The untapped potential of preferential trade agreements for climate governance
The regulatory contribution that preferential trade agreements (PTAs) make to global climate governance is assessed through an analysis of climate-related provisions found in 688 PTAs signed between 1947 and 2016. Provisions are analyzed along four dimensions: innovation, legalization, replication,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental politics 2018-05, Vol.27 (3), p.541-565 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 565 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 541 |
container_title | Environmental politics |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Morin, Jean-Frédéric Jinnah, Sikina |
description | The regulatory contribution that preferential trade agreements (PTAs) make to global climate governance is assessed through an analysis of climate-related provisions found in 688 PTAs signed between 1947 and 2016. Provisions are analyzed along four dimensions: innovation, legalization, replication, and distribution. Innovative climate provisions are found in several PTAs that are in some cases more specific and enforceable than the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement. Nonetheless, these climate provisions offer limited progress because they remain weakly 'legalized', fail to replicate broadly in the global trade system, and were not adopted by the largest greenhouse gas emitters. Despite the inclusion of innovative climate provisions in a number of PTAs, their poor design and weak replication position them as some of the weakest environmental provisions within PTAs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/09644016.2017.1421399 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2014971440</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2014971440</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-307a9f348084152c1875ac6ddb2db52cd4ab9221fc44cf33b19191ebcbe9a0823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfQQh43pp_201uStEqFL3Uc8hmJ3XLdrMmqdJvb5bWq8xhmOG9Yd4PoVtKZpRIck_UXAhC5zNGaDWjglGu1Bma0ErwQiouztFk1BSj6BJdxbglhEqm2AS9rT8B7_tkhgEaPPgEfWpNh73DQwAH4TSnYBrAZhMAdnkVsfMB267dmQR4478h9Ka3cI0unOki3Jz6FH08P60XL8Xqffm6eFwVlssyFZxURjkuJJGClsxSWZXGzpumZk2d50aYWjFGnRXCOs5rqnJBbWtQhkjGp-jueHcI_msPMemt3-cXuqgzBKEqmolkVXlU2eBjzHH0EPLH4aAp0SM6_YdudFX6hC77Ho6-ts8xd-bHh67RyRw6H1zIOduo-f8nfgGRSXW3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2014971440</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The untapped potential of preferential trade agreements for climate governance</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Access via Taylor & Francis</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><creator>Morin, Jean-Frédéric ; Jinnah, Sikina</creator><creatorcontrib>Morin, Jean-Frédéric ; Jinnah, Sikina</creatorcontrib><description>The regulatory contribution that preferential trade agreements (PTAs) make to global climate governance is assessed through an analysis of climate-related provisions found in 688 PTAs signed between 1947 and 2016. Provisions are analyzed along four dimensions: innovation, legalization, replication, and distribution. Innovative climate provisions are found in several PTAs that are in some cases more specific and enforceable than the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement. Nonetheless, these climate provisions offer limited progress because they remain weakly 'legalized', fail to replicate broadly in the global trade system, and were not adopted by the largest greenhouse gas emitters. Despite the inclusion of innovative climate provisions in a number of PTAs, their poor design and weak replication position them as some of the weakest environmental provisions within PTAs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-4016</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-8934</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2017.1421399</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Agreements ; Climate ; Climate change ; Decriminalization ; Emitters ; Environmental assessment ; Environmental protection ; Governance ; Greenhouse effect ; Greenhouse gases ; Innovations ; institutional interactions ; international negotiations ; International trade ; Kyoto Protocol ; Legalization ; regime complex ; Replication ; Reproducibility ; strategic linkage ; Textile industry ; trade ; Trade agreements</subject><ispartof>Environmental politics, 2018-05, Vol.27 (3), p.541-565</ispartof><rights>2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2018</rights><rights>2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-307a9f348084152c1875ac6ddb2db52cd4ab9221fc44cf33b19191ebcbe9a0823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-307a9f348084152c1875ac6ddb2db52cd4ab9221fc44cf33b19191ebcbe9a0823</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1053-5597</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/09644016.2017.1421399$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09644016.2017.1421399$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27931,27932,33781,59654,60443</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morin, Jean-Frédéric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jinnah, Sikina</creatorcontrib><title>The untapped potential of preferential trade agreements for climate governance</title><title>Environmental politics</title><description>The regulatory contribution that preferential trade agreements (PTAs) make to global climate governance is assessed through an analysis of climate-related provisions found in 688 PTAs signed between 1947 and 2016. Provisions are analyzed along four dimensions: innovation, legalization, replication, and distribution. Innovative climate provisions are found in several PTAs that are in some cases more specific and enforceable than the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement. Nonetheless, these climate provisions offer limited progress because they remain weakly 'legalized', fail to replicate broadly in the global trade system, and were not adopted by the largest greenhouse gas emitters. Despite the inclusion of innovative climate provisions in a number of PTAs, their poor design and weak replication position them as some of the weakest environmental provisions within PTAs.