An Implicit Törnqvist Index of Real GDP

Recently much attention has been devoted to superlative indexes in the context of the national accounts. In this paper we advocate the use of the implicit Törnqvist quantity index to measure real GDP. This index, which has been proposed by Diewert and Morrison (1986), has never received serious cons...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of productivity analysis 2004-05, Vol.21 (3), p.337-353
1. Verfasser: KOHLI, ULRICH
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 353
container_issue 3
container_start_page 337
container_title Journal of productivity analysis
container_volume 21
creator KOHLI, ULRICH
description Recently much attention has been devoted to superlative indexes in the context of the national accounts. In this paper we advocate the use of the implicit Törnqvist quantity index to measure real GDP. This index, which has been proposed by Diewert and Morrison (1986), has never received serious consideration in the literature. Yet, compared to the better-known Fisher index, the implicit Törnqvist index of real GDP has a number of advantages. Thus, it can be shown to be exact for the Translog GDP function, it allows for a complete multiplicative decomposition of nominal and real GDP, and it is consistent with state-of-the-art measures of total factor productivity that typically rely on the Törnqvist aggregation. Estimates for a sample of 26 countries are reported. We find that the Laspeyres quantity index still used by the statistical agencies of most countries tends to underestimate real growth. Over the 1960-1996 period, the cumulated shortfall was as much as 13.4% of GDP in the case of Japan.
doi_str_mv 10.1023/B:PROD.0000022097.34038.ad
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_201704375</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41770162</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41770162</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-6a455f3213fd58b0e2bfaa7bc0a5f17c61ab247fc65dd07f1ef2c1e545ef0a833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkMtKw0AUQAdRsFY_QQhduUm888ok3fWhNVBoKRXcDZPJDCS0STuTFv0xf8AfM7Wid3M359wLB6EBhggDoY_j4XK1mEZwGkIgFRFlQJNIFReoh7mgITCGL1EPkpSHPCZv1-jG-6rD00SkPfQwqoNsu9uUumyD9denq_fH0rdBVhfmPWhssDJqE8ymy1t0ZdXGm7vf3Uevz0_ryUs4X8yyyWgeaipIG8aKcW4pwdQWPMnBkNwqJXINilssdIxVTpiwOuZFAcJiY4nGhjNuLKiE0j4anO_uXLM_GN_Kqjm4unspCWABjAreQcMzpF3jvTNW7ly5Ve5DYpCnMHIsT2Hkfxj5E0aqopPvz3Ll28b9mQwLATgm9Bukb2B5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>201704375</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Implicit Törnqvist Index of Real GDP</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>KOHLI, ULRICH</creator><creatorcontrib>KOHLI, ULRICH</creatorcontrib><description>Recently much attention has been devoted to superlative indexes in the context of the national accounts. In this paper we advocate the use of the implicit Törnqvist quantity index to measure real GDP. This index, which has been proposed by Diewert and Morrison (1986), has never received serious consideration in the literature. Yet, compared to the better-known Fisher index, the implicit Törnqvist index of real GDP has a number of advantages. Thus, it can be shown to be exact for the Translog GDP function, it allows for a complete multiplicative decomposition of nominal and real GDP, and it is consistent with state-of-the-art measures of total factor productivity that typically rely on the Törnqvist aggregation. Estimates for a sample of 26 countries are reported. We find that the Laspeyres quantity index still used by the statistical agencies of most countries tends to underestimate real growth. Over the 1960-1996 period, the cumulated shortfall was as much as 13.4% of GDP in the case of Japan.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0895-562X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0441</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/B:PROD.0000022097.34038.ad</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Norwell: Kluwer Academic Publishers</publisher><subject>Economic indices ; Economic justification ; GDP ; Gross Domestic Product ; Gross domestic product indices ; Index numbers ; Indexes ; Laspeyres price index ; Nominal gross domestic product ; Output price indices ; Paasche price index ; Prices ; Productivity ; Real gross domestic product ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of productivity analysis, 2004-05, Vol.21 (3), p.337-353</ispartof><rights>Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers May 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-6a455f3213fd58b0e2bfaa7bc0a5f17c61ab247fc65dd07f1ef2c1e545ef0a833</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41770162$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41770162$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>KOHLI, ULRICH</creatorcontrib><title>An Implicit Törnqvist Index of Real GDP</title><title>Journal of productivity analysis</title><description>Recently much attention has been devoted to superlative indexes in the context of the national accounts. In this paper we advocate the use of the implicit Törnqvist quantity index to measure real GDP. This index, which has been proposed by Diewert and Morrison (1986), has never received serious consideration in the literature. Yet, compared to the better-known Fisher index, the implicit Törnqvist index of real GDP has a number of advantages. Thus, it can be shown to be exact for the Translog GDP function, it allows for a complete multiplicative decomposition of nominal and real GDP, and it is consistent with state-of-the-art measures of total factor productivity that typically rely on the Törnqvist aggregation. Estimates for a sample of 26 countries are reported. We find that the Laspeyres quantity index still used by the statistical agencies of most countries tends to underestimate real growth. Over the 1960-1996 period, the cumulated shortfall was as much as 13.4% of GDP in the case of Japan.