An Implicit Törnqvist Index of Real GDP
Recently much attention has been devoted to superlative indexes in the context of the national accounts. In this paper we advocate the use of the implicit Törnqvist quantity index to measure real GDP. This index, which has been proposed by Diewert and Morrison (1986), has never received serious cons...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of productivity analysis 2004-05, Vol.21 (3), p.337-353 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 353 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 337 |
container_title | Journal of productivity analysis |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | KOHLI, ULRICH |
description | Recently much attention has been devoted to superlative indexes in the context of the national accounts. In this paper we advocate the use of the implicit Törnqvist quantity index to measure real GDP. This index, which has been proposed by Diewert and Morrison (1986), has never received serious consideration in the literature. Yet, compared to the better-known Fisher index, the implicit Törnqvist index of real GDP has a number of advantages. Thus, it can be shown to be exact for the Translog GDP function, it allows for a complete multiplicative decomposition of nominal and real GDP, and it is consistent with state-of-the-art measures of total factor productivity that typically rely on the Törnqvist aggregation. Estimates for a sample of 26 countries are reported. We find that the Laspeyres quantity index still used by the statistical agencies of most countries tends to underestimate real growth. Over the 1960-1996 period, the cumulated shortfall was as much as 13.4% of GDP in the case of Japan. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1023/B:PROD.0000022097.34038.ad |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_201704375</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41770162</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41770162</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-6a455f3213fd58b0e2bfaa7bc0a5f17c61ab247fc65dd07f1ef2c1e545ef0a833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkMtKw0AUQAdRsFY_QQhduUm888ok3fWhNVBoKRXcDZPJDCS0STuTFv0xf8AfM7Wid3M359wLB6EBhggDoY_j4XK1mEZwGkIgFRFlQJNIFReoh7mgITCGL1EPkpSHPCZv1-jG-6rD00SkPfQwqoNsu9uUumyD9denq_fH0rdBVhfmPWhssDJqE8ymy1t0ZdXGm7vf3Uevz0_ryUs4X8yyyWgeaipIG8aKcW4pwdQWPMnBkNwqJXINilssdIxVTpiwOuZFAcJiY4nGhjNuLKiE0j4anO_uXLM_GN_Kqjm4unspCWABjAreQcMzpF3jvTNW7ly5Ve5DYpCnMHIsT2Hkfxj5E0aqopPvz3Ll28b9mQwLATgm9Bukb2B5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>201704375</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Implicit Törnqvist Index of Real GDP</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>KOHLI, ULRICH</creator><creatorcontrib>KOHLI, ULRICH</creatorcontrib><description>Recently much attention has been devoted to superlative indexes in the context of the national accounts. In this paper we advocate the use of the implicit Törnqvist quantity index to measure real GDP. This index, which has been proposed by Diewert and Morrison (1986), has never received serious consideration in the literature. Yet, compared to the better-known Fisher index, the implicit Törnqvist index of real GDP has a number of advantages. Thus, it can be shown to be exact for the Translog GDP function, it allows for a complete multiplicative decomposition of nominal and real GDP, and it is consistent with state-of-the-art measures of total factor productivity that typically rely on the Törnqvist aggregation. Estimates for a sample of 26 countries are reported. We find that the Laspeyres quantity index still used by the statistical agencies of most countries tends to underestimate real growth. Over the 1960-1996 period, the cumulated shortfall was as much as 13.4% of GDP in the case of Japan.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0895-562X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0441</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/B:PROD.0000022097.34038.ad</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Norwell: Kluwer Academic Publishers</publisher><subject>Economic indices ; Economic justification ; GDP ; Gross Domestic Product ; Gross domestic product indices ; Index numbers ; Indexes ; Laspeyres price index ; Nominal gross domestic product ; Output price indices ; Paasche price index ; Prices ; Productivity ; Real gross domestic product ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of productivity analysis, 2004-05, Vol.21 (3), p.337-353</ispartof><rights>Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers May 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-6a455f3213fd58b0e2bfaa7bc0a5f17c61ab247fc65dd07f1ef2c1e545ef0a833</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41770162$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41770162$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>KOHLI, ULRICH</creatorcontrib><title>An Implicit Törnqvist Index of Real GDP</title><title>Journal of productivity analysis</title><description>Recently much attention has been devoted to superlative indexes in the context of the national accounts. In this paper we advocate the use of the implicit Törnqvist quantity index to measure real GDP. This index, which has been proposed by Diewert and Morrison (1986), has never received serious consideration in the literature. Yet, compared to the better-known Fisher index, the implicit Törnqvist index of real GDP has a number of advantages. Thus, it can be shown to be exact for the Translog GDP function, it allows for a complete multiplicative decomposition of nominal and real GDP, and it is consistent with state-of-the-art measures of total factor productivity that typically rely on the Törnqvist aggregation. Estimates for a sample of 26 countries are reported. We find that the Laspeyres quantity index still used by the statistical agencies of most countries tends to underestimate real growth. Over the 1960-1996 period, the cumulated shortfall was as much as 13.4% of GDP in the case of Japan.