Differences in bacterial composition between men’s and women’s restrooms and other common areas within a public building
Humans distribute a wide range of microorganisms around building interiors, and some of these are potentially pathogenic. Recent research established that humans are the main drivers of the indoor microbiome and up to now significant literature has been produced about this topic. Here we analyzed di...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2018-04, Vol.111 (4), p.551-561 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 561 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 551 |
container_title | Antonie van Leeuwenhoek |
container_volume | 111 |
creator | Dobbler, Priscila Caroline Thiago Laureano, Álvaro Macedo Sarzi, Deise Schroder Cañón, Ehidy Rocio Peña Metz, Geferson Fernando de Freitas, Anderson Santos Takagaki, Beatriz Midori D´Oliveira, Cristiane Barbosa Pylro, Victor Satler Copetti, André Carlos Victoria, Filipe Redmile-Gordon, Marc Morais, Daniel Kumazawa Roesch, Luiz Fernando Wurdig |
description | Humans distribute a wide range of microorganisms around building interiors, and some of these are potentially pathogenic. Recent research established that humans are the main drivers of the indoor microbiome and up to now significant literature has been produced about this topic. Here we analyzed differences in bacterial composition between men’s and women’s restrooms and other common areas within the same public building. Bacterial DNA samples were collected from restrooms and halls of a three-floor building from the Federal University of Pampa, RS, Brazil. The bacterial community was characterized by amplification of the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene and sequencing. Throughout all samples, the most abundant phylum was
Proteobacteria
, followed by
Actinobacteria
,
Bacteroidetes
and
Firmicutes.
Beta diversity metrics showed that the structure of the bacterial communities were different among the areas and floors tested, however, only 6–9% of the variation in bacterial communities was explained by the area and floors sampled. A few microorganisms showed significantly differential abundance between men’s and women’s restrooms, but in general, the bacterial communities from both places were very similar. Finally, significant differences among the microbial community profile from different floors were reported, suggesting that the type of use and occupant demographic within the building may directly influence bacterial dispersion and establishment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10482-017-0976-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2015517962</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2015517962</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-342b4de51618f69c2f0817f6029b81e9e8d855c1946105df425cec4dfd144c173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1KxTAQhYMoer36AG4k4LqaSdukWYr_ILjRdWjTiUZum2vSchFc-Bq-nk9iLvVn5WqYmXPODB8hB8COgTF5EoEVFc8YyIwpKTKxQWZQSp4podQmmTHG8kwwyXfIbozPqVWikttkhyvgUvB8Rt7OnbUYsDcYqetpU5sBg6sX1Phu6aMbnE9THFaIPe2w_3z_iLTuW7ryP13AOATvu2nuhycMa3eXjHXAOtKVG55Sdk2XY7NwhjajW7Suf9wjW7ZeRNz_rnPycHlxf3ad3d5d3Zyd3mYmz9WQ5QVvihZLEFBZoQy3rAJpBeOqqQAVVm1VlgZUIYCVrS14adAUrW2hKAzIfE6Optxl8C9j-lY_-zH06aTmDMoSpEow5gQmlQk-xoBWL4Pr6vCqgek1bz3x1om3XvPWInkOv5PHpsP21_EDOAn4JIhp1T9i-Dv9f-oXv6qOLQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2015517962</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences in bacterial composition between men’s and women’s restrooms and other common areas within a public building</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Dobbler, Priscila Caroline Thiago ; Laureano, Álvaro Macedo ; Sarzi, Deise Schroder ; Cañón, Ehidy Rocio Peña ; Metz, Geferson Fernando ; de Freitas, Anderson Santos ; Takagaki, Beatriz Midori ; D´Oliveira, Cristiane Barbosa ; Pylro, Victor Satler ; Copetti, André Carlos ; Victoria, Filipe ; Redmile-Gordon, Marc ; Morais, Daniel Kumazawa ; Roesch, Luiz Fernando Wurdig</creator><creatorcontrib>Dobbler, Priscila Caroline Thiago ; Laureano, Álvaro Macedo ; Sarzi, Deise Schroder ; Cañón, Ehidy Rocio Peña ; Metz, Geferson Fernando ; de Freitas, Anderson Santos ; Takagaki, Beatriz Midori ; D´Oliveira, Cristiane Barbosa ; Pylro, Victor Satler ; Copetti, André Carlos ; Victoria, Filipe ; Redmile-Gordon, Marc ; Morais, Daniel Kumazawa ; Roesch, Luiz Fernando Wurdig</creatorcontrib><description>Humans distribute a wide range of microorganisms around building interiors, and some of these are potentially pathogenic. Recent research established that humans are the main drivers of the indoor microbiome and up to now significant literature has been produced about this topic. Here we analyzed differences in bacterial composition between men’s and women’s restrooms and other common areas within the same public building. Bacterial DNA samples were collected from restrooms and halls of a three-floor building from the Federal University of Pampa, RS, Brazil. The bacterial community was characterized by amplification of the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene and sequencing. Throughout all samples, the most abundant phylum was
Proteobacteria
, followed by
Actinobacteria
,
Bacteroidetes
and
Firmicutes.
