Divide the dollar and conquer more: sequential bargaining and risk aversion
We analyze the problem of dividing a fixed amount of a single commodity between two players on the basis of the Nash bargaining solution (NBS). For one-shot negotiations, a cornerstone result of Roth (Axiomatic models of bargaining. Springer, Berlin, 1979 ) establishes that the more risk averse play...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of game theory 2018-11, Vol.47 (4), p.1261-1286 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1286 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1261 |
container_title | International journal of game theory |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Grech, Philip Tejada, Oriol |
description | We analyze the problem of dividing a fixed amount of a single commodity between two players on the basis of the Nash bargaining solution (NBS). For one-shot negotiations, a cornerstone result of Roth (Axiomatic models of bargaining. Springer, Berlin,
1979
) establishes that the more risk averse player will obtain less than half the total amount. In the present paper, we assume that the bargaining procedure occurs over several rounds. In each round, an increasing share of the total amount is negotiated over in accordance with the NBS, the disagreement point being determined by the outcome of the previous round. In line with Roth’s result, the final amount received by the more risk averse player is still bounded by half the total amount. As a new feature, however, this player does not lose from bargaining for more rounds if his opponent exhibits non-increasing absolute risk aversion. What is more, both players’ risk profiles become essentially irrelevant if successive bargaining takes place over sufficiently small commodity increments. Each player then gets approximately half of the commodity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00182-018-0618-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2015461179</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2015461179</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-edab59017d61ea901613341ac754830c72d12d933622424abddc24159c345dc73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9PwzAMxSMEEmPwAbhF4lywk7RZuaHxV0ziAucoTbKR0aUj6abx7ckoEicuz7b0frb1CDlHuEQAeZUAcMKKLAVUWXYHZISCswKZhEMyAmBQSCarY3KS0hIyAxM2Is-3fuuto_27o7ZrWx2pDpaaLnxuXKSrLrprmlweQu91SxsdF9oHHxY_vujTB9VbF5Pvwik5mus2ubPfOiZv93ev08di9vLwNL2ZFUYw0RfO6qasAaWt0OncVMi5QG1kKSYcjGQWma05rxjLgG6sNUxgWRsuSmskH5OLYe86dvmx1Ktlt4khn1QMsBQVoqyzCweXiV1K0c3VOvqVjl8KQe0zU0NmKovaZ6Z2mWEDk7I3LFz82_w_9A3XMW4n</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2015461179</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Divide the dollar and conquer more: sequential bargaining and risk aversion</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Grech, Philip ; Tejada, Oriol</creator><creatorcontrib>Grech, Philip ; Tejada, Oriol</creatorcontrib><description>We analyze the problem of dividing a fixed amount of a single commodity between two players on the basis of the Nash bargaining solution (NBS). For one-shot negotiations, a cornerstone result of Roth (Axiomatic models of bargaining. Springer, Berlin,
1979
) establishes that the more risk averse player will obtain less than half the total amount. In the present paper, we assume that the bargaining procedure occurs over several rounds. In each round, an increasing share of the total amount is negotiated over in accordance with the NBS, the disagreement point being determined by the outcome of the previous round. In line with Roth’s result, the final amount received by the more risk averse player is still bounded by half the total amount. As a new feature, however, this player does not lose from bargaining for more rounds if his opponent exhibits non-increasing absolute risk aversion. What is more, both players’ risk profiles become essentially irrelevant if successive bargaining takes place over sufficiently small commodity increments. Each player then gets approximately half of the commodity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7276</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1270</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00182-018-0618-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Bargaining ; Behavioral/Experimental Economics ; Commodities ; Economic models ; Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Game Theory ; Negotiations ; Operations Research/Decision Theory ; Original Paper ; Risk ; Risk analysis ; Risk aversion ; Social and Behav. Sciences</subject><ispartof>International journal of game theory, 2018-11, Vol.47 (4), p.1261-1286</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>International Journal of Game Theory is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-edab59017d61ea901613341ac754830c72d12d933622424abddc24159c345dc73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-edab59017d61ea901613341ac754830c72d12d933622424abddc24159c345dc73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00182-018-0618-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00182-018-0618-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grech, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tejada, Oriol</creatorcontrib><title>Divide the dollar and conquer more: sequential bargaining and risk aversion</title><title>International journal of game theory</title><addtitle>Int J Game Theory</addtitle><description>We analyze the problem of dividing a fixed amount of a single commodity between two players on the basis of the Nash bargaining solution (NBS). For one-shot negotiations, a cornerstone result of Roth (Axiomatic models of bargaining. Springer, Berlin,
1979
