Policy Implications for School Desegregation and School Choice in Chicago
School desegregation in Chicago was derived from the implementation of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. This article follows the formation of this policy to its implementation in Chicago. First, the federal government used the Civil Rights Act to garner school desegregation. Then, the Chicago Board of Edu...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Urban review 2018-11, Vol.50 (4), p.584-603 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 603 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 584 |
| container_title | The Urban review |
| container_volume | 50 |
| creator | Danns, Dionne |
| description | School desegregation in Chicago was derived from the implementation of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. This article follows the formation of this policy to its implementation in Chicago. First, the federal government used the Civil Rights Act to garner school desegregation. Then, the Chicago Board of Education created desegregation plans for Chicago Public Schools which included school choice options. Finally, the article uses the oral histories of 68 graduates of three Chicago public high schools to demonstrate how the policy was utilized. The entire process reveals the continuation of institutional racism as school desegregation in Chicago was effectively limited as only a few Black and Latino students benefited from school desegregation. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11256-018-0457-x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2015451398</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1192423</ericid><sourcerecordid>2015451398</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c253x-48c129b669d94dcfc191e2956fce2569a52b1187d63dc29631c76f59cdf14d133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMtKAzEUDaJgrX6AC2HAdfTevGaylPqqFBTUdZhmMtMp7aQmLbR_b-r4WLk6F86Lewg5R7hCgPw6IjKpKGBBQcicbg_IAGXOKWoFh2QAIBgFnbNjchLjHACQ5zAg4xe_aO0uGy9XCct167uY1T5kr3bm_SK7ddE1wTVfTFZ21Q8xmvnWuqzt0pWMjT8lR3W5iO7sG4fk_f7ubfRIJ88P49HNhFom-ZaKwiLTU6V0pUVla4saHdNS1dalD3Qp2RSxyCvFK8u04mhzVUttqxpFhZwPyWWfuwr-Y-Pi2sz9JnSp0jBAKSRyXSQV9iobfIzB1WYV2mUZdgbB7Bcz_WImLWb2i5lt8lz0Hhda-6u_e0LUTLB9M-v5mLiuceGv-f_QTxWZduk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2015451398</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Policy Implications for School Desegregation and School Choice in Chicago</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Danns, Dionne</creator><creatorcontrib>Danns, Dionne</creatorcontrib><description>School desegregation in Chicago was derived from the implementation of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. This article follows the formation of this policy to its implementation in Chicago. First, the federal government used the Civil Rights Act to garner school desegregation. Then, the Chicago Board of Education created desegregation plans for Chicago Public Schools which included school choice options. Finally, the article uses the oral histories of 68 graduates of three Chicago public high schools to demonstrate how the policy was utilized. The entire process reveals the continuation of institutional racism as school desegregation in Chicago was effectively limited as only a few Black and Latino students benefited from school desegregation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0042-0972</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1960</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11256-018-0457-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Civil rights ; Civil Rights Legislation ; Community and Environmental Psychology ; Desegregation ; Education ; Equal Education ; Federal government ; Federal Legislation ; High School Students ; Minority Group Students ; Policy implementation ; Public Schools ; Racial Bias ; School boards ; School Choice ; School Desegregation ; Secondary schools ; Sociology ; Student Experience ; Systemic racism</subject><ispartof>The Urban review, 2018-11, Vol.50 (4), p.584-603</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>The Urban Review is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c253x-48c129b669d94dcfc191e2956fce2569a52b1187d63dc29631c76f59cdf14d133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c253x-48c129b669d94dcfc191e2956fce2569a52b1187d63dc29631c76f59cdf14d133</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11256-018-0457-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11256-018-0457-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27321,27901,27902,33751,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1192423$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Danns, Dionne</creatorcontrib><title>Policy Implications for School Desegregation and School Choice in Chicago</title><title>The Urban review</title><addtitle>Urban Rev</addtitle><description>School desegregation in Chicago was derived from the implementation of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. This article follows the formation of this policy to its implementation in Chicago. First, the federal government used the Civil Rights Act to garner school desegregation. Then, the Chicago Board of Education created desegregation plans for Chicago Public Schools which included school choice options. Finally, the article uses the oral histories of 68 graduates of three Chicago public high schools to demonstrate how the policy was utilized. The entire process reveals the continuation of institutional racism as school desegregation in Chicago was effectively limited as only a few Black and Latino students benefited from school desegregation.</description><subject>Civil rights</subject><subject>Civil Rights Legislation</subject><subject>Community and Environmental Psychology</subject><subject>Desegregation</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Equal Education</subject><subject>Federal government</subject><subject>Federal Legislation</subject><subject>High School Students</subject><subject>Minority Group Students</subject><subject>Policy implementation</subject><subject>Public Schools</subject><subject>Racial Bias</subject><subject>School boards</subject><subject>School Choice</subject><subject>School Desegregation</subject><subject>Secondary schools</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Student Experience</subject><subject>Systemic racism</subject><issn>0042-0972</issn><issn>1573-1960</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UMtKAzEUDaJgrX6AC2HAdfTevGaylPqqFBTUdZhmMtMp7aQmLbR_b-r4WLk6F86Lewg5R7hCgPw6IjKpKGBBQcicbg_IAGXOKWoFh2QAIBgFnbNjchLjHACQ5zAg4xe_aO0uGy9XCct167uY1T5kr3bm_SK7ddE1wTVfTFZ21Q8xmvnWuqzt0pWMjT8lR3W5iO7sG4fk_f7ubfRIJ88P49HNhFom-ZaKwiLTU6V0pUVla4saHdNS1dalD3Qp2RSxyCvFK8u04mhzVUttqxpFhZwPyWWfuwr-Y-Pi2sz9JnSp0jBAKSRyXSQV9iobfIzB1WYV2mUZdgbB7Bcz_WImLWb2i5lt8lz0Hhda-6u_e0LUTLB9M-v5mLiuceGv-f_QTxWZduk</recordid><startdate>20181101</startdate><enddate>20181101</enddate><creator>Danns, Dionne</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181101</creationdate><title>Policy Implications for School Desegregation and School Choice in Chicago</title><author>Danns, Dionne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c253x-48c129b669d94dcfc191e2956fce2569a52b1187d63dc29631c76f59cdf14d133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Civil rights</topic><topic>Civil Rights Legislation</topic><topic>Community and Environmental Psychology</topic><topic>Desegregation</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Equal Education</topic><topic>Federal government</topic><topic>Federal Legislation</topic><topic>High School Students</topic><topic>Minority Group Students</topic><topic>Policy implementation</topic><topic>Public Schools</topic><topic>Racial Bias</topic><topic>School boards</topic><topic>School Choice</topic><topic>School Desegregation</topic><topic>Secondary schools</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Student Experience</topic><topic>Systemic racism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Danns, Dionne</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>The Urban review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Danns, Dionne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1192423</ericid><atitle>Policy Implications for School Desegregation and School Choice in Chicago</atitle><jtitle>The Urban review</jtitle><stitle>Urban Rev</stitle><date>2018-11-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>584</spage><epage>603</epage><pages>584-603</pages><issn>0042-0972</issn><eissn>1573-1960</eissn><abstract>School desegregation in Chicago was derived from the implementation of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. This article follows the formation of this policy to its implementation in Chicago. First, the federal government used the Civil Rights Act to garner school desegregation. Then, the Chicago Board of Education created desegregation plans for Chicago Public Schools which included school choice options. Finally, the article uses the oral histories of 68 graduates of three Chicago public high schools to demonstrate how the policy was utilized. The entire process reveals the continuation of institutional racism as school desegregation in Chicago was effectively limited as only a few Black and Latino students benefited from school desegregation.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11256-018-0457-x</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0042-0972 |
| ispartof | The Urban review, 2018-11, Vol.50 (4), p.584-603 |
| issn | 0042-0972 1573-1960 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2015451398 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals; Sociological Abstracts |
| subjects | Civil rights Civil Rights Legislation Community and Environmental Psychology Desegregation Education Equal Education Federal government Federal Legislation High School Students Minority Group Students Policy implementation Public Schools Racial Bias School boards School Choice School Desegregation Secondary schools Sociology Student Experience Systemic racism |
| title | Policy Implications for School Desegregation and School Choice in Chicago |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T08%3A50%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Policy%20Implications%20for%20School%20Desegregation%20and%20School%20Choice%20in%20Chicago&rft.jtitle=The%20Urban%20review&rft.au=Danns,%20Dionne&rft.date=2018-11-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=584&rft.epage=603&rft.pages=584-603&rft.issn=0042-0972&rft.eissn=1573-1960&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11256-018-0457-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2015451398%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2015451398&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1192423&rfr_iscdi=true |