold difference in resistance between susceptible and resistant genotypes. Among the possible mechanisms affecting resistance, mutations in the enzyme 5‐enolpyruvylshikimate‐3‐phosphate synthase (EPSPS), herbicide differential translocation and overexpression of EPSPS are suggested. Susceptible plants had higher growth than did resistant plants in the absence of the herbicide, in addition to greater expression of protein groups related to photosynthesis and to tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses. With application of glyphosate, resistant plants maintained their metabolism and began to express EPSPS and other candidate proteins related to herbicide resistance.
CONCLUSIONS
In the absence of glyphosate, the susceptible plants would replace the resistant plants over time, and abiotic or biotic stresses would accelerate this process. Resistance in plants resulted from a combination of target‐site and non‐target‐site resistance mechanisms. We identified several candidate proteins that could be investigated in future studies on glyphosate resistance. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry
Non‐target‐site glyphosate resistance mechanisms in weeds continue to be unclear. In this study, some proteins were found to be differentially expressed in susceptible and resistant plants before and after glyphosate contact.</description><subject>aromatic amino acids</subject><subject>Control methods</subject><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>Genotype</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Glycine - analogs & derivatives</subject><subject>Glycine - pharmacology</subject><subject>Glyphosate</subject><subject>glyphosate resistance mechanisms</subject><subject>heat shock protein</subject><subject>Herbicide resistance</subject><subject>Herbicide Resistance - genetics</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Herbicides - pharmacology</subject><subject>Lolium - drug effects</subject><subject>Lolium - genetics</subject><subject>Lolium - growth & development</subject><subject>Lolium multiflorum</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Photosynthesis</subject><subject>Plant Proteins - genetics</subject><subject>Plant Proteins - metabolism</subject><subject>Plants (botany)</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Proteome - drug effects</subject><subject>shikimic acid</subject><subject>stress tolerance</subject><subject>Stresses</subject><subject>Translocation</subject><issn>1526-498X</issn><issn>1526-4998</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMobk7xH0jBCy-kmqTJllzK8AsGDlQQvAhpczIzuqYmLdp_b-fm7rw6B87zPgdehE4JviIY0-s6XjGRkT00JJyOUyal2N_t4m2AjmJcYoyllPQQDaikHAsphuh9HnwDrkqcgapx1hW6cb5KcrA-QKIrk2jbQEgWZVd_-KgbSOC79rHtr31s5kvXrpJVW_bh0od-X0Dlm66GeIwOrC4jnGznCL3e3b5MH9LZ0_3j9GaWFhnjJCV5zg3NuGEEdME1y0RmTcFzIwWeUM1AkIxig4nllAHIXGI7MQx4xjBIko3Q-cZbB__ZQmzU0reh6l8qiong4zERuKcuNlQRfIwBrKqDW-nQKYLVukRVR7UusSfPtr42X4HZcX-t9cDlBvhyJXT_edT8-Vf3A_Ieez4</recordid><startdate>201805</startdate><enddate>201805</enddate><creator>Barroso, Arthur AM</creator><creator>de S Costa, Marilia G</creator><creator>Neto, Nelson J</creator><creator>dos Santos, Juciléia I</creator><creator>Balbuena, Tiago S</creator><creator>Carbonari, Caio A</creator><creator>Alves, Pedro LCA</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0383-2529</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7687-1396</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201805</creationdate><title>Protein identification before and after glyphosate exposure in Lolium multiflorum genotypes</title><author>Barroso, Arthur AM ; de S Costa, Marilia G ; Neto, Nelson J ; dos Santos, Juciléia I ; Balbuena, Tiago S ; Carbonari, Caio A ; Alves, Pedro LCA</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3451-1bb5d235d41eac5a4383fdc5bd98072a4e81320d01f524ee9b90f7d4e5340e913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>aromatic amino acids</topic><topic>Control methods</topic><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>Genotype</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Glycine - analogs & derivatives</topic><topic>Glycine - pharmacology</topic><topic>Glyphosate</topic><topic>glyphosate resistance mechanisms</topic><topic>heat shock protein</topic><topic>Herbicide resistance</topic><topic>Herbicide Resistance - genetics</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Herbicides - pharmacology</topic><topic>Lolium - drug effects</topic><topic>Lolium - genetics</topic><topic>Lolium - growth & development</topic><topic>Lolium multiflorum</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Photosynthesis</topic><topic>Plant Proteins - genetics</topic><topic>Plant Proteins - metabolism</topic><topic>Plants (botany)</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Proteome - drug effects</topic><topic>shikimic acid</topic><topic>stress tolerance</topic><topic>Stresses</topic><topic>Translocation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barroso, Arthur