) establishes that the more risk averse player will obtain less than half the total amount. In the present paper, we assume that the bargaining procedure occurs over several rounds. In each round, an increasing share of the total amount is negotiated over in accordance with the NBS, the disagreement point being determined by the outcome of the previous round. In line with Roth’s result, the final amount received by the more risk averse player is still bounded by half the total amount. As a new feature, however, this player does not lose from bargaining for more rounds if his opponent exhibits non-increasing absolute risk aversion. What is more, both players’ risk profiles become essentially irrelevant if successive bargaining takes place over sufficiently small commodity increments. Each player then gets approximately half of the commodity.</description><subject>Bargaining</subject><subject>Behavioral/Experimental Economics</subject><subject>Commodities</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Game Theory</subject><subject>Negotiations</subject><subject>Operations Research/Decision Theory</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk aversion</subject><subject>Social and Behav. Sciences</subject><issn>0020-7276</issn><issn>1432-1270</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9PwzAMxSMEEmPwAbhF4lywk7RZuaHxV0ziAucoTbKR0aUj6abx7ckoEicuz7b0frb1CDlHuEQAeZUAcMKKLAVUWXYHZISCswKZhEMyAmBQSCarY3KS0hIyAxM2Is-3fuuto_27o7ZrWx2pDpaaLnxuXKSrLrprmlweQu91SxsdF9oHHxY_vujTB9VbF5Pvwik5mus2ubPfOiZv93ev08di9vLwNL2ZFUYw0RfO6qasAaWt0OncVMi5QG1kKSYcjGQWma05rxjLgG6sNUxgWRsuSmskH5OLYe86dvmx1Ktlt4khn1QMsBQVoqyzCweXiV1K0c3VOvqVjl8KQe0zU0NmKovaZ6Z2mWEDk7I3LFz82_w_9A3XMW4n</recordid><startdate>20181101</startdate><enddate>20181101</enddate><creator>Grech, Philip</creator><creator>Tejada, Oriol</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181101</creationdate><title>Divide the dollar and conquer more: sequential bargaining and risk aversion</title><author>Grech, Philip ; Tejada, Oriol</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-edab59017d61ea901613341ac754830c72d12d933622424abddc24159c345dc73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Bargaining</topic><topic>Behavioral/Experimental Economics</topic><topic>Commodities</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Game Theory</topic><topic>Negotiations</topic><topic>Operations Research/Decision Theory</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk aversion</topic><topic>Social and Behav. Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grech, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tejada, Oriol</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>International journal of game theory</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grech, Philip</au><au>Tejada, Oriol</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Divide the dollar and conquer more: sequential bargaining and risk aversion</atitle><jtitle>International journal of game theory</jtitle><stitle>Int J Game Theory</stitle><date>2018-11-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1261</spage><epage>1286</epage><pages>1261-1286</pages><issn>0020-7276</issn><eissn>1432-1270</eissn><abstract>We analyze the problem of dividing a fixed amount of a single commodity between two players on the basis of the Nash bargaining solution (NBS). For one-shot negotiations, a cornerstone result of Roth (Axiomatic models of bargaining. Springer, Berlin,
1979
) establishes that the more risk averse player will obtain less than half the total amount. In the present paper, we assume that the bargaining procedure occurs over several rounds. In each round, an increasing share of the total amount is negotiated over in accordance with the NBS, the disagreement point being determined by the outcome of the previous round. In line with Roth’s result, the final amount received by the more risk averse player is still bounded by half the total amount. As a new feature, however, this player does not lose from bargaining for more rounds if his opponent exhibits non-increasing absolute risk aversion. What is more, both players’ risk profiles become essentially irrelevant if successive bargaining takes place over sufficiently small commodity increments. Each player then gets approximately half of the commodity.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00182-018-0618-x</doi><tpages>26</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0020-7276 |
ispartof | International journal of game theory, 2018-11, Vol.47 (4), p.1261-1286 |
issn | 0020-7276 1432-1270 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2015461179 |
source | SpringerLink Journals; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Bargaining Behavioral/Experimental Economics Commodities Economic models Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods Economics Economics and Finance Game Theory Negotiations Operations Research/Decision Theory Original Paper Risk Risk analysis Risk aversion Social and Behav. Sciences |
title | Divide the dollar and conquer more: sequential bargaining and risk aversion |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T10%3A56%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Divide%20the%20dollar%20and%20conquer%20more:%20sequential%20bargaining%20and%20risk%20aversion&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20game%20theory&rft.au=Grech,%20Philip&rft.date=2018-11-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1261&rft.epage=1286&rft.pages=1261-1286&rft.issn=0020-7276&rft.eissn=1432-1270&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00182-018-0618-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2015461179%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2015461179&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |