Measuring the Impact of Urbanization on Channel Widths Using Historic Aerial Photographs and Modern Surveys1

:  Land use in a watershed is commonly held to exert a strong influence on trunk channel form and process. Land use changes act over human time‐scales, which are short enough to measure effects on channels directly using historic aerial photographs. We show that high‐resolution topographic surveys f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Water Resources Association 2008-08, Vol.44 (4), p.948-960
Hauptverfasser: Galster, Joshua C., Pazzaglia, Frank J., Germanoski, Dru
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 960
container_issue 4
container_start_page 948
container_title Journal of the American Water Resources Association
container_volume 44
creator Galster, Joshua C.
Pazzaglia, Frank J.
Germanoski, Dru
description :  Land use in a watershed is commonly held to exert a strong influence on trunk channel form and process. Land use changes act over human time‐scales, which are short enough to measure effects on channels directly using historic aerial photographs. We show that high‐resolution topographic surveys for the channels of paired watersheds in the Lehigh Valley, Pennsylvania, are comparable, but have channel widths that have changed dramatically in the past five decades. The two watersheds, Little Lehigh Creek and Sacony Creek, are similar in most aspects except in their respective amount of urban land use. Aerial photographs of the urbanized Little Lehigh Creek show that a majority of the measured widths (67 of 85) were statistically wider in 1999 than in 1947. In contrast, the measured widths from the agricultural Sacony Creek are more evenly distributed among those that widened (18), narrowed (28), and those that were statistically unchanged (6) from 1946 to 1999. From 1946 to 1999 the only section of Sacony Creek that widened was that reach downstream of the only sizable urban area in the watershed. The current land use in Sacony Creek watershed resembles that of 1946, while the Little Lehigh Creek watershed has more than tripled its urban area. These data, in concert with other recent hydrologic data from the watersheds suggest that the increase in urban area‐generated peak discharges is the mechanism behind the widening that occurred in the Little Lehigh Creek. These wider channels can affect water quality, aquatic habitat, suspended sediment loads, and river esthetics.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2008.00193.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_201318115</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1550212061</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p813-cd03be61402470908d498bcafdce1a533470d1d3486594945b7dbc67da0af3a93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kFFLwzAQx4soOKffIfjemixpmz74MIa6yYaiG_MtpE26pnRJTVrd_PSmKh4H9-fuf3fwCwKAYIR83NQRSuNJiBJKowmENIIQZTg6nASj_8Gp1zDDIUnJ23lw4VztTTGieBQ0K8ldb5Xega6SYLFvedEBU4KNzblWX7xTRgOfs4prLRuwVaKrHNi4YWWuXGesKsBUWsUb8FyZzuwsb72DawFWRkirwWtvP-TRocvgrOSNk1d_dRys7-_Ws3m4fHpYzKbLsKUIh4WAOJcJInBCUphBKkhG84KXopCIxxj7rkACE5rEGclInKciL5JUcMhLzDM8Dq5_z7bWvPfSdaw2vdX-I5tAhBFFKPam21_Tp2rkkbVW7bk9MgTZgJXVbKDHBnpswMp-sLIDe5xuX7zC32_dbqM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>201318115</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring the Impact of Urbanization on Channel Widths Using Historic Aerial Photographs and Modern Surveys1</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Galster, Joshua C. ; Pazzaglia, Frank J. ; Germanoski, Dru</creator><creatorcontrib>Galster, Joshua C. ; Pazzaglia, Frank J. ; Germanoski, Dru</creatorcontrib><description>:  Land use in a watershed is commonly held to exert a strong influence on trunk channel form and process. Land use changes act over human time‐scales, which are short enough to measure effects on channels directly using historic aerial photographs. We show that high‐resolution topographic surveys for the channels of paired watersheds in the Lehigh Valley, Pennsylvania, are comparable, but have channel widths that have changed dramatically in the past five decades. The two watersheds, Little Lehigh Creek and Sacony Creek, are similar in most aspects except in their respective amount of urban land use. Aerial photographs of the urbanized Little Lehigh Creek show that a majority of the measured widths (67 of 85) were statistically wider in 1999 than in 1947. In contrast, the measured widths from the agricultural Sacony Creek are more evenly distributed among those that widened (18), narrowed (28), and those that were statistically unchanged (6) from 1946 to 1999. From 1946 