</description><subject>Economic indices</subject><subject>Economic justification</subject><subject>GDP</subject><subject>Gross Domestic Product</subject><subject>Gross domestic product indices</subject><subject>Index numbers</subject><subject>Indexes</subject><subject>Laspeyres price index</subject><subject>Nominal gross domestic product</subject><subject>Output price indices</subject><subject>Paasche price index</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Real gross domestic product</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0895-562X</issn><issn>1573-0441</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkMtKw0AUQAdRsFY_QQhduUm888ok3fWhNVBoKRXcDZPJDCS0STuTFv0xf8AfM7Wid3M359wLB6EBhggDoY_j4XK1mEZwGkIgFRFlQJNIFReoh7mgITCGL1EPkpSHPCZv1-jG-6rD00SkPfQwqoNsu9uUumyD9denq_fH0rdBVhfmPWhssDJqE8ymy1t0ZdXGm7vf3Uevz0_ryUs4X8yyyWgeaipIG8aKcW4pwdQWPMnBkNwqJXINilssdIxVTpiwOuZFAcJiY4nGhjNuLKiE0j4anO_uXLM_GN_Kqjm4unspCWABjAreQcMzpF3jvTNW7ly5Ve5DYpCnMHIsT2Hkfxj5E0aqopPvz3Ll28b9mQwLATgm9Bukb2B5</recordid><startdate>20040501</startdate><enddate>20040501</enddate><creator>KOHLI, ULRICH</creator><general>Kluwer Academic Publishers</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040501</creationdate><title>An Implicit Törnqvist Index of Real GDP</title><author>KOHLI, ULRICH</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-6a455f3213fd58b0e2bfaa7bc0a5f17c61ab247fc65dd07f1ef2c1e545ef0a833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Economic indices</topic><topic>Economic justification</topic><topic>GDP</topic><topic>Gross Domestic Product</topic><topic>Gross domestic product indices</topic><topic>Index numbers</topic><topic>Indexes</topic><topic>Laspeyres price index</topic><topic>Nominal gross domestic product</topic><topic>Output price indices</topic><topic>Paasche price index</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Real gross domestic product</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KOHLI, ULRICH</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of productivity analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KOHLI, ULRICH</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Implicit Törnqvist Index of Real GDP</atitle><jtitle>Journal of productivity analysis</jtitle><date>2004-05-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>337</spage><epage>353</epage><pages>337-353</pages><issn>0895-562X</issn><eissn>1573-0441</eissn><abstract>Recently much attention has been devoted to superlative indexes in the context of the national accounts. In this paper we advocate the use of the implicit Törnqvist quantity index to measure real GDP. This index, which has been proposed by Diewert and Morrison (1986), has never received serious consideration in the literature. Yet, compared to the better-known Fisher index, the implicit Törnqvist index of real GDP has a number of advantages. Thus, it can be shown to be exact for the Translog GDP function, it allows for a complete multiplicative decomposition of nominal and real GDP, and it is consistent with state-of-the-art measures of total factor productivity that typically rely on the Törnqvist aggregation. Estimates for a sample of 26 countries are reported. We find that the Laspeyres quantity index still used by the statistical agencies of most countries tends to underestimate real growth. Over the 1960-1996 period, the cumulated shortfall was as much as 13.4% of GDP in the case of Japan.</abstract><cop>Norwell</cop><pub>Kluwer Academic Publishers</pub><doi>10.1023/B:PROD.0000022097.34038.ad</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0895-562X |
ispartof | Journal of productivity analysis, 2004-05, Vol.21 (3), p.337-353 |
issn | 0895-562X 1573-0441 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_201704375 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; SpringerLink Journals; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Economic indices Economic justification GDP Gross Domestic Product Gross domestic product indices Index numbers Indexes Laspeyres price index Nominal gross domestic product Output price indices Paasche price index Prices Productivity Real gross domestic product Studies |
title | An Implicit Törnqvist Index of Real GDP |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T08%3A31%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Implicit%20T%C3%B6rnqvist%20Index%20of%20Real%20GDP&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20productivity%20analysis&rft.au=KOHLI,%20ULRICH&rft.date=2004-05-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=337&rft.epage=353&rft.pages=337-353&rft.issn=0895-562X&rft.eissn=1573-0441&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/B:PROD.0000022097.34038.ad&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E41770162%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=201704375&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=41770162&rfr_iscdi=true |