Measuring Gender Equality in Education: Lessons from Trends in 43 Countries

Over the last several decades, policymakers and practitioners have used gender gaps in school enrollment and attainment as the main indicators of progress in achieving gender equality in education. Based on these measures, in 2014 UNESCO declared that gender parity in primary and secondary education...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Population and development review 2018-03, Vol.44 (1), p.117-142
Hauptverfasser: Psaki, Stephanie R., McCarthy, Katharine J., Mensch, Barbara S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 142
container_issue 1
container_start_page 117
container_title Population and development review
container_volume 44
creator Psaki, Stephanie R.
McCarthy, Katharine J.
Mensch, Barbara S.
description Over the last several decades, policymakers and practitioners have used gender gaps in school enrollment and attainment as the main indicators of progress in achieving gender equality in education. Based on these measures, in 2014 UNESCO declared that gender parity in primary and secondary education had been achieved globally, averaging the diverse experiences of countries (including high-income countries) with varying levels of school enrollment and attainment. Our analyses of levels and trends in female attainment and gender gaps over ten years in 43 low- and middle-income countries reveal that binary views of whether more boys or girls are in school provide an incomplete and often misleading picture of progress and setbacks in achieving gender equality in education. To develop a more complete picture of progress, data on gender gaps in attainment should be combined with information on changing enrollment and attainment levels over time; the levels of schooling at which gender gaps emerge and grow; gender-related barriers to school enrollment, progression, and learning; and gender differences in the return on investments in schooling. A more inclusive approach to measuring progress in achieving gender equality in education will inform more effective policies and interventions.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/padr.12121
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2017670863</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26622795</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26622795</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5151-b16fafc10a6018b5ec781772b77b507f03418211e840b7e6ea0ea14b758eba0e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90M1LwzAYBvAgCs7pxbsQ8CZ05k2bj3obc05xosg8h7RLJWNrtqRF9t-bWhVPJofk8HufkAehcyAjiOt6q5d-BDTuAzQAQWWSZUwcogEhuUxETuEYnYSwIoSA4HyAHp-MDq239TuemXppPJ7uWr22zR7bGk-Xbakb6-obPDchuDrgyrsNXvhoQyeyFE9cWzfemnCKjiq9Dubs-xyit7vpYnKfzJ9nD5PxPCkZMEgK4JWuSiCaE5AFM6WQIAQthCgYERVJM5AUwMiMFMJwo4nRkBWCSVPEezpEl33u1rtda0KjVq71dXxS0e5bgkieRnXVq9K7ELyp1NbbjfZ7BUR1ZamuLPVVVsS4x6Z0tQ1_aJZTkUuWRwI9-bBrs_8nTL2Mb19_Yi_6mVVonP-doZzTmMrSTy4xfqk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2017670863</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring Gender Equality in Education: Lessons from Trends in 43 Countries</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Psaki, Stephanie R. ; McCarthy, Katharine J. ; Mensch, Barbara S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Psaki, Stephanie R. ; McCarthy, Katharine J. ; Mensch, Barbara S.</creatorcontrib><description>Over the last several decades, policymakers and practitioners have used gender gaps in school enrollment and attainment as the main indicators of progress in achieving gender equality in education. Based on these measures, in 2014 UNESCO declared that gender parity in primary and secondary education had been achieved globally, averaging the diverse experiences of countries (including high-income countries) with varying levels of school enrollment and attainment. Our analyses of levels and trends in female attainment and gender gaps over ten years in 43 low- and middle-income countries reveal that binary views of whether more boys or girls are in school provide an incomplete and often misleading picture of progress and setbacks in achieving gender equality in education. To develop a more complete picture of progress, data on gender gaps in attainment should be combined with information on changing enrollment and attainment levels over time; the levels of schooling at which gender gaps emerge and grow; gender-related barriers to school enrollment, progression, and learning; and gender differences in the return on investments in schooling. A more inclusive approach to measuring progress in achieving gender equality in education will inform more effective policies and interventions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-7921</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1728-4457</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/padr.12121</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>1997-2014 ; Bildung ; DATA AND PERSPECTIVES ; Equality ; Gender inequality ; Gleichberechtigung ; Messung ; Welt</subject><ispartof>Population and development review, 2018-03, Vol.44 (1), p.117-142</ispartof><rights>2018 The Population Council, Inc.</rights><rights>2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5151-b16fafc10a6018b5ec781772b77b507f03418211e840b7e6ea0ea14b758eba0e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5151-b16fafc10a6018b5ec781772b77b507f03418211e840b7e6ea0ea14b758eba0e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1073-9135 ; 0000-0002-0332-7653</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26622795$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26622795$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,805,1419,27931,27932,31006,33781,45581,45582,58024,58257</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Psaki, Stephanie R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarthy, Katharine J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mensch, Barbara S.