Single-Case Analysis to Determine Reasons for Failure of Behavioral Treatment via Telehealth
Functional communication training (FCT) is a widely used and effective function-based treatment for problem behavior. The purpose of this article is to present two cases in which FCT was unsuccessful in reducing the occurrence of problem behavior displayed by two young children with an autism spectr...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Remedial and special education 2018-03, Vol.39 (2), p.95-105 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 105 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 95 |
| container_title | Remedial and special education |
| container_volume | 39 |
| creator | Schieltz, Kelly M. Romani, Patrick W. Wacker, David P. Suess, Alyssa N. Huang, Pei Berg, Wendy K. Lindgren, Scott D. Kopelman, Todd G. |
| description | Functional communication training (FCT) is a widely used and effective function-based treatment for problem behavior. The purpose of this article is to present two cases in which FCT was unsuccessful in reducing the occurrence of problem behavior displayed by two young children with an autism spectrum disorder. Both children received the same functional analysis plus FCT treatment package via telehealth that had proven to be highly successful for the other participants. The FCT package was conducted within tightly controlled single-case designs for each participant, which permitted subsequent analyses to determine why FCT was unsuccessful. These analyses suggested distinct reasons for the treatment failure for each child. Although the negative results of treatment appeared to be similar for both children, the specific reasons for treatment failure were highly individualistic and identifiable via the single-case analyses conducted. We present findings from both our initial and subsequent analyses and discuss the implications. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0741932517743791 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2017556649</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1173903</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_0741932517743791</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2017556649</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-4d8f301fe9d1a99b10c1c8453fba3431d692a22fc5531f94ea6eea497bed7c813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMoWKt3L0LA82qySTabY62tHxQErTdhmW4nbcp2U5Ntof-9W1YUBE8z8HvvDfMIueTshnOtb5mW3IhUtbsU2vAj0uNK5InUKjsmvQNODvyUnMW4Yoxxnac98vHm6kWFyRAi0kEN1T66SBtP77HBsHY10leE6OtIrQ90DK7aBqTe0jtcws75ABWdBoRmjXVDdw7oFCtcIlTN8pycWKgiXnzPPnkfj6bDx2Ty8vA0HEySUgjeJHKeW8G4RTPnYMyMs5KXuVTCzkBIweeZSSFNbamU4NZIhAwRpNEznOsy56JPrrvcTfCfW4xNsfLb0D4Ti7T9U6ksk6ZVsU5VBh9jQFtsgltD2BecFYcOi78dtparzoLBlT_y0XOrFoaJlicdj7DA36P_5n0BSAd6IA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2017556649</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Single-Case Analysis to Determine Reasons for Failure of Behavioral Treatment via Telehealth</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Sage Journals</source><creator>Schieltz, Kelly M. ; Romani, Patrick W. ; Wacker, David P. ; Suess, Alyssa N. ; Huang, Pei ; Berg, Wendy K. ; Lindgren, Scott D. ; Kopelman, Todd G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Schieltz, Kelly M. ; Romani, Patrick W. ; Wacker, David P. ; Suess, Alyssa N. ; Huang, Pei ; Berg, Wendy K. ; Lindgren, Scott D. ; Kopelman, Todd G.</creatorcontrib><description>Functional communication training (FCT) is a widely used and effective function-based treatment for problem behavior. The purpose of this article is to present two cases in which FCT was unsuccessful in reducing the occurrence of problem behavior displayed by two young children with an autism spectrum disorder. Both children received the same functional analysis plus FCT treatment package via telehealth that had proven to be highly successful for the other participants. The FCT package was conducted within tightly controlled single-case designs for each participant, which permitted subsequent analyses to determine why FCT was unsuccessful. These analyses suggested distinct reasons for the treatment failure for each child. Although the negative results of treatment appeared to be similar for both children, the specific reasons for treatment failure were highly individualistic and identifiable via the single-case analyses conducted. We present findings from both our initial and subsequent analyses and discuss the implications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0741-9325</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-4756</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0741932517743791</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Autism ; Autistic children ; Behavior Modification ; Behavior Problems ; Children ; Communication Skills ; Comparative Analysis ; Computer Mediated Communication ; Consultants ; Fidelity ; Functional Behavioral Assessment ; Functional communication ; Functionalism ; Individual Characteristics ; Intervention ; Mothers ; Pervasive Developmental Disorders ; Program Effectiveness ; Program Implementation ; Randomized Controlled Trials ; Reinforcement ; Telemedicine ; Training ; Video Technology ; Young Children</subject><ispartof>Remedial and special education, 2018-03, Vol.39 (2), p.95-105</ispartof><rights>Hammill Institute on Disabilities 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-4d8f301fe9d1a99b10c1c8453fba3431d692a22fc5531f94ea6eea497bed7c813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-4d8f301fe9d1a99b10c1c8453fba3431d692a22fc5531f94ea6eea497bed7c813</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0741932517743791$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0741932517743791$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,30976,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1173903$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schieltz, Kelly M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romani, Patrick W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wacker, David P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suess, Alyssa N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Pei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berg, Wendy K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindgren, Scott D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kopelman, Todd G.</creatorcontrib><title>Single-Case Analysis to Determine Reasons for Failure of Behavioral Treatment via Telehealth</title><title>Remedial and special education</title><description>Functional communication training (FCT) is a widely used and effective function-based treatment for problem behavior. The purpose of this article is to present two cases in which FCT was unsuccessful in reducing the occurrence of problem behavior displayed by two young children with an autism spectrum disorder. Both children received the same functional analysis plus FCT treatment package via telehealth that had proven to be highly successful for the other participants. The FCT package was conducted within tightly controlled single-case designs for each participant, which permitted subsequent analyses to determine why FCT was unsuccessful. These analyses suggested distinct reasons for the treatment failure for each child. Although the negative results of treatment appeared to be similar for both children, the specific reasons for treatment failure were highly individualistic and identifiable via the single-case analyses conducted. We present findings from both our initial and subsequent analyses and discuss the implications.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Autism</subject><subject>Autistic children</subject><subject>Behavior Modification</subject><subject>Behavior Problems</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Communication Skills</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Computer Mediated Communication</subject><subject>Consultants</subject><subject>Fidelity</subject><subject>Functional Behavioral Assessment</subject><subject>Functional communication</subject><subject>Functionalism</subject><subject>Individual Characteristics</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Mothers</subject><subject>Pervasive Developmental Disorders</subject><subject>Program Effectiveness</subject><subject>Program Implementation</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</subject><subject>Reinforcement</subject><subject>Telemedicine</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Video Technology</subject><subject>Young Children</subject><issn>0741-9325</issn><issn>1538-4756</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMoWKt3L0LA82qySTabY62tHxQErTdhmW4nbcp2U5Ntof-9W1YUBE8z8HvvDfMIueTshnOtb5mW3IhUtbsU2vAj0uNK5InUKjsmvQNODvyUnMW4Yoxxnac98vHm6kWFyRAi0kEN1T66SBtP77HBsHY10leE6OtIrQ90DK7aBqTe0jtcws75ABWdBoRmjXVDdw7oFCtcIlTN8pycWKgiXnzPPnkfj6bDx2Ty8vA0HEySUgjeJHKeW8G4RTPnYMyMs5KXuVTCzkBIweeZSSFNbamU4NZIhAwRpNEznOsy56JPrrvcTfCfW4xNsfLb0D4Ti7T9U6ksk6ZVsU5VBh9jQFtsgltD2BecFYcOi78dtparzoLBlT_y0XOrFoaJlicdj7DA36P_5n0BSAd6IA</recordid><startdate>20180301</startdate><enddate>20180301</enddate><creator>Schieltz, Kelly M.</creator><creator>Romani, Patrick W.</creator><creator>Wacker, David P.</creator><creator>Suess, Alyssa N.</creator><creator>Huang, Pei</creator><creator>Berg, Wendy K.</creator><creator>Lindgren, Scott D.</creator><creator>Kopelman, Todd G.