Fine-Scale Spatial Genetic Structure of Deer in a Suburban Landscape
Hunting regulations traditionally applied to manage deer populations in rural areas are not well suited to management in heavily populated suburban landscapes. We evaluated the spatial genetic structure of a suburban deer population to assess the feasibility of localized management at the scale of s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of wildlife management 2018-04, Vol.82 (3), p.596-607 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 607 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 596 |
container_title | The Journal of wildlife management |
container_volume | 82 |
creator | CRAWFORD, JOANNE C. QUINN, AMY DECHEN WILLIAMS, DAVID M. RUDOLPH, BRENT A. SCRIBNER, KIM T. PORTER, WILLIAM F. |
description | Hunting regulations traditionally applied to manage deer populations in rural areas are not well suited to management in heavily populated suburban landscapes. We evaluated the spatial genetic structure of a suburban deer population to assess the feasibility of localized management at the scale of social groups. We used fecal DNA from white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in suburban Michigan to determine whether deer in suburban landscapes maintain the matrilineal social structure that has been observed in studies of rural deer. We amplified 7 microsatellite loci from fecal pellets (n = 591) collected from August to October 2013 on public and private lands throughout Meridian Township, Ingham County, central Michigan, USA. Based on multi-locus genotypes, we identified individuals, quantified the extent of spatial genetic structure at multiple spatial scales, identified the location and spatial extent of aggregations of related females and males, and estimated genetic neighborhood size. We also used landscape genetic analyses to evaluate associations between measures of land cover, edge density, the presence of major roads, and inter-individual genetic distance. Spatial genetic autocorrelation was positive and significant up to a distance of 0.5 km. We did not detect correlations between landscape variables and inter-individual genetic distance. Results indicate that deer in suburban landscapes exhibit familial structure reported for deer in more rural areas, albeit at a smaller spatial scale, and with substantial overlap among groups. Management at the spatial scales of genetically related groups of deer may be feasible in suburban communities. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jwmg.21417 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2013736169</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26607998</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26607998</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3237-91c10e1cf71c2fff493ee13c4f733745b3e7baa48ea9852975ae19e9d253c1ef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDFPwzAQRi0EEqWwsCNZYkNK8dlJHI-o0AIqYggItshxzyhRmgQ7UdV_T0qAkemGe--700fIObAZMMavy-3mY8YhBHlAJqCEDHgC8pBMhiUPohDej8mJ9yVjAiCJJ-R2UdQYpEZXSNNWd4Wu6BJr7ApD0871pusd0sbSW0RHi5pqmvZ573Jd05Wu197oFk_JkdWVx7OfOSWvi7uX-X2wel4-zG9WgRF8eEWBAYZgrATDrbWhEoggTGilEDKMcoEy1zpMUKsk4kpGGkGhWvNIGEArpuRyzG1d89mj77Ky6V09nMw4AyFFDLEaqKuRMq7x3qHNWldstNtlwLJ9S9m-pey7pQGGEd4WFe7-IbPHt6flr3MxOqXvGvfn8DhmUqlEfAEitXJ7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2013736169</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fine-Scale Spatial Genetic Structure of Deer in a Suburban Landscape</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>CRAWFORD, JOANNE C. ; QUINN, AMY DECHEN ; WILLIAMS, DAVID M. ; RUDOLPH, BRENT A. ; SCRIBNER, KIM T. ; PORTER, WILLIAM F.</creator><creatorcontrib>CRAWFORD, JOANNE C. ; QUINN, AMY DECHEN ; WILLIAMS, DAVID M. ; RUDOLPH, BRENT A. ; SCRIBNER, KIM T. ; PORTER, WILLIAM F.</creatorcontrib><description>Hunting regulations traditionally applied to manage deer populations in rural areas are not well suited to management in heavily populated suburban landscapes. We evaluated the spatial genetic structure of a suburban deer population to assess the feasibility of localized management at the scale of social groups. We used fecal DNA from white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in suburban Michigan to determine whether deer in suburban landscapes maintain the matrilineal social structure that has been observed in studies of rural deer. We amplified 7 microsatellite loci from fecal pellets (n = 591) collected from August to October 2013 on public and private lands throughout Meridian Township, Ingham County, central Michigan, USA. Based on multi-locus genotypes, we identified individuals, quantified the extent of spatial genetic structure at multiple spatial scales, identified the location and spatial extent of aggregations of related females and males, and estimated genetic neighborhood size. We also used landscape genetic analyses to evaluate associations between measures of land cover, edge density, the presence of major roads, and inter-individual genetic distance. Spatial genetic autocorrelation was positive and significant up to a distance of 0.5 km. We did not detect correlations between landscape variables and inter-individual genetic distance. Results indicate that deer in suburban landscapes exhibit familial structure reported for deer in more rural areas, albeit at a smaller spatial scale, and with substantial overlap among groups. Management at the spatial scales of genetically related groups of deer may be feasible in suburban communities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.21417</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda: Wiley</publisher><subject>Animal populations ; Data processing ; Deer ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; Feasibility studies ; Genetic analysis ; Genetic distance ; Genetic structure ; Genotypes ; Hunting ; Land cover ; Landscape ; Loci ; Neighborhoods ; Odocoileus virginianus ; Population Ecology ; Private lands ; relatedness ; Rural areas ; Rural populations ; Social conditions ; social structure ; Spatial analysis ; spatialgenetic structure ; Suburban areas ; urban ; white‐tailed deer ; Wildlife ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 2018-04, Vol.82 (3), p.596-607</ispartof><rights>2018 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>The Wildlife Society, 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3237-91c10e1cf71c2fff493ee13c4f733745b3e7baa48ea9852975ae19e9d253c1ef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3237-91c10e1cf71c2fff493ee13c4f733745b3e7baa48ea9852975ae19e9d253c1ef3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26607998$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26607998$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,804,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580,58022,58255</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>CRAWFORD, JOANNE C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>QUINN, AMY DECHEN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WILLIAMS, DAVID M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RUDOLPH, BRENT A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCRIBNER, KIM T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PORTER, WILLIAM F.</creatorcontrib><title>Fine-Scale Spatial Genetic Structure of Deer in a Suburban Landscape</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><description>Hunting regulations traditionally applied to manage deer populations in rural areas are not well suited to management in heavily populated suburban landscapes. We evaluated the spatial genetic structure of a suburban deer population to assess the feasibility of localized management at the scale of social groups. We used fecal DNA from white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in suburban Michigan to determine whether deer in suburban landscapes maintain the matrilineal social structure that has been observed in studies of rural deer. We amplified 7 microsatellite loci from fecal pellets (n = 591) collected from August to October 2013 on public and private lands throughout Meridian Township, Ingham County, central Michigan, USA. Based on multi-locus genotypes, we identified individuals, quantified the extent of spatial genetic structure at multiple spatial scales, identified the location and spatial extent of aggregations of related females and males, and estimated genetic neighborhood size. We also used landscape genetic analyses to evaluate associations between measures of land cover, edge density, the presence of major roads, and inter-individual genetic distance. Spatial genetic autocorrelation was positive and significant up to a distance of 0.5 km. We did not detect correlations between landscape variables and inter-individual genetic distance. Results indicate that deer in suburban landscapes exhibit familial structure reported for deer in more rural areas, albeit at a smaller spatial scale, and with substantial overlap among groups. Management at the spatial scales of genetically related groups of deer may be feasible in suburban communities.</description><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Deer</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>Feasibility studies</subject><subject>Genetic analysis</subject><subject>Genetic distance</subject><subject>Genetic structure</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Hunting</subject><subject>Land cover</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Loci</subject><subject>Neighborhoods</subject><subject>Odocoileus virginianus</subject><subject>Population Ecology</subject><subject>Private lands</subject><subject>relatedness</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural populations</subject><subject>Social conditions</subject><subject>social structure</subject><subject>Spatial analysis</subject><subject>spatialgenetic structure</subject><subject>Suburban areas</subject><subject>urban</subject><subject>white‐tailed deer</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kDFPwzAQRi0EEqWwsCNZYkNK8dlJHI-o0AIqYggItshxzyhRmgQ7UdV_T0qAkemGe--700fIObAZMMavy-3mY8YhBHlAJqCEDHgC8pBMhiUPohDej8mJ9yVjAiCJJ-R2UdQYpEZXSNNWd4Wu6BJr7ApD0871pusd0sbSW0RHi5pqmvZ573Jd05Wu197oFk_JkdWVx7OfOSWvi7uX-X2wel4-zG9WgRF8eEWBAYZgrATDrbWhEoggTGilEDKMcoEy1zpMUKsk4kpGGkGhWvNIGEArpuRyzG1d89mj77Ky6V09nMw4AyFFDLEaqKuRMq7x3qHNWldstNtlwLJ9S9m-pey7pQGGEd4WFe7-IbPHt6flr3MxOqXvGvfn8DhmUqlEfAEitXJ7</recordid><startdate>20180401</startdate><enddate>20180401</enddate><creator>CRAWFORD, JOANNE C.</creator><creator>QUINN, AMY DECHEN</creator><creator>WILLIAMS, DAVID M.</creator><creator>RUDOLPH, BRENT A.</creator><creator>SCRIBNER, KIM T.</creator><creator>PORTER, WILLIAM F.