to 1999 the only section of Sacony Creek that widened was that reach downstream of the only sizable urban area in the watershed. The current land use in Sacony Creek watershed resembles that of 1946, while the Little Lehigh Creek watershed has more than tripled its urban area. These data, in concert with other recent hydrologic data from the watersheds suggest that the increase in urban area‐generated peak discharges is the mechanism behind the widening that occurred in the Little Lehigh Creek. These wider channels can affect water quality, aquatic habitat, suspended sediment loads, and river esthetics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1093-474X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1752-1688</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2008.00193.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Changes ; erosion ; fluvial geomorphology ; fluvial processes ; geographic information system ; Land use ; Population density ; runoff ; Sample size ; Stormwater ; Urban areas ; Urbanization ; watersheds</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2008-08, Vol.44 (4), p.948-960</ispartof><rights>2008 American Water Resources Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Water Resources Association Aug 2008</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1752-1688.2008.00193.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1752-1688.2008.00193.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,27933,27934,45583,45584</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Galster, Joshua C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pazzaglia, Frank J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Germanoski, Dru</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring the Impact of Urbanization on Channel Widths Using Historic Aerial Photographs and Modern Surveys1</title><title>Journal of the American Water Resources Association</title><description>:  Land use in a watershed is commonly held to exert a strong influence on trunk channel form and process. Land use changes act over human time‐scales, which are short enough to measure effects on channels directly using historic aerial photographs. We show that high‐resolution topographic surveys for the channels of paired watersheds in the Lehigh Valley, Pennsylvania, are comparable, but have channel widths that have changed dramatically in the past five decades. The two watersheds, Little Lehigh Creek and Sacony Creek, are similar in most aspects except in their respective amount of urban land use. Aerial photographs of the urbanized Little Lehigh Creek show that a majority of the measured widths (67 of 85) were statistically wider in 1999 than in 1947. In contrast, the measured widths from the agricultural Sacony Creek are more evenly distributed among those that widened (18), narrowed (28), and those that were statistically unchanged (6) from 1946 to 1999. From 1946 to 1999 the only section of Sacony Creek that widened was that reach downstream of the only sizable urban area in the watershed. The current land use in Sacony Creek watershed resembles that of 1946, while the Little Lehigh Creek watershed has more than tripled its urban area. These data, in concert with other recent hydrologic data from the watersheds suggest that the increase in urban area‐generated peak discharges is the mechanism behind the widening that occurred in the Little Lehigh Creek. These wider channels can affect water quality, aquatic habitat, suspended sediment loads, and river esthetics.</description><subject>Changes</subject><subject>erosion</subject><subject>fluvial geomorphology</subject><subject>fluvial processes</subject><subject>geographic information system</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Population density</subject><subject>runoff</subject><subject>Sample size</subject><subject>Stormwater</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Urbanization</subject><subject>watersheds</subject><issn>1093-474X</issn><issn>1752-1688</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kFFLwzAQx4soOKffIfjemixpmz74MIa6yYaiG_MtpE26pnRJTVrd_PSmKh4H9-fuf3fwCwKAYIR83NQRSuNJiBJKowmENIIQZTg6nASj_8Gp1zDDIUnJ23lw4VztTTGieBQ0K8ldb5Xega6SYLFvedEBU4KNzblWX7xTRgOfs4prLRuwVaKrHNi4YWWuXGesKsBUWsUb8FyZzuwsb72DawFWRkirwWtvP-TRocvgrOSNk1d_dRys7-_Ws3m4fHpYzKbLsKUIh4WAOJcJInBCUphBKkhG84KXopCIxxj7rkACE5rEGclInKciL5JUcMhLzDM8Dq5_z7bWvPfSdaw2vdX-I5tAhBFFKPam21_Tp2rkkbVW7bk9MgTZgJXVbKDHBnpswMp-sLIDe5xuX7zC32_dbqM</recordid><startdate>200808</startdate><enddate>200808</enddate><creator>Galster, Joshua C.</creator><creator>Pazzaglia, Frank J.