Contrasting impacts of highly invasive plant species on flower-visiting insect communities

Invasive alien plants threaten biodiversity, ecosystems and service provision worldwide. They can have positive and negative direct and indirect effects on herbivorous insects, including those that provide pollination services. Here, we quantify how three highly invasive plant species ( Heracleum ma...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biodiversity and conservation 2018-07, Vol.27 (8), p.2069-2085
Hauptverfasser: Davis, Emily S., Kelly, Ruth, Maggs, Christine A., Stout, Jane C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2085
container_issue 8
container_start_page 2069
container_title Biodiversity and conservation
container_volume 27
creator Davis, Emily S.
Kelly, Ruth
Maggs, Christine A.
Stout, Jane C.
description Invasive alien plants threaten biodiversity, ecosystems and service provision worldwide. They can have positive and negative direct and indirect effects on herbivorous insects, including those that provide pollination services. Here, we quantify how three highly invasive plant species ( Heracleum mantegazzianum , Impatiens glandulifera and Fallopia japonica ) influence the availability of floral resources and flower-visiting insect communities. We compared invaded with comparable uninvaded areas to assess floral resources and used pan-trapping to quantify insect communities. Only F. japonica influenced floral resource availability: sites invaded by this species had a higher flowering plant species richness and abundance of open floral units than uninvaded sites, probably due to its late flowering and the paucity of other flowering species at this time of year. Fallopia japonica was also associated with higher abundances of bumblebees, higher overall insect diversity and higher hoverfly diversity than uninvaded areas. Differences in pollinator communities were also associated with I. glandulifera and H. mantegazzianum , despite there being no detectable differences in floral resources at these sites. Specifically, there were more bumblebees and solitary bees in I. glandulifera sites, and a higher overall diversity of insects, particularly hoverflies. By contrast, H. mantegazzianum sites had a lower abundance of solitary bees and hoverflies. These findings confirm that invasive plant species have a range of species-specific effects on ecological communities. This supports the emerging view that control of invasive species, as required under international obligations, is not simple and that potential losses and gains for biodiversity must be carefully evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10531-018-1525-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2015472329</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A727373068</galeid><sourcerecordid>A727373068</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-dbf3a6c6d0b912b043d5b5f26eb701d74b70bffcd2f6f27964e2617abd0e5c273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_wN2A69TcTJN0lqX4goIb3bgJmUzSpswkYzKtzL83MoIruYsDl_Pdx0HoFsgCCBH3CQgrARNYYWCU4fEMzYAJiisB5BzNSMUJLgHYJbpK6UAywzjM0Mcm-CGqNDi_K1zXKz2kIthi73b7diycP6nkTqboW-WHIvVGO5MNvrBt-DIRn1xyE-uT0UOhQ9cdfW6ZdI0urGqTufnVOXp_fHjbPOPt69PLZr3FumRswE1tS8U1b0hdAa3JsmxYzSzlphYEGrHMUlurG2q5paLiS0M5CFU3xDBNRTlHd9PcPobPo0mDPIRj9HmlpATYUtCSVtm1mFw71RrpvA35bZ2rMZ3TwRvrcn8t8kBREr7KAEyAjiGlaKzso-tUHCUQ-ZO5nDKXOXP5k7kcM0MnJmWv35n4d8r_0DcANoZT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2015472329</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contrasting impacts of highly invasive plant species on flower-visiting insect communities</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Davis, Emily S. ; Kelly, Ruth ; Maggs, Christine A. ; Stout, Jane C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Davis, Emily S. ; Kelly, Ruth ; Maggs, Christine A. ; Stout, Jane C.</creatorcontrib><description>Invasive alien plants threaten biodiversity, ecosystems and service provision worldwide. They can have positive and negative direct and indirect effects on herbivorous insects, including those that provide pollination services. Here, we quantify how three highly invasive plant species ( Heracleum mantegazzianum , Impatiens glandulifera and Fallopia japonica ) influence the availability of floral resources and flower-visiting insect communities. We compared invaded with comparable uninvaded areas to assess floral resources and used pan-trapping to quantify insect communities. Only F. japonica influenced floral resource availability: sites invaded by this species had a higher flowering plant species richness and abundance of open floral units than uninvaded sites, probably due to its late flowering and the paucity of other flowering species at this time of year. Fallopia japonica was also associated with higher abundances of bumblebees, higher overall insect diversity and higher hoverfly diversity than uninvaded areas. Differences in pollinator communities were also associated with I. glandulifera and H. mantegazzianum , despite there being no detectable differences in floral resources at these sites. Specifically, there were more bumblebees and solitary bees in I. glandulifera sites, and a higher overall diversity of insects, particularly hoverflies. By contrast, H. mantegazzianum sites had a lower abundance of solitary bees and hoverflies. These findings confirm that invasive plant species have a range of species-specific effects on ecological communities. This supports the emerging view that control of invasive species, as