</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring Gender Equality in Education: Lessons from Trends in 43 Countries</title><title>Population and development review</title><description>Over the last several decades, policymakers and practitioners have used gender gaps in school enrollment and attainment as the main indicators of progress in achieving gender equality in education. Based on these measures, in 2014 UNESCO declared that gender parity in primary and secondary education had been achieved globally, averaging the diverse experiences of countries (including high-income countries) with varying levels of school enrollment and attainment. Our analyses of levels and trends in female attainment and gender gaps over ten years in 43 low- and middle-income countries reveal that binary views of whether more boys or girls are in school provide an incomplete and often misleading picture of progress and setbacks in achieving gender equality in education. To develop a more complete picture of progress, data on gender gaps in attainment should be combined with information on changing enrollment and attainment levels over time; the levels of schooling at which gender gaps emerge and grow; gender-related barriers to school enrollment, progression, and learning; and gender differences in the return on investments in schooling. A more inclusive approach to measuring progress in achieving gender equality in education will inform more effective policies and interventions.</description><subject>1997-2014</subject><subject>Bildung</subject><subject>DATA AND PERSPECTIVES</subject><subject>Equality</subject><subject>Gender inequality</subject><subject>Gleichberechtigung</subject><subject>Messung</subject><subject>Welt</subject><issn>0098-7921</issn><issn>1728-4457</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp90M1LwzAYBvAgCs7pxbsQ8CZ05k2bj3obc05xosg8h7RLJWNrtqRF9t-bWhVPJofk8HufkAehcyAjiOt6q5d-BDTuAzQAQWWSZUwcogEhuUxETuEYnYSwIoSA4HyAHp-MDq239TuemXppPJ7uWr22zR7bGk-Xbakb6-obPDchuDrgyrsNXvhoQyeyFE9cWzfemnCKjiq9Dubs-xyit7vpYnKfzJ9nD5PxPCkZMEgK4JWuSiCaE5AFM6WQIAQthCgYERVJM5AUwMiMFMJwo4nRkBWCSVPEezpEl33u1rtda0KjVq71dXxS0e5bgkieRnXVq9K7ELyp1NbbjfZ7BUR1ZamuLPVVVsS4x6Z0tQ1_aJZTkUuWRwI9-bBrs_8nTL2Mb19_Yi_6mVVonP-doZzTmMrSTy4xfqk</recordid><startdate>201803</startdate><enddate>201803</enddate><creator>Psaki, Stephanie R.</creator><creator>McCarthy, Katharine J.</creator><creator>Mensch, Barbara S.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1073-9135</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0332-7653</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201803</creationdate><title>Measuring Gender Equality in Education: Lessons from Trends in 43 Countries</title><author>Psaki, Stephanie R. ; McCarthy, Katharine J. ; Mensch, Barbara S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5151-b16fafc10a6018b5ec781772b77b507f03418211e840b7e6ea0ea14b758eba0e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>1997-2014</topic><topic>Bildung</topic><topic>DATA AND PERSPECTIVES</topic><topic>Equality</topic><topic>Gender inequality</topic><topic>Gleichberechtigung</topic><topic>Messung</topic><topic>Welt</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Psaki, Stephanie R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarthy, Katharine J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mensch, Barbara S.</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Population and development review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Psaki, Stephanie R.</au><au>McCarthy, Katharine J.</au><au>Mensch, Barbara S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring Gender Equality in Education: Lessons from Trends in 43 Countries</atitle><jtitle>Population and development review</jtitle><date>2018-03</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>117</spage><epage>142</epage><pages>117-142</pages><issn>0098-7921</issn><eissn>1728-4457</eissn><abstract>Over the last several decades, policymakers and practitioners have used gender gaps in school enrollment and attainment as the main indicators of progress in achieving gender equality in education. Based on these measures, in 2014 UNESCO declared that gender parity in primary and secondary education had been achieved globally, averaging the diverse experiences of countries (including high-income countries) with varying levels of school enrollment and attainment. Our analyses of levels and trends in female attainment and gender gaps over ten years in 43 low- and middle-income countries reveal that binary views of whether more boys or girls are in school provide an incomplete and often misleading picture of progress and setbacks in achieving gender equality in education. To develop a more complete picture of progress, data on gender gaps in attainment should be combined with information on changing enrollment and attainment levels over time; the levels of schooling at which gender gaps emerge and grow; gender-related barriers to school enrollment, progression, and learning; and gender differences in the return on investments in schooling. A more inclusive approach to measuring progress in achieving gender equality in education will inform more effective policies and interventions.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/padr.12121</doi><tpages>26</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1073-9135</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0332-7653</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0098-7921
ispartof Population and development review, 2018-03, Vol.44 (1), p.117-142
issn 0098-7921
1728-4457
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2017670863
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects 1997-2014
Bildung
DATA AND PERSPECTIVES
Equality
Gender inequality
Gleichberechtigung
Messung
Welt
title Measuring Gender Equality in Education: Lessons from Trends in 43 Countries
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T11%3A29%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20Gender%20Equality%20in%20Education:%20Lessons%20from%20Trends%20in%2043%20Countries&rft.jtitle=Population%20and%20development%20review&rft.au=Psaki,%20Stephanie%20R.&rft.date=2018-03&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=117&rft.epage=142&rft.pages=117-142&rft.issn=0098-7921&rft.eissn=1728-4457&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/padr.12121&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26622795%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2017670863&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26622795&rfr_iscdi=true