</creator><creator>Germanoski, Dru</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200808</creationdate><title>Measuring the Impact of Urbanization on Channel Widths Using Historic Aerial Photographs and Modern Surveys1</title><author>Galster, Joshua C. ; Pazzaglia, Frank J. ; Germanoski, Dru</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p813-cd03be61402470908d498bcafdce1a533470d1d3486594945b7dbc67da0af3a93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Changes</topic><topic>erosion</topic><topic>fluvial geomorphology</topic><topic>fluvial processes</topic><topic>geographic information system</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Population density</topic><topic>runoff</topic><topic>Sample size</topic><topic>Stormwater</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Urbanization</topic><topic>watersheds</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Galster, Joshua C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pazzaglia, Frank J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Germanoski, Dru</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Water Resources Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Galster, Joshua C.</au><au>Pazzaglia, Frank J.</au><au>Germanoski, Dru</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring the Impact of Urbanization on Channel Widths Using Historic Aerial Photographs and Modern Surveys1</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Water Resources Association</jtitle><date>2008-08</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>948</spage><epage>960</epage><pages>948-960</pages><issn>1093-474X</issn><eissn>1752-1688</eissn><abstract>:  Land use in a watershed is commonly held to exert a strong influence on trunk channel form and process. Land use changes act over human time‐scales, which are short enough to measure effects on channels directly using historic aerial photographs. We show that high‐resolution topographic surveys for the channels of paired watersheds in the Lehigh Valley, Pennsylvania, are comparable, but have channel widths that have changed dramatically in the past five decades. The two watersheds, Little Lehigh Creek and Sacony Creek, are similar in most aspects except in their respective amount of urban land use. Aerial photographs of the urbanized Little Lehigh Creek show that a majority of the measured widths (67 of 85) were statistically wider in 1999 than in 1947. In contrast, the measured widths from the agricultural Sacony Creek are more evenly distributed among those that widened (18), narrowed (28), and those that were statistically unchanged (6) from 1946 to 1999. From 1946 to 1999 the only section of Sacony Creek that widened was that reach downstream of the only sizable urban area in the watershed. The current land use in Sacony Creek watershed resembles that of 1946, while the Little Lehigh Creek watershed has more than tripled its urban area. These data, in concert with other recent hydrologic data from the watersheds suggest that the increase in urban area‐generated peak discharges is the mechanism behind the widening that occurred in the Little Lehigh Creek. These wider channels can affect water quality, aquatic habitat, suspended sediment loads, and river esthetics.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1752-1688.2008.00193.x</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1093-474X
ispartof Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2008-08, Vol.44 (4), p.948-960
issn 1093-474X
1752-1688
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_201318115
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Changes
erosion
fluvial geomorphology
fluvial processes
geographic information system
Land use
Population density
runoff
Sample size
Stormwater
Urban areas
Urbanization
watersheds
title Measuring the Impact of Urbanization on Channel Widths Using Historic Aerial Photographs and Modern Surveys1
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-01T05%3A50%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20the%20Impact%20of%20Urbanization%20on%20Channel%20Widths%20Using%20Historic%20Aerial%20Photographs%20and%20Modern%20Surveys1&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Water%20Resources%20Association&rft.au=Galster,%20Joshua%20C.&rft.date=2008-08&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=948&rft.epage=960&rft.pages=948-960&rft.issn=1093-474X&rft.eissn=1752-1688&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2008.00193.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E1550212061%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=201318115&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true