required under international obligations, is not simple and that potential losses and gains for biodiversity must be carefully evaluated on a case-by-case basis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-3115</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9710</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10531-018-1525-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Bees ; Biodiversity ; Biological diversity ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Bumblebees ; Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts ; Conservation Biology/Ecology ; Control ; Ecological effects ; Ecology ; Ecosystems ; Fallopia japonica ; Flowering ; Flowering plants ; Flowers ; Flowers &amp; plants ; Heracleum mantegazzianum ; Herbivores ; Impatiens glandulifera ; Insects ; Introduced species ; Invasive plants ; Invasive species ; Life Sciences ; Original Paper ; Plant species ; Plants (botany) ; Pollination ; Pollinators ; Resource availability ; Resources ; Species richness</subject><ispartof>Biodiversity and conservation, 2018-07, Vol.27 (8), p.2069-2085</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Springer</rights><rights>Biodiversity and Conservation is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-dbf3a6c6d0b912b043d5b5f26eb701d74b70bffcd2f6f27964e2617abd0e5c273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-dbf3a6c6d0b912b043d5b5f26eb701d74b70bffcd2f6f27964e2617abd0e5c273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10531-018-1525-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10531-018-1525-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davis, Emily S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maggs, Christine A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stout, Jane C.</creatorcontrib><title>Contrasting impacts of highly invasive plant species on flower-visiting insect communities</title><title>Biodiversity and conservation</title><addtitle>Biodivers Conserv</addtitle><description>Invasive alien plants threaten biodiversity, ecosystems and service provision worldwide. They can have positive and negative direct and indirect effects on herbivorous insects, including those that provide pollination services. Here, we quantify how three highly invasive plant species ( Heracleum mantegazzianum , Impatiens glandulifera and Fallopia japonica ) influence the availability of floral resources and flower-visiting insect communities. We compared invaded with comparable uninvaded areas to assess floral resources and used pan-trapping to quantify insect communities. Only F. japonica influenced floral resource availability: sites invaded by this species had a higher flowering plant species richness and abundance of open floral units than uninvaded sites, probably due to its late flowering and the paucity of other flowering species at this time of year. Fallopia japonica was also associated with higher abundances of bumblebees, higher overall insect diversity and higher hoverfly diversity than uninvaded areas. Differences in pollinator communities were also associated with I. glandulifera and H. mantegazzianum , despite there being no detectable differences in floral resources at these sites. Specifically, there were more bumblebees and solitary bees in I. glandulifera sites, and a higher overall diversity of insects, particularly hoverflies. By contrast, H. mantegazzianum sites had a lower abundance of solitary bees and hoverflies. These findings confirm that invasive plant species have a range of species-specific effects on ecological communities. This supports the emerging view that control of invasive species, as required under international obligations, is not simple and that potential losses and gains for biodiversity must be carefully evaluated on a case-by-case basis.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Bees</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological diversity</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Bumblebees</subject><subject>Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts</subject><subject>Conservation Biology/Ecology</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Fallopia japonica</subject><subject>Flowering</subject><subject>Flowering plants</subject><subject>Flowers</subject><subject>Flowers &amp; plants</subject><subject>Heracleum mantegazzianum</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Impatiens glandulifera</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Introduced species</subject><subject>Invasive plants</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Plants (botany)</subject><subject>Pollination</subject><subject>Pollinators</subject><subject>Resource availability</subject><subject>Resources</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><issn>0960-3115</issn><issn>1572-9710</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_wN2A69TcTJN0lqX4goIb3bgJmUzSpswkYzKtzL83MoIruYsDl_Pdx0HoFsgCCBH3CQgrARNYYWCU4fEMzYAJiisB5BzNSMUJLgHYJbpK6UAywzjM0Mcm-CGqNDi_K1zXKz2kIthi73b7diycP6nkTqboW-WHIvVGO5MNvrBt-DIRn1xyE-uT0UOhQ9cdfW6ZdI0urGqTufnVOXp_fHjbPOPt69PLZr3FumRswE1tS8U1b0hdAa3JsmxYzSzlphYEGrHMUlurG2q5paLiS0M5CFU3xDBNRTlHd9PcPobPo0mDPIRj9HmlpATYUtCSVtm1mFw71RrpvA35bZ2rMZ3TwRvrcn8t8kBREr7KAEyAjiGlaKzso-tUHCUQ-ZO5nDKXOXP5k7kcM0MnJmWv35n4d8r_0DcANoZT</recordid><startdate>20180701</startdate><enddate>20180701</enddate><creator>Davis, Emily S.</creator><creator>Kelly, Ruth</creator><creator>Maggs, Christine A.</creator><creator>Stout, Jane C.