</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180401</creationdate><title>Fine-Scale Spatial Genetic Structure of Deer in a Suburban Landscape</title><author>CRAWFORD, JOANNE C. ; QUINN, AMY DECHEN ; WILLIAMS, DAVID M. ; RUDOLPH, BRENT A. ; SCRIBNER, KIM T. ; PORTER, WILLIAM F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3237-91c10e1cf71c2fff493ee13c4f733745b3e7baa48ea9852975ae19e9d253c1ef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Deer</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>Feasibility studies</topic><topic>Genetic analysis</topic><topic>Genetic distance</topic><topic>Genetic structure</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Hunting</topic><topic>Land cover</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Loci</topic><topic>Neighborhoods</topic><topic>Odocoileus virginianus</topic><topic>Population Ecology</topic><topic>Private lands</topic><topic>relatedness</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural populations</topic><topic>Social conditions</topic><topic>social structure</topic><topic>Spatial analysis</topic><topic>spatialgenetic structure</topic><topic>Suburban areas</topic><topic>urban</topic><topic>white‐tailed deer</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>CRAWFORD, JOANNE C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>QUINN, AMY DECHEN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WILLIAMS, DAVID M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RUDOLPH, BRENT A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCRIBNER, KIM T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PORTER, WILLIAM F.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>CRAWFORD, JOANNE C.</au><au>QUINN, AMY DECHEN</au><au>WILLIAMS, DAVID M.</au><au>RUDOLPH, BRENT A.</au><au>SCRIBNER, KIM T.</au><au>PORTER, WILLIAM F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fine-Scale Spatial Genetic Structure of Deer in a Suburban Landscape</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><date>2018-04-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>596</spage><epage>607</epage><pages>596-607</pages><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><abstract>Hunting regulations traditionally applied to manage deer populations in rural areas are not well suited to management in heavily populated suburban landscapes. We evaluated the spatial genetic structure of a suburban deer population to assess the feasibility of localized management at the scale of social groups. We used fecal DNA from white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in suburban Michigan to determine whether deer in suburban landscapes maintain the matrilineal social structure that has been observed in studies of rural deer. We amplified 7 microsatellite loci from fecal pellets (n = 591) collected from August to October 2013 on public and private lands throughout Meridian Township, Ingham County, central Michigan, USA. Based on multi-locus genotypes, we identified individuals, quantified the extent of spatial genetic structure at multiple spatial scales, identified the location and spatial extent of aggregations of related females and males, and estimated genetic neighborhood size. We also used landscape genetic analyses to evaluate associations between measures of land cover, edge density, the presence of major roads, and inter-individual genetic distance. Spatial genetic autocorrelation was positive and significant up to a distance of 0.5 km. We did not detect correlations between landscape variables and inter-individual genetic distance. Results indicate that deer in suburban landscapes exhibit familial structure reported for deer in more rural areas, albeit at a smaller spatial scale, and with substantial overlap among groups. Management at the spatial scales of genetically related groups of deer may be feasible in suburban communities.</abstract><cop>Bethesda</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1002/jwmg.21417</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-541X |
ispartof | The Journal of wildlife management, 2018-04, Vol.82 (3), p.596-607 |
issn | 0022-541X 1937-2817 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2013736169 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library; Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Animal populations Data processing Deer Deoxyribonucleic acid DNA Feasibility studies Genetic analysis Genetic distance Genetic structure Genotypes Hunting Land cover Landscape Loci Neighborhoods Odocoileus virginianus Population Ecology Private lands relatedness Rural areas Rural populations Social conditions social structure Spatial analysis spatialgenetic structure Suburban areas urban white‐tailed deer Wildlife Wildlife management |
title | Fine-Scale Spatial Genetic Structure of Deer in a Suburban Landscape |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T09%3A40%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fine-Scale%20Spatial%20Genetic%20Structure%20of%20Deer%20in%20a%20Suburban%20Landscape&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=CRAWFORD,%20JOANNE%20C.&rft.date=2018-04-01&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=596&rft.epage=607&rft.pages=596-607&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jwmg.21417&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26607998%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2013736169&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26607998&rfr_iscdi=true |