AM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de S Costa, Marilia G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neto, Nelson J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>dos Santos, Juciléia I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balbuena, Tiago S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carbonari, Caio A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alves, Pedro LCA</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Pest management science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barroso, Arthur AM</au><au>de S Costa, Marilia G</au><au>Neto, Nelson J</au><au>dos Santos, Juciléia I</au><au>Balbuena, Tiago S</au><au>Carbonari, Caio A</au><au>Alves, Pedro LCA</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Protein identification before and after glyphosate exposure in Lolium multiflorum genotypes</atitle><jtitle>Pest management science</jtitle><addtitle>Pest Manag Sci</addtitle><date>2018-05</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1125</spage><epage>1133</epage><pages>1125-1133</pages><issn>1526-498X</issn><eissn>1526-4998</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND
Weeds reduce crop yields, and among the methods used to control these plants, the use of chemicals is preferred. However, the repeated application of herbicides with the same mechanism of action selects for resistant populations. The aim of this study was to evaluate glyphosate resistance in Lolium multiflorum (Lam.) and relate the resistance to protein expression in the absence and presence of the herbicide using a metabolic‐proteomic approach.
RESULTS
Glyphosate resistance was confirmed, with a sevenfold difference in resistance between susceptible and resistant genotypes. Among the possible mechanisms affecting resistance, mutations in the enzyme 5‐enolpyruvylshikimate‐3‐phosphate synthase (EPSPS), herbicide differential translocation and overexpression of EPSPS are suggested. Susceptible plants had higher growth than did resistant plants in the absence of the herbicide, in addition to greater expression of protein groups related to photosynthesis and to tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses. With application of glyphosate, resistant plants maintained their metabolism and began to express EPSPS and other candidate proteins related to herbicide resistance.
CONCLUSIONS
In the absence of glyphosate, the susceptible plants would replace the resistant plants over time, and abiotic or biotic stresses would accelerate this process. Resistance in plants resulted from a combination of target‐site and non‐target‐site resistance mechanisms. We identified several candidate proteins that could be investigated in future studies on glyphosate resistance. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry
Non‐target‐site glyphosate resistance mechanisms in weeds continue to be unclear. In this study, some proteins were found to be differentially expressed in susceptible and resistant plants before and after glyphosate contact.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>29250898</pmid><doi>10.1002/ps.4831</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0383-2529</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7687-1396</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1526-498X |
ispartof | Pest management science, 2018-05, Vol.74 (5), p.1125-1133 |
issn | 1526-498X 1526-4998 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2018566180 |
source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE |
subjects | aromatic amino acids Control methods Crop yield Genotype Genotypes Glycine - analogs & derivatives Glycine - pharmacology Glyphosate glyphosate resistance mechanisms heat shock protein Herbicide resistance Herbicide Resistance - genetics Herbicides Herbicides - pharmacology Lolium - drug effects Lolium - genetics Lolium - growth & development Lolium multiflorum Metabolism Mutation Photosynthesis Plant Proteins - genetics Plant Proteins - metabolism Plants (botany) Proteins Proteome - drug effects shikimic acid stress tolerance Stresses Translocation |
title | Protein identification before and after glyphosate exposure in Lolium multiflorum genotypes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T23%3A45%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Protein%20identification%20before%20and%20after%20glyphosate%20exposure%20in%20Lolium%20multiflorum%20genotypes&rft.jtitle=Pest%20management%20science&rft.au=Barroso,%20Arthur%20AM&rft.date=2018-05&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1125&rft.epage=1133&rft.pages=1125-1133&rft.issn=1526-498X&rft.eissn=1526-4998&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ps.4831&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2018566180%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2018566180&rft_id=info:pmid/29250898&rfr_iscdi=true |