PGE exploration in the Wadi Amarah complex, southwestern Arabian Shield
A stream sediment survey targeting PGE and their pathfinders was carried out at a gabbro/pyroxenite complex in Wadi Amarah in the SW Arabian Shield. Twenty-nine stream sediment samples were collected from wadi channels and analyzed for PGE and base metals. None of the samples contained detectable PG...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Arabian journal of geosciences 2018-03, Vol.11 (6), p.1-14, Article 127 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 14 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Arabian journal of geosciences |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Al-Saleh, Ahmad M. |
description | A stream sediment survey targeting PGE and their pathfinders was carried out at a gabbro/pyroxenite complex in Wadi Amarah in the SW Arabian Shield. Twenty-nine stream sediment samples were collected from wadi channels and analyzed for PGE and base metals. None of the samples contained detectable PGE except for WAS-3 and WAS-27 which returned values above 70 ppb of combined Pt and Pd; these two locations are also anomalous for Au. A follow-up survey was conducted to further investigate the anomalies at these locations. A total of 48 soil and rock samples were collected from the two anomalous localities. Unlike the initial survey, most samples contained detectable PGE and Au albeit not as high as the original anomalies. Factor analysis of the results from the initial survey returned five main factors, with the first four reflecting the effects of mineral detritus as well as adsorption onto Fe–Mn oxyhydroxides; however, the last factor is loaded only for Cu and Ni and is therefore considered an ore factor indicating the presence of Cu–Ni sulphides. Another five factors were obtained from the follow-up survey, and as was the case in the initial survey, the first four factors are detrital/adsorption-related, while factor 5 has high loadings for only Pd and Pt and is therefore interpreted as a PGE ore factor. These findings reveal different modes of dispersion of PGE and base metals in the secondary environment and, more importantly, demonstrate the effectiveness of factor analysis in detecting even faint anomalies from disseminated mineralization. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12517-018-3452-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2017099177</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2017099177</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-6abc3eac3e7377e00b4d8092df3e8d8e492dc63101e9a80f949e3ef77d610d003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLw0AQhRdRsFZ_gLcFr0Znsunu5lhKjUJBQcXjsk0mJiVN4m6K9d-7JaInD8PM4b03Mx9jlwg3CKBuPcYzVBGgjkQyiyNxxCaopYzUTOjj3xnxlJ15vwGQGpSesOwpW3La903n7FB3La9bPlTE32xR8_nWOlvxvNv2De2vue92Q_VJfiDX8rmz69q2_LmqqSnO2UlpG08XP33KXu-WL4v7aPWYPSzmqyiPpR4iade5IBtKCaUIYJ0UGtK4KAXpQlMSxlwKBKTUaijTJCVBpVKFRCgAxJRdjbm96z524RSz6XauDStNDKggTVGpoMJRlbvOe0el6V0dnvkyCObAy4y8TOBlDryMCJ549Pigbd_J_SX_b_oGx0lsmg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2017099177</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PGE exploration in the Wadi Amarah complex, southwestern Arabian Shield</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Al-Saleh, Ahmad M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Al-Saleh, Ahmad M.</creatorcontrib><description>A stream sediment survey targeting PGE and their pathfinders was carried out at a gabbro/pyroxenite complex in Wadi Amarah in the SW Arabian Shield. Twenty-nine stream sediment samples were collected from wadi channels and analyzed for PGE and base metals. None of the samples contained detectable PGE except for WAS-3 and WAS-27 which returned values above 70 ppb of combined Pt and Pd; these two locations are also anomalous for Au. A follow-up survey was conducted to further investigate the anomalies at these locations. A total of 48 soil and rock samples were collected from the two anomalous localities. Unlike the initial survey, most samples contained detectable PGE and Au albeit not as high as the original anomalies. Factor analysis of the results from the initial survey returned five main factors, with the first four reflecting the effects of mineral detritus as well as adsorption onto Fe–Mn oxyhydroxides; however, the last factor is loaded only for Cu and Ni and is therefore considered an ore factor indicating the presence of Cu–Ni sulphides. Another five factors were obtained from the follow-up survey, and as was the case in the initial survey, the first four