Balancing upstream–downstream interests in flood risk management: experiences from a catchment‐based approach in Austria

River floods usually do not stop at administrative borders. The respective location of municipalities along a river creates different options and dependencies, commonly referred to as upstream–downstream relations. This regional dimension of flood risk calls for catchment‐based approaches in flood r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of flood risk management 2018-03, Vol.11 (1), p.56-65
Hauptverfasser: Seher, W., Löschner, L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 65
container_issue 1
container_start_page 56
container_title Journal of flood risk management
container_volume 11
creator Seher, W.
Löschner, L.
description River floods usually do not stop at administrative borders. The respective location of municipalities along a river creates different options and dependencies, commonly referred to as upstream–downstream relations. This regional dimension of flood risk calls for catchment‐based approaches in flood risk management as advocated by the EU Flood Directive. In this article, we present and assess the case of an intermunicipal cooperation in Austria which aims to alleviate flood risk and coordinate planning activities based on a catchment approach. The authors apply an established model of water governance to characterise the governance features and to assess the governance qualities and governance capacities of the intermunicipal cooperation. Findings show that the selected case qualifies as a suitable governance instrument to address the main policy objectives. Existing functional ties, shared (flooding) experiences, and mutual trust mark key success factors, indicating that proximity – in its many different forms – is crucial to overcome power asymmetries and spatial misfits in catchment‐based flood risk management. However, intermunicipal cooperation is weak when it comes to ensuring binding land use regulations, showing the need for a complementary use of governance arrangements and formal instruments of regional land use planning in flood risk management.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jfr3.12266
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2017722198</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2017722198</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3016-e75877d99109eb3cdcc21dc0c74f409914fb34f82638770ad2023491f212ad743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtOwzAQhi0EEqWw4QSW2CG1-JHGCbtSUR6qhIRAYme5frQpiRPsRKUSix4BiRv2JDiEBStm4xnPN__YPwCnGA1xiIuVcXSICYnjPdDDbEQHFCcv-3_yQ3Dk_QqhmCUs6oGPK5ELKzO7gE3la6dFsdt-qXJtuwJmttZO-9qHDJq8LBV0mX-FhbBioQtt60uo3yvtMm2l9tC4soACSlHLZdvdbT_nwmsFRVW5UshlqzNugnomjsGBEbnXJ79nHzxPr58mt4PZw83dZDwbSIpwPNBslDCm0hSjVM-pVFISrCSSLDIRCteRmdPIJCSmgUNCEURolGJDMBGKRbQPzjrd8IK3JnyGr8rG2bCSE4QZIwSnSaDOO0q60nunDa9cVgi34Rjx1l3eust_3A0w7uB1luvNPyS_nz7SbuYbHhh_4Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2017722198</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Balancing upstream–downstream interests in flood risk management: experiences from a catchment‐based approach in Austria</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Seher, W. ; Löschner, L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Seher, W. ; Löschner, L.</creatorcontrib><description>River floods usually do not stop at administrative borders. The respective location of municipalities along a river creates different options and dependencies, commonly referred to as upstream–downstream relations. This regional dimension of flood risk calls for catchment‐based approaches in flood risk management as advocated by the EU Flood Directive. In this article, we present and assess the case of an intermunicipal cooperation in Austria which aims to alleviate flood risk and coordinate planning activities based on a catchment approach. The authors apply an established model of water governance to characterise the governance features and to assess the governance qualities and governance capacities of the intermunicipal cooperation. Findings show that the selected case qualifies as a suitable governance instrument to address the main policy objectives. Existing functional ties, shared (flooding) experiences, and mutual trust mark key success factors, indicating that proximity – in its many different forms – is crucial to overcome power asymmetries and spatial misfits in catchment‐based flood risk management. However, intermunicipal cooperation is weak when it comes to ensuring binding land use regulations, showing the need for a complementary use of governance arrangements and formal instruments of regional land use planning in flood risk management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1753-318X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1753-318X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jfr3.12266</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Catchment ; Catchment area ; Catchment areas ; Catchments ; Cooperation ; Downstream ; Environmental risk ; Flood control ; Flood insurance ; Flood management ; Flood risk ; Flooding ; Floods ; Governance ; Instruments ; intermunicipal cooperation ; Land use ; Land use management ; Land use planning ; Municipalities ; regional flood risk management ; Regional planning ; Risk ; Risk management ; Rivers ; Upstream ; upstream–downstream relations ; Water governance ; Water policy</subject><ispartof>Journal of flood risk management, 2018-03, Vol.11 (1), p.56-65</ispartof><rights>2016 The Chartered Institution of Water and Environmental Management (CIWEM) and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2018 The Chartered Institution of Water and Environmental Management (CIWEM) and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3016-e75877d99109eb3cdcc21dc0c74f409914fb34f82638770ad2023491f212ad743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3016-e75877d99109eb3cdcc21dc0c74f409914fb34f82638770ad2023491f212ad743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjfr3.12266$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjfr3.12266$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seher, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Löschner, L.</creatorcontrib><title>Balancing upstream–downstream interests in flood risk management: experiences from a catchment‐based approach in Austria</title><title>Journal of flood risk management</title><description>River floods usually do not stop at administrative borders. The respective location of municipalities along a river creates different options and dependencies, commonly referred to as upstream–downstream relations. This regional dimension of flood risk calls for catchment‐based approaches in flood risk management as advocated by the EU Flood Directive. In this article, we present and assess the case of an intermunicipal cooperation in Austria which aims to alleviate flood risk and coordinate planning activities based on a catchment approach. The authors apply an established model of water governance to characterise the governance features and to assess the governance qualities and governance capacities of the intermunicipal cooperation. Findings show that the selected case qualifies as a suitable governance instrument to address the main policy objectives. Existing functional ties, shared (flooding) experiences, and mutual trust mark key success factors, indicating that proximity – in its many different forms – is crucial to overcome power asymmetries and spatial misfits in catchment‐based flood risk management. However, intermunicipal cooperation is weak when it comes to ensuring binding land use regulations, showing the need for a complementary use of governance arrangements and formal instruments of regional land use planning in flood risk management.