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE Publications and Hammill Institute on Disabilities</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180301</creationdate><title>Single-Case Analysis to Determine Reasons for Failure of Behavioral Treatment via Telehealth</title><author>Schieltz, Kelly M. ; Romani, Patrick W. ; Wacker, David P. ; Suess, Alyssa N. ; Huang, Pei ; Berg, Wendy K. ; Lindgren, Scott D. ; Kopelman, Todd G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-4d8f301fe9d1a99b10c1c8453fba3431d692a22fc5531f94ea6eea497bed7c813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Autism</topic><topic>Autistic children</topic><topic>Behavior Modification</topic><topic>Behavior Problems</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Communication Skills</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Computer Mediated Communication</topic><topic>Consultants</topic><topic>Fidelity</topic><topic>Functional Behavioral Assessment</topic><topic>Functional communication</topic><topic>Functionalism</topic><topic>Individual Characteristics</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Mothers</topic><topic>Pervasive Developmental Disorders</topic><topic>Program Effectiveness</topic><topic>Program Implementation</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials</topic><topic>Reinforcement</topic><topic>Telemedicine</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Video Technology</topic><topic>Young Children</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schieltz, Kelly M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romani, Patrick W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wacker, David P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suess, Alyssa N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Pei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berg, Wendy K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindgren, Scott D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kopelman, Todd G.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Remedial and special education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schieltz, Kelly M.</au><au>Romani, Patrick W.</au><au>Wacker, David P.</au><au>Suess, Alyssa N.</au><au>Huang, Pei</au><au>Berg, Wendy K.</au><au>Lindgren, Scott D.</au><au>Kopelman, Todd G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1173903</ericid><atitle>Single-Case Analysis to Determine Reasons for Failure of Behavioral Treatment via Telehealth</atitle><jtitle>Remedial and special education</jtitle><date>2018-03-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>95</spage><epage>105</epage><pages>95-105</pages><issn>0741-9325</issn><eissn>1538-4756</eissn><abstract>Functional communication training (FCT) is a widely used and effective function-based treatment for problem behavior. The purpose of this article is to present two cases in which FCT was unsuccessful in reducing the occurrence of problem behavior displayed by two young children with an autism spectrum disorder. Both children received the same functional analysis plus FCT treatment package via telehealth that had proven to be highly successful for the other participants. The FCT package was conducted within tightly controlled single-case designs for each participant, which permitted subsequent analyses to determine why FCT was unsuccessful. These analyses suggested distinct reasons for the treatment failure for each child. Although the negative results of treatment appeared to be similar for both children, the specific reasons for treatment failure were highly individualistic and identifiable via the single-case analyses conducted. We present findings from both our initial and subsequent analyses and discuss the implications.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0741932517743791</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0741-9325 |
| ispartof | Remedial and special education, 2018-03, Vol.39 (2), p.95-105 |
| issn | 0741-9325 1538-4756 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2017556649 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Alma/SFX Local Collection; Sage Journals |
| subjects | Analysis Autism Autistic children Behavior Modification Behavior Problems Children Communication Skills Comparative Analysis Computer Mediated Communication Consultants Fidelity Functional Behavioral Assessment Functional communication Functionalism Individual Characteristics Intervention Mothers Pervasive Developmental Disorders Program Effectiveness Program Implementation Randomized Controlled Trials Reinforcement Telemedicine Training Video Technology Young Children |
| title | Single-Case Analysis to Determine Reasons for Failure of Behavioral Treatment via Telehealth |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T14%3A42%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Single-Case%20Analysis%20to%20Determine%20Reasons%20for%20Failure%20of%20Behavioral%20Treatment%20via%20Telehealth&rft.jtitle=Remedial%20and%20special%20education&rft.au=Schieltz,%20Kelly%20M.&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=95&rft.epage=105&rft.pages=95-105&rft.issn=0741-9325&rft.eissn=1538-4756&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0741932517743791&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2017556649%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2017556649&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1173903&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0741932517743791&rfr_iscdi=true |