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180701</creationdate><title>Contrasting impacts of highly invasive plant species on flower-visiting insect communities</title><author>Davis, Emily S. ; Kelly, Ruth ; Maggs, Christine A. ; Stout, Jane C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-dbf3a6c6d0b912b043d5b5f26eb701d74b70bffcd2f6f27964e2617abd0e5c273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Bees</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological diversity</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Bumblebees</topic><topic>Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts</topic><topic>Conservation Biology/Ecology</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Fallopia japonica</topic><topic>Flowering</topic><topic>Flowering plants</topic><topic>Flowers</topic><topic>Flowers &amp; plants</topic><topic>Heracleum mantegazzianum</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Impatiens glandulifera</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Introduced species</topic><topic>Invasive plants</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Plants (botany)</topic><topic>Pollination</topic><topic>Pollinators</topic><topic>Resource availability</topic><topic>Resources</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davis, Emily S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maggs, Christine A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stout, Jane C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biodiversity and conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davis, Emily S.</au><au>Kelly, Ruth</au><au>Maggs, Christine A.</au><au>Stout, Jane C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contrasting impacts of highly invasive plant species on flower-visiting insect communities</atitle><jtitle>Biodiversity and conservation</jtitle><stitle>Biodivers Conserv</stitle><date>2018-07-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2069</spage><epage>2085</epage><pages>2069-2085</pages><issn>0960-3115</issn><eissn>1572-9710</eissn><abstract>Invasive alien plants threaten biodiversity, ecosystems and service provision worldwide. They can have positive and negative direct and indirect effects on herbivorous insects, including those that provide pollination services. Here, we quantify how three highly invasive plant species ( Heracleum mantegazzianum , Impatiens glandulifera and Fallopia japonica ) influence the availability of floral resources and flower-visiting insect communities. We compared invaded with comparable uninvaded areas to assess floral resources and used pan-trapping to quantify insect communities. Only F. japonica influenced floral resource availability: sites invaded by this species had a higher flowering plant species richness and abundance of open floral units than uninvaded sites, probably due to its late flowering and the paucity of other flowering species at this time of year. Fallopia japonica was also associated with higher abundances of bumblebees, higher overall insect diversity and higher hoverfly diversity than uninvaded areas. Differences in pollinator communities were also associated with I. glandulifera and H. mantegazzianum , despite there being no detectable differences in floral resources at these sites. Specifically, there were more bumblebees and solitary bees in I. glandulifera sites, and a higher overall diversity of insects, particularly hoverflies. By contrast, H. mantegazzianum sites had a lower abundance of solitary bees and hoverflies. These findings confirm that invasive plant species have a range of species-specific effects on ecological communities. This supports the emerging view that control of invasive species, as required under international obligations, is not simple and that potential losses and gains for biodiversity must be carefully evaluated on a case-by-case basis.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10531-018-1525-y</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-3115
ispartof Biodiversity and conservation, 2018-07, Vol.27 (8), p.2069-2085
issn 0960-3115
1572-9710
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2015472329
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Abundance
Bees
Biodiversity
Biological diversity
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Bumblebees
Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts
Conservation Biology/Ecology
Control
Ecological effects
Ecology
Ecosystems
Fallopia japonica
Flowering
Flowering plants
Flowers
Flowers & plants
Heracleum mantegazzianum
Herbivores
Impatiens glandulifera
Insects
Introduced species
Invasive plants
Invasive species
Life Sciences
Original Paper
Plant species
Plants (botany)
Pollination
Pollinators
Resource availability
Resources
Species richness
title Contrasting impacts of highly invasive plant species on flower-visiting insect communities
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T11%3A38%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contrasting%20impacts%20of%20highly%20invasive%20plant%20species%20on%20flower-visiting%20insect%20communities&rft.jtitle=Biodiversity%20and%20conservation&rft.au=Davis,%20Emily%20S.&rft.date=2018-07-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2069&rft.epage=2085&rft.pages=2069-2085&rft.issn=0960-3115&rft.eissn=1572-9710&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10531-018-1525-y&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA727373068%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2015472329&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A727373068&rfr_iscdi=true