Predictive factors for the outcome of high flow nasal cannula therapy in a pediatric intensive care unit: Is the SpO2/FiO2ratio useful?
Objectives To determine the predictive factors for the outcome of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Materials and methods We prospectively included all patients with acute respiratory distress/failure aged 1month to 18years who were admitted to the PIC...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of critical care 2018-04, Vol.44, p.436 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 436 |
container_title | Journal of critical care |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Can, Fulya Kamit Ayşe Berna Anil Murat Anil Zengin, Neslihan Durak, Fatih Alparslan, Caner Goc, Zeynep |
description | Objectives To determine the predictive factors for the outcome of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Materials and methods We prospectively included all patients with acute respiratory distress/failure aged 1month to 18years who were admitted to the PICU between January 2015 and May 2016 and treated with HFNC as a primary support and for postextubation according to our pre-established protocol. HFNC failure was defined as the need for escalation to non-invasive ventilation (NIV) or invasive mechanical ventilation (MV). HFNC responders and nonresponders were compared based on clinical data obtained just before HFNC and at 30, 60, and 120min, 12, 24, and 48h, and at the end of therapy. Results A total of 204 patients (median age: 16.5months) participated in the study. Twenty-six (12.7%) patients required escalation (4 to NIV and 22 to MV). Age >120months, higher PRISM-III and respiratory scores, and a lower SpO2/FiO2(S/F) ratio at admission were predictors of HFNC failure. Achievement of the S/F>200 goal at 60min significantly predicted successful HFNC. Conclusion Monitoring the S/F ratio might be useful and practical to avoid delaying escalation to another ventilation support. Failure to achieve S/F>200 at 60min should be a warning for the escalation of respiratory support. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.09.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2012330711</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2012330711</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_20123307113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNj81KxDAUhYMoWH9ewNUF180kzXTaceNCHMbVCLofLjGxKTWpN4niE_jaZsQHcHU4nI8PDmNXUnAp5Gox8lGT5o2QHRdrLoQ6YpVs267uV7I9ZpXoe1Wvl0t5ys5iHEUBlWor9v1I5sXp5D4MWNQpUAQbCNJgIOSkw1tJC4N7HcBO4RM8RpxAo_d5wgNGOH-B84AwFxMmcrrUZHw8ODWSgexduoGH-Gt9mnfNYuN2DWFyAXI0Nk-3F-zE4hTN5V-es-vN_fPdtp4pvGcT034MmXyZ9uVko5TopFT_o34AS3tZtQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2012330711</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predictive factors for the outcome of high flow nasal cannula therapy in a pediatric intensive care unit: Is the SpO2/FiO2ratio useful?</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Can, Fulya Kamit ; Ayşe Berna Anil ; Murat Anil ; Zengin, Neslihan ; Durak, Fatih ; Alparslan, Caner ; Goc, Zeynep</creator><creatorcontrib>Can, Fulya Kamit ; Ayşe Berna Anil ; Murat Anil ; Zengin, Neslihan ; Durak, Fatih ; Alparslan, Caner ; Goc, Zeynep</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives To determine the predictive factors for the outcome of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Materials and methods We prospectively included all patients with acute respiratory distress/failure aged 1month to 18years who were admitted to the PICU between January 2015 and May 2016 and treated with HFNC as a primary support and for postextubation according to our pre-established protocol. HFNC failure was defined as the need for escalation to non-invasive ventilation (NIV) or invasive mechanical ventilation (MV). HFNC responders and nonresponders were compared based on clinical data obtained just before HFNC and at 30, 60, and 120min, 12, 24, and 48h, and at the end of therapy. Results A total of 204 patients (median age: 16.5months) participated in the study. Twenty-six (12.7%) patients required escalation (4 to NIV and 22 to MV). Age >120months, higher PRISM-III and respiratory scores, and a lower SpO2/FiO2(S/F) ratio at admission were predictors of HFNC failure. Achievement of the S/F>200 goal at 60min significantly predicted successful HFNC. Conclusion Monitoring the S/F ratio might be useful and practical to avoid delaying escalation to another ventilation support. Failure to achieve S/F>200 at 60min should be a warning for the escalation of respiratory support.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-9441</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-8615</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.09.003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: Elsevier Limited</publisher><subject>Emergency medical care ; Hospital costs ; Intensive care ; Intubation ; Ostomy ; Oxygen therapy ; Patients ; Pediatrics ; Respiratory therapy ; Ventilators</subject><ispartof>Journal of critical care, 2018-04, Vol.44, p.436</ispartof><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Apr 1, 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2012330711?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,64385,64389,72469</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Can, Fulya Kamit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayşe Berna Anil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murat Anil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zengin, Neslihan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durak, Fatih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alparslan, Caner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goc, Zeynep</creatorcontrib><title>Predictive factors for the outcome of high flow nasal cannula therapy in a pediatric intensive care unit: Is the SpO2/FiO2ratio useful?