Beta diversity metrics showed that the structure of the bacterial communities were different among the areas and floors tested, however, only 6–9% of the variation in bacterial communities was explained by the area and floors sampled. A few microorganisms showed significantly differential abundance between men’s and women’s restrooms, but in general, the bacterial communities from both places were very similar. Finally, significant differences among the microbial community profile from different floors were reported, suggesting that the type of use and occupant demographic within the building may directly influence bacterial dispersion and establishment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-6072</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9699</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10482-017-0976-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29127623</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Bacteria ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Communities ; Demographics ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; Gene sequencing ; Halls ; Life Sciences ; Medical Microbiology ; Men ; Microbiology ; Microbiomes ; Microorganisms ; Original Paper ; Plant Sciences ; Public buildings ; rRNA 16S ; Soil Science & Conservation</subject><ispartof>Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 2018-04, Vol.111 (4), p.551-561</ispartof><rights>Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2017</rights><rights>Antonie van Leeuwenhoek is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-342b4de51618f69c2f0817f6029b81e9e8d855c1946105df425cec4dfd144c173</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-342b4de51618f69c2f0817f6029b81e9e8d855c1946105df425cec4dfd144c173</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1450-8828</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10482-017-0976-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10482-017-0976-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29127623$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dobbler, Priscila Caroline Thiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laureano, Álvaro Macedo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarzi, Deise Schroder</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cañón, Ehidy Rocio Peña</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metz, Geferson Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Freitas, Anderson Santos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takagaki, Beatriz Midori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D´Oliveira, Cristiane Barbosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pylro, Victor Satler</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Copetti, André Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Victoria, Filipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redmile-Gordon, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morais, Daniel Kumazawa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roesch, Luiz Fernando Wurdig</creatorcontrib><title>Differences in bacterial composition between men’s and women’s restrooms and other common areas within a public building</title><title>Antonie van Leeuwenhoek</title><addtitle>Antonie van Leeuwenhoek</addtitle><addtitle>Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek</addtitle><description>Humans distribute a wide range of microorganisms around building interiors, and some of these are potentially pathogenic. Recent research established that humans are the main drivers of the indoor microbiome and up to now significant literature has been produced about this topic. Here we analyzed differences in bacterial composition between men’s and women’s restrooms and other common areas within the same public building. Bacterial DNA samples were collected from restrooms and halls of a three-floor building from the Federal University of Pampa, RS, Brazil. The bacterial community was characterized by amplification of the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene and sequencing. Throughout all samples, the most abundant phylum was
Proteobacteria
, followed by
Actinobacteria
,
Bacteroidetes
and
Firmicutes.
Beta diversity metrics showed that the structure of the bacterial communities were different among the areas and floors tested, however, only 6–9% of the variation in bacterial communities was explained by the area and floors sampled. A few microorganisms showed significantly differential abundance between men’s and women’s restrooms, but in general, the bacterial communities from both places were very similar. Finally, significant differences among the microbial community profile from different floors were reported, suggesting that the type of use and occupant demographic within the building may directly influence bacterial dispersion and establishment.</description><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>Gene sequencing</subject><subject>Halls</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Medical Microbiology</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Microbiomes</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Public buildings</subject><subject>rRNA 16S</subject><subject>Soil Science & Conservation</subject><issn>0003-6072</issn><issn>1572-9699</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1KxTAQhYMoer36AG4k4LqaSdukWYr_ILjRdWjTiUZum2vSchFc-Bq-nk9iLvVn5WqYmXPODB8hB8COgTF5EoEVFc8YyIwpKTKxQWZQSp4podQmmTHG8kwwyXfIbozPqVWikttkhyvgUvB8Rt7OnbUYsDcYqetpU5sBg6sX1Phu6aMbnE9THFaIPe2w_3z_iLTuW7ryP13AOATvu2nuhycMa3eXjHXAOtKVG55Sdk2XY7NwhjajW7Suf9wjW7ZeRNz_rnPycHlxf3ad3d5d3Zyd3mYmz9WQ5QVvihZLEFBZoQy3rAJpBeOqqQAVVm1VlgZUIYCVrS14adAUrW2hKAzIfE6Optxl8C9j-lY_-zH06aTmDMoSpEow5gQmlQk-xoBWL4Pr6vCqgek1bz3x1om3XvPWInkOv5PHpsP21_EDOAn4JIhp1T9i-Dv9f-oXv6qOLQ</recordid><startdate>20180401</startdate><enddate>20180401</enddate><creator>Dobbler, Priscila Caroline Thiago</creator><creator>Laureano, Álvaro Macedo</creator><creator>Sarzi, Deise Schroder</creator><creator>Cañón, Ehidy Rocio Peña</creator><creator>Metz, Geferson Fernando</creator><creator>de Freitas, Anderson Santos</creator><creator>Takagaki, Beatriz Midori</creator><creator>D´Oliveira, Cristiane Barbosa</creator><creator>Pylro, Victor Satler</creator><creator>Copetti, André Carlos</creator><creator>Victoria, Filipe</creator><creator>Redmile-Gordon, Marc</creator><creator>Morais, Daniel Kumazawa</creator><creator>Roesch, Luiz