factors are detrital/adsorption-related, while factor 5 has high loadings for only Pd and Pt and is therefore interpreted as a PGE ore factor. These findings reveal different modes of dispersion of PGE and base metals in the secondary environment and, more importantly, demonstrate the effectiveness of factor analysis in detecting even faint anomalies from disseminated mineralization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1866-7511</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1866-7538</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12517-018-3452-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adsorption ; Anomalies ; Copper ; Detritus ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth science ; Earth Sciences ; Exploration ; Factor analysis ; Gabbro ; Manganese ; Metals ; Mineralization ; Nickel ; Original Paper ; Palladium ; Platinum ; Polls & surveys ; Rivers ; Sediment ; Sediment samplers ; Sediment samples ; Soil ; Soil investigations ; Sulphides ; Surveying</subject><ispartof>Arabian journal of geosciences, 2018-03, Vol.11 (6), p.1-14, Article 127</ispartof><rights>Saudi Society for Geosciences 2018</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science & Business Media 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-6abc3eac3e7377e00b4d8092df3e8d8e492dc63101e9a80f949e3ef77d610d003</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12517-018-3452-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12517-018-3452-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Al-Saleh, Ahmad M.</creatorcontrib><title>PGE exploration in the Wadi Amarah complex, southwestern Arabian Shield</title><title>Arabian journal of geosciences</title><addtitle>Arab J Geosci</addtitle><description>A stream sediment survey targeting PGE and their pathfinders was carried out at a gabbro/pyroxenite complex in Wadi Amarah in the SW Arabian Shield. Twenty-nine stream sediment samples were collected from wadi channels and analyzed for PGE and base metals. None of the samples contained detectable PGE except for WAS-3 and WAS-27 which returned values above 70 ppb of combined Pt and Pd; these two locations are also anomalous for Au. A follow-up survey was conducted to further investigate the anomalies at these locations. A total of 48 soil and rock samples were collected from the two anomalous localities. Unlike the initial survey, most samples contained detectable PGE and Au albeit not as high as the original anomalies. Factor analysis of the results from the initial survey returned five main factors, with the first four reflecting the effects of mineral detritus as well as adsorption onto Fe–Mn oxyhydroxides; however, the last factor is loaded only for Cu and Ni and is therefore considered an ore factor indicating the presence of Cu–Ni sulphides. Another five factors were obtained from the follow-up survey, and as was the case in the initial survey, the first four factors are detrital/adsorption-related, while factor 5 has high loadings for only Pd and Pt and is therefore interpreted as a PGE ore factor. These findings reveal different modes of dispersion of PGE and base metals in the secondary environment and, more importantly, demonstrate the effectiveness of factor analysis in detecting even faint anomalies from disseminated mineralization.</description><subject>Adsorption</subject><subject>Anomalies</subject><subject>Copper</subject><subject>Detritus</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Exploration</subject><subject>Factor analysis</subject><subject>Gabbro</subject><subject>Manganese</subject><subject>Metals</subject><subject>Mineralization</subject><subject>Nickel</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Palladium</subject><subject>Platinum</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Sediment</subject><subject>Sediment samplers</subject><subject>Sediment samples</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil investigations</subject><subject>Sulphides</subject><subject>Surveying</subject><issn>1866-7511</issn><issn>1866-7538</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEFLw0AQhRdRsFZ_gLcFr0Znsunu5lhKjUJBQcXjsk0mJiVN4m6K9d-7JaInD8PM4b03Mx9jlwg3CKBuPcYzVBGgjkQyiyNxxCaopYzUTOjj3xnxlJ15vwGQGpSesOwpW3La903n7FB3La9bPlTE32xR8_nWOlvxvNv2De2vue92Q_VJfiDX8rmz69q2_LmqqSnO2UlpG08XP33KXu-WL4v7aPWYPSzmqyiPpR4iade5IBtKCaUIYJ0UGtK4KAXpQlMSxlwKBKTUaijTJCVBpVKFRCgAxJRdjbm96z524RSz6XauDStNDKggTVGpoMJRlbvOe0el6V0dnvkyCObAy4y8TOBlDryMCJ549Pigbd_J_SX_b_oGx0lsmg</recordid><startdate>20180301</startdate><enddate>20180301</enddate><creator>Al-Saleh, Ahmad M.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180301</creationdate><title>PGE exploration in the Wadi Amarah complex, southwestern Arabian Shield</title><author>Al-Saleh, Ahmad M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-6abc3eac3e7377e00b4d8092df3e8d8e492dc63101e9a80f949e3ef77d610d003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adsorption</topic><topic>Anomalies</topic><topic>Copper</topic><topic>Detritus</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Exploration</topic><topic>Factor analysis</topic><topic>Gabbro</topic><topic>Manganese</topic><topic>Metals</topic><topic>Mineralization</topic><topic>Nickel</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Palladium</topic><topic>Platinum</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Sediment</topic><topic>Sediment samplers</topic><topic>Sediment samples</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil investigations</topic><topic>Sulphides</topic><topic>Surveying</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Al-Saleh, Ahmad M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Arabian journal of geosciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Al-Saleh, Ahmad M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PGE exploration in the Wadi Amarah complex, southwestern Arabian Shield</atitle><jtitle>Arabian journal of geosciences</jtitle><stitle>Arab J Geosci</stitle><date>2018-03-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>14</epage><pages>1-14</pages><artnum>127</artnum><issn>1866-7511</issn><eissn>1866-7538</eissn><abstract>A stream sediment survey targeting PGE and their pathfinders was carried out at a gabbro/pyroxenite complex in Wadi Amarah in the SW Arabian Shield. Twenty-nine stream sediment samples were collected from wadi channels and analyzed for PGE and base metals. None of the samples contained detectable PGE except for WAS-3 and WAS-27 which returned values above 70 ppb of combined Pt and Pd; these two locations are also anomalous for Au. A follow-up survey was conducted to further investigate the anomalies at these locations. A total of 48 soil and rock samples were collected from the two anomalous localities. Unlike the initial survey, most samples contained detectable PGE and Au albeit not as high as the original anomalies. Factor analysis of the results from the initial survey returned five main factors, with the first four reflecting the effects of mineral detritus as well as adsorption onto Fe–Mn oxyhydroxides; however, the last factor is loaded only for Cu and Ni and is therefore considered an ore factor indicating the presence of Cu–Ni sulphides. Another five factors were obtained from the follow-up survey, and as was the case in the initial survey, the first four factors are detrital/adsorption-related, while factor 5 has high loadings for only Pd and Pt and is therefore interpreted as a PGE ore factor. These findings reveal different modes of dispersion of PGE and base metals in the secondary environment and, more importantly, demonstrate the effectiveness of factor analysis in detecting even faint anomalies from disseminated mineralization.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s12517-018-3452-3</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1866-7511 |
ispartof | Arabian journal of geosciences, 2018-03, Vol.11 (6), p.1-14, Article 127 |
issn | 1866-7511 1866-7538 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2017099177 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Adsorption Anomalies Copper Detritus Earth and Environmental Science Earth science Earth Sciences Exploration Factor analysis Gabbro Manganese Metals Mineralization Nickel Original Paper Palladium Platinum Polls & surveys Rivers Sediment Sediment samplers Sediment samples Soil Soil investigations Sulphides Surveying |
title | PGE exploration in the Wadi Amarah complex, southwestern Arabian Shield |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T07%3A58%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PGE%20exploration%20in%20the%20Wadi%20Amarah%20complex,%20southwestern%20Arabian%20Shield&rft.jtitle=Arabian%20journal%20of%20geosciences&rft.au=Al-Saleh,%20Ahmad%20M.&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=14&rft.pages=1-14&rft.artnum=127&rft.issn=1866-7511&rft.eissn=1866-7538&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12517-018-3452-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2017099177%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2017099177&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |