Contrasting impacts of highly invasive plant species on flower-visiting insect communities
Invasive alien plants threaten biodiversity, ecosystems and service provision worldwide. They can have positive and negative direct and indirect effects on herbivorous insects, including those that provide pollination services. Here, we quantify how three highly invasive plant species ( Heracleum ma...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biodiversity and conservation 2018-07, Vol.27 (8), p.2069-2085 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2085 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 2069 |
container_title | Biodiversity and conservation |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Davis, Emily S. Kelly, Ruth Maggs, Christine A. Stout, Jane C. |
description | Invasive alien plants threaten biodiversity, ecosystems and service provision worldwide. They can have positive and negative direct and indirect effects on herbivorous insects, including those that provide pollination services. Here, we quantify how three highly invasive plant species (
Heracleum mantegazzianum
,
Impatiens glandulifera
and
Fallopia japonica
) influence the availability of floral resources and flower-visiting insect communities. We compared invaded with comparable uninvaded areas to assess floral resources and used pan-trapping to quantify insect communities. Only
F. japonica
influenced floral resource availability: sites invaded by this species had a higher flowering plant species richness and abundance of open floral units than uninvaded sites, probably due to its late flowering and the paucity of other flowering species at this time of year.
Fallopia japonica
was also associated with higher abundances of bumblebees, higher overall insect diversity and higher hoverfly diversity than uninvaded areas. Differences in pollinator communities were also associated with
I. glandulifera
and
H. mantegazzianum
, despite there being no detectable differences in floral resources at these sites. Specifically, there were more bumblebees and solitary bees in
I. glandulifera
sites, and a higher overall diversity of insects, particularly hoverflies. By contrast,
H. mantegazzianum
sites had a lower abundance of solitary bees and hoverflies. These findings confirm that invasive plant species have a range of species-specific effects on ecological communities. This supports the emerging view that control of invasive species, as required under international obligations, is not simple and that potential losses and gains for biodiversity must be carefully evaluated on a case-by-case basis. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10531-018-1525-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2015472329</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A727373068</galeid><sourcerecordid>A727373068</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-dbf3a6c6d0b912b043d5b5f26eb701d74b70bffcd2f6f27964e2617abd0e5c273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_wN2A69TcTJN0lqX4goIb3bgJmUzSpswkYzKtzL83MoIruYsDl_Pdx0HoFsgCCBH3CQgrARNYYWCU4fEMzYAJiisB5BzNSMUJLgHYJbpK6UAywzjM0Mcm-CGqNDi_K1zXKz2kIthi73b7diycP6nkTqboW-WHIvVGO5MNvrBt-DIRn1xyE-uT0UOhQ9cdfW6ZdI0urGqTufnVOXp_fHjbPOPt69PLZr3FumRswE1tS8U1b0hdAa3JsmxYzSzlphYEGrHMUlurG2q5paLiS0M5CFU3xDBNRTlHd9PcPobPo0mDPIRj9HmlpATYUtCSVtm1mFw71RrpvA35bZ2rMZ3TwRvrcn8t8kBREr7KAEyAjiGlaKzso-tUHCUQ-ZO5nDKXOXP5k7kcM0MnJmWv35n4d8r_0DcANoZT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2015472329</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contrasting impacts of highly invasive plant species on flower-visiting insect communities</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Davis, Emily S. ; Kelly, Ruth ; Maggs, Christine A. ; Stout, Jane C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Davis, Emily S. ; Kelly, Ruth ; Maggs, Christine A. ; Stout, Jane C.</creatorcontrib><description>Invasive alien plants threaten biodiversity, ecosystems and service provision worldwide. They can have positive and negative direct and indirect effects on herbivorous insects, including those that provide pollination services. Here, we quantify how three highly invasive plant species (
Heracleum mantegazzianum
,
Impatiens glandulifera
and
Fallopia japonica
) influence the availability of floral resources and flower-visiting insect communities. We compared invaded with comparable uninvaded areas to assess floral resources and used pan-trapping to quantify insect communities. Only
F. japonica
influenced floral resource availability: sites invaded by this species had a higher flowering plant species richness and abundance of open floral units than uninvaded sites, probably due to its late flowering and the paucity of other flowering species at this time of year.
Fallopia japonica
was also associated with higher abundances of bumblebees, higher overall insect diversity and higher hoverfly diversity than uninvaded areas. Differences in pollinator communities were also associated with
I. glandulifera
and
H. mantegazzianum
, despite there being no detectable differences in floral resources at these sites. Specifically, there were more bumblebees and solitary bees in
I. glandulifera
sites, and a higher overall diversity of insects, particularly hoverflies. By contrast,
H. mantegazzianum
sites had a lower abundance of solitary bees and hoverflies. These findings confirm that invasive plant species have a range of species-specific effects on ecological communities. This supports the emerging view that control of invasive species, as required under international obligations, is not simple and that potential losses and gains for biodiversity must be carefully evaluated on a case-by-case basis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-3115</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9710</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10531-018-1525-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Bees ; Biodiversity ; Biological diversity ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Bumblebees ; Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts ; Conservation Biology/Ecology ; Control ; Ecological effects ; Ecology ; Ecosystems ; Fallopia japonica ; Flowering ; Flowering plants ; Flowers ; Flowers & plants ; Heracleum mantegazzianum ; Herbivores ; Impatiens glandulifera ; Insects ; Introduced species ; Invasive plants ; Invasive species ; Life Sciences ; Original Paper ; Plant species ; Plants (botany) ; Pollination ; Pollinators ; Resource availability ; Resources ; Species richness</subject><ispartof>Biodiversity and conservation, 2018-07, Vol.27 (8), p.2069-2085</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Springer</rights><rights>Biodiversity and Conservation is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-dbf3a6c6d0b912b043d5b5f26eb701d74b70bffcd2f6f27964e2617abd0e5c273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-dbf3a6c6d0b912b043d5b5f26eb701d74b70bffcd2f6f27964e2617abd0e5c273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10531-018-1525-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10531-018-1525-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davis, Emily S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maggs, Christine A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stout, Jane C.</creatorcontrib><title>Contrasting impacts of highly invasive plant species on flower-visiting insect communities</title><title>Biodiversity and conservation</title><addtitle>Biodivers Conserv</addtitle><description>Invasive alien plants threaten biodiversity, ecosystems and service provision worldwide. They can have positive and negative direct and indirect effects on herbivorous insects, including those that provide pollination services. Here, we quantify how three highly invasive plant species (
Heracleum mantegazzianum
,
Impatiens glandulifera
and
Fallopia japonica
) influence the availability of floral resources and flower-visiting insect communities. We compared invaded with comparable uninvaded areas to assess floral resources and used pan-trapping to quantify insect communities. Only
F. japonica
influenced floral resource availability: sites invaded by this species had a higher flowering plant species richness and abundance of open floral units than uninvaded sites, probably due to its late flowering and the paucity of other flowering species at this time of year.
Fallopia japonica
was also associated with higher abundances of bumblebees, higher overall insect diversity and higher hoverfly diversity than uninvaded areas. Differences in pollinator communities were also associated with
I. glandulifera
and
H. mantegazzianum
, despite there being no detectable differences in floral resources at these sites. Specifically, there were more bumblebees and solitary bees in
I. glandulifera
sites, and a higher overall diversity of insects, particularly hoverflies. By contrast,
H. mantegazzianum
sites had a lower abundance of solitary bees and hoverflies. These findings confirm that invasive plant species have a range of species-specific effects on ecological communities. This supports the emerging view that control of invasive species, as required under international obligations, is not simple and that potential losses and gains for biodiversity must be carefully evaluated on a case-by-case basis.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Bees</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological diversity</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Bumblebees</subject><subject>Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts</subject><subject>Conservation Biology/Ecology</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Fallopia japonica</subject><subject>Flowering</subject><subject>Flowering plants</subject><subject>Flowers</subject><subject>Flowers & plants</subject><subject>Heracleum mantegazzianum</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Impatiens glandulifera</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Introduced species</subject><subject>Invasive plants</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Plants (botany)</subject><subject>Pollination</subject><subject>Pollinators</subject><subject>Resource availability</subject><subject>Resources</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><issn>0960-3115</issn><issn>1572-9710</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_wN2A69TcTJN0lqX4goIb3bgJmUzSpswkYzKtzL83MoIruYsDl_Pdx0HoFsgCCBH3CQgrARNYYWCU4fEMzYAJiisB5BzNSMUJLgHYJbpK6UAywzjM0Mcm-CGqNDi_K1zXKz2kIthi73b7diycP6nkTqboW-WHIvVGO5MNvrBt-DIRn1xyE-uT0UOhQ9cdfW6ZdI0urGqTufnVOXp_fHjbPOPt69PLZr3FumRswE1tS8U1b0hdAa3JsmxYzSzlphYEGrHMUlurG2q5paLiS0M5CFU3xDBNRTlHd9PcPobPo0mDPIRj9HmlpATYUtCSVtm1mFw71RrpvA35bZ2rMZ3TwRvrcn8t8kBREr7KAEyAjiGlaKzso-tUHCUQ-ZO5nDKXOXP5k7kcM0MnJmWv35n4d8r_0DcANoZT</recordid><startdate>20180701</startdate><enddate>20180701</enddate><creator>Davis, Emily S.</creator><creator>Kelly, Ruth</creator><creator>Maggs, Christine A.</creator><creator>Stout, Jane C.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180701</creationdate><title>Contrasting impacts of highly invasive plant species on flower-visiting insect communities</title><author>Davis, Emily S. ; Kelly, Ruth ; Maggs, Christine A. ; Stout, Jane C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-dbf3a6c6d0b912b043d5b5f26eb701d74b70bffcd2f6f27964e2617abd0e5c273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Bees</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological diversity</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Bumblebees</topic><topic>Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts</topic><topic>Conservation Biology/Ecology</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Fallopia japonica</topic><topic>Flowering</topic><topic>Flowering plants</topic><topic>Flowers</topic><topic>Flowers & plants</topic><topic>Heracleum mantegazzianum</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Impatiens glandulifera</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Introduced species</topic><topic>Invasive plants</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Plants (botany)</topic><topic>Pollination</topic><topic>Pollinators</topic><topic>Resource availability</topic><topic>Resources</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davis, Emily S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maggs, Christine A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stout, Jane C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biodiversity and conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davis, Emily S.</au><au>Kelly, Ruth</au><au>Maggs, Christine A.</au><au>Stout, Jane C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contrasting impacts of highly invasive plant species on flower-visiting insect communities</atitle><jtitle>Biodiversity and conservation</jtitle><stitle>Biodivers Conserv</stitle><date>2018-07-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2069</spage><epage>2085</epage><pages>2069-2085</pages><issn>0960-3115</issn><eissn>1572-9710</eissn><abstract>Invasive alien plants threaten biodiversity, ecosystems and service provision worldwide. They can have positive and negative direct and indirect effects on herbivorous insects, including those that provide pollination services. Here, we quantify how three highly invasive plant species (
Heracleum mantegazzianum
,
Impatiens glandulifera
and
Fallopia japonica
) influence the availability of floral resources and flower-visiting insect communities. We compared invaded with comparable uninvaded areas to assess floral resources and used pan-trapping to quantify insect communities. Only
F. japonica
influenced floral resource availability: sites invaded by this species had a higher flowering plant species richness and abundance of open floral units than uninvaded sites, probably due to its late flowering and the paucity of other flowering species at this time of year.
Fallopia japonica
was also associated with higher abundances of bumblebees, higher overall insect diversity and higher hoverfly diversity than uninvaded areas. Differences in pollinator communities were also associated with
I. glandulifera
and
H. mantegazzianum
, despite there being no detectable differences in floral resources at these sites. Specifically, there were more bumblebees and solitary bees in
I. glandulifera
sites, and a higher overall diversity of insects, particularly hoverflies. By contrast,
H. mantegazzianum
sites had a lower abundance of solitary bees and hoverflies. These findings confirm that invasive plant species have a range of species-specific effects on ecological communities. This supports the emerging view that control of invasive species, as required under international obligations, is not simple and that potential losses and gains for biodiversity must be carefully evaluated on a case-by-case basis.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10531-018-1525-y</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0960-3115 |
ispartof | Biodiversity and conservation, 2018-07, Vol.27 (8), p.2069-2085 |
issn | 0960-3115 1572-9710 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2015472329 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Abundance Bees Biodiversity Biological diversity Biomedical and Life Sciences Bumblebees Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts Conservation Biology/Ecology Control Ecological effects Ecology Ecosystems Fallopia japonica Flowering Flowering plants Flowers Flowers & plants Heracleum mantegazzianum Herbivores Impatiens glandulifera Insects Introduced species Invasive plants Invasive species Life Sciences Original Paper Plant species Plants (botany) Pollination Pollinators Resource availability Resources Species richness |
title | Contrasting impacts of highly invasive plant species on flower-visiting insect communities |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T11%3A38%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contrasting%20impacts%20of%20highly%20invasive%20plant%20species%20on%20flower-visiting%20insect%20communities&rft.jtitle=Biodiversity%20and%20conservation&rft.au=Davis,%20Emily%20S.&rft.date=2018-07-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2069&rft.epage=2085&rft.pages=2069-2085&rft.issn=0960-3115&rft.eissn=1572-9710&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10531-018-1525-y&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA727373068%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2015472329&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A727373068&rfr_iscdi=true |