Fernando Wurdig</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1450-8828</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180401</creationdate><title>Differences in bacterial composition between men’s and women’s restrooms and other common areas within a public building</title><author>Dobbler, Priscila Caroline Thiago ; Laureano, Álvaro Macedo ; Sarzi, Deise Schroder ; Cañón, Ehidy Rocio Peña ; Metz, Geferson Fernando ; de Freitas, Anderson Santos ; Takagaki, Beatriz Midori ; D´Oliveira, Cristiane Barbosa ; Pylro, Victor Satler ; Copetti, André Carlos ; Victoria, Filipe ; Redmile-Gordon, Marc ; Morais, Daniel Kumazawa ; Roesch, Luiz Fernando Wurdig</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-342b4de51618f69c2f0817f6029b81e9e8d855c1946105df425cec4dfd144c173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>Gene sequencing</topic><topic>Halls</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Medical Microbiology</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Microbiomes</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Public buildings</topic><topic>rRNA 16S</topic><topic>Soil Science & Conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dobbler, Priscila Caroline Thiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laureano, Álvaro Macedo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarzi, Deise Schroder</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cañón, Ehidy Rocio Peña</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metz, Geferson Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Freitas, Anderson Santos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takagaki, Beatriz Midori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D´Oliveira, Cristiane Barbosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pylro, Victor Satler</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Copetti, André Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Victoria, Filipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redmile-Gordon, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morais, Daniel Kumazawa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roesch, Luiz Fernando Wurdig</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Antonie van Leeuwenhoek</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dobbler, Priscila Caroline Thiago</au><au>Laureano, Álvaro Macedo</au><au>Sarzi, Deise Schroder</au><au>Cañón, Ehidy Rocio Peña</au><au>Metz, Geferson Fernando</au><au>de Freitas, Anderson Santos</au><au>Takagaki, Beatriz Midori</au><au>D´Oliveira, Cristiane Barbosa</au><au>Pylro, Victor Satler</au><au>Copetti, André Carlos</au><au>Victoria, Filipe</au><au>Redmile-Gordon, Marc</au><au>Morais, Daniel Kumazawa</au><au>Roesch, Luiz Fernando Wurdig</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differences in bacterial composition between men’s and women’s restrooms and other common areas within a public building</atitle><jtitle>Antonie van Leeuwenhoek</jtitle><stitle>Antonie van Leeuwenhoek</stitle><addtitle>Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek</addtitle><date>2018-04-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>111</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>551</spage><epage>561</epage><pages>551-561</pages><issn>0003-6072</issn><eissn>1572-9699</eissn><abstract>Humans distribute a wide range of microorganisms around building interiors, and some of these are potentially pathogenic. Recent research established that humans are the main drivers of the indoor microbiome and up to now significant literature has been produced about this topic. Here we analyzed differences in bacterial composition between men’s and women’s restrooms and other common areas within the same public building. Bacterial DNA samples were collected from restrooms and halls of a three-floor building from the Federal University of Pampa, RS, Brazil. The bacterial community was characterized by amplification of the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene and sequencing. Throughout all samples, the most abundant phylum was
Proteobacteria
, followed by
Actinobacteria
,
Bacteroidetes
and
Firmicutes.
Beta diversity metrics showed that the structure of the bacterial communities were different among the areas and floors tested, however, only 6–9% of the variation in bacterial communities was explained by the area and floors sampled. A few microorganisms showed significantly differential abundance between men’s and women’s restrooms, but in general, the bacterial communities from both places were very similar. Finally, significant differences among the microbial community profile from different floors were reported, suggesting that the type of use and occupant demographic within the building may directly influence bacterial dispersion and establishment.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>29127623</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10482-017-0976-6</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1450-8828</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-6072 |
ispartof | Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 2018-04, Vol.111 (4), p.551-561 |
issn | 0003-6072 1572-9699 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2015517962 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Bacteria Biomedical and Life Sciences Communities Demographics Deoxyribonucleic acid DNA Gene sequencing Halls Life Sciences Medical Microbiology Men Microbiology Microbiomes Microorganisms Original Paper Plant Sciences Public buildings rRNA 16S Soil Science & Conservation |
title | Differences in bacterial composition between men’s and women’s restrooms and other common areas within a public building |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T17%3A08%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20in%20bacterial%20composition%20between%20men%E2%80%99s%20and%20women%E2%80%99s%20restrooms%20and%20other%20common%20areas%20within%20a%20public%20building&rft.jtitle=Antonie%20van%20Leeuwenhoek&rft.au=Dobbler,%20Priscila%20Caroline%20Thiago&rft.date=2018-04-01&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=551&rft.epage=561&rft.pages=551-561&rft.issn=0003-6072&rft.eissn=1572-9699&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10482-017-0976-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2015517962%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2015517962&rft_id=info:pmid/29127623&rfr_iscdi=true |