Pleasure and Purpose in Kant’s Theory of Taste

In the Kant repeatedly points out that it is only the pleasure of taste that reveals to us the need to introduce a third faculty of the mind with its own a priori principle. In order to elucidate this claim I discuss two general principles about pleasure that Kant presents, the transcendental defini...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Kant-Studien 2018-03, Vol.109 (1), p.101-123
1. Verfasser: Rueger, Alexander
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 123
container_issue 1
container_start_page 101
container_title Kant-Studien
container_volume 109
creator Rueger, Alexander
description In the Kant repeatedly points out that it is only the pleasure of taste that reveals to us the need to introduce a third faculty of the mind with its own a priori principle. In order to elucidate this claim I discuss two general principles about pleasure that Kant presents, the transcendental definition of pleasure from § 10 and the principle from the Introduction that connects pleasure with the achievement of an aim. Precursors of these principles had been employed by Kant and others in empirical psychology. But how can such principles of empirical psychology be transferred to transcendental philosophy? I suggest that Kant accomplishes this by deriving the connection of pleasure with achievement of an aim from the transcendental definition and the assumption that faculties have interests. I finally reconstruct § 11 as a ‘regressive argument’ from the peculiarities of the pleasure of taste to the need to acknowledge a new faculty.
doi_str_mv 10.1515/kant-2018-0003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2017189109</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2017189109</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-c7b1e328c813d97741b6b3f8a2e7c551a3b24e92f019906553f6c01c4eae2f163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkL1OwzAUhS0EEuVnZY7E7HKvncTOwIAq_kQlOpTZctxraClJsROhbrwGr8eT4KhILEz3DOc7R_cwdoYwxgKLi1fbdFwAag4Aco-NsETJEWW-z0YAQnCtlTpkRzGukqOUOYwYzNZkYx8os80im_Vh00bKlk32kNK-P79iNn-hNmyz1mdzGzs6YQferiOd_t5j9nRzPZ_c8enj7f3kasqdFNhxp2okKbTTKBeVUjnWZS29toKUKwq0shY5VcIDVhWURSF96QBdTpaEx1Ies_Nd7ia07z3FzqzaPjSp0qQfFeoKoUqu8c7lQhtjIG82Yflmw9YgmGEVM6wyENoMqyTgcgd82HVHYUHPod8m8Zf-P5jKEAHlD0T-aCk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2017189109</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pleasure and Purpose in Kant’s Theory of Taste</title><source>De Gruyter journals</source><creator>Rueger, Alexander</creator><creatorcontrib>Rueger, Alexander</creatorcontrib><description>In the Kant repeatedly points out that it is only the pleasure of taste that reveals to us the need to introduce a third faculty of the mind with its own a priori principle. In order to elucidate this claim I discuss two general principles about pleasure that Kant presents, the transcendental definition of pleasure from § 10 and the principle from the Introduction that connects pleasure with the achievement of an aim. Precursors of these principles had been employed by Kant and others in empirical psychology. But how can such principles of empirical psychology be transferred to transcendental philosophy? I suggest that Kant accomplishes this by deriving the connection of pleasure with achievement of an aim from the transcendental definition and the assumption that faculties have interests. I finally reconstruct § 11 as a ‘regressive argument’ from the peculiarities of the pleasure of taste to the need to acknowledge a new faculty.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-8877</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1613-1134</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1515/kant-2018-0003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: De Gruyter</publisher><subject>Aesthetics ; empirical psychology ; Empiricism ; Judgment ; Kant, Immanuel (1724-1804) ; Philosophy ; pleasure of taste ; Power of judgment ; Psychology ; Theory ; transcendental definition ; Transcendentalism</subject><ispartof>Kant-Studien, 2018-03, Vol.109 (1), p.101-123</ispartof><rights>Copyright Walter de Gruyter GmbH Mar 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-c7b1e328c813d97741b6b3f8a2e7c551a3b24e92f019906553f6c01c4eae2f163</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/kant-2018-0003/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/kant-2018-0003/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,66626,68410</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rueger, Alexander</creatorcontrib><title>Pleasure and Purpose in Kant’s Theory of Taste</title><title>Kant-Studien</title><description>In the Kant repeatedly points out that it is only the pleasure of taste that reveals to us the need to introduce a third faculty of the mind with its own a priori principle. In order to elucidate this claim I discuss two general principles about pleasure that Kant presents, the transcendental definition of pleasure from § 10 and the principle from the Introduction that connects pleasure with the achievement of an aim. Precursors of these principles had been employed by Kant and others in empirical psychology. But how can such principles of empirical psychology be transferred to transcendental philosophy? I suggest that Kant accomplishes this by deriving the connection of pleasure with achievement of an aim from the transcendental definition and the assumption that faculties have interests. I finally reconstruct § 11 as a ‘regressive argument’ from the peculiarities of the pleasure of taste to the need to acknowledge a new faculty.