</description><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Decriminalization</subject><subject>Emitters</subject><subject>Environmental assessment</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Greenhouse effect</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>institutional interactions</subject><subject>international negotiations</subject><subject>International trade</subject><subject>Kyoto Protocol</subject><subject>Legalization</subject><subject>regime complex</subject><subject>Replication</subject><subject>Reproducibility</subject><subject>strategic linkage</subject><subject>Textile industry</subject><subject>trade</subject><subject>Trade agreements</subject><issn>0964-4016</issn><issn>1743-8934</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfQQh43pp_201uStEqFL3Uc8hmJ3XLdrMmqdJvb5bWq8xhmOG9Yd4PoVtKZpRIck_UXAhC5zNGaDWjglGu1Bma0ErwQiouztFk1BSj6BJdxbglhEqm2AS9rT8B7_tkhgEaPPgEfWpNh73DQwAH4TSnYBrAZhMAdnkVsfMB267dmQR4478h9Ka3cI0unOki3Jz6FH08P60XL8Xqffm6eFwVlssyFZxURjkuJJGClsxSWZXGzpumZk2d50aYWjFGnRXCOs5rqnJBbWtQhkjGp-jueHcI_msPMemt3-cXuqgzBKEqmolkVXlU2eBjzHH0EPLH4aAp0SM6_YdudFX6hC77Ho6-ts8xd-bHh67RyRw6H1zIOduo-f8nfgGRSXW3</recordid><startdate>20180504</startdate><enddate>20180504</enddate><creator>Morin, Jean-Frédéric</creator><creator>Jinnah, Sikina</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1053-5597</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180504</creationdate><title>The untapped potential of preferential trade agreements for climate governance</title><author>Morin, Jean-Frédéric ; Jinnah, Sikina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-307a9f348084152c1875ac6ddb2db52cd4ab9221fc44cf33b19191ebcbe9a0823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Decriminalization</topic><topic>Emitters</topic><topic>Environmental assessment</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Greenhouse effect</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>institutional interactions</topic><topic>international negotiations</topic><topic>International trade</topic><topic>Kyoto Protocol</topic><topic>Legalization</topic><topic>regime complex</topic><topic>Replication</topic><topic>Reproducibility</topic><topic>strategic linkage</topic><topic>Textile industry</topic><topic>trade</topic><topic>Trade agreements</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morin, Jean-Frédéric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jinnah, Sikina</creatorcontrib><collection>Access via Taylor & Francis (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Environmental politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morin, Jean-Frédéric</au><au>Jinnah, Sikina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The untapped potential of preferential trade agreements for climate governance</atitle><jtitle>Environmental politics</jtitle><date>2018-05-04</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>541</spage><epage>565</epage><pages>541-565</pages><issn>0964-4016</issn><eissn>1743-8934</eissn><abstract>The regulatory contribution that preferential trade agreements (PTAs) make to global climate governance is assessed through an analysis of climate-related provisions found in 688 PTAs signed between 1947 and 2016. Provisions are analyzed along four dimensions: innovation, legalization, replication, and distribution. Innovative climate provisions are found in several PTAs that are in some cases more specific and enforceable than the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement. Nonetheless, these climate provisions offer limited progress because they remain weakly 'legalized', fail to replicate broadly in the global trade system, and were not adopted by the largest greenhouse gas emitters. Despite the inclusion of innovative climate provisions in a number of PTAs, their poor design and weak replication position them as some of the weakest environmental provisions within PTAs.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/09644016.2017.1421399</doi><tpages>25</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1053-5597</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0964-4016 |
ispartof | Environmental politics, 2018-05, Vol.27 (3), p.541-565 |
issn | 0964-4016 1743-8934 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2014971440 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; Access via Taylor & Francis; Political Science Complete |
subjects | Agreements Climate Climate change Decriminalization Emitters Environmental assessment Environmental protection Governance Greenhouse effect Greenhouse gases Innovations institutional interactions international negotiations International trade Kyoto Protocol Legalization regime complex Replication Reproducibility strategic linkage Textile industry trade Trade agreements |
title | The untapped potential of preferential trade agreements for climate governance |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-05T21%3A55%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20untapped%20potential%20of%20preferential%20trade%20agreements%20for%20climate%20governance&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20politics&rft.au=Morin,%20Jean-Fr%C3%A9d%C3%A9ric&rft.date=2018-05-04&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=541&rft.epage=565&rft.pages=541-565&rft.issn=0964-4016&rft.eissn=1743-8934&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/09644016.2017.1421399&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E2014971440%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2014971440&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |