Measuring Gender Equality in Education: Lessons from Trends in 43 Countries
Over the last several decades, policymakers and practitioners have used gender gaps in school enrollment and attainment as the main indicators of progress in achieving gender equality in education. Based on these measures, in 2014 UNESCO declared that gender parity in primary and secondary education...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Population and development review 2018-03, Vol.44 (1), p.117-142 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 142 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 117 |
container_title | Population and development review |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Psaki, Stephanie R. McCarthy, Katharine J. Mensch, Barbara S. |
description | Over the last several decades, policymakers and practitioners have used gender gaps in school enrollment and attainment as the main indicators of progress in achieving gender equality in education. Based on these measures, in 2014 UNESCO declared that gender parity in primary and secondary education had been achieved globally, averaging the diverse experiences of countries (including high-income countries) with varying levels of school enrollment and attainment. Our analyses of levels and trends in female attainment and gender gaps over ten years in 43 low- and middle-income countries reveal that binary views of whether more boys or girls are in school provide an incomplete and often misleading picture of progress and setbacks in achieving gender equality in education. To develop a more complete picture of progress, data on gender gaps in attainment should be combined with information on changing enrollment and attainment levels over time; the levels of schooling at which gender gaps emerge and grow; gender-related barriers to school enrollment, progression, and learning; and gender differences in the return on investments in schooling. A more inclusive approach to measuring progress in achieving gender equality in education will inform more effective policies and interventions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/padr.12121 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2017670863</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26622795</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26622795</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5151-b16fafc10a6018b5ec781772b77b507f03418211e840b7e6ea0ea14b758eba0e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90M1LwzAYBvAgCs7pxbsQ8CZ05k2bj3obc05xosg8h7RLJWNrtqRF9t-bWhVPJofk8HufkAehcyAjiOt6q5d-BDTuAzQAQWWSZUwcogEhuUxETuEYnYSwIoSA4HyAHp-MDq239TuemXppPJ7uWr22zR7bGk-Xbakb6-obPDchuDrgyrsNXvhoQyeyFE9cWzfemnCKjiq9Dubs-xyit7vpYnKfzJ9nD5PxPCkZMEgK4JWuSiCaE5AFM6WQIAQthCgYERVJM5AUwMiMFMJwo4nRkBWCSVPEezpEl33u1rtda0KjVq71dXxS0e5bgkieRnXVq9K7ELyp1NbbjfZ7BUR1ZamuLPVVVsS4x6Z0tQ1_aJZTkUuWRwI9-bBrs_8nTL2Mb19_Yi_6mVVonP-doZzTmMrSTy4xfqk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2017670863</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring Gender Equality in Education: Lessons from Trends in 43 Countries</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Psaki, Stephanie R. ; McCarthy, Katharine J. ; Mensch, Barbara S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Psaki, Stephanie R. ; McCarthy, Katharine J. ; Mensch, Barbara S.</creatorcontrib><description>Over the last several decades, policymakers and practitioners have used gender gaps in school enrollment and attainment as the main indicators of progress in achieving gender equality in education. Based on these measures, in 2014 UNESCO declared that gender parity in primary and secondary education had been achieved globally, averaging the diverse experiences of countries (including high-income countries) with varying levels of school enrollment and attainment. Our analyses of levels and trends in female attainment and gender gaps over ten years in 43 low- and middle-income countries reveal that binary views of whether more boys or girls are in school provide an incomplete and often misleading picture of progress and setbacks in achieving gender equality in education. To develop a more complete picture of progress, data on gender gaps in attainment should be combined with information on changing enrollment and attainment levels over time; the levels of schooling at which gender gaps emerge and grow; gender-related barriers to school enrollment, progression, and learning; and gender differences in the return on investments in schooling. A more inclusive approach to measuring progress in achieving gender equality in education will inform more effective policies and interventions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-7921</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1728-4457</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/padr.12121</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>1997-2014 ; Bildung ; DATA AND PERSPECTIVES ; Equality ; Gender inequality ; Gleichberechtigung ; Messung ; Welt</subject><ispartof>Population and development review, 2018-03, Vol.44 (1), p.117-142</ispartof><rights>2018 The Population Council, Inc.</rights><rights>2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5151-b16fafc10a6018b5ec781772b77b507f03418211e840b7e6ea0ea14b758eba0e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5151-b16fafc10a6018b5ec781772b77b507f03418211e840b7e6ea0ea14b758eba0e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1073-9135 ; 0000-0002-0332-7653</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26622795$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26622795$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,805,1419,27931,27932,31006,33781,45581,45582,58024,58257</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Psaki, Stephanie R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarthy, Katharine J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mensch, Barbara S.