</description><subject>Economic indices</subject><subject>Economic justification</subject><subject>GDP</subject><subject>Gross Domestic Product</subject><subject>Gross domestic product indices</subject><subject>Index numbers</subject><subject>Indexes</subject><subject>Laspeyres price index</subject><subject>Nominal gross domestic product</subject><subject>Output price indices</subject><subject>Paasche price index</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Real gross domestic product</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0895-562X</issn><issn>1573-0441</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkMtKw0AUQAdRsFY_QQhduUm888ok3fWhNVBoKRXcDZPJDCS0STuTFv0xf8AfM7Wid3M359wLB6EBhggDoY_j4XK1mEZwGkIgFRFlQJNIFReoh7mgITCGL1EPkpSHPCZv1-jG-6rD00SkPfQwqoNsu9uUumyD9denq_fH0rdBVhfmPWhssDJqE8ymy1t0ZdXGm7vf3Uevz0_ryUs4X8yyyWgeaipIG8aKcW4pwdQWPMnBkNwqJXINilssdIxVTpiwOuZFAcJiY4nGhjNuLKiE0j4anO_uXLM_GN_Kqjm4unspCWABjAreQcMzpF3jvTNW7ly5Ve5DYpCnMHIsT2Hkfxj5E0aqopPvz3Ll28b9mQwLATgm9Bukb2B5</recordid><startdate>20040501</startdate><enddate>20040501</enddate><creator>KOHLI, ULRICH</creator><general>Kluwer Academic Publishers</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040501</creationdate><title>An Implicit Törnqvist Index of Real GDP</title><author>KOHLI, ULRICH</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-6a455f3213fd58b0e2bfaa7bc0a5f17c61ab247fc65dd07f1ef2c1e545ef0a833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Economic indices</topic><topic>Economic justification</topic><topic>GDP</topic><topic>Gross Domestic Product</topic><topic>Gross domestic product indices</topic><topic>Index numbers</topic><topic>Indexes</topic><topic>Laspeyres price index</topic><topic>Nominal gross domestic product</topic><topic>Output price indices</topic><topic>Paasche price index</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Real gross domestic product</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KOHLI, ULRICH</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of productivity analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KOHLI, ULRICH</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Implicit Törnqvist Index of Real GDP</atitle><jtitle>Journal of productivity analysis</jtitle><date>2004-05-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>337</spage><epage>353</epage><pages>337-353</pages><issn>0895-562X</issn><eissn>1573-0441</eissn><abstract>Recently much attention has been devoted to superlative indexes in the context of the national accounts. In this paper we advocate the use of the implicit Törnqvist quantity index to measure real GDP. This index, which has been proposed by Diewert and Morrison (1986), has never received serious consideration in the literature. Yet, compared to the better-known Fisher index, the implicit Törnqvist index of real GDP has a number of advantages. Thus, it can be shown to be exact for the Translog GDP function, it allows for a complete multiplicative decomposition of nominal and real GDP, and it is consistent with state-of-the-art measures of total factor productivity that typically rely on the Törnqvist aggregation. Estimates for a sample of 26 countries are reported. We find that the Laspeyres quantity index still used by the statistical agencies of most countries tends to underestimate real growth. Over the 1960-1996 period, the cumulated shortfall was as much as 13.4% of GDP in the case of Japan.</abstract><cop>Norwell</cop><pub>Kluwer Academic Publishers</pub><doi>10.1023/B:PROD.0000022097.34038.ad</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0895-562X
ispartof Journal of productivity analysis, 2004-05, Vol.21 (3), p.337-353
issn 0895-562X
1573-0441
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_201704375
source Jstor Complete Legacy; SpringerLink Journals; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects Economic indices
Economic justification
GDP
Gross Domestic Product
Gross domestic product indices
Index numbers
Indexes
Laspeyres price index
Nominal gross domestic product
Output price indices
Paasche price index
Prices
Productivity
Real gross domestic product
Studies
title An Implicit Törnqvist Index of Real GDP
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T08%3A31%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Implicit%20T%C3%B6rnqvist%20Index%20of%20Real%20GDP&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20productivity%20analysis&rft.au=KOHLI,%20ULRICH&rft.date=2004-05-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=337&rft.epage=353&rft.pages=337-353&rft.issn=0895-562X&rft.eissn=1573-0441&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/B:PROD.0000022097.34038.ad&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E41770162%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=201704375&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=41770162&rfr_iscdi=true