</description><subject>Aesthetics</subject><subject>empirical psychology</subject><subject>Empiricism</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Kant, Immanuel (1724-1804)</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>pleasure of taste</subject><subject>Power of judgment</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Theory</subject><subject>transcendental definition</subject><subject>Transcendentalism</subject><issn>0022-8877</issn><issn>1613-1134</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkL1OwzAUhS0EEuVnZY7E7HKvncTOwIAq_kQlOpTZctxraClJsROhbrwGr8eT4KhILEz3DOc7R_cwdoYwxgKLi1fbdFwAag4Aco-NsETJEWW-z0YAQnCtlTpkRzGukqOUOYwYzNZkYx8os80im_Vh00bKlk32kNK-P79iNn-hNmyz1mdzGzs6YQferiOd_t5j9nRzPZ_c8enj7f3kasqdFNhxp2okKbTTKBeVUjnWZS29toKUKwq0shY5VcIDVhWURSF96QBdTpaEx1Ies_Nd7ia07z3FzqzaPjSp0qQfFeoKoUqu8c7lQhtjIG82Yflmw9YgmGEVM6wyENoMqyTgcgd82HVHYUHPod8m8Zf-P5jKEAHlD0T-aCk</recordid><startdate>20180308</startdate><enddate>20180308</enddate><creator>Rueger, Alexander</creator><general>De Gruyter</general><general>Walter de Gruyter GmbH</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180308</creationdate><title>Pleasure and Purpose in Kant’s Theory of Taste</title><author>Rueger, Alexander</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-c7b1e328c813d97741b6b3f8a2e7c551a3b24e92f019906553f6c01c4eae2f163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aesthetics</topic><topic>empirical psychology</topic><topic>Empiricism</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Kant, Immanuel (1724-1804)</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>pleasure of taste</topic><topic>Power of judgment</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>transcendental definition</topic><topic>Transcendentalism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rueger, Alexander</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Kant-Studien</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rueger, Alexander</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pleasure and Purpose in Kant’s Theory of Taste</atitle><jtitle>Kant-Studien</jtitle><date>2018-03-08</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>109</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>101</spage><epage>123</epage><pages>101-123</pages><issn>0022-8877</issn><eissn>1613-1134</eissn><abstract>In the Kant repeatedly points out that it is only the pleasure of taste that reveals to us the need to introduce a third faculty of the mind with its own a priori principle. In order to elucidate this claim I discuss two general principles about pleasure that Kant presents, the transcendental definition of pleasure from § 10 and the principle from the Introduction that connects pleasure with the achievement of an aim. Precursors of these principles had been employed by Kant and others in empirical psychology. But how can such principles of empirical psychology be transferred to transcendental philosophy? I suggest that Kant accomplishes this by deriving the connection of pleasure with achievement of an aim from the transcendental definition and the assumption that faculties have interests. I finally reconstruct § 11 as a ‘regressive argument’ from the peculiarities of the pleasure of taste to the need to acknowledge a new faculty.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>De Gruyter</pub><doi>10.1515/kant-2018-0003</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-8877
ispartof Kant-Studien, 2018-03, Vol.109 (1), p.101-123
issn 0022-8877
1613-1134
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2017189109
source De Gruyter journals
subjects Aesthetics
empirical psychology
Empiricism
Judgment
Kant, Immanuel (1724-1804)
Philosophy
pleasure of taste
Power of judgment
Psychology
Theory
transcendental definition
Transcendentalism
title Pleasure and Purpose in Kant’s Theory of Taste
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T22%3A55%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pleasure%20and%20Purpose%20in%20Kant%E2%80%99s%20Theory%20of%20Taste&rft.jtitle=Kant-Studien&rft.au=Rueger,%20Alexander&rft.date=2018-03-08&rft.volume=109&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=101&rft.epage=123&rft.pages=101-123&rft.issn=0022-8877&rft.eissn=1613-1134&rft_id=info:doi/10.1515/kant-2018-0003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2017189109%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2017189109&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true