</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring Gender Equality in Education: Lessons from Trends in 43 Countries</title><title>Population and development review</title><description>Over the last several decades, policymakers and practitioners have used gender gaps in school enrollment and attainment as the main indicators of progress in achieving gender equality in education. Based on these measures, in 2014 UNESCO declared that gender parity in primary and secondary education had been achieved globally, averaging the diverse experiences of countries (including high-income countries) with varying levels of school enrollment and attainment. Our analyses of levels and trends in female attainment and gender gaps over ten years in 43 low- and middle-income countries reveal that binary views of whether more boys or girls are in school provide an incomplete and often misleading picture of progress and setbacks in achieving gender equality in education. To develop a more complete picture of progress, data on gender gaps in attainment should be combined with information on changing enrollment and attainment levels over time; the levels of schooling at which gender gaps emerge and grow; gender-related barriers to school enrollment, progression, and learning; and gender differences in the return on investments in schooling. A more inclusive approach to measuring progress in achieving gender equality in education will inform more effective policies and interventions.</description><subject>1997-2014</subject><subject>Bildung</subject><subject>DATA AND PERSPECTIVES</subject><subject>Equality</subject><subject>Gender inequality</subject><subject>Gleichberechtigung</subject><subject>Messung</subject><subject>Welt</subject><issn>0098-7921</issn><issn>1728-4457</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp90M1LwzAYBvAgCs7pxbsQ8CZ05k2bj3obc05xosg8h7RLJWNrtqRF9t-bWhVPJofk8HufkAehcyAjiOt6q5d-BDTuAzQAQWWSZUwcogEhuUxETuEYnYSwIoSA4HyAHp-MDq239TuemXppPJ7uWr22zR7bGk-Xbakb6-obPDchuDrgyrsNXvhoQyeyFE9cWzfemnCKjiq9Dubs-xyit7vpYnKfzJ9nD5PxPCkZMEgK4JWuSiCaE5AFM6WQIAQthCgYERVJM5AUwMiMFMJwo4nRkBWCSVPEezpEl33u1rtda0KjVq71dXxS0e5bgkieRnXVq9K7ELyp1NbbjfZ7BUR1ZamuLPVVVsS4x6Z0tQ1_aJZTkUuWRwI9-bBrs_8nTL2Mb19_Yi_6mVVonP-doZzTmMrSTy4xfqk</recordid><startdate>201803</startdate><enddate>201803</enddate><creator>Psaki, Stephanie R.</creator><creator>McCarthy, Katharine J.</creator><creator>Mensch, Barbara S.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1073-9135</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0332-7653</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201803</creationdate><title>Measuring Gender Equality in Education: Lessons from Trends in 43 Countries</title><author>Psaki, Stephanie R. ; McCarthy, Katharine J. ; Mensch, Barbara S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5151-b16fafc10a6018b5ec781772b77b507f03418211e840b7e6ea0ea14b758eba0e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>1997-2014</topic><topic>Bildung</topic><topic>DATA AND PERSPECTIVES</topic><topic>Equality</topic><topic>Gender inequality</topic><topic>Gleichberechtigung</topic><topic>Messung</topic><topic>Welt</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Psaki, Stephanie R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarthy, Katharine J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mensch, Barbara S.</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Population and development review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Psaki, Stephanie R.</au><au>McCarthy, Katharine J.</au><au>Mensch, Barbara S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring Gender Equality in Education: Lessons from Trends in 43 Countries</atitle><jtitle>Population and development review</jtitle><date>2018-03</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>117</spage><epage>142</epage><pages>117-142</pages><issn>0098-7921</issn><eissn>1728-4457</eissn><abstract>Over the last several decades, policymakers and practitioners have used gender gaps in school enrollment and attainment as the main indicators of progress in achieving gender equality in education. Based on these measures, in 2014 UNESCO declared that gender parity in primary and secondary education had been achieved globally, averaging the diverse experiences of countries (including high-income countries) with varying levels of school enrollment and attainment. Our analyses of levels and trends in female attainment and gender gaps over ten years in 43 low- and middle-income countries reveal that binary views of whether more boys or girls are in school provide an incomplete and often misleading picture of progress and setbacks in achieving gender equality in education. To develop a more complete picture of progress, data on gender gaps in attainment should be combined with information on changing enrollment and attainment levels over time; the levels of schooling at which gender gaps emerge and grow; gender-related barriers to school enrollment, progression, and learning; and gender differences in the return on investments in schooling. A more inclusive approach to measuring progress in achieving gender equality in education will inform more effective policies and interventions.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/padr.12121</doi><tpages>26</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1073-9135</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0332-7653</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0098-7921 |
ispartof | Population and development review, 2018-03, Vol.44 (1), p.117-142 |
issn | 0098-7921 1728-4457 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2017670863 |
source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | 1997-2014 Bildung DATA AND PERSPECTIVES Equality Gender inequality Gleichberechtigung Messung Welt |
title | Measuring Gender Equality in Education: Lessons from Trends in 43 Countries |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T11%3A29%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20Gender%20Equality%20in%20Education:%20Lessons%20from%20Trends%20in%2043%20Countries&rft.jtitle=Population%20and%20development%20review&rft.au=Psaki,%20Stephanie%20R.&rft.date=2018-03&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=117&rft.epage=142&rft.pages=117-142&rft.issn=0098-7921&rft.eissn=1728-4457&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/padr.12121&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26622795%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2017670863&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26622795&rfr_iscdi=true |