</title><title>Journal of critical care</title><description>Objectives To determine the predictive factors for the outcome of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Materials and methods We prospectively included all patients with acute respiratory distress/failure aged 1month to 18years who were admitted to the PICU between January 2015 and May 2016 and treated with HFNC as a primary support and for postextubation according to our pre-established protocol. HFNC failure was defined as the need for escalation to non-invasive ventilation (NIV) or invasive mechanical ventilation (MV). HFNC responders and nonresponders were compared based on clinical data obtained just before HFNC and at 30, 60, and 120min, 12, 24, and 48h, and at the end of therapy. Results A total of 204 patients (median age: 16.5months) participated in the study. Twenty-six (12.7%) patients required escalation (4 to NIV and 22 to MV). Age >120months, higher PRISM-III and respiratory scores, and a lower SpO2/FiO2(S/F) ratio at admission were predictors of HFNC failure. Achievement of the S/F>200 goal at 60min significantly predicted successful HFNC. Conclusion Monitoring the S/F ratio might be useful and practical to avoid delaying escalation to another ventilation support. Failure to achieve S/F>200 at 60min should be a warning for the escalation of respiratory support.</description><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Hospital costs</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Intubation</subject><subject>Ostomy</subject><subject>Oxygen therapy</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Respiratory therapy</subject><subject>Ventilators</subject><issn>0883-9441</issn><issn>1557-8615</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNj81KxDAUhYMoWH9ewNUF180kzXTaceNCHMbVCLofLjGxKTWpN4niE_jaZsQHcHU4nI8PDmNXUnAp5Gox8lGT5o2QHRdrLoQ6YpVs267uV7I9ZpXoe1Wvl0t5ys5iHEUBlWor9v1I5sXp5D4MWNQpUAQbCNJgIOSkw1tJC4N7HcBO4RM8RpxAo_d5wgNGOH-B84AwFxMmcrrUZHw8ODWSgexduoGH-Gt9mnfNYuN2DWFyAXI0Nk-3F-zE4hTN5V-es-vN_fPdtp4pvGcT034MmXyZ9uVko5TopFT_o34AS3tZtQ</recordid><startdate>20180401</startdate><enddate>20180401</enddate><creator>Can, Fulya Kamit</creator><creator>Ayşe Berna Anil</creator><creator>Murat Anil</creator><creator>Zengin, Neslihan</creator><creator>Durak, Fatih</creator><creator>Alparslan, Caner</creator><creator>Goc, Zeynep</creator><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180401</creationdate><title>Predictive factors for the outcome of high flow nasal cannula therapy in a pediatric intensive care unit: Is the SpO2/FiO2ratio useful?</title><author>Can, Fulya Kamit ; Ayşe Berna Anil ; Murat Anil ; Zengin, Neslihan ; Durak, Fatih ; Alparslan, Caner ; Goc, Zeynep</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20123307113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Hospital costs</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Intubation</topic><topic>Ostomy</topic><topic>Oxygen therapy</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Respiratory therapy</topic><topic>Ventilators</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Can, Fulya Kamit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayşe Berna Anil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murat Anil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zengin, Neslihan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durak, Fatih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alparslan, Caner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goc, Zeynep</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of critical care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Can, Fulya Kamit</au><au>Ayşe Berna Anil</au><au>Murat Anil</au><au>Zengin, Neslihan</au><au>Durak, Fatih</au><au>Alparslan, Caner</au><au>Goc, Zeynep</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predictive factors for the outcome of high flow nasal cannula therapy in a pediatric intensive care unit: Is the SpO2/FiO2ratio useful?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of critical care</jtitle><date>2018-04-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>44</volume><spage>436</spage><pages>436-</pages><issn>0883-9441</issn><eissn>1557-8615</eissn><abstract>Objectives To determine the predictive factors for the outcome of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Materials and methods We prospectively included all patients with acute respiratory distress/failure aged 1month to 18years who were admitted to the PICU between January 2015 and May 2016 and treated with HFNC as a primary support and for postextubation according to our pre-established protocol. HFNC failure was defined as the need for escalation to non-invasive ventilation (NIV) or invasive mechanical ventilation (MV). HFNC responders and nonresponders were compared based on clinical data obtained just before HFNC and at 30, 60, and 120min, 12, 24, and 48h, and at the end of therapy. Results A total of 204 patients (median age: 16.5months) participated in the study. Twenty-six (12.7%) patients required escalation (4 to NIV and 22 to MV). Age >120months, higher PRISM-III and respiratory scores, and a lower SpO2/FiO2(S/F) ratio at admission were predictors of HFNC failure. Achievement of the S/F>200 goal at 60min significantly predicted successful HFNC. Conclusion Monitoring the S/F ratio might be useful and practical to avoid delaying escalation to another ventilation support. Failure to achieve S/F>200 at 60min should be a warning for the escalation of respiratory support.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>Elsevier Limited</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.09.003</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0883-9441 |
ispartof | Journal of critical care, 2018-04, Vol.44, p.436 |
issn | 0883-9441 1557-8615 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2012330711 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Emergency medical care Hospital costs Intensive care Intubation Ostomy Oxygen therapy Patients Pediatrics Respiratory therapy Ventilators |
title | Predictive factors for the outcome of high flow nasal cannula therapy in a pediatric intensive care unit: Is the SpO2/FiO2ratio useful? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T04%3A11%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predictive%20factors%20for%20the%20outcome%20of%20high%20flow%20nasal%20cannula%20therapy%20in%20a%20pediatric%20intensive%20care%20unit:%20Is%20the%20SpO2/FiO2ratio%20useful?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20critical%20care&rft.au=Can,%20Fulya%20Kamit&rft.date=2018-04-01&rft.volume=44&rft.spage=436&rft.pages=436-&rft.issn=0883-9441&rft.eissn=1557-8615&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.09.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2012330711%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2012330711&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |