Balancing upstream–downstream interests in flood risk management: experiences from a catchment‐based approach in Austria
River floods usually do not stop at administrative borders. The respective location of municipalities along a river creates different options and dependencies, commonly referred to as upstream–downstream relations. This regional dimension of flood risk calls for catchment‐based approaches in flood r...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of flood risk management 2018-03, Vol.11 (1), p.56-65 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 65 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 56 |
container_title | Journal of flood risk management |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Seher, W. Löschner, L. |
description | River floods usually do not stop at administrative borders. The respective location of municipalities along a river creates different options and dependencies, commonly referred to as upstream–downstream relations. This regional dimension of flood risk calls for catchment‐based approaches in flood risk management as advocated by the EU Flood Directive. In this article, we present and assess the case of an intermunicipal cooperation in Austria which aims to alleviate flood risk and coordinate planning activities based on a catchment approach. The authors apply an established model of water governance to characterise the governance features and to assess the governance qualities and governance capacities of the intermunicipal cooperation. Findings show that the selected case qualifies as a suitable governance instrument to address the main policy objectives. Existing functional ties, shared (flooding) experiences, and mutual trust mark key success factors, indicating that proximity – in its many different forms – is crucial to overcome power asymmetries and spatial misfits in catchment‐based flood risk management. However, intermunicipal cooperation is weak when it comes to ensuring binding land use regulations, showing the need for a complementary use of governance arrangements and formal instruments of regional land use planning in flood risk management. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jfr3.12266 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2017722198</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2017722198</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3016-e75877d99109eb3cdcc21dc0c74f409914fb34f82638770ad2023491f212ad743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtOwzAQhi0EEqWw4QSW2CG1-JHGCbtSUR6qhIRAYme5frQpiRPsRKUSix4BiRv2JDiEBStm4xnPN__YPwCnGA1xiIuVcXSICYnjPdDDbEQHFCcv-3_yQ3Dk_QqhmCUs6oGPK5ELKzO7gE3la6dFsdt-qXJtuwJmttZO-9qHDJq8LBV0mX-FhbBioQtt60uo3yvtMm2l9tC4soACSlHLZdvdbT_nwmsFRVW5UshlqzNugnomjsGBEbnXJ79nHzxPr58mt4PZw83dZDwbSIpwPNBslDCm0hSjVM-pVFISrCSSLDIRCteRmdPIJCSmgUNCEURolGJDMBGKRbQPzjrd8IK3JnyGr8rG2bCSE4QZIwSnSaDOO0q60nunDa9cVgi34Rjx1l3eust_3A0w7uB1luvNPyS_nz7SbuYbHhh_4Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2017722198</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Balancing upstream–downstream interests in flood risk management: experiences from a catchment‐based approach in Austria</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Seher, W. ; Löschner, L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Seher, W. ; Löschner, L.</creatorcontrib><description>River floods usually do not stop at administrative borders. The respective location of municipalities along a river creates different options and dependencies, commonly referred to as upstream–downstream relations. This regional dimension of flood risk calls for catchment‐based approaches in flood risk management as advocated by the EU Flood Directive. In this article, we present and assess the case of an intermunicipal cooperation in Austria which aims to alleviate flood risk and coordinate planning activities based on a catchment approach. The authors apply an established model of water governance to characterise the governance features and to assess the governance qualities and governance capacities of the intermunicipal cooperation. Findings show that the selected case qualifies as a suitable governance instrument to address the main policy objectives. Existing functional ties, shared (flooding) experiences, and mutual trust mark key success factors, indicating that proximity – in its many different forms – is crucial to overcome power asymmetries and spatial misfits in catchment‐based flood risk management. However, intermunicipal cooperation is weak when it comes to ensuring binding land use regulations, showing the need for a complementary use of governance arrangements and formal instruments of regional land use planning in flood risk management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1753-318X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1753-318X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jfr3.12266</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Catchment ; Catchment area ; Catchment areas ; Catchments ; Cooperation ; Downstream ; Environmental risk ; Flood control ; Flood insurance ; Flood management ; Flood risk ; Flooding ; Floods ; Governance ; Instruments ; intermunicipal cooperation ; Land use ; Land use management ; Land use planning ; Municipalities ; regional flood risk management ; Regional planning ; Risk ; Risk management ; Rivers ; Upstream ; upstream–downstream relations ; Water governance ; Water policy</subject><ispartof>Journal of flood risk management, 2018-03, Vol.11 (1), p.56-65</ispartof><rights>2016 The Chartered Institution of Water and Environmental Management (CIWEM) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2018 The Chartered Institution of Water and Environmental Management (CIWEM) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3016-e75877d99109eb3cdcc21dc0c74f409914fb34f82638770ad2023491f212ad743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3016-e75877d99109eb3cdcc21dc0c74f409914fb34f82638770ad2023491f212ad743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjfr3.12266$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjfr3.12266$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seher, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Löschner, L.</creatorcontrib><title>Balancing upstream–downstream interests in flood risk management: experiences from a catchment‐based approach in Austria</title><title>Journal of flood risk management</title><description>River floods usually do not stop at administrative borders. The respective location of municipalities along a river creates different options and dependencies, commonly referred to as upstream–downstream relations. This regional dimension of flood risk calls for catchment‐based approaches in flood risk management as advocated by the EU Flood Directive. In this article, we present and assess the case of an intermunicipal cooperation in Austria which aims to alleviate flood risk and coordinate planning activities based on a catchment approach. The authors apply an established model of water governance to characterise the governance features and to assess the governance qualities and governance capacities of the intermunicipal cooperation. Findings show that the selected case qualifies as a suitable governance instrument to address the main policy objectives. Existing functional ties, shared (flooding) experiences, and mutual trust mark key success factors, indicating that proximity – in its many different forms – is crucial to overcome power asymmetries and spatial misfits in catchment‐based flood risk management. However, intermunicipal cooperation is weak when it comes to ensuring binding land use regulations, showing the need for a complementary use of governance arrangements and formal instruments of regional land use planning in flood risk management.