Ain't no sunshine: The cinema in 2003

Ain't no sunshine: The cinema in 2003

As 2003 came to a close, the usual plethora of critics' awards found themselves usurped by the decision of the Motion Picture Producers Association of America to disallow the distribution of screeners to its members, and to any organization which adheres to MPAA guidelines (which includes the M...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PAJ (Baltimore, Md.) Md.), 2004-05 (77), p.26
Hauptverfasser: Qualls, Larry, Chin, Daryl
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Motion picture criticism
Motion picture industry
Year in review
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 77
container_start_page 26
container_title PAJ (Baltimore, Md.)
container_volume
creator Qualls, Larry
Chin, Daryl
description As 2003 came to a close, the usual plethora of critics' awards found themselves usurped by the decision of the Motion Picture Producers Association of America to disallow the distribution of screeners to its members, and to any organization which adheres to MPAA guidelines (which includes the Motion Picture Academy of Arts and Sciences). This became the rallying cry of the Independent Feature Project, as those producers who had created some of the most notable "independent" films of the year tried to find a way to guarantee visibility during award season. This issue soon swamped all discussions of year-end appraisals, as everyone, from critics to filmmakers to studio executives, seemed to weigh in with an opinion on the matter of screeners.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_201755031</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>642456691</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p112t-138494900ee38217c0ee71b56cb40dbfdf0406fffde71d5d16186d572c4fdcff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotzc1qAjEUBeAgFbTqO4SCuArcm59JpjuRWgWhGwvuxElycaTNqJl5_47Y1fk4i3MGbIxGWVFqa18eliCkw8OIveZ8AUC02o3ZfFmnRctTw3OX8rlO8Z3vz5H7Xr8nXicuAdSUDen0k-PsPyfse_2xX23E7utzu1ruxBVRtgKV06UuAWJUTqL1PSxWpvCVhlBRINBQEFHo62ACFuiKYKz0moInUhP29ty93ptbF3N7vDTdPfWXRwlojQGF6g9ZZDql</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>201755031</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ain't no sunshine: The cinema in 2003</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Qualls, Larry ; Chin, Daryl</creator><creatorcontrib>Qualls, Larry ; Chin, Daryl</creatorcontrib><description>As 2003 came to a close, the usual plethora of critics' awards found themselves usurped by the decision of the Motion Picture Producers Association of America to disallow the distribution of screeners to its members, and to any organization which adheres to MPAA guidelines (which includes the Motion Picture Academy of Arts and Sciences). This became the rallying cry of the Independent Feature Project, as those producers who had created some of the most notable "independent" films of the year tried to find a way to guarantee visibility during award season. This issue soon swamped all discussions of year-end appraisals, as everyone, from critics to filmmakers to studio executives, seemed to weigh in with an opinion on the matter of screeners.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1520-281X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-9477</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Baltimore: MIT Press Journals, The</publisher><subject>Motion picture criticism ; Motion picture industry ; Year in review</subject><ispartof>PAJ (Baltimore, Md.), 2004-05 (77), p.26</ispartof><rights>Copyright Johns Hopkins University Press May 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Qualls, Larry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chin, Daryl</creatorcontrib><title>Ain't no sunshine: The cinema in 2003</title><title>PAJ (Baltimore, Md.)</title><description>As 2003 came to a close, the usual plethora of critics' awards found themselves usurped by the decision of the Motion Picture Producers Association of America to disallow the distribution of screeners to its members, and to any organization which adheres to MPAA guidelines (which includes the Motion Picture Academy of Arts and Sciences). This became the rallying cry of the Independent Feature Project, as those producers who had created some of the most notable "independent" films of the year tried to find a way to guarantee visibility during award season. This issue soon swamped all discussions of year-end appraisals, as everyone, from critics to filmmakers to studio executives, seemed to weigh in with an opinion on the matter of screeners.</description><subject>Motion picture criticism</subject><subject>Motion picture industry</subject><subject>Year in review</subject><issn>1520-281X</issn><issn>1537-9477</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotzc1qAjEUBeAgFbTqO4SCuArcm59JpjuRWgWhGwvuxElycaTNqJl5_47Y1fk4i3MGbIxGWVFqa18eliCkw8OIveZ8AUC02o3ZfFmnRctTw3OX8rlO8Z3vz5H7Xr8nXicuAdSUDen0k-PsPyfse_2xX23E7utzu1ruxBVRtgKV06UuAWJUTqL1PSxWpvCVhlBRINBQEFHo62ACFuiKYKz0moInUhP29ty93ptbF3N7vDTdPfWXRwlojQGF6g9ZZDql</recordid><startdate>20040501</startdate><enddate>20040501</enddate><creator>Qualls, Larry</creator><creator>Chin, Daryl</creator><general>MIT Press Journals, The</general><scope>C18</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040501</creationdate><title>Ain't no sunshine: The cinema in 2003</title><author>Qualls, Larry ; Chin, Daryl</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p112t-138494900ee38217c0ee71b56cb40dbfdf0406fffde71d5d16186d572c4fdcff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Motion picture criticism</topic><topic>Motion picture industry</topic><topic>Year in review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Qualls, Larry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chin, Daryl</creatorcontrib><collection>Humanities Index</collection><jtitle>PAJ (Baltimore, Md.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Qualls, Larry</au><au>Chin, Daryl</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ain't no sunshine: The cinema in 2003</atitle><jtitle>PAJ (Baltimore, Md.)</jtitle><date>2004-05-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><issue>77</issue><spage>26</spage><pages>26-</pages><issn>1520-281X</issn><eissn>1537-9477</eissn><abstract>As 2003 came to a close, the usual plethora of critics' awards found themselves usurped by the decision of the Motion Picture Producers Association of America to disallow the distribution of screeners to its members, and to any organization which adheres to MPAA guidelines (which includes the Motion Picture Academy of Arts and Sciences). This became the rallying cry of the Independent Feature Project, as those producers who had created some of the most notable "independent" films of the year tried to find a way to guarantee visibility during award season. This issue soon swamped all discussions of year-end appraisals, as everyone, from critics to filmmakers to studio executives, seemed to weigh in with an opinion on the matter of screeners.</abstract><cop>Baltimore</cop><pub>MIT Press Journals, The</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1520-281X
ispartof PAJ (Baltimore, Md.), 2004-05 (77), p.26
issn 1520-281X
1537-9477
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_201755031
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Motion picture criticism
Motion picture industry
Year in review
title Ain't no sunshine: The cinema in 2003
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T07%3A04%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ain't%20no%20sunshine:%20The%20cinema%20in%202003&rft.jtitle=PAJ%20(Baltimore,%20Md.)&rft.au=Qualls,%20Larry&rft.date=2004-05-01&rft.issue=77&rft.spage=26&rft.pages=26-&rft.issn=1520-281X&rft.eissn=1537-9477&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E642456691%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=201755031&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true