</description><subject>Catchment</subject><subject>Catchment area</subject><subject>Catchment areas</subject><subject>Catchments</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Downstream</subject><subject>Environmental risk</subject><subject>Flood control</subject><subject>Flood insurance</subject><subject>Flood management</subject><subject>Flood risk</subject><subject>Flooding</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Instruments</subject><subject>intermunicipal cooperation</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Land use management</subject><subject>Land use planning</subject><subject>Municipalities</subject><subject>regional flood risk management</subject><subject>Regional planning</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Upstream</subject><subject>upstream–downstream relations</subject><subject>Water governance</subject><subject>Water policy</subject><issn>1753-318X</issn><issn>1753-318X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtOwzAQhi0EEqWw4QSW2CG1-JHGCbtSUR6qhIRAYme5frQpiRPsRKUSix4BiRv2JDiEBStm4xnPN__YPwCnGA1xiIuVcXSICYnjPdDDbEQHFCcv-3_yQ3Dk_QqhmCUs6oGPK5ELKzO7gE3la6dFsdt-qXJtuwJmttZO-9qHDJq8LBV0mX-FhbBioQtt60uo3yvtMm2l9tC4soACSlHLZdvdbT_nwmsFRVW5UshlqzNugnomjsGBEbnXJ79nHzxPr58mt4PZw83dZDwbSIpwPNBslDCm0hSjVM-pVFISrCSSLDIRCteRmdPIJCSmgUNCEURolGJDMBGKRbQPzjrd8IK3JnyGr8rG2bCSE4QZIwSnSaDOO0q60nunDa9cVgi34Rjx1l3eust_3A0w7uB1luvNPyS_nz7SbuYbHhh_4Q</recordid><startdate>201803</startdate><enddate>201803</enddate><creator>Seher, W.</creator><creator>Löschner, L.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201803</creationdate><title>Balancing upstream–downstream interests in flood risk management: experiences from a catchment‐based approach in Austria</title><author>Seher, W. ; Löschner, L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3016-e75877d99109eb3cdcc21dc0c74f409914fb34f82638770ad2023491f212ad743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Catchment</topic><topic>Catchment area</topic><topic>Catchment areas</topic><topic>Catchments</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Downstream</topic><topic>Environmental risk</topic><topic>Flood control</topic><topic>Flood insurance</topic><topic>Flood management</topic><topic>Flood risk</topic><topic>Flooding</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Instruments</topic><topic>intermunicipal cooperation</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Land use management</topic><topic>Land use planning</topic><topic>Municipalities</topic><topic>regional flood risk management</topic><topic>Regional planning</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Upstream</topic><topic>upstream–downstream relations</topic><topic>Water governance</topic><topic>Water policy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seher, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Löschner, L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of flood risk management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seher, W.</au><au>Löschner, L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Balancing upstream–downstream interests in flood risk management: experiences from a catchment‐based approach in Austria</atitle><jtitle>Journal of flood risk management</jtitle><date>2018-03</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>56</spage><epage>65</epage><pages>56-65</pages><issn>1753-318X</issn><eissn>1753-318X</eissn><abstract>River floods usually do not stop at administrative borders. The respective location of municipalities along a river creates different options and dependencies, commonly referred to as upstream–downstream relations. This regional dimension of flood risk calls for catchment‐based approaches in flood risk management as advocated by the EU Flood Directive. In this article, we present and assess the case of an intermunicipal cooperation in Austria which aims to alleviate flood risk and coordinate planning activities based on a catchment approach. The authors apply an established model of water governance to characterise the governance features and to assess the governance qualities and governance capacities of the intermunicipal cooperation. Findings show that the selected case qualifies as a suitable governance instrument to address the main policy objectives. Existing functional ties, shared (flooding) experiences, and mutual trust mark key success factors, indicating that proximity – in its many different forms – is crucial to overcome power asymmetries and spatial misfits in catchment‐based flood risk management. However, intermunicipal cooperation is weak when it comes to ensuring binding land use regulations, showing the need for a complementary use of governance arrangements and formal instruments of regional land use planning in flood risk management.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/jfr3.12266</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1753-318X
ispartof Journal of flood risk management, 2018-03, Vol.11 (1), p.56-65
issn 1753-318X
1753-318X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2017722198
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Catchment
Catchment area
Catchment areas
Catchments
Cooperation
Downstream
Environmental risk
Flood control
Flood insurance
Flood management
Flood risk
Flooding
Floods
Governance
Instruments
intermunicipal cooperation
Land use
Land use management
Land use planning
Municipalities
regional flood risk management
Regional planning
Risk
Risk management
Rivers
Upstream
upstream–downstream relations
Water governance
Water policy
title Balancing upstream–downstream interests in flood risk management: experiences from a catchment‐based approach in Austria
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-16T02%3A54%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Balancing%20upstream%E2%80%93downstream%20interests%20in%20flood%20risk%20management:%20experiences%20from%20a%20catchment%E2%80%90based%20approach%20in%20Austria&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20flood%20risk%20management&rft.au=Seher,%20W.&rft.date=2018-03&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=56&rft.epage=65&rft.pages=56-65&rft.issn=1753-318X&rft.eissn=1753-318X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jfr3.12266&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2017722198%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2017722198&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true