</description><subject>Catchment</subject><subject>Catchment area</subject><subject>Catchment areas</subject><subject>Catchments</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Downstream</subject><subject>Environmental risk</subject><subject>Flood control</subject><subject>Flood insurance</subject><subject>Flood management</subject><subject>Flood risk</subject><subject>Flooding</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Instruments</subject><subject>intermunicipal cooperation</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Land use management</subject><subject>Land use planning</subject><subject>Municipalities</subject><subject>regional flood risk management</subject><subject>Regional planning</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Upstream</subject><subject>upstream–downstream relations</subject><subject>Water governance</subject><subject>Water policy</subject><issn>1753-318X</issn><issn>1753-318X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtOwzAQhi0EEqWw4QSW2CG1-JHGCbtSUR6qhIRAYme5frQpiRPsRKUSix4BiRv2JDiEBStm4xnPN__YPwCnGA1xiIuVcXSICYnjPdDDbEQHFCcv-3_yQ3Dk_QqhmCUs6oGPK5ELKzO7gE3la6dFsdt-qXJtuwJmttZO-9qHDJq8LBV0mX-FhbBioQtt60uo3yvtMm2l9tC4soACSlHLZdvdbT_nwmsFRVW5UshlqzNugnomjsGBEbnXJ79nHzxPr58mt4PZw83dZDwbSIpwPNBslDCm0hSjVM-pVFISrCSSLDIRCteRmdPIJCSmgUNCEURolGJDMBGKRbQPzjrd8IK3JnyGr8rG2bCSE4QZIwSnSaDOO0q60nunDa9cVgi34Rjx1l3eust_3A0w7uB1luvNPyS_nz7SbuYbHhh_4Q</recordid><startdate>201803</startdate><enddate>201803</enddate><creator>Seher, W.</creator><creator>Löschner, L.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201803</creationdate><title>Balancing upstream–downstream interests in flood risk management: experiences from a catchment‐based approach in Austria</title><author>Seher, W. ; Löschner, L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3016-e75877d99109eb3cdcc21dc0c74f409914fb34f82638770ad2023491f212ad743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Catchment</topic><topic>Catchment area</topic><topic>Catchment areas</topic><topic>Catchments</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Downstream</topic><topic>Environmental risk</topic><topic>Flood control</topic><topic>Flood insurance</topic><topic>Flood management</topic><topic>Flood risk</topic><topic>Flooding</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Instruments</topic><topic>intermunicipal cooperation</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Land use management</topic><topic>Land use planning</topic><topic>Municipalities</topic><topic>regional flood risk management</topic><topic>Regional planning</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Upstream</topic><topic>upstream–downstream relations</topic><topic>Water governance</topic><topic>Water policy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seher, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Löschner, L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of flood risk management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seher, W.</au><au>Löschner, L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Balancing upstream–downstream interests in flood risk management: experiences from a catchment‐based approach in Austria</atitle><jtitle>Journal of flood risk management</jtitle><date>2018-03</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>56</spage><epage>65</epage><pages>56-65</pages><issn>1753-318X</issn><eissn>1753-318X</eissn><abstract>River floods usually do not stop at administrative borders. The respective location of municipalities along a river creates different options and dependencies, commonly referred to as upstream–downstream relations. This regional dimension of flood risk calls for catchment‐based approaches in flood risk management as advocated by the EU Flood Directive. In this article, we present and assess the case of an intermunicipal cooperation in Austria which aims to alleviate flood risk and coordinate planning activities based on a catchment approach. The authors apply an established model of water governance to characterise the governance features and to assess the governance qualities and governance capacities of the intermunicipal cooperation. Findings show that the selected case qualifies as a suitable governance instrument to address the main policy objectives. Existing functional ties, shared (flooding) experiences, and mutual trust mark key success factors, indicating that proximity – in its many different forms – is crucial to overcome power asymmetries and spatial misfits in catchment‐based flood risk management. However, intermunicipal cooperation is weak when it comes to ensuring binding land use regulations, showing the need for a complementary use of governance arrangements and formal instruments of regional land use planning in flood risk management.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/jfr3.12266</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1753-318X |
ispartof | Journal of flood risk management, 2018-03, Vol.11 (1), p.56-65 |
issn | 1753-318X 1753-318X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2017722198 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Catchment Catchment area Catchment areas Catchments Cooperation Downstream Environmental risk Flood control Flood insurance Flood management Flood risk Flooding Floods Governance Instruments intermunicipal cooperation Land use Land use management Land use planning Municipalities regional flood risk management Regional planning Risk Risk management Rivers Upstream upstream–downstream relations Water governance Water policy |
title | Balancing upstream–downstream interests in flood risk management: experiences from a catchment‐based approach in Austria |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-16T02%3A54%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Balancing%20upstream%E2%80%93downstream%20interests%20in%20flood%20risk%20management:%20experiences%20from%20a%20catchment%E2%80%90based%20approach%20in%20Austria&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20flood%20risk%20management&rft.au=Seher,%20W.&rft.date=2018-03&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=56&rft.epage=65&rft.pages=56-65&rft.issn=1753-318X&rft.eissn=1753-318X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jfr3.12266&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2017722198%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2017722198&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |